“Whistleblower” Potentially Identified as Eric Ciaramella, Former Obama NSC Director for Ukraine

[progressive hunter]

if it ends up being true will you apologize for being an ignorant dickhead???

no. You are still sheep that assume he is guilty off of nothing more than a blog post.

in 2016/17 when these same accusations were made against him there was never a shred of evidence or support and he still had to quit his job due to death threats

so if youre wrong youre going to be an arrogant prick and not admit you were wrong

for some reason that doesnt surprise me

there is nothing for me to be wrong about. I have not declared him innocent or guilty...just pointing out that you all assume he is off the say so of a blogger.

and if its proven true will you apologize for being a dickhead??

It does not matter, either way you assumed he was guilty based on the word of a blogger

and if that blogger ends up being right will you apologize for being a dickhead???

 

[Jitss617]

It is telling how the Trump sheep assume this guys guilt based off of an alt-right conspiracy blog.

if it ends up being true will you apologize for being an ignorant dickhead???

no. You are still sheep that assume he is guilty off of nothing more than a blog post.

in 2016/17 when these same accusations were made against him there was never a shred of evidence or support and he still had to quit his job due to death threats

so he does not even work there now?

McMaster hired him as his personal aid

Meet Eric Ciaramella — H.R. McMaster Appoints Susan Rice Ally to be his Personal Aide

and McMaster has been gone for more than a year. His aide would have been gone with him

Not if he’s the original whistle blower Remember the first whistleblower got 2nd to 3rd hand knowledge

 

[Harpy Eagle]

no. You are still sheep that assume he is guilty off of nothing more than a blog post.

in 2016/17 when these same accusations were made against him there was never a shred of evidence or support and he still had to quit his job due to death threats

so if youre wrong youre going to be an arrogant prick and not admit you were wrong

for some reason that doesnt surprise me

there is nothing for me to be wrong about. I have not declared him innocent or guilty...just pointing out that you all assume he is off the say so of a blogger.

and if its proven true will you apologize for being a dickhead??

It does not matter, either way you assumed he was guilty based on the word of a blogger

and if that blogger ends up being right will you apologize for being a dickhead???

no, as it changes nothing.

 

[Jitss617]

Eric Ciaramella knows Alexandra Chalupa very well. Yes the same Chalupa that interfered in the election via Ukraine and the DNC. Yes the same Chalupa that worked with DNC serial Bomber and pedo Brett Kimberlin.


Getting deep

and you know this how?

I can’t reveal my sources are I’m investigation that I can’t talk about

 

[progressive hunter]

so if youre wrong youre going to be an arrogant prick and not admit you were wrong

for some reason that doesnt surprise me

there is nothing for me to be wrong about. I have not declared him innocent or guilty...just pointing out that you all assume he is off the say so of a blogger.

and if its proven true will you apologize for being a dickhead??

It does not matter, either way you assumed he was guilty based on the word of a blogger

and if that blogger ends up being right will you apologize for being a dickhead???

no, as it changes nothing.

your right,, it wont change you being a dickhead,,,

 

[Harpy Eagle]

there is nothing for me to be wrong about. I have not declared him innocent or guilty...just pointing out that you all assume he is off the say so of a blogger.

and if its proven true will you apologize for being a dickhead??

It does not matter, either way you assumed he was guilty based on the word of a blogger

and if that blogger ends up being right will you apologize for being a dickhead???

no, as it changes nothing.

your right,, it wont change you being a dickhead,,,

and it will not change you being a sheep that assumes guilt on nothing more than the word of a blogger

 

[Jitss617]

and if its proven true will you apologize for being a dickhead??

It does not matter, either way you assumed he was guilty based on the word of a blogger

and if that blogger ends up being right will you apologize for being a dickhead???

no, as it changes nothing.

your right,, it wont change you being a dickhead,,,

and it will not change you being a sheep that assumes guilt on nothing more than the word of a blogger

Look at you trying to cover up the deep state

 

[progressive hunter]

and if its proven true will you apologize for being a dickhead??

It does not matter, either way you assumed he was guilty based on the word of a blogger

and if that blogger ends up being right will you apologize for being a dickhead???

no, as it changes nothing.

your right,, it wont change you being a dickhead,,,

and it will not change you being a sheep that assumes guilt on nothing more than the word of a blogger

when did I ever say I believed it???

 

[Care4all]

Anyone notice McMaster and Susan Rice have recently been on TV

Rice is doing a book tour, she has a book just released...

do not know about McMaster?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It does not matter, either way you assumed he was guilty based on the word of a blogger

and if that blogger ends up being right will you apologize for being a dickhead???

no, as it changes nothing.

your right,, it wont change you being a dickhead,,,

and it will not change you being a sheep that assumes guilt on nothing more than the word of a blogger

Look at you trying to cover up the deep state

look at you being a sheep blindly accepting what you are being fed

 

[Care4all]

It does not matter, either way you assumed he was guilty based on the word of a blogger

and if that blogger ends up being right will you apologize for being a dickhead???

no, as it changes nothing.

your right,, it wont change you being a dickhead,,,

and it will not change you being a sheep that assumes guilt on nothing more than the word of a blogger

Look at you trying to cover up the deep state

does this guy you are negligently smearing work for the CIA right now or any part of our gvt??

 

[Care4all]

IF he does not work for our gvt right now, then it CAN NOT BE HIM getting the Whistle Blower Act protection....?

 

[Care4all]

if it ends up being true will you apologize for being an ignorant dickhead???

no. You are still sheep that assume he is guilty off of nothing more than a blog post.

in 2016/17 when these same accusations were made against him there was never a shred of evidence or support and he still had to quit his job due to death threats

so he does not even work there now?

McMaster hired him as his personal aid

Meet Eric Ciaramella — H.R. McMaster Appoints Susan Rice Ally to be his Personal Aide

and McMaster has been gone for more than a year. His aide would have been gone with him

Not if he’s the original whistle blower Remember the first whistleblower got 2nd to 3rd hand knowledge

the IG said the whistle blower works for the gvt right now and presently has access to the information in the report that was first hand...

your TWITTER SLEUTHS need to start all over....

 

[Lesh]

Well what do you know, a left over subversive does it and NO THOUGHT AT ALL that the president wasn't potentially SET UP....Especially since the TRANSCRIPT is completely different than the SEVEN OR EIGHT TIMES BIDEN was supposedly mentioned directly by Trump...... how stupid do you think American voters are?

Internet sleuths may have just identified the so-called Ukraine ‘whistleblower’ that made claims regarding the President’s phone call with Mr. Zelensky; claims that turned out to be grossly misleading and highly inaccurate.

Transcripts subsequently released of the phone call itself disprove the claims of the gossip blower. According to Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit:

This provided some hints as to who the so-called whistleblower could be. Some enterprising researchers discovered information that may have led to the identity of this dangerous leaker.

“@FOOL_NELSON” on Twitter has identified someone who certainly seems to fit the mold of what we know about the so-called whistleblower. In fact, this person had even been described back in 2017 as a potential leaker who was pro-Ukraine, anti-Russia, and who was out to harm the Trump administration. Now, what are the odds of that?

(Excerpt) Read more at patriotssoapbox.com ...

The phone MEMO (it's not a full transcript) absolutely showed Trump breaking numerous laws in trying to strong arm Zelensky into manufacturing political dirt on Biden to help his re-election

And the WB deserves anonymity. That;s why we HAVE a WB Protection Act

These Trump bots are just looking for someone to attack

 

[Camp]

Another conspiracy theory thread littering and degrading the political forum. This place has become a right-wing blog spammer

no. You are still sheep that assume he is guilty off of nothing more than a blog post.

in 2016/17 when these same accusations were made against him there was never a shred of evidence or support and he still had to quit his job due to death threats

so he does not even work there now?

McMaster hired him as his personal aid

Meet Eric Ciaramella — H.R. McMaster Appoints Susan Rice Ally to be his Personal Aide

and McMaster has been gone for more than a year. His aide would have been gone with him

Not if he’s the original whistle blower Remember the first whistleblower got 2nd to 3rd hand knowledge

the IG said the whistle blower works for the gvt right now and presently has access to the information in the report that was first hand...

your TWITTER SLEUTHS need to start all over....

Another conspiracy theory littering and contaminating the political forum. This place has become a rightwing blog spammers flea market.

 

[Care4all]

Well what do you know, a left over subversive does it and NO THOUGHT AT ALL that the president wasn't potentially SET UP....Especially since the TRANSCRIPT is completely different than the SEVEN OR EIGHT TIMES BIDEN was supposedly mentioned directly by Trump...... how stupid do you think American voters are?

Internet sleuths may have just identified the so-called Ukraine ‘whistleblower’ that made claims regarding the President’s phone call with Mr. Zelensky; claims that turned out to be grossly misleading and highly inaccurate.

Transcripts subsequently released of the phone call itself disprove the claims of the gossip blower. According to Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit:

This provided some hints as to who the so-called whistleblower could be. Some enterprising researchers discovered information that may have led to the identity of this dangerous leaker.

“@FOOL_NELSON” on Twitter has identified someone who certainly seems to fit the mold of what we know about the so-called whistleblower. In fact, this person had even been described back in 2017 as a potential leaker who was pro-Ukraine, anti-Russia, and who was out to harm the Trump administration. Now, what are the odds of that?

(Excerpt) Read more at patriotssoapbox.com ...

The phone MEMO (it's not a full transcript) absolutely showed Trump breaking numerous laws in trying to strong arm Zelensky into manufacturing political dirt on Biden to help his re-election

And the WB deserves anonymity. That;s why we HAVE a WB Protection Act

These Trump bots are just looking for someone to attack

more info is needed, thus the investigation...

-they need the full conversation

-they need any directives on the money being held back and why

they received some back up info in the text messages of diplomats

-they need more info of Giuliani's shenanigans

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So Obamakov made Biden the point man on Ukraine, Hunter gets signed up as the coffee boy for an Ukrainian energy company, Obamakov makes Ciaramella his NSC Director for Ukraine.

Something stinks in the swamp. Looks like the swamp rat may get indicted for leaking classified information.

He may have been the leaker in a lot of the cases.

Go get this traitor, Barr.

Obamakov, LOL.

 

[The Purge]

Well what do you know, a left over subversive does it and NO THOUGHT AT ALL that the president wasn't potentially SET UP....Especially since the TRANSCRIPT is completely different than the SEVEN OR EIGHT TIMES BIDEN was supposedly mentioned directly by Trump...... how stupid do you think American voters are?

Internet sleuths may have just identified the so-called Ukraine ‘whistleblower’ that made claims regarding the President’s phone call with Mr. Zelensky; claims that turned out to be grossly misleading and highly inaccurate.

Transcripts subsequently released of the phone call itself disprove the claims of the gossip blower. According to Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit:

This provided some hints as to who the so-called whistleblower could be. Some enterprising researchers discovered information that may have led to the identity of this dangerous leaker.

“@FOOL_NELSON” on Twitter has identified someone who certainly seems to fit the mold of what we know about the so-called whistleblower. In fact, this person had even been described back in 2017 as a potential leaker who was pro-Ukraine, anti-Russia, and who was out to harm the Trump administration. Now, what are the odds of that?

(Excerpt) Read more at patriotssoapbox.com ...

The phone MEMO (it's not a full transcript) absolutely showed Trump breaking numerous laws in trying to strong arm Zelensky into manufacturing political dirt on Biden to help his re-election

And the WB deserves anonymity. That;s why we HAVE a WB Protection Act

These Trump bots are just looking for someone to attack

No. It didn't and even the PRESIDENT of Ukraine stated publically he was NEVER PRESSURED TO DO ANYTHING....Don't worry loser, you fucking idiots will continue to push this shit and continue to look like assholes and will lose the election. Maybe even by Reagan amounts....stock market Up another 400 points on all this GREAT BIDEN NEWS!!!!...ROTFLMFAO!!!!

 

[The Purge]

Well what do you know, a left over subversive does it and NO THOUGHT AT ALL that the president wasn't potentially SET UP....Especially since the TRANSCRIPT is completely different than the SEVEN OR EIGHT TIMES BIDEN was supposedly mentioned directly by Trump...... how stupid do you think American voters are?

Internet sleuths may have just identified the so-called Ukraine ‘whistleblower’ that made claims regarding the President’s phone call with Mr. Zelensky; claims that turned out to be grossly misleading and highly inaccurate.

Transcripts subsequently released of the phone call itself disprove the claims of the gossip blower. According to Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit:

This provided some hints as to who the so-called whistleblower could be. Some enterprising researchers discovered information that may have led to the identity of this dangerous leaker.

“@FOOL_NELSON” on Twitter has identified someone who certainly seems to fit the mold of what we know about the so-called whistleblower. In fact, this person had even been described back in 2017 as a potential leaker who was pro-Ukraine, anti-Russia, and who was out to harm the Trump administration. Now, what are the odds of that?

(Excerpt) Read more at patriotssoapbox.com ...

The phone MEMO (it's not a full transcript) absolutely showed Trump breaking numerous laws in trying to strong arm Zelensky into manufacturing political dirt on Biden to help his re-election

And the WB deserves anonymity. That;s why we HAVE a WB Protection Act

These Trump bots are just looking for someone to attack

more info is needed, thus the investigation...

-they need the full conversation

-they need any directives on the money being held back and why

they received some back up info in the text messages of diplomats

-they need more info of Giuliani's shenanigans

No, they don't and there is no law or subpoena that forces Trump to do so.....ROTFLMFAO!

 

[Lesh]

It’s called the Whistleblower Protection act moron