Why a special prosecutor needed for BenghaziGate...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by healthmyths, Nov 16, 2012.

  1. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,253
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,857
    The reason is the Obama administration were proudly beating their chests about "Osama is dead"... Terrorism is defeated thanks to Obama!
    Using that as a theme Obama BEAT Osama the TERRORIST attack on Benghazi totally refuted that and therefore Obama could NOT allow that to disrupt his campaign theme!
    Unlike Watergate though where NO ONE died 4 Americans murdered in BenghaziGate!

    So is Obama guilty of NOT trying to prevent the deaths because to do so would be admit Terrorism was NOT defeated?
    Did Obama put politics above people's safety by ignoring the pleas for help?
     
  2. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,253
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,857
    PROOF???

    Representative Peter King stated that former CIA Director David Petraeus stated that he knew the Benghazi attack was terrorism
    and that the talking points given to Ambassador Susan Rice were different from the ones prepared by the CIA.
    Petraeus stated Rice's talking points were edited to demphasized the possibility of terrorism.
    King: Petraeus Said CIA's Talking Points Were Edited to Play Down Terrorism | MRCTV
     
  3. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,253
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,857
    MORE PROOF from the CNN!!!

    "When he looks at what Susan Rice said," CNN reports, "here is what Petraeus's take is, according to my source. Petraeus developed some talking points laying it all out. those talking points as always were approved by the intelligence community.
    But then he sees Susan Rice make her statements and he sees input from other areas of the administration. Petraeus -- it is believed -- will tell the committee he is not certain where Susan Rice got all of her information."

    Petraeus 'Knew Almost Immediately' Al Qaeda-Linked Group Responsible for Benghazi | The Weekly Standard
     
  4. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,584
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,677
    Don't see where the crime is that requires a special prosecutor. You seem to want to make hay out of unfortunate deaths and confusion over the cause, when we have a deficit to worry about. Don't derail important work with another failed witchhunt.
     
  5. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,253
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,857
    From Petraeus..
    "The original talking points were much more specific about al-Qaeda involvement and yet the finals ones just said' indications of extremists.' It said 'indicate' even though there was clearly evidence at the CIA that there was al-Qaeda involvement."

    Obviously, what we now know is that in their final format, the talking points in question focused exclusively on the false idea that the September 11 anniversary attack was motivated by a spontaneous protest over an anti-Muslim video.

    Rep. Peter King: Petraeus Testified Rice's Original CIA Talking Points Contained al-Qaeda Element

    The reason YOU don't see is because YOU are biased. You I'm sure had NO problem with Nixon impeachment and Nixon resigning did you and no one died in Watergate!

    But here if the Obama administration LEFT out terrorism because it hurt the political narrative..i.e. Osama is dead...Obama the victor hence you should vote for Obama.
    It means people died ONLY because the Obama administration DIDN"T want to harm the political narrative!
     
  6. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,253
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,857
    WaterGate was a crime covered up by Nixon.
    Nixon was going to be impeached and resigned.

    BenghaziGate was a crime in false information being presented BEFORE the election to falsely convince voters of Obama's success in reducing terrorism..remember "Osama is Dead"???
    By manipulating Federal information for political gain is a CRIME!!!
     
  7. BlindBoo
    Offline

    BlindBoo Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2010
    Messages:
    19,625
    Thanks Received:
    2,195
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +4,399
    Were there CIA whistleblowers whose bodies are now lying at the bottom of the Potomac? Was David Petraeus being blackmailed? Are William Ayers and Jeremiah Wright involved? Did Susan Rice fly to Tripoli, have a steamy liaison with a clone of Ayman al-Zawahiri created in a secret underground laboratory, then go to Benghazi where she personally killed Ambassador Chris Stevens with a hat pin? We won’t know unless we spin this out into a multi-week story!

    So what’s going on here? I can sum it up in two words: scandal envy.

    GOP’s scandal envy - Salon.com
     

Share This Page