Why didn't Bush speak at the Republican Convention?

manifold

Diamond Member
Feb 19, 2008
57,723
8,638
2,030
your dreams
You know the Democrats can't wait to trot out Clinton.

So why didn't the Republicans have Bush speak and give Romney his endorsement? :dunno:
 
Bush Sr should have been a highlighted speaker

He is the parties only connection to Ron Reagan and they treat him like dirt
 

From you link:

The Bush name and legacy are noticeably absent from the 2012 Republican convention. The former president unceremoniously announced he was skipping the affair months ago. Dick Cheney, the former vice president who remains more revered among the core national-security minded conservative set, isn't speaking, either. Bush's brother, Jeb, the former Republican governor of Florida, will address the crowd. As will Bush's former secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice. But they're expected to address specific policy issues, mainly education, rather than defend their brethren and their former boss.
 
Liberals - couldn't wait to get rid of George Bush

Now they're "concerned" he's not around.

Idiots.


Seriously.....


Flaming fucking idiots
 

From you link:

The Bush name and legacy are noticeably absent from the 2012 Republican convention. The former president unceremoniously announced he was skipping the affair months ago. Dick Cheney, the former vice president who remains more revered among the core national-security minded conservative set, isn't speaking, either. Bush's brother, Jeb, the former Republican governor of Florida, will address the crowd. As will Bush's former secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice. But they're expected to address specific policy issues, mainly education, rather than defend their brethren and their former boss.

And so...
 
You know the Democrats can't wait to trot out Clinton.

So why didn't the Republicans have Bush speak and give Romney his endorsement? :dunno:

No need. The Republican party has so many young and upcoming personalities that, unlike the Democrats, it is not necessary to look to the past. Republicans are looking to the future.
 
Well it used to be that a President would stay out of the limelight after holding office. Kind of a gentlemen's agreement if you will.
That ended when Bill Clinton started missing the attention.
 
George W. Bush Video At Republican Convention Pays Tribute To Former President

America's last two Republican presidents -- father and son -- addressed the 2012 Republican Convention via prerecorded video Wednesday night.

George W. Bush and his father, George H.W. Bush, fondly recalled moments from their presidencies, and pledged their support to Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney.


Video At Republican Convention ... fondly recalled moments from their presidencies


a few "moments" - from a History of Incompetence and Needless Wars. Rather than Remorse, Republicans offer a video.
 
You know the Democrats can't wait to trot out Clinton.

So why didn't the Republicans have Bush speak and give Romney his endorsement? :dunno:

No need. The Republican party has so many young and upcoming personalities that, unlike the Democrats, it is not necessary to look to the past. Republicans are looking to the future.

Republicans have a stable of exciting candidates for 2016

Too bad they had none for 2012
 
You know the Democrats can't wait to trot out Clinton.

So why didn't the Republicans have Bush speak and give Romney his endorsement? :dunno:
Since it was a very successful convention, it appears that the planners were right.

He wasn't needed.

Of course, people of character like George W. Bush, usually stick with their word. Since he stated he was no longer in, it means he is all the way out.

Dems should give that character thing a try sometime.
 

Forum List

Back
Top