- May 20, 2009
- 144,338
- 66,698
- 2,330
why are Liberals so retarded?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We already have have the ADA, which is more problematic than it's worth.
Fuck the UN.
This treaty would have had NO EFFECT ON WHAT WE ALREADY DO.
Like I said, the UN treaty was modeled on what we've already done with the ADA. Basically, what that means is disabled people who have gotten used to the way we already do things here, would also see those same things in other places like Europe.
We would have to do nothing, because we already do it.
But..................go ahead...................support the GOP's hatred of the disabled.
Wow....Nice rationalization for being a pushy, self-righteous, internationalist, do-gooder busybody.It would mean that those disabled people who travel overseas to Europe could expect the same kind of treatment and access that they already enjoy here in the US.
Besides......................what's wrong with exporting a US law to other countries? Isn't that one of the better ways to spread democracy?
So you're a neocon. Excellent.
Actually, I think that democracy can be better spread through diplomacy rather than at the point of a gun.
I came to have those views after my second cruise in the U.S. Navy, and have kept them ever since, because everytime we walked off the ship, we were told that each and every one of us were ambassadors for the United States.
And you know...................80 percent of the people overseas speak English, but if you holler loud and slow at them, they will say they don't. Know what works better? Getting a decent phrase book and approaching them in their native language, because after a couple of minutes of sputtering around, they'll say they speak English.
Most of 'em were just looking to see if you were willing to make the effort, or if you were just another Ugly American.
And yeah.................exporting this law overseas would be good not only for those over in other countries, but also would be good for Americans who are visiting those countries.
But, it's always interesting to see what depths the GOP will sink in their pursuit of partisan hackery.
Wow....Nice rationalization for being a pushy, self-righteous, internationalist, do-gooder busybody.So you're a neocon. Excellent.
Actually, I think that democracy can be better spread through diplomacy rather than at the point of a gun.
I came to have those views after my second cruise in the U.S. Navy, and have kept them ever since, because everytime we walked off the ship, we were told that each and every one of us were ambassadors for the United States.
And you know...................80 percent of the people overseas speak English, but if you holler loud and slow at them, they will say they don't. Know what works better? Getting a decent phrase book and approaching them in their native language, because after a couple of minutes of sputtering around, they'll say they speak English.
Most of 'em were just looking to see if you were willing to make the effort, or if you were just another Ugly American.
And yeah.................exporting this law overseas would be good not only for those over in other countries, but also would be good for Americans who are visiting those countries.
But, it's always interesting to see what depths the GOP will sink in their pursuit of partisan hackery.
You sure you didn't support Chimpy Bush?
We already have out law.. what the FUCK do we need the UN 'observing' or anything else ABOVE out law, encroaching on our sovereignty???
So fucking what?Wow....Nice rationalization for being a pushy, self-righteous, internationalist, do-gooder busybody.Actually, I think that democracy can be better spread through diplomacy rather than at the point of a gun.
I came to have those views after my second cruise in the U.S. Navy, and have kept them ever since, because everytime we walked off the ship, we were told that each and every one of us were ambassadors for the United States.
And you know...................80 percent of the people overseas speak English, but if you holler loud and slow at them, they will say they don't. Know what works better? Getting a decent phrase book and approaching them in their native language, because after a couple of minutes of sputtering around, they'll say they speak English.
Most of 'em were just looking to see if you were willing to make the effort, or if you were just another Ugly American.
And yeah.................exporting this law overseas would be good not only for those over in other countries, but also would be good for Americans who are visiting those countries.
But, it's always interesting to see what depths the GOP will sink in their pursuit of partisan hackery.
You sure you didn't support Chimpy Bush?
Voted for him on his first term, voted against him his second.
But, like I said, it's interesting that this was a bipartisan bill, signed into law by a Republican president (Bush Sr.), yet it was voted down by the GOP when it came to sending this law to other countries who want it.
Bob Dole must be so proud.
We already have out law.. what the FUCK do we need the UN 'observing' or anything else ABOVE out law, encroaching on our sovereignty???
There is no "enroaching on our sovereignty" Dippy Dave.
And no...........the black helicopters aren't goingXXXXXXXX.
We already have out law.. what the FUCK do we need the UN 'observing' or anything else ABOVE out law, encroaching on our sovereignty???
There is no "enroaching on our sovereignty" Dippy Dave.
And no...........the black helicopters aren't going XXXXXXX.
When they have powers of observance, input, or anything else (and they will, else why would this be done at all?) is encroaching on our sovereignty...
We have our laws.. we have no need for the UN on this.. much like we have no need for the UN for much of anything at all
Oh.. and leave any reference to any of my kids out of this, you motherfucker
So fucking what?Wow....Nice rationalization for being a pushy, self-righteous, internationalist, do-gooder busybody.
You sure you didn't support Chimpy Bush?
Voted for him on his first term, voted against him his second.
But, like I said, it's interesting that this was a bipartisan bill, signed into law by a Republican president (Bush Sr.), yet it was voted down by the GOP when it came to sending this law to other countries who want it.
Bob Dole must be so proud.
Since when is it America's role to impose shit on the rest of the world, with or without the goddamn UN?
Oh yeah...It's not.
There is no "enroaching on our sovereignty" Dippy Dave.
And no...........the black helicopters aren't goingXXXXXX.
When they have powers of observance, input, or anything else (and they will, else why would this be done at all?) is encroaching on our sovereignty...
We have our laws.. we have no need for the UN on this.. much like we have no need for the UN for much of anything at all
Oh.. and leave any reference to any of my kids out of this, you motherfucker
Didn't know you had kids that were disabled. However, the reason that I put that little remark in there is because that was one of the main scare points that the GOP used to not vote for this bill.
But...................keep being a self centered fucktard, it suits you well asshat.
When they have powers of observance, input, or anything else (and they will, else why would this be done at all?) is encroaching on our sovereignty...
We have our laws.. we have no need for the UN on this.. much like we have no need for the UN for much of anything at all
Oh.. and leave any reference to any of my kids out of this, you motherfucker
Didn't know you had kids that were disabled. However, the reason that I put that little remark in there is because that was one of the main scare points that the GOP used to not vote for this bill.
But...................keep being a self centered fucktard, it suits you well asshat.
I have kids.. and what ailment afflicts one is none of your fucking business... as stated, you keep any comments about my kids out of here... you can call me anything you want.. you never get to refer to my kids without my permission
That is not any point I am making.. it is that there is no need for this with our laws in place.. and the UN should NEVER be put in any place to have any power of observance over our country or anything else.. this is BAD precedent
The fuckwits who voted this down were told yo in order to continue to get PAC monies.
If I travel overseas I may or may not be allowed on public transportation or into public restrooms with my powerchair.
With the treaty Elizabeth Dole would be guaranteed a handicapped accessible room for Bob Dole at overseas hotels. But politibucks are WAY more important.
Jackasses.
Regards from Rosie
YAY! A third topic about the same thing.
Answer me this ABikerSailor, what would signing this treaty have meant for disabled people in america? The answer, NOTHING! We already have a better law in place in the US, so I fail to see how signing a treaty from that defunct organization the UN could have possibly bettered the lives of disabled people in america.
But maybe you can explain why disabled people in america needed this law?
because its not for us, and more so the rest of the world. The UN decided to copy our law because it seems to be the best standard around.
But fuck those people right?
YAY! A third topic about the same thing.
Answer me this ABikerSailor, what would signing this treaty have meant for disabled people in america? The answer, NOTHING! We already have a better law in place in the US, so I fail to see how signing a treaty from that defunct organization the UN could have possibly bettered the lives of disabled people in america.
But maybe you can explain why disabled people in america needed this law?
because its not for us, and more so the rest of the world. The UN decided to copy our law because it seems to be the best standard around.
But fuck those people right?
It benefits AMERICANS while in other countries, especially disabled vets.
That's the real reason the pubs voted it down. Anything to get at the vets whose lobby is getting stronger and louder.
because its not for us, and more so the rest of the world. The UN decided to copy our law because it seems to be the best standard around.
But fuck those people right?
It benefits AMERICANS while in other countries, especially disabled vets.
That's the real reason the pubs voted it down. Anything to get at the vets whose lobby is getting stronger and louder.
I'm a disabled vet, please show me in the treaty where it would benefit me, you idiots are just trying to throw labels around without know anything your talking about. I've actually read the damn thing and I am glad they didn't ratify it. So point out in the actual treaty what would benefit this country. I can easily point out many parts that wouldn't.