Why does it matter if Homosexuality is a choice or not?

[Maryland Patriot]

Im sorry for making fun of the animal thing, but I really dont see it as something thats going to happen.
I do however see polygamy coming back, but again, being married, I tend to feel more sorrow than disgust at those that would have more than one wife. There is only so much bitching about the garbage that one man can take.
I also see health care costs going up for those with more than one wife, depression, exhaustion (if lucky) suicide etc.. maybe even obesity when all the wives start trying to outdo each other in the kitchen. And then there are the trips to the ER when he leaves the toilet seat up in a house full of menstruating women.

 

[MathewSmith]

All persons of good will should oppose any proposal to give legitimacy to adoption of children by homosexual couples. Not only does it give legitimacy to an unnatural relationship, which is the true end of the activists promoting such laws, but it places children at risk for the sake of a radical and destructive agenda.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

All persons of good will should oppose any proposal to give legitimacy to adoption of children by homosexual couples. Not only does it give legitimacy to an unnatural relationship, which is the true end of the activists promoting such laws, but it places children at risk for the sake of a radical and destructive agenda.

Im old enough to remember those same things being said about the children of interracial marriages. never happened. The only noticeable outcome from interracial children is that some of the most beautiful women have come from those marriages. White features, darker skin tone, just pure perfection.

 

[jknowgood]

All persons of good will should oppose any proposal to give legitimacy to adoption of children by homosexual couples. Not only does it give legitimacy to an unnatural relationship, which is the true end of the activists promoting such laws, but it places children at risk for the sake of a radical and destructive agenda.

Maybe they cou

Right marriage has been redefined to mean anything. If blood relatives want to marry, sure. Oh, he is in love with his dog. Get married. Marriage once stood for something, now it's a joke. Oh by the way my marriage produced a son with out help from a 3rd person. Can yours?

Marriage still stands for the same thing
two people that love each other, want to be there for each other to share their lives, hopefully make each other happy, and yes, have a legal bond that expresses all of this to the world. God forbid they might even want to adopt an Asian child and call themselves a family, might even get a dog, but I doubt they will include the dog on their marriage license.
as far as marrying animals? pretty sure thats not in the picture, and to be honest, its this type of hyperbole from both sides on many different issues that will cause people to discount what people have to say about the ills of gay marriage.
Interesting fact, Im married, I was married before gay marriage became legal any where, I was married before the first gays got married, Im still married now even though gays are getting married. You know its really hard to believe but, my marriage has not changed one bit since gays started getting married, Ive lost no rights and nothing in my world has changed other than seeing happy couples that just a few years back had to hide their relationship. I expect I will continue living regardless of gay marriage.

On the other side of the coin, I do think that a Christian business owner (such as the baker) should have the right not to be included in gay weddings if it is really against their religion and morals. Let the public decide if they want to frequent these places of business. Sooner or later it will all work out. Can you even imagine any business turning down a mixed race couple for marriage accommodations today? hard to believe it happened in the 60s and to some extent the 70s.

bottom line, Just accept that it now is, and will be forever. Might just ease a lot of pain to go ahead and celebrate their marriages instead of letting it eat away at your ass.

Just wait the world is getting sick. There will be a push for marrying animals and liberals will cave on it. If it will get them votes.

Get a grip.

I'm not the one that will cave, you get a grip. I say five years from now, someone will marry an animal and your kind will be calling us animalphobes.

Is the sky falling where you are?

Yeah those two would be great parents parading around like that.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

All persons of good will should oppose any proposal to give legitimacy to adoption of children by homosexual couples. Not only does it give legitimacy to an unnatural relationship, which is the true end of the activists promoting such laws, but it places children at risk for the sake of a radical and destructive agenda.

Maybe they cou

Marriage still stands for the same thing
two people that love each other, want to be there for each other to share their lives, hopefully make each other happy, and yes, have a legal bond that expresses all of this to the world. God forbid they might even want to adopt an Asian child and call themselves a family, might even get a dog, but I doubt they will include the dog on their marriage license.
as far as marrying animals? pretty sure thats not in the picture, and to be honest, its this type of hyperbole from both sides on many different issues that will cause people to discount what people have to say about the ills of gay marriage.
Interesting fact, Im married, I was married before gay marriage became legal any where, I was married before the first gays got married, Im still married now even though gays are getting married. You know its really hard to believe but, my marriage has not changed one bit since gays started getting married, Ive lost no rights and nothing in my world has changed other than seeing happy couples that just a few years back had to hide their relationship. I expect I will continue living regardless of gay marriage.

On the other side of the coin, I do think that a Christian business owner (such as the baker) should have the right not to be included in gay weddings if it is really against their religion and morals. Let the public decide if they want to frequent these places of business. Sooner or later it will all work out. Can you even imagine any business turning down a mixed race couple for marriage accommodations today? hard to believe it happened in the 60s and to some extent the 70s.

bottom line, Just accept that it now is, and will be forever. Might just ease a lot of pain to go ahead and celebrate their marriages instead of letting it eat away at your ass.

Just wait the world is getting sick. There will be a push for marrying animals and liberals will cave on it. If it will get them votes.

Get a grip.

I'm not the one that will cave, you get a grip. I say five years from now, someone will marry an animal and your kind will be calling us animalphobes.

Is the sky falling where you are?

Yeah those two would be great parents parading around like that. View attachment 46069

are you saying that you cant find a picture of a male and female doing something wrong or offensive, Im sure I can dig up some crack whore pictures.
You get a picture of two guys at what appears to be a gay pride event and pretend they dress like that all the time, but you overlook the crack whore that is smoked up all the time and forgets she even has kids.
Now who would make the better parent.

( of course, I would have to be pretty smoked up to go out in public like the two guys you showed so you never know.)

 

[kaz]

Well anyway marriage means nothing now, so your kind has done it's job.

"Your kind"? What "kind" would that be, fellow Americans? Because I'm now legally married in all 50 states, your marriage means nothing? That wasn't much of a marriage.

Marriage means a great deal to most people still.

Right marriage has been redefined to mean anything.

Nope, not redefined at all. Marriage still means the same exact thing, it just means it to gay couples too.

If blood relatives want to marry, sure.

Blood relatives could already marry in some states. 1st cousins can marry. That was way before June 26th.

Oh, he is in love with his dog. Get married.

When was that ruling Captain Hyperbole?

Marriage once stood for something, now it's a joke.

Marriage still does. Don't blame gays because you have a bad marriage. My marriage to my partner of 20 years means a great deal to us. It's not affected by your failed marriage at all.

Oh by the way my marriage produced a son with out help from a 3rd person. Can yours?

Nope, but neither can millions of straight Americans that use assisted reproductive technology. I still have two gorgeous children that are legally and, more importantly, emotionally, the children of my wife and I. (I also had three babies for a gay male couple as a gestational surrogate) Can you do that?

Well congratulations you sacrificing three of your siblings for a social experiment. You know the liberal experiment with welfare turned out so well. Also abortion hasn't been a positive influence on society. In 1973 abortion wouldn't of become legal if it was known what liberals are doing today with unborn babies. So far liberal experiments has been a failure. So congratulations!

What are you talking about? My siblings? I have one brother...he's childless.

Are you talking about the surrogate children? They aren't my siblings or my children's siblings. Look up gestational surrogate.

Sorry captain non sequitur but you'll have to start a thread on welfare and women's reproductive choices if you want to get trounced on those issues as well.

You always know quickly the ones who know they aren't doing well, they are the ones who realize they need to state how well they are doing as even they realize the discussion isn't supporting that

 

[Maryland Patriot]

"Your kind"? What "kind" would that be, fellow Americans? Because I'm now legally married in all 50 states, your marriage means nothing? That wasn't much of a marriage.

Marriage means a great deal to most people still.

Right marriage has been redefined to mean anything.

Nope, not redefined at all. Marriage still means the same exact thing, it just means it to gay couples too.

If blood relatives want to marry, sure.

Blood relatives could already marry in some states. 1st cousins can marry. That was way before June 26th.

Oh, he is in love with his dog. Get married.

When was that ruling Captain Hyperbole?

Marriage once stood for something, now it's a joke.

Marriage still does. Don't blame gays because you have a bad marriage. My marriage to my partner of 20 years means a great deal to us. It's not affected by your failed marriage at all.

Oh by the way my marriage produced a son with out help from a 3rd person. Can yours?

Nope, but neither can millions of straight Americans that use assisted reproductive technology. I still have two gorgeous children that are legally and, more importantly, emotionally, the children of my wife and I. (I also had three babies for a gay male couple as a gestational surrogate) Can you do that?

Well congratulations you sacrificing three of your siblings for a social experiment. You know the liberal experiment with welfare turned out so well. Also abortion hasn't been a positive influence on society. In 1973 abortion wouldn't of become legal if it was known what liberals are doing today with unborn babies. So far liberal experiments has been a failure. So congratulations!

What are you talking about? My siblings? I have one brother...he's childless.

Are you talking about the surrogate children? They aren't my siblings or my children's siblings. Look up gestational surrogate.

Sorry captain non sequitur but you'll have to start a thread on welfare and women's reproductive choices if you want to get trounced on those issues as well.

You always know quickly the ones who know they aren't doing well, they are the ones who realize they need to state how well they are doing as even they realize the discussion isn't supporting that

who said they were doing well?

 

[mdk]

 

[kaz]

Right marriage has been redefined to mean anything.

Nope, not redefined at all. Marriage still means the same exact thing, it just means it to gay couples too.

If blood relatives want to marry, sure.

Blood relatives could already marry in some states. 1st cousins can marry. That was way before June 26th.

Oh, he is in love with his dog. Get married.

When was that ruling Captain Hyperbole?

Marriage once stood for something, now it's a joke.

Marriage still does. Don't blame gays because you have a bad marriage. My marriage to my partner of 20 years means a great deal to us. It's not affected by your failed marriage at all.

Oh by the way my marriage produced a son with out help from a 3rd person. Can yours?

Nope, but neither can millions of straight Americans that use assisted reproductive technology. I still have two gorgeous children that are legally and, more importantly, emotionally, the children of my wife and I. (I also had three babies for a gay male couple as a gestational surrogate) Can you do that?

Well congratulations you sacrificing three of your siblings for a social experiment. You know the liberal experiment with welfare turned out so well. Also abortion hasn't been a positive influence on society. In 1973 abortion wouldn't of become legal if it was known what liberals are doing today with unborn babies. So far liberal experiments has been a failure. So congratulations!

What are you talking about? My siblings? I have one brother...he's childless.

Are you talking about the surrogate children? They aren't my siblings or my children's siblings. Look up gestational surrogate.

Sorry captain non sequitur but you'll have to start a thread on welfare and women's reproductive choices if you want to get trounced on those issues as well.

You always know quickly the ones who know they aren't doing well, they are the ones who realize they need to state how well they are doing as even they realize the discussion isn't supporting that

who said they were doing well?

They did. Try reading my post again, I answered that

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Nope, not redefined at all. Marriage still means the same exact thing, it just means it to gay couples too. Blood relatives could already marry in some states. 1st cousins can marry. That was way before June 26th. When was that ruling Captain Hyperbole?
Marriage still does. Don't blame gays because you have a bad marriage. My marriage to my partner of 20 years means a great deal to us. It's not affected by your failed marriage at all.
Nope, but neither can millions of straight Americans that use assisted reproductive technology. I still have two gorgeous children that are legally and, more importantly, emotionally, the children of my wife and I. (I also had three babies for a gay male couple as a gestational surrogate) Can you do that?

Well congratulations you sacrificing three of your siblings for a social experiment. You know the liberal experiment with welfare turned out so well. Also abortion hasn't been a positive influence on society. In 1973 abortion wouldn't of become legal if it was known what liberals are doing today with unborn babies. So far liberal experiments has been a failure. So congratulations!

What are you talking about? My siblings? I have one brother...he's childless.

Are you talking about the surrogate children? They aren't my siblings or my children's siblings. Look up gestational surrogate.

Sorry captain non sequitur but you'll have to start a thread on welfare and women's reproductive choices if you want to get trounced on those issues as well.

You always know quickly the ones who know they aren't doing well, they are the ones who realize they need to state how well they are doing as even they realize the discussion isn't supporting that

who said they were doing well?

They did. Try reading my post again, I answered that

maybe you quoted the wrong post? nobody said they were doing well, they just explained that the children were not her siblings.

 

[Seawytch]

"Your kind"? What "kind" would that be, fellow Americans? Because I'm now legally married in all 50 states, your marriage means nothing? That wasn't much of a marriage.

Marriage means a great deal to most people still.

Right marriage has been redefined to mean anything.

Nope, not redefined at all. Marriage still means the same exact thing, it just means it to gay couples too.

If blood relatives want to marry, sure.

Blood relatives could already marry in some states. 1st cousins can marry. That was way before June 26th.

Oh, he is in love with his dog. Get married.

When was that ruling Captain Hyperbole?

Marriage once stood for something, now it's a joke.

Marriage still does. Don't blame gays because you have a bad marriage. My marriage to my partner of 20 years means a great deal to us. It's not affected by your failed marriage at all.

Oh by the way my marriage produced a son with out help from a 3rd person. Can yours?

Nope, but neither can millions of straight Americans that use assisted reproductive technology. I still have two gorgeous children that are legally and, more importantly, emotionally, the children of my wife and I. (I also had three babies for a gay male couple as a gestational surrogate) Can you do that?

Well congratulations you sacrificing three of your siblings for a social experiment. You know the liberal experiment with welfare turned out so well. Also abortion hasn't been a positive influence on society. In 1973 abortion wouldn't of become legal if it was known what liberals are doing today with unborn babies. So far liberal experiments has been a failure. So congratulations!

What are you talking about? My siblings? I have one brother...he's childless.

Are you talking about the surrogate children? They aren't my siblings or my children's siblings. Look up gestational surrogate.

Sorry captain non sequitur but you'll have to start a thread on welfare and women's reproductive choices if you want to get trounced on those issues as well.

Off topic but Im curious.
do you have contact with the children and do they know who you are to them, or did you all think it would be better if the children were not aware that you were the actual mother.
Im curious because I have some lesbian friends that at one time were hinting that I help them with having a child. The conversation passed so I never brought it up again. I thought it could end up being the end of our friendship.

I'm not the "actual mother" to start with. It wasn't my egg, they used donor eggs. And, yes, I do know the family and the kids all know I carried them. My kids call them "womb mates".

We live 3000 miles away so we don't see each other often but we're all aware of each other.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Right marriage has been redefined to mean anything.

Nope, not redefined at all. Marriage still means the same exact thing, it just means it to gay couples too.

If blood relatives want to marry, sure.

Blood relatives could already marry in some states. 1st cousins can marry. That was way before June 26th.

Oh, he is in love with his dog. Get married.

When was that ruling Captain Hyperbole?

Marriage once stood for something, now it's a joke.

Marriage still does. Don't blame gays because you have a bad marriage. My marriage to my partner of 20 years means a great deal to us. It's not affected by your failed marriage at all.

Oh by the way my marriage produced a son with out help from a 3rd person. Can yours?

Nope, but neither can millions of straight Americans that use assisted reproductive technology. I still have two gorgeous children that are legally and, more importantly, emotionally, the children of my wife and I. (I also had three babies for a gay male couple as a gestational surrogate) Can you do that?

Well congratulations you sacrificing three of your siblings for a social experiment. You know the liberal experiment with welfare turned out so well. Also abortion hasn't been a positive influence on society. In 1973 abortion wouldn't of become legal if it was known what liberals are doing today with unborn babies. So far liberal experiments has been a failure. So congratulations!

What are you talking about? My siblings? I have one brother...he's childless.

Are you talking about the surrogate children? They aren't my siblings or my children's siblings. Look up gestational surrogate.

Sorry captain non sequitur but you'll have to start a thread on welfare and women's reproductive choices if you want to get trounced on those issues as well.

Off topic but Im curious.
do you have contact with the children and do they know who you are to them, or did you all think it would be better if the children were not aware that you were the actual mother.
Im curious because I have some lesbian friends that at one time were hinting that I help them with having a child. The conversation passed so I never brought it up again. I thought it could end up being the end of our friendship.

I'm not the "actual mother" to start with. It wasn't my egg, they used donor eggs. And, yes, I do know the family and the kids all know I carried them. My kids call them "womb mates".

We live 3000 miles away so we don't see each other often but we're all aware of each other.

Didnt mean to pry, I was just curious.

 

[Seawytch]

All persons of good will should oppose any proposal to give legitimacy to adoption of children by homosexual couples. Not only does it give legitimacy to an unnatural relationship, which is the true end of the activists promoting such laws, but it places children at risk for the sake of a radical and destructive agenda.

Maybe they cou

Marriage still stands for the same thing
two people that love each other, want to be there for each other to share their lives, hopefully make each other happy, and yes, have a legal bond that expresses all of this to the world. God forbid they might even want to adopt an Asian child and call themselves a family, might even get a dog, but I doubt they will include the dog on their marriage license.
as far as marrying animals? pretty sure thats not in the picture, and to be honest, its this type of hyperbole from both sides on many different issues that will cause people to discount what people have to say about the ills of gay marriage.
Interesting fact, Im married, I was married before gay marriage became legal any where, I was married before the first gays got married, Im still married now even though gays are getting married. You know its really hard to believe but, my marriage has not changed one bit since gays started getting married, Ive lost no rights and nothing in my world has changed other than seeing happy couples that just a few years back had to hide their relationship. I expect I will continue living regardless of gay marriage.

On the other side of the coin, I do think that a Christian business owner (such as the baker) should have the right not to be included in gay weddings if it is really against their religion and morals. Let the public decide if they want to frequent these places of business. Sooner or later it will all work out. Can you even imagine any business turning down a mixed race couple for marriage accommodations today? hard to believe it happened in the 60s and to some extent the 70s.

bottom line, Just accept that it now is, and will be forever. Might just ease a lot of pain to go ahead and celebrate their marriages instead of letting it eat away at your ass.

Just wait the world is getting sick. There will be a push for marrying animals and liberals will cave on it. If it will get them votes.

Get a grip.

I'm not the one that will cave, you get a grip. I say five years from now, someone will marry an animal and your kind will be calling us animalphobes.

Is the sky falling where you are?

Yeah those two would be great parents parading around like that. View attachment 46069

How many parents run around naked at Mardi Gras? A lot I'll bet.

Here's actual parents at pride

 

[Seawytch]

Nope, not redefined at all. Marriage still means the same exact thing, it just means it to gay couples too. Blood relatives could already marry in some states. 1st cousins can marry. That was way before June 26th. When was that ruling Captain Hyperbole?
Marriage still does. Don't blame gays because you have a bad marriage. My marriage to my partner of 20 years means a great deal to us. It's not affected by your failed marriage at all.
Nope, but neither can millions of straight Americans that use assisted reproductive technology. I still have two gorgeous children that are legally and, more importantly, emotionally, the children of my wife and I. (I also had three babies for a gay male couple as a gestational surrogate) Can you do that?

Well congratulations you sacrificing three of your siblings for a social experiment. You know the liberal experiment with welfare turned out so well. Also abortion hasn't been a positive influence on society. In 1973 abortion wouldn't of become legal if it was known what liberals are doing today with unborn babies. So far liberal experiments has been a failure. So congratulations!

What are you talking about? My siblings? I have one brother...he's childless.

Are you talking about the surrogate children? They aren't my siblings or my children's siblings. Look up gestational surrogate.

Sorry captain non sequitur but you'll have to start a thread on welfare and women's reproductive choices if you want to get trounced on those issues as well.

Off topic but Im curious.
do you have contact with the children and do they know who you are to them, or did you all think it would be better if the children were not aware that you were the actual mother.
Im curious because I have some lesbian friends that at one time were hinting that I help them with having a child. The conversation passed so I never brought it up again. I thought it could end up being the end of our friendship.

I'm not the "actual mother" to start with. It wasn't my egg, they used donor eggs. And, yes, I do know the family and the kids all know I carried them. My kids call them "womb mates".

We live 3000 miles away so we don't see each other often but we're all aware of each other.

Didnt mean to pry, I was just curious.

No problem. I'm quite proud of being a surrogate and have no problem talking about it.

 

[kaz]

maybe you quoted the wrong post? nobody said they were doing well, they just explained that the children were not her siblings.

Here you go, maybe you are the one who got confused on the discussion because she certainly did

Sorry captain non sequitur but you'll have to start a thread on welfare and women's reproductive choices if you want to get trounced on those issues as well.

 

[Flopper]

Well anyway marriage means nothing now, so your kind has done it's job.

"Your kind"? What "kind" would that be, fellow Americans? Because I'm now legally married in all 50 states, your marriage means nothing? That wasn't much of a marriage.

Marriage means a great deal to most people still.

Right marriage has been redefined to mean anything. If blood relatives want to marry, sure. Oh, he is in love with his dog. Get married. Marriage once stood for something, now it's a joke. Oh by the way my marriage produced a son with out help from a 3rd person. Can yours?

Marriage still stands for the same thing
two people that love each other, want to be there for each other to share their lives, hopefully make each other happy, and yes, have a legal bond that expresses all of this to the world. God forbid they might even want to adopt an Asian child and call themselves a family, might even get a dog, but I doubt they will include the dog on their marriage license.
as far as marrying animals? pretty sure thats not in the picture, and to be honest, its this type of hyperbole from both sides on many different issues that will cause people to discount what people have to say about the ills of gay marriage.
Interesting fact, Im married, I was married before gay marriage became legal any where, I was married before the first gays got married, Im still married now even though gays are getting married. You know its really hard to believe but, my marriage has not changed one bit since gays started getting married, Ive lost no rights and nothing in my world has changed other than seeing happy couples that just a few years back had to hide their relationship. I expect I will continue living regardless of gay marriage.

On the other side of the coin, I do think that a Christian business owner (such as the baker) should have the right not to be included in gay weddings if it is really against their religion and morals. Let the public decide if they want to frequent these places of business. Sooner or later it will all work out. Can you even imagine any business turning down a mixed race couple for marriage accommodations today? hard to believe it happened in the 60s and to some extent the 70s.

bottom line, Just accept that it now is, and will be forever. Might just ease a lot of pain to go ahead and celebrate their marriages instead of letting it eat away at your ass.

As far as the issue of denial of service, I think it's the principal we are discussing. If the baker can deny service to a gay couple because he considers it an issue of morality, then why shouldn't a grocery, a doctor, a hotel, a restaurant, a landlord or any business be able to do the same. Is that what we really want, a nation where 40% of the people worry that they may be denied a meal, a hotel room or any other product or service because of their race, religion, ethnicity, or sexual preference. There are many countries in the world where minorities only patronize businesses that are safe for their kind. Hopefully, that will never be the case in America.

 

[jknowgood]

All persons of good will should oppose any proposal to give legitimacy to adoption of children by homosexual couples. Not only does it give legitimacy to an unnatural relationship, which is the true end of the activists promoting such laws, but it places children at risk for the sake of a radical and destructive agenda.

Maybe they cou

Just wait the world is getting sick. There will be a push for marrying animals and liberals will cave on it. If it will get them votes.

Get a grip.

I'm not the one that will cave, you get a grip. I say five years from now, someone will marry an animal and your kind will be calling us animalphobes.

Is the sky falling where you are?

Yeah those two would be great parents parading around like that. View attachment 46069

are you saying that you cant find a picture of a male and female doing something wrong or offensive, Im sure I can dig up some crack whore pictures.
You get a picture of two guys at what appears to be a gay pride event and pretend they dress like that all the time, but you overlook the crack whore that is smoked up all the time and forgets she even has kids.
Now who would make the better parent.

( of course, I would have to be pretty smoked up to go out in public like the two guys you showed so you never know.)

Most of the queers at a parade are dressed like that and they also bring their children to it. A crack whore gets her baby taken, but you celebrate children being raised around things that go on in those parades.

 

[Seawytch]

All persons of good will should oppose any proposal to give legitimacy to adoption of children by homosexual couples. Not only does it give legitimacy to an unnatural relationship, which is the true end of the activists promoting such laws, but it places children at risk for the sake of a radical and destructive agenda.

Maybe they cou

Get a grip.

I'm not the one that will cave, you get a grip. I say five years from now, someone will marry an animal and your kind will be calling us animalphobes.

Is the sky falling where you are?

Yeah those two would be great parents parading around like that. View attachment 46069

are you saying that you cant find a picture of a male and female doing something wrong or offensive, Im sure I can dig up some crack whore pictures.
You get a picture of two guys at what appears to be a gay pride event and pretend they dress like that all the time, but you overlook the crack whore that is smoked up all the time and forgets she even has kids.
Now who would make the better parent.

( of course, I would have to be pretty smoked up to go out in public like the two guys you showed so you never know.)

Most of the queers at a parade are dressed like that and they also bring their children to it. A crack whore gets her baby taken, but you celebrate children being raised around things that go on in those parades.

Really? Most? How many have you been to because I've been to SF twice, once as a parade marcher with my children. We saw nothing we wouldn't see at the beach...we'll probably better "put together"

Beach..

Pride

 

[Maryland Patriot]

maybe you quoted the wrong post? nobody said they were doing well, they just explained that the children were not her siblings.

Here you go, maybe you are the one who got confused on the discussion because she certainly did

Sorry captain non sequitur but you'll have to start a thread on welfare and women's reproductive choices if you want to get trounced on those issues as well.

I saw that, I just don't see it in any way bragging about how well she is doing. she simply pointed out that an alternative thread to discuss your opinion might be better suited.

 

[Seawytch]

maybe you quoted the wrong post? nobody said they were doing well, they just explained that the children were not her siblings.

Here you go, maybe you are the one who got confused on the discussion because she certainly did

Sorry captain non sequitur but you'll have to start a thread on welfare and women's reproductive choices if you want to get trounced on those issues as well.

I didn't say I was trouncing him...but trounced he has been.