- Mar 7, 2014
- 45,163
- 9,162
- 2,030
It's a question, which Federal politicians are working for you, the people, rather than for their own self interest and the interests of the rich and powerful?
Are there any?
Are there any?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Rand Paul, Justin Amash, and Bernie Sanders
Rand Paul. Period. Nobody else at anylevel of government is doing jack fucking shit.
/thread
Of course there are. While I wouldn't say the current crop of Congressional and Executive Branch office holders are "working for me," I can say they keep implementing policies that, for the most part, don't do me harm. Thing is, I can say that about any of the past crops of politicians as well.It's a question, which Federal politicians are working for you, the people, rather than for their own self interest and the interests of the rich and powerful?
Are there any?
Off-topic:They're not supposed to be working for you, themselves, nor the rich. They're supposed to be operating the federal government within the confines of the Constitution. Haven't seen that in well over 100 years.
Of course there are. While I wouldn't say the current crop of Congressional and Executive Branch office holders are "working for me," I can say they keep implementing policies that, for the most part, don't do me harm. Thing is, I can say that about any of the past crops of politicians as well.It's a question, which Federal politicians are working for you, the people, rather than for their own self interest and the interests of the rich and powerful?
Are there any?
Of course there are. While I wouldn't say the current crop of Congressional and Executive Branch office holders are "working for me," I can say they keep implementing policies that, for the most part, don't do me harm. Thing is, I can say that about any of the past crops of politicians as well.It's a question, which Federal politicians are working for you, the people, rather than for their own self interest and the interests of the rich and powerful?
Are there any?
I was more looking for the argument about WHY he is.
When I get time I'll trying and dig up the dirt on him. Right now I have to be doing other stuff.
He who?I was more looking for the argument about WHY he is.
Of course there are. While I wouldn't say the current crop of Congressional and Executive Branch office holders are "working for me," I can say they keep implementing policies that, for the most part, don't do me harm. Thing is, I can say that about any of the past crops of politicians as well.It's a question, which Federal politicians are working for you, the people, rather than for their own self interest and the interests of the rich and powerful?
Are there any?
I was more looking for the argument about WHY he is.
When I get time I'll trying and dig up the dirt on him. Right now I have to be doing other stuff.He who?I was more looking for the argument about WHY he is.
Of course there are. While I wouldn't say the current crop of Congressional and Executive Branch office holders are "working for me," I can say they keep implementing policies that, for the most part, don't do me harm. Thing is, I can say that about any of the past crops of politicians as well.It's a question, which Federal politicians are working for you, the people, rather than for their own self interest and the interests of the rich and powerful?
Are there any?
I was more looking for the argument about WHY he is.
When I get time I'll trying and dig up the dirt on him. Right now I have to be doing other stuff.He who?I was more looking for the argument about WHY he is.
Understood...NPSorry, I thought I was replying to those who had said Rand Paul.
Oh, federal election and high appointed office holders are definitely doing decent enough stuff for people of means. I couldn't tell you what they'd doing for lower and middle-middle income earners, though the folks who are upper-middle income (~$200K/year to ~$450K/year] are likely content enough with what "these people," as you call them, are doing.Basically I want people to tell me why these people are working for them and not the rich.
It's a question, which Federal politicians are working for you, the people, rather than for their own self interest and the interests of the rich and powerful?
Are there any?
Of course there are. While I wouldn't say the current crop of Congressional and Executive Branch office holders are "working for me," I can say they keep implementing policies that, for the most part, don't do me harm. Thing is, I can say that about any of the past crops of politicians as well.It's a question, which Federal politicians are working for you, the people, rather than for their own self interest and the interests of the rich and powerful?
Are there any?
I was more looking for the argument about WHY he is.
When I get time I'll trying and dig up the dirt on him. Right now I have to be doing other stuff.He who?I was more looking for the argument about WHY he is.Understood...NPSorry, I thought I was replying to those who had said Rand Paul.
Oh, federal election and high appointed office holders are definitely doing decent enough stuff for people of means. I couldn't tell you what they'd doing for lower and middle-middle income earners, though the folks who are upper-middle income (~$200K/year to ~$450K/year] are likely content enough with what "these people," as you call them, are doing.Basically I want people to tell me why these people are working for them and not the rich.
Of course there are. While I wouldn't say the current crop of Congressional and Executive Branch office holders are "working for me," I can say they keep implementing policies that, for the most part, don't do me harm. Thing is, I can say that about any of the past crops of politicians as well.It's a question, which Federal politicians are working for you, the people, rather than for their own self interest and the interests of the rich and powerful?
Are there any?
I was more looking for the argument about WHY he is.
When I get time I'll trying and dig up the dirt on him. Right now I have to be doing other stuff.He who?I was more looking for the argument about WHY he is.
Understood...NPSorry, I thought I was replying to those who had said Rand Paul.
Basically I want people to tell me why these people are working for them and not the rich.
Oh, federal election and high appointed office holders are definitely doing decent enough stuff for people of means. I couldn't tell you what they'd doing for lower and middle-middle income earners, though the folks who are upper-middle income (~$200K/year to ~$450K/year] are likely content enough with what "these people," as you call them, are doing.
Oh, crap.Definitely, but did they get elected by these people? Probably not.
It's funny how the voters go out and vote for people not to represent them.
It's a question, which Federal politicians are working for you, the people, rather than for their own self interest and the interests of the rich and powerful?
Are there any?