why does alaska keep trying to send us their fuckwits?

why are you adding one?



fuckwit

A person who is not only lacking in clue but is apparently unable or unwilling to acquire clue even when handed it on a plate in generous portions.

Urban Dictionary, October 15: ha

must be a regional thing like soda and pop.

actually, fuckpop has possibilities

I hear ya, brotherman. Go for it.

dancing_cats_03.gif
 
Del, you don't like the candidate from Alaska, don't vote for him..

oh wait.:lol:

One thing I say, there are REAL men in Alaska, and as we see, the women have more balls than most liberal men. lol
 
Last edited:
Del, you don't like the candidate from Alaska, don't vote for him..

oh wait.:lol:

One thing I say, there are REAL men in Alaska, and as we see, the women have more balls than most liberal men. lol

Quitting your job means you have balls?
 
Go Joe Miller.... all the right peolple hate him, so I like him!

Thats seems to be a good way to measure a candidate here lately.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: del
Del, you don't like the candidate from Alaska, don't vote for him..

oh wait.:lol:

One thing I say, there are REAL men in Alaska, and as we see, the women have more balls than most liberal men. lol

The women in Alaska have balls? I must not have gotten the memo...
 
In recent weeks, Miller has had to respond to a series of disclosures about his past, including reports that he accepted federal farm subsidies in the 1990s, that his wife briefly obtained unemployment benefits, and that his family for a period received Medicaid — benefits he now rails against or believes would be better decided at the state level. He said his family struggled for a time, like a lot of other families have, but that he receives no benefits now and none of this has any relevance to the race

Just because he took subsidies and his wife took unemployment, and his family has been on Medicaid in the past. Does not make him a Hippocratic for wanting to move Medicaid control to the state level and reform other social programs. Just because you have taken such aid in the past. Does not mean you have to stick your head in the sand and IGNORE the fact that said programs are broken, and unsustainable, and reforms need to happen.

I think you are allowing partisanship to blind you of reality here.

Farm subsidies are often abused and inefficient

unemployment (regular state unemployment) is not welfare. Your employer pays 10% of what you make up to a point into a fund to Pay for regular unemployment. so in effect when you collect it you are simply collection your money as it is assumed if employers did not have to put that 10% in, your pay would be higher.

Medicaid is an extremely inefficient and abused program, partly because it is controlled by a massive federal bureaucracy. Wanting to move control of it to the states does not equate to wanting to abolish it. In fact it is a good idea to try to stream line it and reduce abuse and improve efficiency.
 
Last edited:

Unrelated to the topic, but if you are a men and do face-shaving, the Best thing as after-shave is alcoholic Rosewater. It usually comes from Mid-East (maybe Muslim Shops near you) and it is very cheap. Best is the citrus version.
But it also sells as Cologne water in Germany.
 
In recent weeks, Miller has had to respond to a series of disclosures about his past, including reports that he accepted federal farm subsidies in the 1990s, that his wife briefly obtained unemployment benefits, and that his family for a period received Medicaid — benefits he now rails against or believes would be better decided at the state level. He said his family struggled for a time, like a lot of other families have, but that he receives no benefits now and none of this has any relevance to the race

Just because he took subsidies and his wife took unemployment, and his family has been on Medicaid in the past. Does not make him a Hippocratic for wanting to move Medicaid control to the state level and reform other social programs. Just because you have taken such aid in the past. Does not mean you have to stick your head in the sand and IGNORE the fact that said programs are broken, and unsustainable, and reforms need to happen.

I think you are allowing partisanship to blind you of reality here.

Farm subsidies are often abused and inefficient

unemployment (regular state unemployment) is not welfare. Your employer pays 10% of what you make up to a point into a fund to Pay for regular unemployment. so in effect when you collect it you are simply collection your money as it is assumed if employers did not have to put that 10% in, your pay would be higher.

Medicaid is an extremely inefficient and abused program, partly because it is controlled by a massive federal bureaucracy. Wanting to move control of it to the states does not equate to wanting to abolish it. In fact it is a good idea to try to stream line it and reduce abuse and improve efficiency.

my position on the programs is more in line with his than not, but to refuse to answer questions about one's past is bullshit. no one held a gun to his head and forced him to run. how can you evaluate him as a potential office holder if he refuses to answer those questions?

it's not partisan to expect someone who voluntarily puts himself in the public arena to respond to legitimate questions regarding public policy or his past.
 
The biggest FUCKWITS in the history of the world are ODUMBO, BITEME & the ODUMBONISTA LIBERALS.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top