Papageorgio
The Ultimate Winner
.
This is a specious argument. Any business could be considered "socialism" within itself. For that matter any FAMILY could be considered "socialism" within itself. The painfully obvious difference is that those functions and actions are not controlled and/or owned by an outside, public entity.
I'm not a Tea Partier, I'm not a "government is evil at all times" absolutist, but this whole premise is silly. Making it worse is the obtuse behavior of those pushing it. If you want more government control, fine, that's a separate argument. But putting a dog mask on a cat doesn't make it a dog.
Nothing of substance is accomplished until intellectual honesty is adhered to.
And by the way, the phrase should be spelled "...run by communists."
.
sports teams are owned by different people, they work together to make the league strong, not unlike a country owned by different people but working together to make the country strong, yes if you want a strong league you must redistribut some wealth, same if you want a strong country, as far as the size of government, I want it big enough to make sure I get a chance in the workplace ran by giants and to make sure I got clean water to drink, but not so big to post up in my bedroom or doctor's office.
I can't believe that you can't comprehend that the NFL is capitalism at it's best. They work together so they don't allow anything else to take its place as the King of US sports. Wealth is NOT redistributed, every team shares in TV revenue because every team is on TV. This is getting payed at its best. Players salaries are capped to control cost, a real source of collusion if you ask me.
The rest of your post is nonsense.