James Comer: ‘There Was Never Any Evidence’ That Ukraine Prosecutor Biden Had Fired Was Corrupt

He's a politician. He's not only wrong. He's lying.
Newly unearthed government documents from the Obama era thoroughly debunk Joe Biden’s repeated claims that former Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin had to be fired because he was corrupt. The memos reveal that Biden likely acted alone and counter to US policy when he threatened in December 2015 to withhold $1 billion in US loan guarantees for Ukraine in exchange for Shokin’s ouster.

It was a quid pro quo to protect his own arse and his sons, now I know you are so deeply ignorant as to understand that but your ignorance won't save Creepy Joe and his scumbag son.
 
Newly unearthed government documents from the Obama era thoroughly debunk Joe Biden’s repeated claims that former Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin had to be fired because he was corrupt. The memos reveal that Biden likely acted alone and counter to US policy when he threatened in December 2015 to withhold $1 billion in US loan guarantees for Ukraine in exchange for Shokin’s ouster.

It was a quid pro quo to protect his own arse and his sons, now I know you are so deeply ignorant as to understand that but your ignorance won't save Creepy Joe and his scumbag son.
Remenber the Dimtards tried to blame Trump for what Joey Capone did.
 
Newly unearthed government documents from the Obama era thoroughly debunk Joe Biden’s repeated claims that former Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin had to be fired because he was corrupt. The memos reveal that Biden likely acted alone and counter to US policy when he threatened in December 2015 to withhold $1 billion in US loan guarantees for Ukraine in exchange for Shokin’s ouster.

It was a quid pro quo to protect his own arse and his sons, now I know you are so deeply ignorant as to understand that but your ignorance won't save Creepy Joe and his scumbag son.
The "documents" absolutely don't show that whatsoever.

The fact that you guys can ignore so much evidence about the State Dept process in ousting Shokin is astounding. You really are kept ignorant by the censoring right wing media.
 
That's simply not the case. We have plenty of basis and fact, it's just that the information is censored by right wing media.
If you have the basis and fact, then bring it. Also, you’ve got to be kidding that anything could be censored by the right wing when the media as a whole is dominated by the Left.
 
If you have the basis and fact, then bring it. Also, you’ve got to be kidding that anything could be censored by the right wing when the media as a whole is dominated by the Left.
We can start here.


Have you ever seen this information before?
 
We can start here.


Have you ever seen this information before?
Newly unearthed government documents from the Obama era thoroughly debunk Joe Biden’s repeated claims that former Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin had to be fired because he was corrupt. The memos reveal that Biden likely acted alone and counter to US policy when he threatened in December 2015 to withhold $1 billion in US loan guarantees for Ukraine in exchange for Shokin’s ouster.
 
Newly unearthed government documents from the Obama era thoroughly debunk Joe Biden’s repeated claims that former Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin had to be fired because he was corrupt. The memos reveal that Biden likely acted alone and counter to US policy when he threatened in December 2015 to withhold $1 billion in US loan guarantees for Ukraine in exchange for Shokin’s ouster.
The memo does nothing of the sort. Not only does the memo well predate the push to fire Shokin, it does not praise him at all in any capacity.
 
The scheme that Biden openly bragged about was to rid Ukraine of anyone who would shed light on the Biden Family's corruption.

The big question: What did Obama know and when did he know it? Or, if Obama didn't know then that speaks loudly about Obama's incompetence.


Newly unearthed government documents from the Obama era thoroughly debunk Joe Biden’s repeated claims that former Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin had to be fired because he was corrupt. The memos reveal that Biden likely acted alone and counter to US policy when he threatened in December 2015 to withhold $1 billion in US loan guarantees for Ukraine in exchange for Shokin’s ouster.​
“There was never any evidence that Shokin was corrupt,” declared House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) Wednesday.
In fact, in the weeks leading up to Biden’s December 2015 visit to Kyiv, multiple Obama officials said they were “impressed” with the “progress” Shokin’s office had made in rooting out corruption.​
Victoria Nuland, then-Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs at the State Department, complimented Shokin in a letter in the summer of 2015.​
“We have been impressed with the ambitious reform and anti-corruption agenda of your government,” Nuland wrote.
“The IPC [Interagency Policy Committees] concluded Ukraine has made sufficient progress on its reform agenda to justify a third guarantee” of aid money,” White House Director of International Economic Affairs Christina Segal-Knowles wrote to government officials advising the IPC in September 2015.​
Segal-Knowles added that the IPC recommended “moving forward with a third loan guarantee for Ukraine in the near‐term.”​
Shokin at the time was investigating Burisma Holdings, a corrupt Ukrainian gas company that had given Hunter Biden a lucrative position on its board.
Throughout the fall and early winter, US foreign policy officials reportedly continued to make the case for Ukraine to receive the loan guarantee and invited senior leadership of Shokin’s office to join them in Washington for meetings in January 2016.
During this visit, officials on the IPC task force were stunned to learn that US aid to Ukraine was now tied to Shokin’s ouster.
One of those officials was Eric Ciaramella, the “whistleblower,” whose complaint against President Donald Trump in the summer of 2019 spurred the Democrats’ impeachment inquisition.​
“Yikes. I don’t recall this coming up in our meeting with them on Tuesday, although we did discuss the fact that the [Prosecutor General’s Office Inspector General] condition has not yet been met,” Ciaramella wrote in a memo.​
The anti-Trump operative added, “We were super impressed with the group, and we had a two-hour discussion of their priorities and the obstacles they face,” referring to the DC meeting with Shokin’s aides.​
Despite this, Ciaramella went on to “blow the whistle” on Donald Trump’s “perfect” phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky four years later because Trump had asked for an investigation into the Biden family’s corrupt activities in Ukraine.​
By the time Shokin was booted from his post in March 2016, the narrative about the “impressive” prosecutor had changed, and there was “a consensus” that he was blocking major cases against allies and influential figures.​
“What we’re finding is they created this narrative that Victor Shokin was corrupt,” said House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer on Fox Business Wednesday.
“We now know that the Obama Secretary of State’s office sent Shokin a letter praising him for his reform efforts,” Rep. Comer told host Elizabeth MacDonald.
Shokin said in a recent interview with Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade that Hunter was brought on to the gas company’s board in 2013 to “provide protection” for its CEO, from his investigation into the company’s alleged bribery schemes.​




Over the summer, an FBI FD-1023 FBI file detailing the bribery scheme was released to the public. The document alleges that the Bidens accepted bribes of $5 million apiece from Burisma’s founder and CEO, Mykola Zlochevsky, in exchange for Shokin’s firing. Zlochevsky allegedly told an FBI confidential source that he was “coerced” into paying Joe and Hunter Biden $5 million apiece “so everything will be okay.” The CHS alleged that the Bidens pressured Zlochevsky to retain Hunter on Burisma’s board, which he did, despite believing that “Hunter was stupid and his [Zlochevsky’s] dog was smarter.”​
...​


Maybe Comer never saw the video where Potatohead was bragging to everybody that he put pressure on the Ukrainians not to investigate his son.

Ether that or Comer is a piece of shit covering up the Biden corruption like he covered up Crooked Hillary's corruption.
 
Why should expect lots of lies from Comer? Give us a few lies from Comers up to this point.
Comer has been promising yall proof that Biden committed impeachable offenses, yet has shown none outside of innuendo


In fact, it has been so weak that Republicans can't even ensure they can get enough Republican votes to pass an article of impeachment

Democrats did this twice, and yall still claim Trump was innocent......its a cult
 
Comer has been promising yall proof that Biden committed impeachable offenses, yet has shown none outside of innuendo


In fact, it has been so weak that Republicans can't even ensure they can get enough Republican votes to pass an article of impeachment

Democrats did this twice, and yall still claim Trump was innocent......its a cult
Lets get some exact quotes. I dont think he said what youre claiming he said.
 
“There was never any evidence that Shokin was corrupt,” declared House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) Wednesday.
OK.....then show the FACTUAL evidence of Shokin Prosecuting Corruption.

The story is that Shokin was a sheep, and he didn't prosecute the Corruption.

If this ^^^ is true.....simply show the cases where Shokin actually DID prosecute the corruption.
 
Maybe Comer never saw the video where Potatohead was bragging to everybody that he put pressure on the Ukrainians not to investigate his son.

Ether that or Comer is a piece of shit covering up the Biden corruption like he covered up Crooked Hillary's corruption.
That never happened.
Your memo told you to say that.

If Shokin was actually prosecuting the massive corruption in Ukraine......then simply show the corruption that Shokin prosecuted. This goes way beyond Burisma, just show Multiple cases of Shokin ACTUALLY prosecuting the corruption in Ukraine.
Hiding behind the video and hunter doesn't cut it dude.
Show the corruption that Shokin actually DID prosecute.
 
OK.....then show the FACTUAL evidence of Shokin Prosecuting Corruption.

The story is that Shokin was a sheep, and he didn't prosecute the Corruption.

If this ^^^ is true.....simply show the cases where Shokin actually DID prosecute the corruption.
Nope. That is over and done with. You sound like the people saying but look at all this stuff about a stolen election but, they, like you, Winco, have nothing. You have to prove the case.
 

Forum List

Back
Top