Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I was wishing there would be a massive movement to refuse to vote, all over the country. Have such low attendance the parties would have had to notice. Too many partisans and money bags around though. We are good sheep on both sides.Lack of education.
That covers those who voted for Trump and Hillary.
I don't consider any of very bright.
The best word to describe the 120,000,000 that voted for a majority party in 2016 is....
GULLIBLE
Well I can't argue with that. I often felt like we should have gotten primary do over because Trump and Hilary may have been the worse choices we've ever gotten for a presidential election.
Really? Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought. In essence that was his problem. He was smart, meticulous, communicative and.... ultimately boring. Black people thought he was to white, white people thought he was to black, those who believed his message of change figured him to much a politician. Trump is his anti synthesis, that is not a coincidence. You have a reality star that treats the office as the Apprentice, and predictable certain people like that way better then an episode of the West Wing without any of the juicy bits.Sure, it's what people want. The problem is running a government is an insanely complex thing. Saying it's simple is a very easy lie. Saying it's complex an infinitely harder thing to rally behind. Trump used that to his advantage. He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer. People relate to that way easier.Not for nothing, this post is what the people you refer to in this post would feel a confirmation of what they feel is wrong with the left. Calling people who voted and keep on supporting Trump dumb. It is arrogant in the extreme. It's not that they are dumb it's that they neither care, nor have any affinity with the complexities of something. They don't consider context or have any patience with complexity. Trump is the ultimate vindication to them, of those beliefs. Having said that I've seen people on the left who have the same problem. Every time you, and ultimate me talk down to them, they just entrench more.Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:
http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4
Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers
What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html
Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand
Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology
Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.
Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:
http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/
The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266
So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.
* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/
It's not that they are dumb it's that they neither care, nor have any affinity with the complexities of something. They don't consider context or have any patience with complexity.
Hope & Change
He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer.
And Obama is the guy who solves the world's problems while passing around the joint.
I drew a road map. I connected all of the dots. See if you follow along. Better yet, lets see if can refute it.Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:
http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4
Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers
What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html
High and rising income inequality in the United States has recently been widely commented upon. What has not been as widely discussed is the role educational attainment has played in these disparities. Indeed, America is in some ways two different countries economically, segregated by educational achievement.
Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand
Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology
Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology.They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.
What this study and those before it suggests is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based off of averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing.
Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.
Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:
http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/
There’s is a positive correlation between symbolic racism amongst white Americans and gun ownership, according to the results of a new international study published in PLoS One, the peer-reviewed scientific journal
The study, “Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions,” conducted by researchers from Britain’s Manchester University and Australia’s Monash University, collected data from white U.S. voters and found that for each one point increase (on a scale from one to five) in symbolic racism there was a 50 percent increase in the odds that the respondent had a firearm in the home. This political reality did not spring up overnight.
The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266
A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from −.20 to −.25 (mean r = −.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.
So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.
* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/
Are you overcompensating for a little dick? You're a legend in your own mind, just ask you. It seems that the left has an insatiable need to tell everyone how smart they think they are. Were you HALF as smart as you think you are you'd know you are taking it balls deep from the entire system.
Give me 1 example? 1 example of Obama sounding incoherent?Really? Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought. In essence that was his problem. He was smart, meticulous, communicative and.... ultimately boring. Black people thought he was to white, white people thought he was to black, those who believed his message of change figured him to much a politician. Trump is his anti synthesis, that is not a coincidence. You have a reality star that treats the office as the Apprentice, and predictable certain people like that way better then an episode of the West Wing without any of the juicy bits.Sure, it's what people want. The problem is running a government is an insanely complex thing. Saying it's simple is a very easy lie. Saying it's complex an infinitely harder thing to rally behind. Trump used that to his advantage. He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer. People relate to that way easier.Not for nothing, this post is what the people you refer to in this post would feel a confirmation of what they feel is wrong with the left. Calling people who voted and keep on supporting Trump dumb. It is arrogant in the extreme. It's not that they are dumb it's that they neither care, nor have any affinity with the complexities of something. They don't consider context or have any patience with complexity. Trump is the ultimate vindication to them, of those beliefs. Having said that I've seen people on the left who have the same problem. Every time you, and ultimate me talk down to them, they just entrench more.
It's not that they are dumb it's that they neither care, nor have any affinity with the complexities of something. They don't consider context or have any patience with complexity.
Hope & Change
He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer.
And Obama is the guy who solves the world's problems while passing around the joint.
Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought.
He read a decent teleprompter.
Without one, he often turned into a stuttering fuck.
Lack of education.
That covers those who voted for Trump and Hillary.
I don't consider any of very bright.
The best word to describe the 120,000,000 that voted for a majority party in 2016 is....
GULLIBLE
Translation: You can't refute any of it.I drew a road map. I connected all of the dots. See if you follow along. Better yet, lets see if can refute it.Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:
http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4
Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers
What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html
High and rising income inequality in the United States has recently been widely commented upon. What has not been as widely discussed is the role educational attainment has played in these disparities. Indeed, America is in some ways two different countries economically, segregated by educational achievement.
Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand
Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology
Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology.They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.
What this study and those before it suggests is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based off of averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing.
Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.
Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:
http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/
There’s is a positive correlation between symbolic racism amongst white Americans and gun ownership, according to the results of a new international study published in PLoS One, the peer-reviewed scientific journal
The study, “Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions,” conducted by researchers from Britain’s Manchester University and Australia’s Monash University, collected data from white U.S. voters and found that for each one point increase (on a scale from one to five) in symbolic racism there was a 50 percent increase in the odds that the respondent had a firearm in the home. This political reality did not spring up overnight.
The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266
A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from −.20 to −.25 (mean r = −.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.
So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.
* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/
Are you overcompensating for a little dick? You're a legend in your own mind, just ask you. It seems that the left has an insatiable need to tell everyone how smart they think they are. Were you HALF as smart as you think you are you'd know you are taking it balls deep from the entire system.
LOL, you quoted shit that you claim "proves" your point. It wouldn't matter what sources were posted that "refuted" YOUR sources, you'd just claim that whatever sources they posted weren't "worthy" of belief. Fact, you're too stupid to understand that the entire system is against you. You're too stupid to look at the situation and realize that NOTHING ever changes and there is no difference between either Party, that in point of fact the two party paradigm is a construct and a tool used by the political classes to divide us and keep us at each others throats.
Give me 1 example? 1 example of Obama sounding incoherent?Really? Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought. In essence that was his problem. He was smart, meticulous, communicative and.... ultimately boring. Black people thought he was to white, white people thought he was to black, those who believed his message of change figured him to much a politician. Trump is his anti synthesis, that is not a coincidence. You have a reality star that treats the office as the Apprentice, and predictable certain people like that way better then an episode of the West Wing without any of the juicy bits.Sure, it's what people want. The problem is running a government is an insanely complex thing. Saying it's simple is a very easy lie. Saying it's complex an infinitely harder thing to rally behind. Trump used that to his advantage. He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer. People relate to that way easier.It's not that they are dumb it's that they neither care, nor have any affinity with the complexities of something. They don't consider context or have any patience with complexity.
Hope & Change
He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer.
And Obama is the guy who solves the world's problems while passing around the joint.
Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought.
He read a decent teleprompter.
Without one, he often turned into a stuttering fuck.
Translation: You can't refute any of it.I drew a road map. I connected all of the dots. See if you follow along. Better yet, lets see if can refute it.Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:
http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4
Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers
What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html
High and rising income inequality in the United States has recently been widely commented upon. What has not been as widely discussed is the role educational attainment has played in these disparities. Indeed, America is in some ways two different countries economically, segregated by educational achievement.
Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand
Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology
Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology.They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.
What this study and those before it suggests is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based off of averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing.
Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.
Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:
http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/
There’s is a positive correlation between symbolic racism amongst white Americans and gun ownership, according to the results of a new international study published in PLoS One, the peer-reviewed scientific journal
The study, “Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions,” conducted by researchers from Britain’s Manchester University and Australia’s Monash University, collected data from white U.S. voters and found that for each one point increase (on a scale from one to five) in symbolic racism there was a 50 percent increase in the odds that the respondent had a firearm in the home. This political reality did not spring up overnight.
The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266
A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from −.20 to −.25 (mean r = −.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.
So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.
* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/
Are you overcompensating for a little dick? You're a legend in your own mind, just ask you. It seems that the left has an insatiable need to tell everyone how smart they think they are. Were you HALF as smart as you think you are you'd know you are taking it balls deep from the entire system.
LOL, you quoted shit that you claim "proves" your point. It wouldn't matter what sources were posted that "refuted" YOUR sources, you'd just claim that whatever sources they posted weren't "worthy" of belief. Fact, you're too stupid to understand that the entire system is against you. You're too stupid to look at the situation and realize that NOTHING ever changes and there is no difference between either Party, that in point of fact the two party paradigm is a construct and a tool used by the political classes to divide us and keep us at each others throats.
The stupid people are the ones who actually believe that there is no difference between parties
Give me 1 example? 1 example of Obama sounding incoherent?Really? Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought. In essence that was his problem. He was smart, meticulous, communicative and.... ultimately boring. Black people thought he was to white, white people thought he was to black, those who believed his message of change figured him to much a politician. Trump is his anti synthesis, that is not a coincidence. You have a reality star that treats the office as the Apprentice, and predictable certain people like that way better then an episode of the West Wing without any of the juicy bits.Sure, it's what people want. The problem is running a government is an insanely complex thing. Saying it's simple is a very easy lie. Saying it's complex an infinitely harder thing to rally behind. Trump used that to his advantage. He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer. People relate to that way easier.
He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer.
And Obama is the guy who solves the world's problems while passing around the joint.
Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought.
He read a decent teleprompter.
Without one, he often turned into a stuttering fuck.
Give me 1 example? 1 example of Obama sounding incoherent?Really? Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought. In essence that was his problem. He was smart, meticulous, communicative and.... ultimately boring. Black people thought he was to white, white people thought he was to black, those who believed his message of change figured him to much a politician. Trump is his anti synthesis, that is not a coincidence. You have a reality star that treats the office as the Apprentice, and predictable certain people like that way better then an episode of the West Wing without any of the juicy bits.He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer.
And Obama is the guy who solves the world's problems while passing around the joint.
Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought.
He read a decent teleprompter.
Without one, he often turned into a stuttering fuck.
Is there a particular reason those clips were all a few seconds long? The use of stop words is not sounding incoherent, it's a normal speech pattern when add libbing. If you stop the clip every time before a thought is formed what you are actually doing is selectively quoting.
Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:
http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4
Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers
What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html
High and rising income inequality in the United States has recently been widely commented upon. What has not been as widely discussed is the role educational attainment has played in these disparities. Indeed, America is in some ways two different countries economically, segregated by educational achievement.
Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand
Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology
Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology.They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.
What this study and those before it suggests is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based off of averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing.
Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.
Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:
http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/
There’s is a positive correlation between symbolic racism amongst white Americans and gun ownership, according to the results of a new international study published in PLoS One, the peer-reviewed scientific journal
The study, “Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions,” conducted by researchers from Britain’s Manchester University and Australia’s Monash University, collected data from white U.S. voters and found that for each one point increase (on a scale from one to five) in symbolic racism there was a 50 percent increase in the odds that the respondent had a firearm in the home. This political reality did not spring up overnight.
The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266
A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from −.20 to −.25 (mean r = −.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.
So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.
* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/
You'd have to ask them. I just provided a possibility.Perhaps they just feel that Trump will be better for the country, and then by extension, for them.What is going on here?
As opposed to those who vote based on "what's in it for me".
I didn't vote for the guy, but I can see that line of reasoning.
......about how well trickle down economics worked before
Give me 1 example? 1 example of Obama sounding incoherent?Really? Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought. In essence that was his problem. He was smart, meticulous, communicative and.... ultimately boring. Black people thought he was to white, white people thought he was to black, those who believed his message of change figured him to much a politician. Trump is his anti synthesis, that is not a coincidence. You have a reality star that treats the office as the Apprentice, and predictable certain people like that way better then an episode of the West Wing without any of the juicy bits.Sure, it's what people want. The problem is running a government is an insanely complex thing. Saying it's simple is a very easy lie. Saying it's complex an infinitely harder thing to rally behind. Trump used that to his advantage. He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer. People relate to that way easier.
He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer.
And Obama is the guy who solves the world's problems while passing around the joint.
Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought.
He read a decent teleprompter.
Without one, he often turned into a stuttering fuck.
Give me 1 example? 1 example of Obama sounding incoherent?Really? Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought. In essence that was his problem. He was smart, meticulous, communicative and.... ultimately boring. Black people thought he was to white, white people thought he was to black, those who believed his message of change figured him to much a politician. Trump is his anti synthesis, that is not a coincidence. You have a reality star that treats the office as the Apprentice, and predictable certain people like that way better then an episode of the West Wing without any of the juicy bits.He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer.
And Obama is the guy who solves the world's problems while passing around the joint.
Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought.
He read a decent teleprompter.
Without one, he often turned into a stuttering fuck.
This is a particular interview this thing was lifted from.
Explain how Obama is incoherent in it, I dare you.
Give me 1 example? 1 example of Obama sounding incoherent?Really? Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought. In essence that was his problem. He was smart, meticulous, communicative and.... ultimately boring. Black people thought he was to white, white people thought he was to black, those who believed his message of change figured him to much a politician. Trump is his anti synthesis, that is not a coincidence. You have a reality star that treats the office as the Apprentice, and predictable certain people like that way better then an episode of the West Wing without any of the juicy bits.
Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought.
He read a decent teleprompter.
Without one, he often turned into a stuttering fuck.
Is there a particular reason those clips were all a few seconds long? The use of stop words is not sounding incoherent, it's a normal speech pattern when add libbing. If you stop the clip every time before a thought is formed what you are actually doing is selectively quoting.
How long does a stutter last?
Give me 1 example? 1 example of Obama sounding incoherent?Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought.
He read a decent teleprompter.
Without one, he often turned into a stuttering fuck.
Is there a particular reason those clips were all a few seconds long? The use of stop words is not sounding incoherent, it's a normal speech pattern when add libbing. If you stop the clip every time before a thought is formed what you are actually doing is selectively quoting.
How long does a stutter last?
A few seconds at most. Which is how long they lasted when not spliced one after another. It's insanely dishonest to claim it's him being incoherent.
