who is more dangerous to the country?

[blu]

Who is more dangerous to the USA:

neocons who want to nuke any country who doesn't bow to us
or
liberals who wouldn't fight back even if 9/11 happened ten times over

 

[Modbert]

Both.

 

[hjmick]

Canadians.

 

[brewerboy]

Dumb poll.

 

[JScott]

Who is more dangerous to the USA:

neocons who want to nuke any country who doesn't bow to us
or
liberals who wouldn't fight back even if 9/11 happened ten times over

Both have their good points and bad points. Both are dangerous if given the rope. Both can be helpful.

Youre view about both parties is a little extreme.

 

[Modbert]

Canadians.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYSYipouABI]YouTube - South Park Uncut - Song - Blame Canada[/ame]

 

[brewerboy]

Who is more dangerous to the USA:

neocons who want to nuke any country who doesn't bow to us
or
liberals who wouldn't fight back even if 9/11 happened ten times over

Both have their good points and bad points. Both are dangerous if given the rope. Both can be helpful.

Youre view about both parties is a little extreme.

"A little" extreme????

 

[Mr. H.]

The pen won't stay the demon's wings- the hour approaches, pounding out the devil's sermon.

 

[JScott]

Who is more dangerous to the USA:

neocons who want to nuke any country who doesn't bow to us
or
liberals who wouldn't fight back even if 9/11 happened ten times over

Both have their good points and bad points. Both are dangerous if given the rope. Both can be helpful.

Youre view about both parties is a little extreme.

"A little" extreme????

Well, everyone is entitled to their opinion.

 

[brewerboy]

Both have their good points and bad points. Both are dangerous if given the rope. Both can be helpful.

Youre view about both parties is a little extreme.

"A little" extreme????

Well, everyone is entitled to their opinion.

Agreed, but that doesnt make it intelligent

 

[rdean]

Who is more dangerous to the USA:

neocons who want to nuke any country who doesn't bow to us
or
liberals who wouldn't fight back even if 9/11 happened ten times over

You mean like "FDR"?

If Conservatives think Liberals won't fight, it shows how little they know about an opponent. Having such a lack of understanding proves they are not fit to lead. Put them in power and they will run around starting wars without a clue how to finish them.

 

[Modbert]

Well, everyone is entitled to their opinion.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bWHAFXKlfQ&feature=related]YouTube - South Park uncut - Song - Its easy Mmmkay[/ame]

 

[wethepeople]

Hahaha!! Thought the libtards didn't take any stock in polls?? B hussein is still going down!!! In the polls!!! Lol

 

[Mister T]

Who is more dangerous to the USA:

neocons who want to nuke any country who doesn't bow to us
or
liberals who wouldn't fight back even if 9/11 happened ten times over

partisan hacks

 

[asaratis]

The choices in the voting block are not the same as described in the posted text of the OP.

Meek liberals are far more dangerous than sword rattlers.

Blessed are the meek, for they shall become slaves to invading mongrels.

However, nuking all countries that do not bow to us is not on the agenda.

 

[Si modo]

Those who are passive are the most dangerous.




All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

Better be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident security.

He who wrestles with us strengthens our nerves and sharpens our skill. Our antagonist is our helper.

No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little.

The wise determine from the gravity of the case; the irritable, from sensibility to oppression; the high minded, from disdain and indignation at abusive power in unworthy hands.

No passion so effectually robs the mind of all its powers of acting and reasoning as fear.




Edmund Burke's wise words are applicable once again in our day.

 

[Mr Natural]

Shouldn't the choices have been:

Perpetual War Conservatives

and

No War Ever Liberals

?

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Who is more dangerous to the USA:

neocons who want to nuke any country who doesn't bow to us
or
liberals who wouldn't fight back even if 9/11 happened ten times over

I hate to be a jerk but I say neither. You are painting conservatives as warmongers ready to nuke everyone which is innacurate, most conservatives dont want wars.

then you paint liberals as peace loving beatnicks who wouldn't respond to a 9/11 style attack, which also isn't accurate.


I think ignorance and a willful end to truthful, investigative reporting is the biggest danger to the country of the USA.

 

[RadiomanATL]

My IQ just dropped by looking at that poll.

Bad poster! Bad! Don't do that again!

 

[Polk]

Who is more dangerous to the USA:

neocons who want to nuke any country who doesn't bow to us
or
liberals who wouldn't fight back even if 9/11 happened ten times over

You mean like "FDR"?

If Conservatives think Liberals won't fight, it shows how little they know about an opponent. Having such a lack of understanding proves they are not fit to lead. Put them in power and they will run around starting wars without a clue how to finish them.

Indeed.