Which was worst Assad or Saddam.. 5,000 killed or 800,000 killed?

Dumbfuck, most of their supporters are part of the overall group.

I'd say anyone that openly supports that group is a piece of shit.

If you're with Anonymous....you'll be in jail soon.

Call him up.Brainwashed Nazi.

What kind of stupid shit is this GoneBezerk?

You do know that nearly all of the Anonymous supporters/members are not involved in any of the actual operations that Anonymous does, right?

So your assumptions are baseless and stupid.

We don't live in Nazi Germany where mere association or support with a group lands you in jail.
 
You need to get your lies in tune with each other...

You say Saddam didn't have WMDs, but then you say we sold WMDs to Saddam.

Obama is all bent out of shape over Syria's Assad killing 5,000 people YET he evidently was NOT at all concerned over Saddam's killing over the years of 800,000 Iraqis and gave Bush a ration of crap over Liberating 28 million people from a dictator a thousand times worse the Assad!

WHY???

Probably because we were the ones who sold the WMD's to Saddam during the Reagan years.

And get back to me when we put ground troops in Syria.
 
I haven't seen us invade Syria and lose 5500 Americans

Right...
Why did we invade France in WWI
Why did we "invade" France in WWII?
Why did we "invade" Korea in 1950s?

Neither one of them invaded the USA nor killed any American!

What was the difference???
Uh, the FREE French asked us to free the nation; GERMANY occupied much of the country, GERMANY declared war on the US, REMEMBER?
 
Anything in that list after 2001 was planted by the Bush administration. Who knew a president would lie the nation into a war costing the lives of thousands of Americans and the maiming of tens of thousands. Bush Sr. had been head of the CIA, Vice President and President. He knew exactly what was in Iraq. It's why he stopped at the border. Iraq was a defeated country with a ruined military. No manufacturing or industry of any consequence, under sanctions secretly selling oil to get medical supplies for it's people. To think they were a threat is ridiculous. Why can't Republicans "think" instead of only "imagine"?
*******************************************
EXCELLENT QUESTION!
 
OK....let's talk Iraq again
That's always fun


Iraq was no threat to anon outside Iraq, Iraq was under control for ten years, Iraq was not involved in 9-11, Iraq did not have WMDs

IRAQ was NO THREAT

You do not waste 5500 American lives for no threat
In Vietnam over 58K people died and who put our troops there. Oh yeah Dems :cuckoo:

Your point is???


Maybe we should have learned a lesson about deploying our troops frivolously

BUT I am defending Kennedy/Johnson for Vietnam and there is ONE word defense:

SEATO!

But most people don't remember that MUCH less KNOW what SEATO stands for!
Use the internet and find out WHY all wars the USA has been involved in are in
response to ...TREATIES!!! Contracts!!! AGREEMENTS!!!

South East Asia Treaty Organization!
NATO.. Kosovo.. AFGHANISTAN...

TREATIES and not some "frivolous" reason!
GEEZ I am so sick of IGNORANT People!
GET some history lessons folks!
SEATO/NATO both outgrowths of the "COLD WAR" you guys don't have any idea what it was like growing up like I did in the 50s "duck and cover"!!!

Again.. until YOU lived in our shoes at that time with the Cold WAR all capable of destroying life as we all knew it... DO some research!

BUT it was those idiots who wanted to destroy our country i.e. media/Students for Democrat Society, etc. THEY are the ones that cost 58,000 lives!
Just as they and these CHEERLEADERS cost 3,000 more Iraq US troops lives!
YOU can't have leaders of a country CHEERING the bad guys without some affect!


Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets --action of Americans
in the treatment of their prisoners.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "War is lost",
U.S. Rep. Murtha(D) "Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
Senator Kerry(D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the
dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
Senator Obama(D) .."troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

THese CHEERLEADERS helped prolong and COST 3,000 more lives then necessary!
 
Yes, shithead....Bush also convinced the British and Israeli intelligence that Saddam had WMDs.:cuckoo:

You're going to be eating your own feces when those WMDs show up in Syria. :eusa_whistle:

Anything in that list after 2001 was planted by the Bush administration. Who knew a president would lie the nation into a war costing the lives of thousands of Americans and the maiming of tens of thousands. Bush Sr. had been head of the CIA, Vice President and President. He knew exactly what was in Iraq. It's why he stopped at the border. Iraq was a defeated country with a ruined military. No manufacturing or industry of any consequence, under sanctions secretly selling oil to get medical supplies for it's people. To think they were a threat is ridiculous. Why can't Republicans "think" instead of only "imagine"?
*******************************************
EXCELLENT QUESTION!
 
In Vietnam over 58K people died and who put our troops there. Oh yeah Dems :cuckoo:

Your point is???


Maybe we should have learned a lesson about deploying our troops frivolously

BUT I am defending Kennedy/Johnson for Vietnam and there is ONE word defense:

SEATO!

But most people don't remember that MUCH less KNOW what SEATO stands for!
Use the internet and find out WHY all wars the USA has been involved in are in
response to ...TREATIES!!! Contracts!!! AGREEMENTS!!!

South East Asia Treaty Organization!
NATO.. Kosovo.. AFGHANISTAN...

TREATIES and not some "frivolous" reason!
GEEZ I am so sick of IGNORANT People!
GET some history lessons folks!
SEATO/NATO both outgrowths of the "COLD WAR" you guys don't have any idea what it was like growing up like I did in the 50s "duck and cover"!!!

Again.. until YOU lived in our shoes at that time with the Cold WAR all capable of destroying life as we all knew it... DO some research!

BUT it was those idiots who wanted to destroy our country i.e. media/Students for Democrat Society, etc. THEY are the ones that cost 58,000 lives!
Just as they and these CHEERLEADERS cost 3,000 more Iraq US troops lives!
YOU can't have leaders of a country CHEERING the bad guys without some affect!


Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets --action of Americans
in the treatment of their prisoners.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "War is lost",
U.S. Rep. Murtha(D) "Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
Senator Kerry(D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the
dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
Senator Obama(D) .."troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

THese CHEERLEADERS helped prolong and COST 3,000 more lives then necessary!

Vietnam was no threat to the US
Domino Theory was a farce
So was the Gulf of Tonkin incident
 
I haven't seen us invade Syria and lose 5500 Americans

Right...
Why did we invade France in WWI
Why did we "invade" France in WWII?
Why did we "invade" Korea in 1950s?

Neither one of them invaded the USA nor killed any American!

What was the difference???
Uh, the FREE French asked us to free the nation; GERMANY occupied much of the country, GERMANY declared war on the US, REMEMBER?
So they declared war??

Does that mean we had to send troops to die??

So were we wrong to go to Kuwait's aid in 1991?
Did Saddam agree to a Cease Fire in 1991 that meant he had to abide by the terms which included RESUMPTION if he didn't abide?

I mean do treaties agreements,contracts, mean anything?
 
Your point is???


Maybe we should have learned a lesson about deploying our troops frivolously

BUT I am defending Kennedy/Johnson for Vietnam and there is ONE word defense:

SEATO!

But most people don't remember that MUCH less KNOW what SEATO stands for!
Use the internet and find out WHY all wars the USA has been involved in are in
response to ...TREATIES!!! Contracts!!! AGREEMENTS!!!

South East Asia Treaty Organization!
NATO.. Kosovo.. AFGHANISTAN...

TREATIES and not some "frivolous" reason!
GEEZ I am so sick of IGNORANT People!
GET some history lessons folks!
SEATO/NATO both outgrowths of the "COLD WAR" you guys don't have any idea what it was like growing up like I did in the 50s "duck and cover"!!!

Again.. until YOU lived in our shoes at that time with the Cold WAR all capable of destroying life as we all knew it... DO some research!

BUT it was those idiots who wanted to destroy our country i.e. media/Students for Democrat Society, etc. THEY are the ones that cost 58,000 lives!
Just as they and these CHEERLEADERS cost 3,000 more Iraq US troops lives!
YOU can't have leaders of a country CHEERING the bad guys without some affect!


Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets --action of Americans
in the treatment of their prisoners.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "War is lost",
U.S. Rep. Murtha(D) "Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
Senator Kerry(D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the
dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
Senator Obama(D) .."troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

THese CHEERLEADERS helped prolong and COST 3,000 more lives then necessary!

Vietnam was no threat to the US
Domino Theory was a farce
So was the Gulf of Tonkin incident


Vietnam was no threat to the US - not in in and of itself, true
Domino Theory was a farce- very very wrong
So was the Gulf of Tonkin incident- irrelevant
 
Um, the Normandy invasion.....I've been there, but could be some tourist scam by the French. :eusa_shhh:

There were French that sided with the Nazis, the Brits attacked the French ships in the MED as soon as they surrended to the Nazis.

I haven't seen us invade Syria and lose 5500 Americans

Right...
Why did we invade France in WWI
Why did we "invade" France in WWII?
Why did we "invade" Korea in 1950s?

Neither one of them invaded the USA nor killed any American!

What was the difference???
We never invaded France. France was our ally.
 
Um, the Normandy invasion.....I've been there, but could be some tourist scam by the French. :eusa_shhh:

There were French that sided with the Nazis, the Brits attacked the French ships in the MED as soon as they surrended to the Nazis.

Right...
Why did we invade France in WWI
Why did we "invade" France in WWII?
Why did we "invade" Korea in 1950s?

Neither one of them invaded the USA nor killed any American!

What was the difference???
We never invaded France. France was our ally.

Ummmm....the French pleaded with us to retake their country from the Germans

It was the Germans who invaded
 
If left unchecked any ruthless dictator could amass the same stats as Saddam. Imagine the lives and money that could have been saved had we stopped saddam early on.....

Uh yeah :eusa_eh: Didn't help that the U.S. was supplying him w/ weapons to do that killing :eusa_whistle: :clap2:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTldYbqlJc8]Rumsfeld & Saddam Make Nice - YouTube[/ame]​

You evidently WEREN"T alive during the period of time known as "COLD WAR"

Look it up!

Also your hero FDR??
Look who was sitting with a KNOWN murderer of 20 million people and ALLY in WWII!
View attachment 17410
Yes, Stalin was our ally in WWII, along with Churchill.
 
Here are the rules comrades:

Democrat war = Good!! We are there for all of the "correct" reasons.

Republican war = Bad!!! We are there to "exploit" the downtrodden.
 
Here are the rules comrades:

Democrat war = Good!! We are there for all of the "correct" reasons.

Republican war = Bad!!! We are there to "exploit" the downtrodden.

How many Democrats defend Vietnam?
Democrats supported the Bush liberation of Kuwait in Desert Storm
Democrats supported Baby Bush's invasion of Afghanistan

So, what do you have supporting your theory?
 
Here are the rules comrades:

Democrat war = Good!! We are there for all of the "correct" reasons.

Republican war = Bad!!! We are there to "exploit" the downtrodden.

How many Democrats defend Vietnam?
Democrats supported the Bush liberation of Kuwait in Desert Storm
Democrats supported Baby Bush's invasion of Afghanistan

So, what do you have supporting your theory?
Nothing?
 
i guess the real question is if you think the US should be in charge of getting rid of leaders of other countries (if they're crazy) or if the citizens of that country should do so. and before you answer decide where the money comes from and if you like the word "nanny".
 
Anything in that list after 2001 was planted by the Bush administration. Who knew a president would lie the nation into a war costing the lives of thousands of Americans and the maiming of tens of thousands. Bush Sr. had been head of the CIA, Vice President and President. He knew exactly what was in Iraq. It's why he stopped at the border. Iraq was a defeated country with a ruined military. No manufacturing or industry of any consequence, under sanctions secretly selling oil to get medical supplies for it's people. To think they were a threat is ridiculous. Why can't Republicans "think" instead of only "imagine"?
*******************************************
EXCELLENT QUESTION!

And yet it's one the right wing refuses to even consider. Bush Sr. had the perfect opportunity and the backing of the entire Middle East. And still he stopped at the border. An officer during WWII, Head of the CIA, Vice President and President. Would any right winger have the nerve to call him stupid?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Um, the Normandy invasion.....I've been there, but could be some tourist scam by the French. :eusa_shhh:

There were French that sided with the Nazis, the Brits attacked the French ships in the MED as soon as they surrended to the Nazis.

We never invaded France. France was our ally.

Ummmm....the French pleaded with us to retake their country from the Germans

It was the Germans who invaded

I've seen historical revisions, but this pretty much takes the cake.
 

Forum List

Back
Top