LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
I love this thread. Let's bump this one up on an hourly basis. Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaauuuuuuutiful!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think either is a true conservative, but these are the choices we've been presented.
I left out Santorum and Paul. I'll concede both are more conservative in their own way than either of the frontrunners...but this poll is targeted between the two frontrunners only.
Mitt is consistently more conservative, but doesn't matter because Newt is not worthy to be the nominee.
I don't think either is a true conservative, but these are the choices we've been presented.
I left out Santorum and Paul. I'll concede both are more conservative in their own way than either of the frontrunners...but this poll is targeted between the two frontrunners only.
I don't think either is a true conservative, but these are the choices we've been presented.
I left out Santorum and Paul. I'll concede both are more conservative in their own way than either of the frontrunners...but this poll is targeted between the two frontrunners only.
Thats still worth a few miles in political stock. And I bet Newt can capitalize on the RomBama Care thing and turn it into an us vs. them platform. Look what the Tea Party got out of it in the electorate revolution of 2010! Hell don't forget about the republican revolution!
Okay, he's not a conservative. A conservative would never support an amendment that denied people rights.Yes, these issues are not really on his agenda as his true agenda is our economy.
I really don't see his presidency making one bit of difference in public policy...
I don't believe Romney intends to deny anybody their rights...
Okay, he's not a conservative. A conservative would never support an amendment that denied people rights.
I don't believe Romney intends to deny anybody their rights...
I'm, then why would he say...
Romney: We Need Constitutional Amendment Defining Marriage as Between a Man and Woman | Fox News Insider
I don't believe Romney intends to deny anybody their rights...
I'm, then why would he say...
Romney: We Need Constitutional Amendment Defining Marriage as Between a Man and Woman | Fox News Insider
Yeah. Why, Val?
Okay, he's not a conservative. A conservative would never support an amendment that denied people rights.
I don't believe Romney intends to deny anybody their rights...
I'm, then why would he say...
Romney: We Need Constitutional Amendment Defining Marriage as Between a Man and Woman | Fox News Insider
I don't think either is a true conservative, but these are the choices we've been presented.
I left out Santorum and Paul. I'll concede both are more conservative in their own way than either of the frontrunners...but this poll is targeted between the two frontrunners only.
Thats still worth a few miles in political stock. And I bet Newt can capitalize on the RomBama Care thing and turn it into an us vs. them platform. Look what the Tea Party got out of it in the electorate revolution of 2010! Hell don't forget about the republican revolution!
Um, yeah, that will work.
Newt in 1993: "I am for people, individuals — exactly like automobile insurance — individuals having health insurance and being required to have health insurance.”
In 2005: "Our goal has to be for 100 percent of the country to be in the insurance system. So that means finding ways through tax credits and through vouchers so that every American can buy insurance, including, I think, a requirement that if you’re above a certain level of income, you have to either have insurance or post a bond."
In 2009: "Those who oppose the concept of insurance should be forced to post a bond to cover costs. Allowing individuals to pass their health costs on to others reinforces the attitude that their health is not their problem and adds to the irresponsible, unhealthy behaviors that bankrupt the current system."
I'm, then why would he say...
Romney: We Need Constitutional Amendment Defining Marriage as Between a Man and Woman | Fox News Insider
Yeah. Why, Val?
How does the definition of a word deny anyone their rights...?
Finally. Gingrich might have toyed with a mandate, but Mittens made one happen.
Totally.
I'm thumbing through catalogs now to figure out what I'm going to wear next year after Obama's 2nd inauguration.
I'm too depressed today to even argue about the states' rights versus federal overreach issue you're in denial of.
I don't think either is a true conservative, but these are the choices we've been presented.
I left out Santorum and Paul. I'll concede both are more conservative in their own way than either of the frontrunners...but this poll is targeted between the two frontrunners only.
Mitt is consistently more conservative, but doesn't matter because Newt is not worthy to be the nominee.
It should worry both of us that we agree.
JoeBigot is not a Republican and I have been voting GOP for almost forty years.
Yes, Newt will lead the newtlemmings over the political cliff.
Yeah. Why, Val?
How does the definition of a word deny anyone their rights...?
Because the Supreme Court of the United States of America has declared that marriage is a fundamental right. Mitt Romney wants to deny that fundamental right to gay and lesbian couples, thousands of whom are already legally married. That would equal taking rights away.
Why would anyone want to deny someone a fundamental right based on the definition of a word?
Oh, and that was supposed to be um, not I'm...damn autocorrect!
JoeBigot is not a Republican and I have been voting GOP for almost forty years.
Yes, Newt will lead the newtlemmings over the political cliff.
SNIP .
Derp is silly. Now Newt is against the mandate after he was for it? Hmmm. . . that sounds like . . . gasp . . . Mitt?
Derp is silly. Now Newt is against the mandate after he was for it? Hmmm. . . that sounds like . . . gasp . . . Mitt?
None of thee above.