the_human_being
Gold Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 15,277
- 2,741
- 290
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nope. The Senate has the right and the obligation to "Bork" any Obama nominee. Elections have consequences.Obviously your post is tongue and cheek, but as discussed in the several other threads already on this subject, Obama should be choosing a nominee and the Senate should be giving them an up or down vote. Refusing to vote until next year is an abdication of their duties.
Now if Obama nominates a pregnant, transgender dwarf, that is part American Indian or Eskimo.....all bets are off!
No, but they will name someone to replace him and Republicans will not be happyNeither Obama nor Hillary will replace Scalia.Hard to say really. Given that he was president when Scalia died, it should probably be Obama. But Hillary is more likely to name a young, liberal judge
So I think we would be better off with Hillary's choice
Taking no action is taking action. The Republicans are under no obligation to give an up or down vote.Nope. The Senate has the right and the obligation to "Bork" any Obama nominee. Elections have consequences.Obviously your post is tongue and cheek, but as discussed in the several other threads already on this subject, Obama should be choosing a nominee and the Senate should be giving them an up or down vote. Refusing to vote until next year is an abdication of their duties.
Now if Obama nominates a pregnant, transgender dwarf, that is part American Indian or Eskimo.....all bets are off!
Then let the Senate make a stand and vote up or down. Republicans plan to take no action
lol.No, but they will name someone to replace him and Republicans will not be happyNeither Obama nor Hillary will replace Scalia.Hard to say really. Given that he was president when Scalia died, it should probably be Obama. But Hillary is more likely to name a young, liberal judge
So I think we would be better off with Hillary's choice
Hillary will have a Democratic Senate to approve her liberal pick
Nope. The Senate has the right and the obligation to "Bork" any Obama nominee. Elections have consequences.Obviously your post is tongue and cheek, but as discussed in the several other threads already on this subject, Obama should be choosing a nominee and the Senate should be giving them an up or down vote. Refusing to vote until next year is an abdication of their duties.
Now if Obama nominates a pregnant, transgender dwarf, that is part American Indian or Eskimo.....all bets are off!
Then let the Senate make a stand and vote up or down. Republicans plan to take no action
Taking no action is taking action. The Republicans are under no obligation to give an up or down vote.Nope. The Senate has the right and the obligation to "Bork" any Obama nominee. Elections have consequences.Obviously your post is tongue and cheek, but as discussed in the several other threads already on this subject, Obama should be choosing a nominee and the Senate should be giving them an up or down vote. Refusing to vote until next year is an abdication of their duties.
Now if Obama nominates a pregnant, transgender dwarf, that is part American Indian or Eskimo.....all bets are off!
Then let the Senate make a stand and vote up or down. Republicans plan to take no action
Tough shit the Constitution still requires them to do their job. That's what Scalia would have said.Nope. The Senate has the right and the obligation to "Bork" any Obama nominee. Elections have consequences.Obviously your post is tongue and cheek, but as discussed in the several other threads already on this subject, Obama should be choosing a nominee and the Senate should be giving them an up or down vote. Refusing to vote until next year is an abdication of their duties.
Now if Obama nominates a pregnant, transgender dwarf, that is part American Indian or Eskimo.....all bets are off!
Then let the Senate make a stand and vote up or down. Republicans plan to take no action
Tough shit. Elections have consequences. Democrats lost the Senate.
And the Senates role is to vote on the Supreme Court nomineeNope. The Senate has the right and the obligation to "Bork" any Obama nominee. Elections have consequences.Obviously your post is tongue and cheek, but as discussed in the several other threads already on this subject, Obama should be choosing a nominee and the Senate should be giving them an up or down vote. Refusing to vote until next year is an abdication of their duties.
Now if Obama nominates a pregnant, transgender dwarf, that is part American Indian or Eskimo.....all bets are off!
Then let the Senate make a stand and vote up or down. Republicans plan to take no action
Tough shit. Elections have consequences. Democrats lost the Senate.
And the Senates role is to vote on the Supreme Court nomineeNope. The Senate has the right and the obligation to "Bork" any Obama nominee. Elections have consequences.Obviously your post is tongue and cheek, but as discussed in the several other threads already on this subject, Obama should be choosing a nominee and the Senate should be giving them an up or down vote. Refusing to vote until next year is an abdication of their duties.
Now if Obama nominates a pregnant, transgender dwarf, that is part American Indian or Eskimo.....all bets are off!
Then let the Senate make a stand and vote up or down. Republicans plan to take no action
Tough shit. Elections have consequences. Democrats lost the Senate.
Hard to say really. Given that he was president when Scalia died, it should probably be Obama. But Hillary is more likely to name a young, liberal judge
So I think we would be better off with Hillary's choice
I personally think Obamas hands are tied. He has to go with a moderate to bait the Republicans into confirming
Hillary will be free to name a young liberal that Obama can't at this point in his term
Republicans may sit on their hands until things shake out and then jump to Obamas pick when the election looks bad
Too late then
Let's see them stand up and actually take a position on the Obama nomineeAnd the Senates role is to vote on the Supreme Court nomineeNope. The Senate has the right and the obligation to "Bork" any Obama nominee. Elections have consequences.Obviously your post is tongue and cheek, but as discussed in the several other threads already on this subject, Obama should be choosing a nominee and the Senate should be giving them an up or down vote. Refusing to vote until next year is an abdication of their duties.
Now if Obama nominates a pregnant, transgender dwarf, that is part American Indian or Eskimo.....all bets are off!
Then let the Senate make a stand and vote up or down. Republicans plan to take no action
Tough shit. Elections have consequences. Democrats lost the Senate.
Nope. The Senate's role is to hold hearings and interview the nominee in the Senate Judiciary committee. Then decide if the nominee is worthy of a vote. That is what they'll do. Since the committee has a solid GOP majority, I don't see any nominee getting past the "vetting" process. Elections have consequences.
I personally think Obamas hands are tied. He has to go with a moderate to bait the Republicans into confirming
Hillary will be free to name a young liberal that Obama can't at this point in his term
Republicans may sit on their hands until things shake out and then jump to Obamas pick when the election looks bad
Too late then
Either way the republican congress is screwed...If Obama picks anyone and they try to delay, they will lose votes people are pissed about the delays and not working when we pay them....
Makes me laugh to see Ted Cruz, and Mitch pee their pants.........
What Obama is doing today~
I personally think Obamas hands are tied. He has to go with a moderate to bait the Republicans into confirming
Hillary will be free to name a young liberal that Obama can't at this point in his term
Republicans may sit on their hands until things shake out and then jump to Obamas pick when the election looks bad
Too late then
Either way the republican congress is screwed...If Obama picks anyone and they try to delay, they will lose votes people are pissed about the delays and not working when we pay them....
Makes me laugh to see Ted Cruz, and Mitch pee their pants.........
What Obama is doing today~