‘White Women’ Becomes a Disparaging Term

[2aguy]

Democrats are no longer satisfied just lashing out at white men. Now they're going after the women too, many who have been sympathetic to their hate filled lunacy.

Today, white women are being lumped together into a giant bloc subject to absurdly broad stereotyping and vitriolic condemnation. They’re being told to step back and know their place by writers in the New York Times (“white women benefit from patriarchy by trading on their whiteness to monopolize resources for mutual gain”), The New Yorker (“despite the enduring legacy of testimony by black women, white women have often played the protagonists in the history of sexual violence, and black women have been relegated to the supporting cast”) and NBC News (“white women who voted for Trump . . . clearly have no issue with the president’s openly misogynistic behavior, his demeaning of female reporters and his mocking of [Christine Blasey] Ford”).

A writer for The Root castigated Taylor Swift because “like some white women, she uses her privilege to not be involved until she’s directly affected.” Talia Lavin, the New Yorker fact-checker who resigned in June after erroneously suggesting that an ICE agent (who turned out to be a combat-wounded Marine Corps veteran) had a Nazi tattoo, continues to contribute to The New Yorker and tells her 51,000 Twitter followers, “patriarchy won’t protect you no matter how hard white women fight for it.” “White women use strategic tears to silence women of colour,” ran a headline in the Guardian. On the basis of five phone calls, plus the story of what happened to Emmett Till in 1955, Rolling Stone published an essay entitled, “Why White Women Keep Calling the Police on Black People,” blaming them for “a new 21st century version of Jim Crow.” It wouldn’t be terribly difficult, in a nation of 300 million, to come up with five examples of black men who had murdered white women, but if you wrote an essay entitled “Why Black Men Keep Murdering White Women” you would rightly be barred from writing for just about any reputable journalistic outfit. The intellectual error of making invidious generalizations about large groups of people based on superficial characteristics is obvious. So is the moral error.

Democrats’ “White Women” Castigation | National Review

A ridiculous lie contrived by the right, propagated by a rightwing publication.

Most conservatives are truly this stupid to think anyone would believe their idiotic lies.

Moron...it was a left wing journalist who put out an article on this very topic....

 

[petro]

What an extraordinary time for white women. Finally breaking the glass ceiling and joining white men as the oppressors and demons of the world.
You've come a long way baby!
Congratulations?

 

[2aguy]

I find this whole attack on “white women” very confusing...

Unlike many other minority groups, women in general and white women specifically have a far wider variety of opinions, viewpoints and lifestyles amongst them. These differences are based on geographical location, social and financial ststus and personal variations.

The whole idea that any particular set of values can be attributed to “white women” is ridiculous.

You are dealing with left wingers......they will turn on everyone in the end...... the guillotine in France took off the heads of the first revolutionaries right after it took off the heads of the Nobility.....today's left will be no different...

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I know plenty of 'white women' that are bat shit crazy

I'm sure you do since you hang out in liberal circles. Leftists are generally nuts to begin with so no surprise your bitches are crazy too.

One of the craziest WW I am aware of knows more forms of martial arts than most humans could name.
She is a master of Krav Maga. 99% of males that she competes with don't go back for a second helping.
She carries 24/7, even when sleeping, and works for LE. She has legal fully auto at her beck & call.
She is a high strung Republican & she has no problem telling anyone to GFTS.
I NEVER talk politics with her

The craziest women I know are all Democrat leeches in DC and almost all if them are minorities. Unhinged nuts.

 

[2aguy]

I know plenty of 'white women' that are bat shit crazy

I'm sure you do since you hang out in liberal circles. Leftists are generally nuts to begin with so no surprise your bitches are crazy too.

One of the craziest WW I am aware of knows more forms of martial arts than most humans could name.
She is a master of Krav Maga. 99% of males that she competes with don't go back for a second helping.
She carries 24/7, even when sleeping, and works for LE. She has legal fully auto at her beck & call.
She is a high strung Republican & she has no problem telling anyone to GFTS.
I NEVER talk politics with her

Of course you don't...you are silly and a coward. You should talk politics with her, she will be polite and will engage without the hate you always show.... you would learn a lot...

 

[ptbw forever]

I know plenty of 'white women' that are bat shit crazy

I'm sure you do since you hang out in liberal circles. Leftists are generally nuts to begin with so no surprise your bitches are crazy too.

One of the craziest WW I am aware of knows more forms of martial arts than most humans could name.
She is a master of Krav Maga. 99% of males that she competes with don't go back for a second helping.
She carries 24/7, even when sleeping, and works for LE. She has legal fully auto at her beck & call.
She is a high strung Republican & she has no problem telling anyone to GFTS.
I NEVER talk politics with her

She sounds awesome.

Move over beta boy. LOL

 

[2aguy]

Democrats are no longer satisfied just lashing out at white men. Now they're going after the women too, many who have been sympathetic to their hate filled lunacy.

Today, white women are being lumped together into a giant bloc subject to absurdly broad stereotyping and vitriolic condemnation. They’re being told to step back and know their place by writers in the New York Times (“white women benefit from patriarchy by trading on their whiteness to monopolize resources for mutual gain”), The New Yorker (“despite the enduring legacy of testimony by black women, white women have often played the protagonists in the history of sexual violence, and black women have been relegated to the supporting cast”) and NBC News (“white women who voted for Trump . . . clearly have no issue with the president’s openly misogynistic behavior, his demeaning of female reporters and his mocking of [Christine Blasey] Ford”).

A writer for The Root castigated Taylor Swift because “like some white women, she uses her privilege to not be involved until she’s directly affected.” Talia Lavin, the New Yorker fact-checker who resigned in June after erroneously suggesting that an ICE agent (who turned out to be a combat-wounded Marine Corps veteran) had a Nazi tattoo, continues to contribute to The New Yorker and tells her 51,000 Twitter followers, “patriarchy won’t protect you no matter how hard white women fight for it.” “White women use strategic tears to silence women of colour,” ran a headline in the Guardian. On the basis of five phone calls, plus the story of what happened to Emmett Till in 1955, Rolling Stone published an essay entitled, “Why White Women Keep Calling the Police on Black People,” blaming them for “a new 21st century version of Jim Crow.” It wouldn’t be terribly difficult, in a nation of 300 million, to come up with five examples of black men who had murdered white women, but if you wrote an essay entitled “Why Black Men Keep Murdering White Women” you would rightly be barred from writing for just about any reputable journalistic outfit. The intellectual error of making invidious generalizations about large groups of people based on superficial characteristics is obvious. So is the moral error.

Democrats’ “White Women” Castigation | National Review

A ridiculous lie contrived by the right, propagated by a rightwing publication.

Most conservatives are truly this stupid to think anyone would believe their idiotic lies.

But let's never forget that dems were the party of slavery and segregation and still operate within that paradigm today.

Yep....the one thing that changed is that instead of only wanting to keep Blacks as slaves, they now want everyone to be their slaves, regardless of race...

 

[BrokeLoser]

Democrats are no longer satisfied just lashing out at white men. Now they're going after the women too, many who have been sympathetic to their hate filled lunacy.

Today, white women are being lumped together into a giant bloc subject to absurdly broad stereotyping and vitriolic condemnation. They’re being told to step back and know their place by writers in the New York Times (“white women benefit from patriarchy by trading on their whiteness to monopolize resources for mutual gain”), The New Yorker (“despite the enduring legacy of testimony by black women, white women have often played the protagonists in the history of sexual violence, and black women have been relegated to the supporting cast”) and NBC News (“white women who voted for Trump . . . clearly have no issue with the president’s openly misogynistic behavior, his demeaning of female reporters and his mocking of [Christine Blasey] Ford”).

A writer for The Root castigated Taylor Swift because “like some white women, she uses her privilege to not be involved until she’s directly affected.” Talia Lavin, the New Yorker fact-checker who resigned in June after erroneously suggesting that an ICE agent (who turned out to be a combat-wounded Marine Corps veteran) had a Nazi tattoo, continues to contribute to The New Yorker and tells her 51,000 Twitter followers, “patriarchy won’t protect you no matter how hard white women fight for it.” “White women use strategic tears to silence women of colour,” ran a headline in the Guardian. On the basis of five phone calls, plus the story of what happened to Emmett Till in 1955, Rolling Stone published an essay entitled, “Why White Women Keep Calling the Police on Black People,” blaming them for “a new 21st century version of Jim Crow.” It wouldn’t be terribly difficult, in a nation of 300 million, to come up with five examples of black men who had murdered white women, but if you wrote an essay entitled “Why Black Men Keep Murdering White Women” you would rightly be barred from writing for just about any reputable journalistic outfit. The intellectual error of making invidious generalizations about large groups of people based on superficial characteristics is obvious. So is the moral error.

Democrats’ “White Women” Castigation | National Review

Democrats are no longer satisfied just lashing out at white men. Now they're going after the women too, many who have been sympathetic to their hate filled lunacy.

Payback. Revenge. Here it comes.
.

These wacks forget that >70% of the nation is still white. The ignorant fools start fights they’re destined to lose...seems pretty stupid. They won’t be happy until we have them riding at the back of the bus again.
Make America Racist Again...ain’t that right LefTards?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I know plenty of 'white women' that are bat shit crazy

I'm sure you do since you hang out in liberal circles. Leftists are generally nuts to begin with so no surprise your bitches are crazy too.

One of the craziest WW I am aware of knows more forms of martial arts than most humans could name.
She is a master of Krav Maga. 99% of males that she competes with don't go back for a second helping.
She carries 24/7, even when sleeping, and works for LE. She has legal fully auto at her beck & call.
She is a high strung Republican & she has no problem telling anyone to GFTS.
I NEVER talk politics with her

The wrath of the caddo kid sure turned into a whimper in record time.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Only leftist logic would conclude that since they lost an election the key to winning must be disparaging even more groups of voters.

 

[OldLady]

Democrats are no longer satisfied just lashing out at white men. Now they're going after the women too, many who have been sympathetic to their hate filled lunacy.

Today, white women are being lumped together into a giant bloc subject to absurdly broad stereotyping and vitriolic condemnation. They’re being told to step back and know their place by writers in the New York Times (“white women benefit from patriarchy by trading on their whiteness to monopolize resources for mutual gain”), The New Yorker (“despite the enduring legacy of testimony by black women, white women have often played the protagonists in the history of sexual violence, and black women have been relegated to the supporting cast”) and NBC News (“white women who voted for Trump . . . clearly have no issue with the president’s openly misogynistic behavior, his demeaning of female reporters and his mocking of [Christine Blasey] Ford”).

A writer for The Root castigated Taylor Swift because “like some white women, she uses her privilege to not be involved until she’s directly affected.” Talia Lavin, the New Yorker fact-checker who resigned in June after erroneously suggesting that an ICE agent (who turned out to be a combat-wounded Marine Corps veteran) had a Nazi tattoo, continues to contribute to The New Yorker and tells her 51,000 Twitter followers, “patriarchy won’t protect you no matter how hard white women fight for it.” “White women use strategic tears to silence women of colour,” ran a headline in the Guardian. On the basis of five phone calls, plus the story of what happened to Emmett Till in 1955, Rolling Stone published an essay entitled, “Why White Women Keep Calling the Police on Black People,” blaming them for “a new 21st century version of Jim Crow.” It wouldn’t be terribly difficult, in a nation of 300 million, to come up with five examples of black men who had murdered white women, but if you wrote an essay entitled “Why Black Men Keep Murdering White Women” you would rightly be barred from writing for just about any reputable journalistic outfit. The intellectual error of making invidious generalizations about large groups of people based on superficial characteristics is obvious. So is the moral error.

Democrats’ “White Women” Castigation | National Review

It is puzzling to me why a woman would close her eyes to Trump's attitude and behavior toward women, and it is particularly hard for me to hear women calling Dr. Ford a Dem shill liar and the MeToo movement a bunch of attention whores. That is such political brainwashing. But women have every right to their opinions, however crazy, and those obviously have a different list of what is important.

 

[AZGAL]

 

[Theowl32]

We all know the left don't give a shit about white women, just like they don't give a shit about blacks UNLESS they are useful towards their agenda.

Which means they are patronizing racists, like I have said since I started posting here and have known since I was very young.

They use race, gender and classes in order push along their agenda.

Metoo? Are you kidding me? That leftist organization NOW helped hillary attack Paula Jones and Juanita Broderick. Yet, they both had faaaar more evidence of sexual assault. Including the testimony of state troopers.

They did not care then and they don't care now. Liberals are more than some small threat to this country. They are pathetic gasbags and deserve to have their teeth kicked out of their faces.

 

[AZGAL]

Unlike many other minority groups, women in general and white women specifically have a far wider variety of opinions, viewpoints and lifestyles amongst them. These differences are based on geographical location, social and financial ststus and personal variations.

The whole idea that any particular set of values can be attributed to “white women” is ridiculous.

Everyone was "white" in the Bosnia Herzegovina struggle, Sunni and Shia are all Muslim, the northern Irish have fought the Brits, Cartels fight each other, even Native American tribes had some conflicts: This lazy PC journalism style describing hard lines of color in a complicated world is childish. Journalism has reached an all time low when it is so much editorial. They need to leave opinions to the other writers, get off their high horses and start reporting neutral news.

 

[boedicca]

Democrats are no longer satisfied just lashing out at white men. Now they're going after the women too, many who have been sympathetic to their hate filled lunacy.

Today, white women are being lumped together into a giant bloc subject to absurdly broad stereotyping and vitriolic condemnation. They’re being told to step back and know their place by writers in the New York Times (“white women benefit from patriarchy by trading on their whiteness to monopolize resources for mutual gain”), The New Yorker (“despite the enduring legacy of testimony by black women, white women have often played the protagonists in the history of sexual violence, and black women have been relegated to the supporting cast”) and NBC News (“white women who voted for Trump . . . clearly have no issue with the president’s openly misogynistic behavior, his demeaning of female reporters and his mocking of [Christine Blasey] Ford”).

A writer for The Root castigated Taylor Swift because “like some white women, she uses her privilege to not be involved until she’s directly affected.” Talia Lavin, the New Yorker fact-checker who resigned in June after erroneously suggesting that an ICE agent (who turned out to be a combat-wounded Marine Corps veteran) had a Nazi tattoo, continues to contribute to The New Yorker and tells her 51,000 Twitter followers, “patriarchy won’t protect you no matter how hard white women fight for it.” “White women use strategic tears to silence women of colour,” ran a headline in the Guardian. On the basis of five phone calls, plus the story of what happened to Emmett Till in 1955, Rolling Stone published an essay entitled, “Why White Women Keep Calling the Police on Black People,” blaming them for “a new 21st century version of Jim Crow.” It wouldn’t be terribly difficult, in a nation of 300 million, to come up with five examples of black men who had murdered white women, but if you wrote an essay entitled “Why Black Men Keep Murdering White Women” you would rightly be barred from writing for just about any reputable journalistic outfit. The intellectual error of making invidious generalizations about large groups of people based on superficial characteristics is obvious. So is the moral error.

Democrats’ “White Women” Castigation | National Review

With Identify Politics, it's divisiveness all the way down until we get to the most Intersectional Being of All.

 

[80zephyr]

Democrats are no longer satisfied just lashing out at white men. Now they're going after the women too, many who have been sympathetic to their hate filled lunacy.

Today, white women are being lumped together into a giant bloc subject to absurdly broad stereotyping and vitriolic condemnation. They’re being told to step back and know their place by writers in the New York Times (“white women benefit from patriarchy by trading on their whiteness to monopolize resources for mutual gain”), The New Yorker (“despite the enduring legacy of testimony by black women, white women have often played the protagonists in the history of sexual violence, and black women have been relegated to the supporting cast”) and NBC News (“white women who voted for Trump . . . clearly have no issue with the president’s openly misogynistic behavior, his demeaning of female reporters and his mocking of [Christine Blasey] Ford”).

A writer for The Root castigated Taylor Swift because “like some white women, she uses her privilege to not be involved until she’s directly affected.” Talia Lavin, the New Yorker fact-checker who resigned in June after erroneously suggesting that an ICE agent (who turned out to be a combat-wounded Marine Corps veteran) had a Nazi tattoo, continues to contribute to The New Yorker and tells her 51,000 Twitter followers, “patriarchy won’t protect you no matter how hard white women fight for it.” “White women use strategic tears to silence women of colour,” ran a headline in the Guardian. On the basis of five phone calls, plus the story of what happened to Emmett Till in 1955, Rolling Stone published an essay entitled, “Why White Women Keep Calling the Police on Black People,” blaming them for “a new 21st century version of Jim Crow.” It wouldn’t be terribly difficult, in a nation of 300 million, to come up with five examples of black men who had murdered white women, but if you wrote an essay entitled “Why Black Men Keep Murdering White Women” you would rightly be barred from writing for just about any reputable journalistic outfit. The intellectual error of making invidious generalizations about large groups of people based on superficial characteristics is obvious. So is the moral error.

Democrats’ “White Women” Castigation | National Review

A ridiculous lie contrived by the right, propagated by a rightwing publication.

Most conservatives are truly this stupid to think anyone would believe their idiotic lies.

??? These are direct quotes, not some nebulous "sources say" article. If any of the link is in error, please point it out.

Mark

 

[caddo kid]

I know plenty of 'white women' that are bat shit crazy

I'm sure you do since you hang out in liberal circles. Leftists are generally nuts to begin with so no surprise your bitches are crazy too.

One of the craziest WW I am aware of knows more forms of martial arts than most humans could name.
She is a master of Krav Maga. 99% of males that she competes with don't go back for a second helping.
She carries 24/7, even when sleeping, and works for LE. She has legal fully auto at her beck & call.
She is a high strung Republican & she has no problem telling anyone to GFTS.
I NEVER talk politics with her

Of course you don't...you are silly and a coward. You should talk politics with her, she will be polite and will engage without the hate you always show.... you would learn a lot...

I have a policy: I do NOT talk politics with my family members. Capiche?

 

[Sahba]

But women have every right to their opinions, however crazy, and those obviously have a different list of what is important.

Lol, and like everyone else who makes specious assertions and cling to inane "lists of what is important", they should be called out on their sheite; apparently this would include U...

 

[ColonelAngus]

Democrats are no longer satisfied just lashing out at white men. Now they're going after the women too, many who have been sympathetic to their hate filled lunacy.

Today, white women are being lumped together into a giant bloc subject to absurdly broad stereotyping and vitriolic condemnation. They’re being told to step back and know their place by writers in the New York Times (“white women benefit from patriarchy by trading on their whiteness to monopolize resources for mutual gain”), The New Yorker (“despite the enduring legacy of testimony by black women, white women have often played the protagonists in the history of sexual violence, and black women have been relegated to the supporting cast”) and NBC News (“white women who voted for Trump . . . clearly have no issue with the president’s openly misogynistic behavior, his demeaning of female reporters and his mocking of [Christine Blasey] Ford”).

A writer for The Root castigated Taylor Swift because “like some white women, she uses her privilege to not be involved until she’s directly affected.” Talia Lavin, the New Yorker fact-checker who resigned in June after erroneously suggesting that an ICE agent (who turned out to be a combat-wounded Marine Corps veteran) had a Nazi tattoo, continues to contribute to The New Yorker and tells her 51,000 Twitter followers, “patriarchy won’t protect you no matter how hard white women fight for it.” “White women use strategic tears to silence women of colour,” ran a headline in the Guardian. On the basis of five phone calls, plus the story of what happened to Emmett Till in 1955, Rolling Stone published an essay entitled, “Why White Women Keep Calling the Police on Black People,” blaming them for “a new 21st century version of Jim Crow.” It wouldn’t be terribly difficult, in a nation of 300 million, to come up with five examples of black men who had murdered white women, but if you wrote an essay entitled “Why Black Men Keep Murdering White Women” you would rightly be barred from writing for just about any reputable journalistic outfit. The intellectual error of making invidious generalizations about large groups of people based on superficial characteristics is obvious. So is the moral error.

Democrats’ “White Women” Castigation | National Review

I know plenty of 'white women' that are bat shit crazy.

If I saw one making some ding bat false 911 call reporting some fake crap, I would certainly put the wrath of caddo kid in the face of the bat shit crazy white female.

Many years ago in America it was perfectly acceptable for whites to refer to blacks as '******.'

Did you ever have an issue with that one?

Blasey Ford is a perfect example.

Fucking nuts.

 

[Windparadox]

`
The article is a partisan OPINION piece. It cherry picks a couple of quotes then applies it to the entire left. While not very intellectual, it does make good fodder for people to meaninglessly argue about.