Who Judges The Judges?

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,898
60,271
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
How about the persons we elect?

Say.....the President?



1.The judicial decisions of the Supreme Court should be treated the same way Red and Green lights are treated in Rome....as merely a suggestion.

So saith the Constitution.



2. "Trump to order citizenship question on census, despite Supreme Court ruling"
Trump to order citizenship question on census, despite Supreme Court ruling

Exactly as it should be!



3. Every American with a facility in the English language has the same ability to judge the rectitude of Supreme Court pronouncements as any Justice does.

So....what right has the court to tell the President not to ask the citizenship question????
None.



4.The glaring, and momentous, mistake on the part of the Founders, was the Judicial (Supreme Court and lower Courts) Branch of the government.
Before any excuse for the error is mounted , it should be noted that the Constitution does not provide for what is called ‘judicial review,’ nor is the concept found in English law.


5.“If the framers—the authors and, most important, the ratifiers of the Constitution—had decided to grant the power, one would expect to see it, like the analogous presidential veto power, not only plainly stated but limited by giving conditions for its exercise and by making clear provision for Congress to have the last word. It appears that the framers mistakenly envisioned the power as involving merely the application of clear rules to disallow clear violations, something that in fact rarely occurs.” Professor Lino Graglia, https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/0817946020_1.pdf




6. A series of essays, written under the name ‘Brutus,’ warned of exactly the situation we find ourselves in today:

“…they have made the judges independent, in the fullest sense of the word. There is no power above them,to controul any of their decisions. There is no authority that can remove them, and they cannot be controuled by the laws of the legislature. In short, they are independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under heaven. Men placed in this situation will generally soon feel themselves independent of heaven itself.”
Brutus, March 20, 1788
http://www.constitution.org/afp/brutus15.htm



Ask the question!

Unless you already know that 50-80 million illegal aliens already reside in America.
 
Who Judges The Judges?

upload_2019-7-11_8-31-40.jpeg


We do.....
 
Who Judges The Judges?

View attachment 268794

We do.....



Do you vote for Supreme Court Justices????


How do you explain a paid apparatchik for the communist ACLU has been a Justice for over a quarter century.

And another justice doesn't believe in free speech.



The Constitution is written in English...It need not be interpreted, and anyone can apply it.


The Court is a scam and a fraud.

Strong Presidents ignore it.
 
=




6. A series of essays, written under the name ‘Brutus,’ warned of exactly the situation we find ourselves in today:

“…they have made the judges independent, in the fullest sense of the word. There is no power above them,to controul any of their decisions. There is no authority that can remove them, and they cannot be controuled by the laws of the legislature. In short, they are independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under heaven. Men placed in this situation will generally soon feel themselves independent of heaven itself.”
Brutus, March 20, 1788
http://www.constitution.org/afp/brutus15.htm

Brutus and the OP are misinforming and distorting. Supreme Court Justices can be impeached by Congress.
 
They all graduate from the same schools....its like a box of chocolates....
 
=




6. A series of essays, written under the name ‘Brutus,’ warned of exactly the situation we find ourselves in today:

“…they have made the judges independent, in the fullest sense of the word. There is no power above them,to controul any of their decisions. There is no authority that can remove them, and they cannot be controuled by the laws of the legislature. In short, they are independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under heaven. Men placed in this situation will generally soon feel themselves independent of heaven itself.”
Brutus, March 20, 1788
http://www.constitution.org/afp/brutus15.htm

Brutus and the OP are misinforming and distorting. Supreme Court Justices can be impeached by Congress.



Nothing in the Constitution mandated that their pronouncements need be followed; they can be ignored.


The same applies to your posts.
 
=




6. A series of essays, written under the name ‘Brutus,’ warned of exactly the situation we find ourselves in today:

“…they have made the judges independent, in the fullest sense of the word. There is no power above them,to controul any of their decisions. There is no authority that can remove them, and they cannot be controuled by the laws of the legislature. In short, they are independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under heaven. Men placed in this situation will generally soon feel themselves independent of heaven itself.”
Brutus, March 20, 1788
http://www.constitution.org/afp/brutus15.htm

Brutus and the OP are misinforming and distorting. Supreme Court Justices can be impeached by Congress.



Nothing in the Constitution mandated that their pronouncements need be followed; they can be ignored.


The same applies to your posts.
Judges can hold people in contempt and put them in jail indefinitely. The people via Congress can neutralize misbehavior of the courts, including the Supreme Court. You will never be smarter or even as smart as our founding fathers.

Once Donald Dork realized the courts would be his equal and a problem for him, he began bad-mouthing them and demonizing them. What we have here, with this thread, is a loyal lemming following her marching orders.
 
Someone needs to interpret the Constitution calling balls and strikes. Unfortunately, there isn’t a perfect system for doing that. An “activist” court striking down all legislation is as bad as a “restraint” court never striking anything down. There will always be someone who rails against a SC decision no matter what happens.A Five men majority on the bench decide what’s what and that’s all there is to it.
 
Who Judges The Judges?

View attachment 268794

We do.....



Do you vote for Supreme Court Justices????


How do you explain a paid apparatchik for the communist ACLU has been a Justice for over a quarter century.

And another justice doesn't believe in free speech.



The Constitution is written in English...It need not be interpreted, and anyone can apply it.


The Court is a scam and a fraud.

Strong Presidents ignore it.
This country is based on the checks and balances in the Constitution. Are you saying one branch can seize the power delegated to another branch? Sounds like tyranny to me.

If the Supreme Court declares a law to be unconstitutional it can't be enforced. If it is the rule of law is history and we'll soon have another Hitler or Stalin.
 
Who Judges The Judges?

View attachment 268794

We do.....



Do you vote for Supreme Court Justices????


How do you explain a paid apparatchik for the communist ACLU has been a Justice for over a quarter century.

And another justice doesn't believe in free speech.



The Constitution is written in English...It need not be interpreted, and anyone can apply it.


The Court is a scam and a fraud.

Strong Presidents ignore it.
This country is based on the checks and balances in the Constitution. Are you saying one branch can seize the power delegated to another branch? Sounds like tyranny to me.

If the Supreme Court declares a law to be unconstitutional it can't be enforced. If it is the rule of law is history and we'll soon have another Hitler or Stalin.
Trump should be careful about bad mouthing the Chief Justice. If he gets impeached, the Chief Justice will supervise and conduct his trial in the Senate.
 
=




6. A series of essays, written under the name ‘Brutus,’ warned of exactly the situation we find ourselves in today:

“…they have made the judges independent, in the fullest sense of the word. There is no power above them,to controul any of their decisions. There is no authority that can remove them, and they cannot be controuled by the laws of the legislature. In short, they are independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under heaven. Men placed in this situation will generally soon feel themselves independent of heaven itself.”
Brutus, March 20, 1788
http://www.constitution.org/afp/brutus15.htm

Brutus and the OP are misinforming and distorting. Supreme Court Justices can be impeached by Congress.



Nothing in the Constitution mandated that their pronouncements need be followed; they can be ignored.


The same applies to your posts.
Judges can hold people in contempt and put them in jail indefinitely. The people via Congress can neutralize misbehavior of the courts, including the Supreme Court. You will never be smarter or even as smart as our founding fathers.

Once Donald Dork realized the courts would be his equal and a problem for him, he began bad-mouthing them and demonizing them. What we have here, with this thread, is a loyal lemming following her marching orders.



Name a President who the Court has had jailed for contempt.



Name a Supreme Court Justice how has been impeached by Congress.


Seems I'm a lot smarter than you, huh?
 
Who Judges The Judges?

View attachment 268794

We do.....



Do you vote for Supreme Court Justices????


How do you explain a paid apparatchik for the communist ACLU has been a Justice for over a quarter century.

And another justice doesn't believe in free speech.



The Constitution is written in English...It need not be interpreted, and anyone can apply it.


The Court is a scam and a fraud.

Strong Presidents ignore it.
This country is based on the checks and balances in the Constitution. Are you saying one branch can seize the power delegated to another branch? Sounds like tyranny to me.

If the Supreme Court declares a law to be unconstitutional it can't be enforced. If it is the rule of law is history and we'll soon have another Hitler or Stalin.
Trump should be careful about bad mouthing the Chief Justice. If he gets impeached, the Chief Justice will supervise and conduct his trial in the Senate.


Will he be impeached?


See what I mean about ignoring your posts, you dunce?
 
The fastest way for neutralizing the court is by increasing or decreasing the number of Justices on the court.
 
Who Judges The Judges?

View attachment 268794

We do.....



Do you vote for Supreme Court Justices????


How do you explain a paid apparatchik for the communist ACLU has been a Justice for over a quarter century.

And another justice doesn't believe in free speech.



The Constitution is written in English...It need not be interpreted, and anyone can apply it.


The Court is a scam and a fraud.

Strong Presidents ignore it.
This country is based on the checks and balances in the Constitution. Are you saying one branch can seize the power delegated to another branch? Sounds like tyranny to me.

If the Supreme Court declares a law to be unconstitutional it can't be enforced. If it is the rule of law is history and we'll soon have another Hitler or Stalin.



This is what I'm saying, and have said.

3. Every American with a facility in the English language has the same ability to judge the rectitude of Supreme Court pronouncements as any Justice does.

So....what right has the court to tell the President not to ask the citizenship question????
None.



4.The glaring, and momentous, mistake on the part of the Founders, was the Judicial (Supreme Court and lower Courts) Branch of the government.
Before any excuse for the error is mounted , it should be noted that the Constitution does not provide for what is called ‘judicial review,’ nor is the concept found in English law.


5.“If the framers—the authors and, most important, the ratifiers of the Constitution—had decided to grant the power, one would expect to see it, like the analogous presidential veto power, not only plainly stated but limited by giving conditions for its exercise and by making clear provision for Congress to have the last word. It appears that the framers mistakenly envisioned the power as involving merely the application of clear rules to disallow clear violations, something that in fact rarely occurs.” Professor Lino Graglia, https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/0817946020_1.pdf




6. A series of essays, written under the name ‘Brutus,’ warned of exactly the situation we find ourselves in today:

“…they have made the judges independent, in the fullest sense of the word. There is no power above them,to controul any of their decisions. There is no authority that can remove them, and they cannot be controuled by the laws of the legislature. In short, they are independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under heaven. Men placed in this situation will generally soon feel themselves independent of heaven itself.”
Brutus, March 20, 1788
http://www.constitution.org/afp/brutus15.htm






What part did you miss, you moron????
 
Someone needs to interpret the Constitution calling balls and strikes. Unfortunately, there isn’t a perfect system for doing that. An “activist” court striking down all legislation is as bad as a “restraint” court never striking anything down. There will always be someone who rails against a SC decision no matter what happens.A Five men majority on the bench decide what’s what and that’s all there is to it.



"Someone needs to interpret the Constitution calling balls and strikes."

3. Every American with a facility in the English language has the same ability to judge the rectitude of Supreme Court pronouncements as any Justice does.


I recommend:

51mXsv9AVIL._SX340_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
 
=




6. A series of essays, written under the name ‘Brutus,’ warned of exactly the situation we find ourselves in today:

“…they have made the judges independent, in the fullest sense of the word. There is no power above them,to controul any of their decisions. There is no authority that can remove them, and they cannot be controuled by the laws of the legislature. In short, they are independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under heaven. Men placed in this situation will generally soon feel themselves independent of heaven itself.”
Brutus, March 20, 1788
http://www.constitution.org/afp/brutus15.htm

Brutus and the OP are misinforming and distorting. Supreme Court Justices can be impeached by Congress.



Nothing in the Constitution mandated that their pronouncements need be followed; they can be ignored.


The same applies to your posts.
Judges can hold people in contempt and put them in jail indefinitely. The people via Congress can neutralize misbehavior of the courts, including the Supreme Court. You will never be smarter or even as smart as our founding fathers.

Once Donald Dork realized the courts would be his equal and a problem for him, he began bad-mouthing them and demonizing them. What we have here, with this thread, is a loyal lemming following her marching orders.



Name a President who the Court has had jailed for contempt.



Name a Supreme Court Justice how has been impeached by Congress.


Seems I'm a lot smarter than you, huh?
The President does not have to be the target of a contempt charge, his underlings can be the targets.

Justice Chase was impeached.
 
How about the persons we elect?

Say.....the President?



1.The judicial decisions of the Supreme Court should be treated the same way Red and Green lights are treated in Rome....as merely a suggestion.

So saith the Constitution.



2. "Trump to order citizenship question on census, despite Supreme Court ruling"
Trump to order citizenship question on census, despite Supreme Court ruling

Exactly as it should be!



3. Every American with a facility in the English language has the same ability to judge the rectitude of Supreme Court pronouncements as any Justice does.

So....what right has the court to tell the President not to ask the citizenship question????
None.



4.The glaring, and momentous, mistake on the part of the Founders, was the Judicial (Supreme Court and lower Courts) Branch of the government.
Before any excuse for the error is mounted , it should be noted that the Constitution does not provide for what is called ‘judicial review,’ nor is the concept found in English law.


5.“If the framers—the authors and, most important, the ratifiers of the Constitution—had decided to grant the power, one would expect to see it, like the analogous presidential veto power, not only plainly stated but limited by giving conditions for its exercise and by making clear provision for Congress to have the last word. It appears that the framers mistakenly envisioned the power as involving merely the application of clear rules to disallow clear violations, something that in fact rarely occurs.” Professor Lino Graglia, https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/0817946020_1.pdf




6. A series of essays, written under the name ‘Brutus,’ warned of exactly the situation we find ourselves in today:

“…they have made the judges independent, in the fullest sense of the word. There is no power above them,to controul any of their decisions. There is no authority that can remove them, and they cannot be controuled by the laws of the legislature. In short, they are independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under heaven. Men placed in this situation will generally soon feel themselves independent of heaven itself.”
Brutus, March 20, 1788
http://www.constitution.org/afp/brutus15.htm



Ask the question!

Unless you already know that 50-80 million illegal aliens already reside in America.
If a President ignores the SC ruling that a policy or law is Unconstitutional, he will go down in history as engaging in an unlawful act....eg a criminal. Made to order for an impeachment hearing, wouldn't you say?
 

Forum List

Back
Top