R
rdean
Guest
Can someone explain that to me? How can they be members of this board and know absolutely nothing about American history? Especially after all the discussion?
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Gee, that makes so little sense, I can't figure out if you should agree or disagree.It could be that pretzel logic used by posters like yourself,one day they claim the founding fathers where liberal,because they wanted to pull away from an oppressive government,when same logic is used on another group that wanted to pull away from an oppressive Gov,it is just different right?
What makes little sense is responding to your threads.Gee, that makes so little sense, I can't figure out if you should agree or disagree.It could be that pretzel logic used by posters like yourself,one day they claim the founding fathers where liberal,because they wanted to pull away from an oppressive government,when same logic is used on another group that wanted to pull away from an oppressive Gov,it is just different right?
I am sorry you have trouble understanding a simple concept. You should have had no trouble at all understanding an example of double speak nonsense.Gee, that makes so little sense, I can't figure out if you should agree or disagree.It could be that pretzel logic used by posters like yourself,one day they claim the founding fathers where liberal,because they wanted to pull away from an oppressive government,when same logic is used on another group that wanted to pull away from an oppressive Gov,it is just different right?
I think they are that stupid and actually believe it.They say that shit because they know it pisses us off, not because they actually believe it, no one could possibly be that stupid.
Actually confederates wanted to pull away to maintain a MORE oppressive government.It could be that pretzel logic used by posters like yourself,one day they claim the founding fathers where liberal,because they wanted to pull away from an oppressive government,when same logic is used on another group that wanted to pull away from an oppressive Gov,it is just different right?
I wouldn't go that farThey say that shit because they know it pisses us off, not because they actually believe it, no one could possibly be that stupid.
They totally identify with the confederates, they just try to disavow the racist aftermath as the sons and grandsons of confederates fought the tortuously slow journey of a southern African American to go from slave to free man with the same rights as anyone.I think they are that stupid and actually believe it.They say that shit because they know it pisses us off, not because they actually believe it, no one could possibly be that stupid.
What we know is you don't know the difference between an 18th century liberal and a 21st century "Liberal".
Can someone explain that to me? How can they be members of this board and know absolutely nothing about American history? Especially after all the discussion?
Can someone explain that to me? How can they be members of this board and know absolutely nothing about American history? Especially after all the discussion?
Sure, there was another poster who posted that the founding fathers were liberals. OK, they were liberals because they rebelled against the king? Following that logic then the confederates also rebelled thus they have to be liberals. And Clive Bundy and his bunch, they too must be liberals.
In fact what is said is that the democrat party was the party of slavery thus the party of the confederacy. they own it yet deny it.
What we know is you don't know the difference between an 18th century liberal and a 21st century "Liberal".
There is none because both follow the same principles.
Liberal Define Liberal at Dictionary.com
liberal
adjective
1.
favorable to progress or reform, as in political orreligious affairs.
2.
(often initial capital letter) noting or pertaining to apolitical party advocating measures of progressivepolitical reform.
3.
of, pertaining to, based on, or advocatingliberalism, especially the freedom of the individualand governmental guarantees of individual rightsand liberties.
4.
favorable to or in accord with concepts ofmaximum individual freedom possible, especiallyas guaranteed by law and secured bygovernmental protection of civil liberties.
5.
favoring or permitting freedom of action,especially with respect to matters of personalbelief or expression:
a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.
6.
of or relating to representational forms ofgovernment rather than aristocracies andmonarchies.
7.
free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant:
a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
Can someone explain that to me? How can they be members of this board and know absolutely nothing about American history? Especially after all the discussion?
Sure, there was another poster who posted that the founding fathers were liberals. OK, they were liberals because they rebelled against the king? Following that logic then the confederates also rebelled thus they have to be liberals. And Clive Bundy and his bunch, they too must be liberals.
In fact what is said is that the democrat party was the party of slavery thus the party of the confederacy. they own it yet deny it.
Your inability to use logic is patently obvious.
Rebellion is not limited to only conservatives or liberals.
But thanks for proving the OP right.
You know nothing about American history and even less about logic.