Why aren't the "real conservatives" developing any 2016 support?

[BluesLegend]

Howard Dean is not a conservative.

not your twisted version of a conservative, note the difference.

What is my "twisted version of a conservative". This should be entertaining.

do you support ted cruz or the Donald ?
if you do, then my work is done.

Put up to shut up lib, you shot your big mouth off so lets here it. Maybe you don't have the guts, I have found many liberals are gutless cowards when called out.

asked and answered

Ah, you are in the gutless coward camp got it.

 

[daws101]

not your twisted version of a conservative, note the difference.

What is my "twisted version of a conservative". This should be entertaining.

do you support ted cruz or the Donald ?
if you do, then my work is done.

Put up to shut up lib, you shot your big mouth off so lets here it. Maybe you don't have the guts, I have found many liberals are gutless cowards when called out.

asked and answered

Ah, you are in the gutless coward camp got it.

false I'm in the already made my point camp.
you never answered the question "do you support ted cruz or the Donald ?"

 

[hortysir]

Cruz, Santorum, Perry, etc. They all love insulting moderate-republican candidates. Their (extremely small) fanbase joins them in this. They've been moaning about establishment candidates for years. Declaring a real conservative will light up the party. That isn't happening at all. What's the explanation? They're wrong? (yes)

Honestly?

Because there aren't any "real conservatives" on Wall Street or in the other Big Money Conglomerates.

Any REAL Conservatives can only count on "grassroots" money and, as such, don't stand much of a chance

 

[Votto]

To get elected one must cozy up to corporate America and the corporate press.

This means Donald, Hillary, and Jeb.

Luckily for Hillary, Donald works for Hillary and I'm sure Jeb would love to be her VP.

 

[daws101]

To get elected one must cozy up to corporate America and the corporate press.

This means Donald, Hillary, and Jeb.

Luckily for Hillary, Donald works for Hillary and I'm sure Jeb would love to be her VP.

funny didn't al those folks have their own money?

 

[Votto]

To get elected one must cozy up to corporate America and the corporate press.

This means Donald, Hillary, and Jeb.

Luckily for Hillary, Donald works for Hillary and I'm sure Jeb would love to be her VP.

funny didn't al those folks have their own money?

Sure, but are they gonna spend it to try and get elected?

Hell no, they are after more money, which is why they are running for President.

 

[daws101]

To get elected one must cozy up to corporate America and the corporate press.

This means Donald, Hillary, and Jeb.

Luckily for Hillary, Donald works for Hillary and I'm sure Jeb would love to be her VP.

funny didn't al those folks have their own money?

Sure, but are they gonna spend it to try and get elected?

Hell no, they are after more money, which is why they are running for President.

Switch money to power and you may be on to something.

 

[BluesLegend]

What is my "twisted version of a conservative". This should be entertaining.

do you support ted cruz or the Donald ?
if you do, then my work is done.

Put up to shut up lib, you shot your big mouth off so lets here it. Maybe you don't have the guts, I have found many liberals are gutless cowards when called out.

asked and answered

Ah, you are in the gutless coward camp got it.

false I'm in the already made my point camp.
you never answered the question "do you support ted cruz or the Donald ?"

You shot off your mouth, I called you out on it, and you ran and hid.

 

[daws101]

do you support ted cruz or the Donald ?
if you do, then my work is done.

Put up to shut up lib, you shot your big mouth off so lets here it. Maybe you don't have the guts, I have found many liberals are gutless cowards when called out.

asked and answered

Ah, you are in the gutless coward camp got it.

false I'm in the already made my point camp.
you never answered the question "do you support ted cruz or the Donald ?"

You shot off your mouth, I called you out on it, and you ran and hid.

False I handed you your ass .
damn you're a whininy bitch.

 

[Super_Lantern]

Ted Cruz is the third highest fund raiser in the race, behind Jeb and Hillary.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/election-2016-campaign-money-race.html?_r=0

Oops. Kinda blows that shit all to hell.

And what does that have to do with anything? Establishment candidates raise money as well. As your post said, an establishment candidate raised more than Cruz. So if raising money is your definition of success, than moderate candidates have never failed doing that, and the current establishment candidate raised more than the "real conservative"

The lie "real conservatives" have been spouting for years is that if you run a "real conservative", the GOP will win a general election. Well we have like 5 "real conservatives" running, and none of them are getting paid any attention or leading some swelling movement of heretofore seen support

 

[bendog]

Cruz, Santorum, Perry, etc. They all love insulting moderate-republican candidates. Their (extremely small) fanbase joins them in this. They've been moaning about establishment candidates for years. Declaring a real conservative will light up the party. That isn't happening at all. What's the explanation? They're wrong? (yes)

Honestly?

Because there aren't any "real conservatives" on Wall Street or in the other Big Money Conglomerates.

Any REAL Conservatives can only count on "grassroots" money and, as such, don't stand much of a chance

Nah, Cruz led the shut her down over Obama care charge us Seminary Ridge. And he's not going anywhere.

Trump's getting the love from the "I'm mad as hell and not gonna take it anymore" crowd. It's a bit odd. Now Bernie's always been a rather harmless and nice and fortunately politically meaningless socialist. And the dems have always had their wannabe socialist fringe.

 

[The Rabbi]

Ted Cruz is the third highest fund raiser in the race, behind Jeb and Hillary.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/election-2016-campaign-money-race.html?_r=0

Oops. Kinda blows that shit all to hell.

And what does that have to do with anything? Establishment candidates raise money as well. As your post said, an establishment candidate raised more than Cruz. So if raising money is your definition of success, than moderate candidates have never failed doing that, and the current establishment candidate raised more than the "real conservative"

The lie "real conservatives" have been spouting for years is that if you run a "real conservative", the GOP will win a general election. Well we have like 5 "real conservatives" running, and none of them are getting paid any attention or leading some swelling movement of heretofore seen support

The troll question, dumbshit, was why real conservatives werent developing support. Since fundraising is an important measure of support I showed that Cruz is in the top 3 fundraisers, top 2 of the GOP.
Now you can argue:
1) Fundraising isnt a measure of support. That would indicate you are completely ignorant of politics.
2) Cruz isnt conservative. That would indicate you are a babbling idiot.
3) The source is biased. That would indicate you dont know what you're talking about.
Take your pick. Or agree with me that I blew the thread away.

 

[The Rabbi]

Cruz, Santorum, Perry, etc. They all love insulting moderate-republican candidates. Their (extremely small) fanbase joins them in this. They've been moaning about establishment candidates for years. Declaring a real conservative will light up the party. That isn't happening at all. What's the explanation? They're wrong? (yes)

Honestly?

Because there aren't any "real conservatives" on Wall Street or in the other Big Money Conglomerates.

Any REAL Conservatives can only count on "grassroots" money and, as such, don't stand much of a chance

Nah, Cruz led the shut her down over Obama care charge us Seminary Ridge. And he's not going anywhere.

Trump's getting the love from the "I'm mad as hell and not gonna take it anymore" crowd. It's a bit odd. Now Bernie's always been a rather harmless and nice and fortunately politically meaningless socialist. And the dems have always had their wannabe socialist fringe.

Cruz has raised more money than everyone else except Jeb. If that's your definiton of "not going anywhere" so be it.

 

[Super_Lantern]

Ted Cruz is the third highest fund raiser in the race, behind Jeb and Hillary.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/election-2016-campaign-money-race.html?_r=0

Oops. Kinda blows that shit all to hell.

And what does that have to do with anything? Establishment candidates raise money as well. As your post said, an establishment candidate raised more than Cruz. So if raising money is your definition of success, than moderate candidates have never failed doing that, and the current establishment candidate raised more than the "real conservative"

The lie "real conservatives" have been spouting for years is that if you run a "real conservative", the GOP will win a general election. Well we have like 5 "real conservatives" running, and none of them are getting paid any attention or leading some swelling movement of heretofore seen support

The troll question, dumbshit, was why real conservatives werent developing support. Since fundraising is an important measure of support I showed that Cruz is in the top 3 fundraisers, top 2 of the GOP.
Now you can argue:
1) Fundraising isnt a measure of support. That would indicate you are completely ignorant of politics.
2) Cruz isnt conservative. That would indicate you are a babbling idiot.
3) The source is biased. That would indicate you dont know what you're talking about.
Take your pick. Or agree with me that I blew the thread away.

I don't deal with children who resort to personal attacks for communication. And you label anything you don't agree with as trolling. So you are both a child and someone who looks at things with tunnel-vision

I said the "real conservatives" do not have major support and are not leading a voting audience, that allegedly, is dying to have them. You said Cruz's fundraising numbers disagree. I think you need to come with more than that when Jeb raised more than Cruz, and Cruz, Santorum, Perry, Huckabee are barely getting any attention from anybody.

So keep labeling anything you disagree with as trolling, but take it out of my thread

If ONE of the "real conservative" candidates raising money (but not as much as the establishment conservative) is the biggest success "real conservatives" (who have been throwing a fit over establishment candidates for 8 years) can point to, then I don't think Cruz or any of the others will make it far in the primary

 

[The Rabbi]

Ted Cruz is the third highest fund raiser in the race, behind Jeb and Hillary.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/election-2016-campaign-money-race.html?_r=0

Oops. Kinda blows that shit all to hell.

And what does that have to do with anything? Establishment candidates raise money as well. As your post said, an establishment candidate raised more than Cruz. So if raising money is your definition of success, than moderate candidates have never failed doing that, and the current establishment candidate raised more than the "real conservative"

The lie "real conservatives" have been spouting for years is that if you run a "real conservative", the GOP will win a general election. Well we have like 5 "real conservatives" running, and none of them are getting paid any attention or leading some swelling movement of heretofore seen support

The troll question, dumbshit, was why real conservatives werent developing support. Since fundraising is an important measure of support I showed that Cruz is in the top 3 fundraisers, top 2 of the GOP.
Now you can argue:
1) Fundraising isnt a measure of support. That would indicate you are completely ignorant of politics.
2) Cruz isnt conservative. That would indicate you are a babbling idiot.
3) The source is biased. That would indicate you dont know what you're talking about.
Take your pick. Or agree with me that I blew the thread away.

I don't deal with children who resort to personal attacks for communication. And you label anything you don't agree with as trolling. So you are both a child and someone who looks at things with tunnel-vision

Your admission of defeat here is noted and accepted. Move along, junior.

 

[Super_Lantern]

Ted Cruz is the third highest fund raiser in the race, behind Jeb and Hillary.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/election-2016-campaign-money-race.html?_r=0

Oops. Kinda blows that shit all to hell.

And what does that have to do with anything? Establishment candidates raise money as well. As your post said, an establishment candidate raised more than Cruz. So if raising money is your definition of success, than moderate candidates have never failed doing that, and the current establishment candidate raised more than the "real conservative"

The lie "real conservatives" have been spouting for years is that if you run a "real conservative", the GOP will win a general election. Well we have like 5 "real conservatives" running, and none of them are getting paid any attention or leading some swelling movement of heretofore seen support

The troll question, dumbshit, was why real conservatives werent developing support. Since fundraising is an important measure of support I showed that Cruz is in the top 3 fundraisers, top 2 of the GOP.
Now you can argue:
1) Fundraising isnt a measure of support. That would indicate you are completely ignorant of politics.
2) Cruz isnt conservative. That would indicate you are a babbling idiot.
3) The source is biased. That would indicate you dont know what you're talking about.
Take your pick. Or agree with me that I blew the thread away.

I don't deal with children who resort to personal attacks for communication. And you label anything you don't agree with as trolling. So you are both a child and someone who looks at things with tunnel-vision

Your admission of defeat here is noted and accepted. Move along, junior.

Welcome to my ignore list. And have fun watching Cruz and the others go nowhere in the primary. Ill make some TROLL THREADS about it when it happens

 

[The Rabbi]

Ted Cruz is the third highest fund raiser in the race, behind Jeb and Hillary.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/election-2016-campaign-money-race.html?_r=0

Oops. Kinda blows that shit all to hell.

And what does that have to do with anything? Establishment candidates raise money as well. As your post said, an establishment candidate raised more than Cruz. So if raising money is your definition of success, than moderate candidates have never failed doing that, and the current establishment candidate raised more than the "real conservative"

The lie "real conservatives" have been spouting for years is that if you run a "real conservative", the GOP will win a general election. Well we have like 5 "real conservatives" running, and none of them are getting paid any attention or leading some swelling movement of heretofore seen support

The troll question, dumbshit, was why real conservatives werent developing support. Since fundraising is an important measure of support I showed that Cruz is in the top 3 fundraisers, top 2 of the GOP.
Now you can argue:
1) Fundraising isnt a measure of support. That would indicate you are completely ignorant of politics.
2) Cruz isnt conservative. That would indicate you are a babbling idiot.
3) The source is biased. That would indicate you dont know what you're talking about.
Take your pick. Or agree with me that I blew the thread away.

I don't deal with children who resort to personal attacks for communication. And you label anything you don't agree with as trolling. So you are both a child and someone who looks at things with tunnel-vision

Your admission of defeat here is noted and accepted. Move along, junior.

Welcome to my ignore list. And have fun watching Cruz and the others go nowhere in the primary. Ill make some TROLL THREADS about it when it happens

Good. Your butthurt confirms you arent worth debating. Cruz is currently a top money getter and that means something in politics.

 

[hortysir]

Ted Cruz is the third highest fund raiser in the race, behind Jeb and Hillary.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/election-2016-campaign-money-race.html?_r=0

Oops. Kinda blows that shit all to hell.

And what does that have to do with anything? Establishment candidates raise money as well. As your post said, an establishment candidate raised more than Cruz. So if raising money is your definition of success, than moderate candidates have never failed doing that, and the current establishment candidate raised more than the "real conservative"

The lie "real conservatives" have been spouting for years is that if you run a "real conservative", the GOP will win a general election. Well we have like 5 "real conservatives" running, and none of them are getting paid any attention or leading some swelling movement of heretofore seen support

The troll question, dumbshit, was why real conservatives werent developing support. Since fundraising is an important measure of support I showed that Cruz is in the top 3 fundraisers, top 2 of the GOP.
Now you can argue:
1) Fundraising isnt a measure of support. That would indicate you are completely ignorant of politics.
2) Cruz isnt conservative. That would indicate you are a babbling idiot.
3) The source is biased. That would indicate you dont know what you're talking about.
Take your pick. Or agree with me that I blew the thread away.

I don't deal with children who resort to personal attacks for communication. And you label anything you don't agree with as trolling. So you are both a child and someone who looks at things with tunnel-vision

Your admission of defeat here is noted and accepted. Move along, junior.

Welcome to my ignore list. And have fun watching Cruz and the others go nowhere in the primary. Ill make some TROLL THREADS about it when it happens

Tissue?

 

[amrchaos]

And what does that have to do with anything? Establishment candidates raise money as well. As your post said, an establishment candidate raised more than Cruz. So if raising money is your definition of success, than moderate candidates have never failed doing that, and the current establishment candidate raised more than the "real conservative"

The lie "real conservatives" have been spouting for years is that if you run a "real conservative", the GOP will win a general election. Well we have like 5 "real conservatives" running, and none of them are getting paid any attention or leading some swelling movement of heretofore seen support

The troll question, dumbshit, was why real conservatives werent developing support. Since fundraising is an important measure of support I showed that Cruz is in the top 3 fundraisers, top 2 of the GOP.
Now you can argue:
1) Fundraising isnt a measure of support. That would indicate you are completely ignorant of politics.
2) Cruz isnt conservative. That would indicate you are a babbling idiot.
3) The source is biased. That would indicate you dont know what you're talking about.
Take your pick. Or agree with me that I blew the thread away.

I don't deal with children who resort to personal attacks for communication. And you label anything you don't agree with as trolling. So you are both a child and someone who looks at things with tunnel-vision

Your admission of defeat here is noted and accepted. Move along, junior.

Welcome to my ignore list. And have fun watching Cruz and the others go nowhere in the primary. Ill make some TROLL THREADS about it when it happens

Good. Your butthurt confirms you arent worth debating. Cruz is currently a top money getter and that means something in politics.

To win, he need support. He need primary voters. It is possible for Cruz to out raise the majority of his field at the same time is stuck pulling up the rear in all the primary states.

That is a real possibility. The question the Cruz campaign need to address is how to convert their war chest into a lead among voters. His campaign has yet to demonstrate they know how.

 

[daws101]

Ted Cruz is the third highest fund raiser in the race, behind Jeb and Hillary.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/election-2016-campaign-money-race.html?_r=0

Oops. Kinda blows that shit all to hell.

And what does that have to do with anything? Establishment candidates raise money as well. As your post said, an establishment candidate raised more than Cruz. So if raising money is your definition of success, than moderate candidates have never failed doing that, and the current establishment candidate raised more than the "real conservative"

The lie "real conservatives" have been spouting for years is that if you run a "real conservative", the GOP will win a general election. Well we have like 5 "real conservatives" running, and none of them are getting paid any attention or leading some swelling movement of heretofore seen support

The troll question, dumbshit, was why real conservatives werent developing support. Since fundraising is an important measure of support I showed that Cruz is in the top 3 fundraisers, top 2 of the GOP.
Now you can argue:
1) Fundraising isnt a measure of support. That would indicate you are completely ignorant of politics.
2) Cruz isnt conservative. That would indicate you are a babbling idiot.
3) The source is biased. That would indicate you dont know what you're talking about.
Take your pick. Or agree with me that I blew the thread away.

You blew something just not this thread.