Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm talking about decisions. That means choices. Did you know that? There are many resources (that means options and products) available (that means 'at hand') you could use to find out what the big words mean. They are called 'dictionaries'. And you call me stupid. I pity you because you think you're making a point by throwing insults. What a pathetically small mind you have.If they pay for it, they're in the business, stupid.The state isn't making that decision in our name. That decision is made by an individual. Are you proposing that individuals are incapable of making decisions on their own and the state should interfere? What manner of Conservative thinking is this?Except when it comes to babies.I chose the death penalty because I don't believe the state should be in the death business.
You DO see the irony in your post, do you not?I'm talking about decisions. That means choices. Did you know that? There are many resources (that means options and products) available (that means 'at hand') you could use to find out what the big words mean. They are called 'dictionaries'. And you call me stupid. I pity you because you think you're making a point by throwing insults. What a pathetically small mind you have.If they pay for it, they're in the business, stupid.The state isn't making that decision in our name. That decision is made by an individual. Are you proposing that individuals are incapable of making decisions on their own and the state should interfere? What manner of Conservative thinking is this?Except when it comes to babies.I chose the death penalty because I don't believe the state should be in the death business.
Perhaps you would care to read what he actually said? Then explain where you came up with the claim he does not support bills for infrastructure?Earmarks attached to bills in Congress. They are nothing more than a bribe for a vote, and should be voted on by themselves if they are worth their salt.
So yeah, I'd make the bribes go away.
So you don't believe the federal government should invest in bridges, schools,etc...Even through 40% of all investment comes from the federal government. You don't know what you're asking for.
Didn't you just end a post by calling me stupid? Where did you learn about irony?You DO see the irony in your post, do you not?I'm talking about decisions. That means choices. Did you know that? There are many resources (that means options and products) available (that means 'at hand') you could use to find out what the big words mean. They are called 'dictionaries'. And you call me stupid. I pity you because you think you're making a point by throwing insults. What a pathetically small mind you have.If they pay for it, they're in the business, stupid.The state isn't making that decision in our name. That decision is made by an individual. Are you proposing that individuals are incapable of making decisions on their own and the state should interfere? What manner of Conservative thinking is this?Except when it comes to babies.I chose the death penalty because I don't believe the state should be in the death business.
The chamber buys and sells politicians from both parties, just as the Unions. What's good for the goose is good for the gander................Would that include the Unions supporting Dems............hmm............Oh........but they are not a business.Citizens United. Our political system shouldn't be for sale to the highest bidder.
You really don't know what Citizens United does, do you? It has nothing to do with unions. It allows unlimited money for either party. A dozen or so people have supplied the large majority of all donations to all parties. These few rich people are effectively buying our politicians. With that much money from so few people, who do you think will be calling the shots?
Now you can give me the spin that the Unions aren't really a business slinging massive amounts of money out as well.
You trying to put me out of business? I own a bar.The reason why I voted for "Something Else" is because alcoholic beverages was not a choice. I would most definitely make that illegal because to me alcohol consumption does a favor for absolutely no one at the end of the day.
God bless you always!!!
Holly
You're too stupid to know when you've been bitch slapped but the world is full of morons like you. You're against the state funding executions but enthusiastically endorse federal funding for abortion (baby killing). But do keep back peddling, it's fun to watch.Didn't you just end a post by calling me stupid? Where did you learn about irony?You DO see the irony in your post, do you not?I'm talking about decisions. That means choices. Did you know that? There are many resources (that means options and products) available (that means 'at hand') you could use to find out what the big words mean. They are called 'dictionaries'. And you call me stupid. I pity you because you think you're making a point by throwing insults. What a pathetically small mind you have.If they pay for it, they're in the business, stupid.The state isn't making that decision in our name. That decision is made by an individual. Are you proposing that individuals are incapable of making decisions on their own and the state should interfere? What manner of Conservative thinking is this?Except when it comes to babies.
Of the 10 largest private campaign contributions, I saw a list showing Dems out collected the GOP almost 5:1Citizens United. Our political system shouldn't be for sale to the highest bidder.
Only if they do away with ALL donations to fund campaigns.
all campaign funds supplied by government, NO private donations.
No Soros,
No Kochs,
No unions.
zip, zero, nada
Of the 10 largest private campaign contributions, I saw a list showing Dems out collected the GOP almost 5:1Citizens United. Our political system shouldn't be for sale to the highest bidder.
Only if they do away with ALL donations to fund campaigns.
all campaign funds supplied by government, NO private donations.
No Soros,
No Kochs,
No unions.
zip, zero, nada
188.1 million to 38.1 million
Top Individual Contributors: All Federal Contributions | OpenSecrets
Of the 10 largest private campaign contributions, I saw a list showing Dems out collected the GOP almost 5:1Citizens United. Our political system shouldn't be for sale to the highest bidder.
Only if they do away with ALL donations to fund campaigns.
all campaign funds supplied by government, NO private donations.
No Soros,
No Kochs,
No unions.
zip, zero, nada
188.1 million to 38.1 million
Top Individual Contributors: All Federal Contributions | OpenSecrets
Don't you regret all the work republicans put into guaranteeing unlimited money in politics? Democrats would love to take all the big money out of elections, but as long as it's allowed, you can't expect them to limit themselves.
Democrats would love to take all the big money out of elections,
Y'all keep demonising the Koch brothers. I see that Koch Industries contributed about $28,572,742 over all. $1,695,324 to Democrats and $26,966,422 to Conservatives.
Meanwhile, the SEIU donated $222,434,657 over all. Of that, $220,687,443 went to Democrats and $1,294,019 too Conservatives.... But them EVIL corporations are controlling government.
BULLSHIT!
Top Organization Contributors | OpenSecrets
emailJared Bennettemail
Of the 10 largest private campaign contributions, I saw a list showing Dems out collected the GOP almost 5:1Citizens United. Our political system shouldn't be for sale to the highest bidder.
Only if they do away with ALL donations to fund campaigns.
all campaign funds supplied by government, NO private donations.
No Soros,
No Kochs,
No unions.
zip, zero, nada
188.1 million to 38.1 million
Top Individual Contributors: All Federal Contributions | OpenSecrets
Don't you regret all the work republicans put into guaranteeing unlimited money in politics? Democrats would love to take all the big money out of elections, but as long as it's allowed, you can't expect them to limit themselves.
Democrats would love to take all the big money out of elections,
They've been getting big money from unions as far back as memory allows.
CU leveled the field
Funny guy!Y'all keep demonising the Koch brothers. I see that Koch Industries contributed about $28,572,742 over all. $1,695,324 to Democrats and $26,966,422 to Conservatives.
Meanwhile, the SEIU donated $222,434,657 over all. Of that, $220,687,443 went to Democrats and $1,294,019 too Conservatives.... But them EVIL corporations are controlling government.
BULLSHIT!
Top Organization Contributors | OpenSecrets
LOL, thanks to the Citizen's United decision, courtesy of W.'s appointee, Chief Justice Roberts... not only have corporations effectively gained 'personhood', but all that cashish being pumped into political campaigns... even from foreign entities...that is known.... is nothing compared to what isn't shown on the books. So, whatever pittance you think the billionaire Koch Bros have donated is way less than what they (& others) have. But comparing the vast amts of money between what Soros & what the unions can cough up to what the Koch's can throw at candidates is ridiculous, because there isn't any comparison. The Koch talons can dig in deeper than anybody.
12 ways 'Citizens United' has changed politics
Center for Public Integrity investigations illuminate political 'dark money'
By Michael Beckel
5:00 am, January 21, 2015 Updated: 5:00 am, January 21, 2015
An American flag flies in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Five years ago today, in a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled corporations and unions could spend unlimited amounts of money to advocate for or against political candidates.
The court declared that spending by labor unions and companies — including certain types of nonprofit corporations — did “not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption” so long as it was not done in concert or coordination with a political candidate’s own campaign.
While it is still illegal for corporations and labor unions to give money directly to candidates for federal office, that ruling, known as Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, has dramatically reshaped the political landscape for federal and state elections.
Among the most significant developments: a surge of political “dark money” — secret cash that opaque nonprofit organizations funnel into U.S. elections. Such groups do not publicly disclose their donors..."
12 ways 'Citizens United' has changed politics
you mean like murder and theft?....Making certain things 'illegal' is pointless.
Find instead solutions to the problems that compel a desire to make a thing 'illegal.'
Funny guy!Y'all keep demonising the Koch brothers. I see that Koch Industries contributed about $28,572,742 over all. $1,695,324 to Democrats and $26,966,422 to Conservatives.
Meanwhile, the SEIU donated $222,434,657 over all. Of that, $220,687,443 went to Democrats and $1,294,019 too Conservatives.... But them EVIL corporations are controlling government.
BULLSHIT!
Top Organization Contributors | OpenSecrets
LOL, thanks to the Citizen's United decision, courtesy of W.'s appointee, Chief Justice Roberts... not only have corporations effectively gained 'personhood', but all that cashish being pumped into political campaigns... even from foreign entities...that is known.... is nothing compared to what isn't shown on the books. So, whatever pittance you think the billionaire Koch Bros have donated is way less than what they (& others) have. But comparing the vast amts of money between what Soros & what the unions can cough up to what the Koch's can throw at candidates is ridiculous, because there isn't any comparison. The Koch talons can dig in deeper than anybody.
12 ways 'Citizens United' has changed politics
Center for Public Integrity investigations illuminate political 'dark money'
By Michael Beckel
5:00 am, January 21, 2015 Updated: 5:00 am, January 21, 2015
An American flag flies in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Five years ago today, in a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled corporations and unions could spend unlimited amounts of money to advocate for or against political candidates.
The court declared that spending by labor unions and companies — including certain types of nonprofit corporations — did “not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption” so long as it was not done in concert or coordination with a political candidate’s own campaign.
While it is still illegal for corporations and labor unions to give money directly to candidates for federal office, that ruling, known as Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, has dramatically reshaped the political landscape for federal and state elections.
Among the most significant developments: a surge of political “dark money” — secret cash that opaque nonprofit organizations funnel into U.S. elections. Such groups do not publicly disclose their donors..."
12 ways 'Citizens United' has changed politics
You actually think the Kochs' influence is evil and Soros' is fine....
Have you no pride at all?
I showed you 26 million from a corporation and 122 million from a labor union that represents public sector employees.
Can you grasp the corruption involved in public sector unions contributing to the campaigns of elected officials who determine public sector salaries? It's blatant bribery.
Your own hero FDR said, "All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. "
Its nothing personal at least not on my end anyway.You trying to put me out of business? I own a bar.The reason why I voted for "Something Else" is because alcoholic beverages was not a choice. I would most definitely make that illegal because to me alcohol consumption does a favor for absolutely no one at the end of the day.
God bless you always!!!
Holly
LOLOf the 10 largest private campaign contributions, I saw a list showing Dems out collected the GOP almost 5:1Citizens United. Our political system shouldn't be for sale to the highest bidder.
Only if they do away with ALL donations to fund campaigns.
all campaign funds supplied by government, NO private donations.
No Soros,
No Kochs,
No unions.
zip, zero, nada
188.1 million to 38.1 million
Top Individual Contributors: All Federal Contributions | OpenSecrets
Don't you regret all the work republicans put into guaranteeing unlimited money in politics? Democrats would love to take all the big money out of elections, but as long as it's allowed, you can't expect them to limit themselves.
LOLOf the 10 largest private campaign contributions, I saw a list showing Dems out collected the GOP almost 5:1Citizens United. Our political system shouldn't be for sale to the highest bidder.
Only if they do away with ALL donations to fund campaigns.
all campaign funds supplied by government, NO private donations.
No Soros,
No Kochs,
No unions.
zip, zero, nada
188.1 million to 38.1 million
Top Individual Contributors: All Federal Contributions | OpenSecrets
Don't you regret all the work republicans put into guaranteeing unlimited money in politics? Democrats would love to take all the big money out of elections, but as long as it's allowed, you can't expect them to limit themselves.
Tell that to Soros and the Unions..............
LOL
