Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?

The 2nd amendment was never intended to give people a right to murder U.S. federal, state, or local government officials you idiot. Our system of governing is what protects our rights, not any supposed right to gun down any government agent who does something you perceive as violating your rights.

What has kept our system of government the way it is? Surely you aren't suggesting that our government wants to be fair?

It's because of the second Amendment you have the right to speak your mind openly

Oh really? Why hasn't Canada or Australia or any other 1st world country been overrun by their own government?

One thing that separates American citizen from Canadians or Australians
Americans have never been subjects to the crown since we threw off that mentality century's ago. Canadians and Australians are still subjects of the crown and have kept that mentality in tack.
 
Wrong.

The Gov't had Muskets so the People had to be armed equally.

If the Kings Army had .50 cal machine guns, then the Founding Fathers would have had them too.

Then you would be here saying; "I support the constitution the way the founding fathers intended it to be. Every American should be able to own a .50 cal Machine Gun, nothing more."

The point of the 2nd Amendment is for the People to armed in such a manner that Gov't won't even consider trying to violate your rights.


The 2nd amendment was never intended to give people a right to murder U.S. federal, state, or local government officials you idiot. Our system of governing is what protects our rights, not any supposed right to gun down any government agent who does something you perceive as violating your rights.

Yeah.. they did not have the declaration of independence in their minds AT ALL :rolleyes:
Yeah, like sure, OK. :rolleyes: OMG. Declaration of Independence! Of course that makes sense now! Right to bear arms, declaration of independence, scattered unconnected thoughts. :rolleyes:

Oh.. and BTW... war is not murder...

Killing a government official because you think he violated your rights is murder and taking up arms against the U.S. Government is an act of rebellion.


And our system of government has shown to take away our rights as well..
So why don't you get a gun and go shoot the government agents that took your rights? You think the Founders gave you the right to bear arms so you could kill government agents to protect your rights but you're too chicken to do it?
 
Wrong.

The Gov't had Muskets so the People had to be armed equally.

If the Kings Army had .50 cal machine guns, then the Founding Fathers would have had them too.

Then you would be here saying; "I support the constitution the way the founding fathers intended it to be. Every American should be able to own a .50 cal Machine Gun, nothing more."

The point of the 2nd Amendment is for the People to armed in such a manner that Gov't won't even consider trying to violate your rights.



The 2nd amendment was never intended to give people a right to murder U.S. federal, state, or local government officials you idiot. Our system of governing is what protects our rights, not any supposed right to gun down any government agent who does something you perceive as violating your rights.

What has kept our system of government the way it is? Surely you aren't suggesting that our government wants to be fair?

We are the government idiot. Read the first line of the Constitution.

It's because of the second Amendment you have the right to speak your mind openly

No it isn't. That right existed long before the United States was even conceived.
 
What is your fixation on the size of a magazine?

I can do the same damage with 3 10 round magazines in almost the same time frame as a person with 1 30 round mag.

Why don't you just be honest for once and say you want to ban all semi auto rifles?
 
So why don't you get a gun and go shoot the government agents that took your rights? You think the Founders gave you the right to bear arms so you could kill government agents to protect your rights but you're too chicken to do it?
The government doesn't give rights. Read the Declaration of Independence, dipshit.
 
No one needs a 30 round magazine.

I support the constitution the way the founding fathers intended it to be. Every American should be able to own a musket, nothing more.

The 2nd amendment was designed so that the American people can defend themselves from a tyrannical government you numb-nutted puke.

The problem is that he likes the idea of a tyrannical government.
 
The 2nd amendment was never intended to give people a right to murder U.S. federal, state, or local government officials you idiot. Our system of governing is what protects our rights, not any supposed right to gun down any government agent who does something you perceive as violating your rights.

What has kept our system of government the way it is? Surely you aren't suggesting that our government wants to be fair?

We are the government idiot. Read the first line of the Constitution.

It's because of the second Amendment you have the right to speak your mind openly

No it isn't. That right existed long before the United States was even conceived.

You are fucking clueless. The second amendment has kept the government from becoming tyrannical for so long, now idiots like you have chipped away at the second amendment and have weaken it and it's meaning for having it.
Tyrannical government's are only as strong as the people are weak and defenseless.
 
The 2nd amendment was never intended to give people a right to murder U.S. federal, state, or local government officials you idiot. Our system of governing is what protects our rights, not any supposed right to gun down any government agent who does something you perceive as violating your rights.

Yeah.. they did not have the declaration of independence in their minds AT ALL :rolleyes:
Yeah, like sure, OK. :rolleyes: OMG. Declaration of Independence! Of course that makes sense now! Right to bear arms, declaration of independence, scattered unconnected thoughts. :rolleyes:

Oh.. and BTW... war is not murder...

Killing a government official because you think he violated your rights is murder and taking up arms against the U.S. Government is an act of rebellion.


And our system of government has shown to take away our rights as well..
So why don't you get a gun and go shoot the government agents that took your rights? You think the Founders gave you the right to bear arms so you could kill government agents to protect your rights but you're too chicken to do it?

No.. it is not an unconnected thought when you have the document that broadcast and formally announced the insurrection against the government that was over the very people who were at that time forming the constitution and new government... an insurrection that included killing

It can also be an act of war, not just 'rebellion'

And no.. you just like to leap to conclusions... would I take arms AGAIN to defend the constitution, yes... and as I swore the first time, defend it against all enemies foreign and domestic
 
No one needs a 30 round magazine.

I support the constitution the way the founding fathers intended it to be. Every American should be able to own a musket, nothing more.

The 2nd amendment was designed so that the American people can defend themselves from a tyrannical government you numb-nutted puke.

Right, that's why I support your right to own a single shot musket.

Which part of the constitution gives you the right to own a semi-automatic gun with a 30 round clip?

Son, you're dumber than a bag of hair.
 
Senator Dianne Feinstein's latest divide-and-conquer attack on the Second Amendment has made even Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) a sucker for the argument that private citizens do not need high-capacity magazines. These include not only 30-round rifle magazines, but 17-round magazines for handguns like the Glock.

Why does anybody need a high capacity magazine? If Senator Manchin were to educate himself by, for example, attending Front Sight's four-day defensive handgun class, he would learn the two primary answers:

(1) Failure to stop the aggressor
(crazies will not stop)

(2) Multiple aggressors
(gang bangers don't play nice)


Read more: Articles: Why Does Anybody Need a 30-Round Magazine?
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook


That's just what we need, more 30 round magazines in gangland.

Oh look, as if there wasn't enough left wing idiots in this thread already.
 
No one needs a 30 round magazine.

I support the constitution the way the founding fathers intended it to be. Every American should be able to own a musket, nothing more.
Wrong.

The Gov't had Muskets so the People had to be armed equally.

If the Kings Army had .50 cal machine guns, then the Founding Fathers would have had them too.

Then you would be here saying; "I support the constitution the way the founding fathers intended it to be. Every American should be able to own a .50 cal Machine Gun, nothing more."

The point of the 2nd Amendment is for the People to armed in such a manner that Gov't won't even consider trying to violate your rights.


This....right....here! ^^^
 

Forum List

Back
Top