Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yep. You're reduced to pointless spam. Its what you dolts, do.[
Yeah, because you didn't read the article wherein the woman who made the dolls describes the process.
You just keep digging - you're too fucking dumb to stop...
You definitely suffer from Dolt Syndrome™. It's a common parallel to Short Man Syndrome™.Yep. You're reduced to pointless spam. Its what you dolts, do.[
Yeah, because you didn't read the article wherein the woman who made the dolls describes the process.
You just keep digging - you're too fucking dumb to stop...
ROFL
You still claiming that Snopes is lying while ignoring the content of the link?
Yeah dumbfuck, the first picture is a doll. No shit.
Problem, the second picture isn't and is provided to show the difference. You keep lying, and it only makes you look dumber and dumber.
Even Cruella looks rational in contrast.
You definitely suffer from Dolt Syndrome™. It's a common parallel to Short Man Syndrome™.Yep. You're reduced to pointless spam. Its what you dolts, do.[
Yeah, because you didn't read the article wherein the woman who made the dolls describes the process.
You just keep digging - you're too fucking dumb to stop...
ROFL
You still claiming that Snopes is lying while ignoring the content of the link?
Yeah dumbfuck, the first picture is a doll. No shit.
Problem, the second picture isn't and is provided to show the difference. You keep lying, and it only makes you look dumber and dumber.
Even Cruella looks rational in contrast.
I understand you're embarrassed at making a fool of yourself in a public forum, but you have only yourself to blame.
You should actually read the article in order to make an intelligent comment... something you have yet to offer.
Stay with cutting and pasting silly emoticons. You're better at menial tasks.
I'm gonna guess my point sailed over your head.Yeah, because you didn't read the article wherein the woman who made the dolls describes the process.Yeah cause your not human if you have thin skin... ROLLS EYESonly for the health of the mother.......except to save the life of the mother abortion was illegal in the US from the time it became the US......
That is simply not true.
Ronald Reagan signed abortion into law in 1967 in California. I remember the event.
Mr. Dolt and your screaming buddy, Dolt #2.
From your link, the woman who created the dolls you erroneously and falsely represented as an actual fetus describes her work.
"I have included in the model all the features that a 12 week old from conception has at this stage (neck, eyelids, ears, mouth, arms, legs, fingers & toes). As for the translucency of the skin, that is a hard thing to capture. I hand-paint each one of these in multiple layers, but the transparent very thin skin of a 12 week old is difficult to portray in resin. I have begun to try to perfect my hand-painting of each model in order to show more deeper undertones and to give a more transparent skinlike appearance."
Read more at snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
Dolt!
I understand you're struggling with making yourself the village idiot. Next time pay attention and don't continue to enter threads when you're unable to read and comprehend the subject matter.You definitely suffer from Dolt Syndrome™. It's a common parallel to Short Man Syndrome™.Yep. You're reduced to pointless spam. Its what you dolts, do.[
Yeah, because you didn't read the article wherein the woman who made the dolls describes the process.
You just keep digging - you're too fucking dumb to stop...
ROFL
You still claiming that Snopes is lying while ignoring the content of the link?
Yeah dumbfuck, the first picture is a doll. No shit.
Problem, the second picture isn't and is provided to show the difference. You keep lying, and it only makes you look dumber and dumber.
Even Cruella looks rational in contrast.
I understand you're embarrassed at making a fool of yourself in a public forum, but you have only yourself to blame.
You should actually read the article in order to make an intelligent comment... something you have yet to offer.
Stay with cutting and pasting silly emoticons. You're better at menial tasks.
You're too stupid for words.
If you had a point, you might have cobbled words together into coherent sentences.I'm gonna guess my point sailed over your head.Yeah, because you didn't read the article wherein the woman who made the dolls describes the process.Yeah cause your not human if you have thin skin... ROLLS EYESonly for the health of the mother.......That is simply not true.
Ronald Reagan signed abortion into law in 1967 in California. I remember the event.
Mr. Dolt and your screaming buddy, Dolt #2.
From your link, the woman who created the dolls you erroneously and falsely represented as an actual fetus describes her work.
"I have included in the model all the features that a 12 week old from conception has at this stage (neck, eyelids, ears, mouth, arms, legs, fingers & toes). As for the translucency of the skin, that is a hard thing to capture. I hand-paint each one of these in multiple layers, but the transparent very thin skin of a 12 week old is difficult to portray in resin. I have begun to try to perfect my hand-painting of each model in order to show more deeper undertones and to give a more transparent skinlike appearance."
Read more at snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
Dolt!
I thought my point was quite clear, and not transparent at all. But if you insist on an explicit road map:If you had a point, you might have cobbled words together into coherent sentences.I'm gonna guess my point sailed over your head.Yeah, because you didn't read the article wherein the woman who made the dolls describes the process.Yeah cause your not human if you have thin skin... ROLLS EYESonly for the health of the mother.......
Mr. Dolt and your screaming buddy, Dolt #2.
From your link, the woman who created the dolls you erroneously and falsely represented as an actual fetus describes her work.
"I have included in the model all the features that a 12 week old from conception has at this stage (neck, eyelids, ears, mouth, arms, legs, fingers & toes). As for the translucency of the skin, that is a hard thing to capture. I hand-paint each one of these in multiple layers, but the transparent very thin skin of a 12 week old is difficult to portray in resin. I have begun to try to perfect my hand-painting of each model in order to show more deeper undertones and to give a more transparent skinlike appearance."
Read more at snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
Dolt!
During the next six years, many states liberalized abortion statutes, often following California’s lead in permitting abortions when doctors determined that pregnancy endangered the physical or mental health of the mother. By the time the Supreme Court established a constitutional right to abortion in the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, 20 states had liberalized abortion and measures to do so were pending in several others. Four states -- New York, Alaska, Hawaii and Washington -- permitted abortions simply on a mother’s request.only for the health of the mother.......except to save the life of the mother abortion was illegal in the US from the time it became the US......
That is simply not true.
Ronald Reagan signed abortion into law in 1967 in California. I remember the event.
False.
It provided abortion up to the third trimester for most reasons.
During the next six years, many states liberalized abortion statutes, often following California’s lead in permitting abortions when doctors determined that pregnancy endangered the physical or mental health of the mother. By the time the Supreme Court established a constitutional right to abortion in the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, 20 states had liberalized abortion and measures to do so were pending in several others. Four states -- New York, Alaska, Hawaii and Washington -- permitted abortions simply on a mother’s request.only for the health of the mother.......except to save the life of the mother abortion was illegal in the US from the time it became the US......
That is simply not true.
Ronald Reagan signed abortion into law in 1967 in California. I remember the event.
False.
It provided abortion up to the third trimester for most reasons.
Read more: California s Abortion Law A Road Not Taken RealClearPolitics
Follow us: @RCP_Articles on Twitter
I understand you're struggling with making yourself the village idiot. Next time pay attention and don't continue to enter threads when you're unable to read and comprehend the subject matter.You definitely suffer from Dolt Syndrome™. It's a common parallel to Short Man Syndrome™.Yep. You're reduced to pointless spam. Its what you dolts, do.You just keep digging - you're too fucking dumb to stop...
ROFL
You still claiming that Snopes is lying while ignoring the content of the link?
Yeah dumbfuck, the first picture is a doll. No shit.
Problem, the second picture isn't and is provided to show the difference. You keep lying, and it only makes you look dumber and dumber.
Even Cruella looks rational in contrast.
I understand you're embarrassed at making a fool of yourself in a public forum, but you have only yourself to blame.
You should actually read the article in order to make an intelligent comment... something you have yet to offer.
Stay with cutting and pasting silly emoticons. You're better at menial tasks.
You're too stupid for words.
I'm afraid there's no cure for Short Man Complex.
Dear liberal of unsound mind......picture one is of said doll, picture 2 if of an actual 12 week old fetus, used by snopes to show that the first photo is not accurate......in any event there are no photos out there from anyone which purports to prove the claim that a 12 week old fetus is nothing but a smear of blood.......the reason for this is that only on this board will you find anyone stupid enough to pretend that is what a 12 week old fetus looks like.........only for the health of the mother.......except to save the life of the mother abortion was illegal in the US from the time it became the US......
That is simply not true.
Ronald Reagan signed abortion into law in 1967 in California. I remember the event.
Mr. Dolt and your screaming buddy, Dolt #2.
From your link, the woman who created the dolls you erroneously and falsely represented as an actual fetus describes her work.
"I have included in the model all the features that a 12 week old from conception has at this stage (neck, eyelids, ears, mouth, arms, legs, fingers & toes). As for the translucency of the skin, that is a hard thing to capture. I hand-paint each one of these in multiple layers, but the transparent very thin skin of a 12 week old is difficult to portray in resin. I have begun to try to perfect my hand-painting of each model in order to show more deeper undertones and to give a more transparent skinlike appearance."
Read more at snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
Dolt!
not on this board......here, mental health is a scarce commodity..........During the next six years, many states liberalized abortion statutes, often following California’s lead in permitting abortions when doctors determined that pregnancy endangered the physical or mental health of the mother. By the time the Supreme Court established a constitutional right to abortion in the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, 20 states had liberalized abortion and measures to do so were pending in several others. Four states -- New York, Alaska, Hawaii and Washington -- permitted abortions simply on a mother’s request.only for the health of the mother.......except to save the life of the mother abortion was illegal in the US from the time it became the US......
That is simply not true.
Ronald Reagan signed abortion into law in 1967 in California. I remember the event.
False.
It provided abortion up to the third trimester for most reasons.
Read more: California s Abortion Law A Road Not Taken RealClearPolitics
Follow us: @RCP_Articles on Twitter
"mental health" is on demand.
Could you tell me more about those evil and corrupt children? What were they guilty of?
Cruella, let's assume for a moment that this god you are so emotionally invested in with your hatred actually does exist, and that the flood actually happened , wouldn't the number of children killed STILL be a tiny fraction of the number you pro-abort ghouls kill in any given month? Hey I get it, you're just making a buck, and abortion is an billion dollar industry..
I think the smear of blood claim was from the folks that have seen the results of sucking a baby through small tube via a vacuum pump. They leave out the part about what the baby looked like before it was pulverized by their doctor.Dear liberal of unsound mind......picture one is of said doll, picture 2 if of an actual 12 week old fetus, used by snopes to show that the first photo is not accurate......in any event there are no photos out there from anyone which purports to prove the claim that a 12 week old fetus is nothing but a smear of blood.......the reason for this is that only on this board will you find anyone stupid enough to pretend that is what a 12 week old fetus looks like.........only for the health of the mother.......except to save the life of the mother abortion was illegal in the US from the time it became the US......
That is simply not true.
Ronald Reagan signed abortion into law in 1967 in California. I remember the event.
Mr. Dolt and your screaming buddy, Dolt #2.
From your link, the woman who created the dolls you erroneously and falsely represented as an actual fetus describes her work.
"I have included in the model all the features that a 12 week old from conception has at this stage (neck, eyelids, ears, mouth, arms, legs, fingers & toes). As for the translucency of the skin, that is a hard thing to capture. I hand-paint each one of these in multiple layers, but the transparent very thin skin of a 12 week old is difficult to portray in resin. I have begun to try to perfect my hand-painting of each model in order to show more deeper undertones and to give a more transparent skinlike appearance."
Read more at snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
Dolt!
No one here is killing men, women, or children. No one that I know of is profiting from any type of abortion. Did you have some point you were trying to make?
Sorry, fraudster. Read the article. Read the comments directly under the photo of the fetus. You didn't bother to do that.Dear liberal of unsound mind......picture one is of said doll, picture 2 if of an actual 12 week old fetus, used by snopes to show that the first photo is not accurate......in any event there are no photos out there from anyone which purports to prove the claim that a 12 week old fetus is nothing but a smear of blood.......the reason for this is that only on this board will you find anyone stupid enough to pretend that is what a 12 week old fetus looks like.........only for the health of the mother.......except to save the life of the mother abortion was illegal in the US from the time it became the US......
That is simply not true.
Ronald Reagan signed abortion into law in 1967 in California. I remember the event.
Mr. Dolt and your screaming buddy, Dolt #2.
From your link, the woman who created the dolls you erroneously and falsely represented as an actual fetus describes her work.
"I have included in the model all the features that a 12 week old from conception has at this stage (neck, eyelids, ears, mouth, arms, legs, fingers & toes). As for the translucency of the skin, that is a hard thing to capture. I hand-paint each one of these in multiple layers, but the transparent very thin skin of a 12 week old is difficult to portray in resin. I have begun to try to perfect my hand-painting of each model in order to show more deeper undertones and to give a more transparent skinlike appearance."
Read more at snopes.com 12-Week Fetus Photograph
Dolt!
The best I can offer is a 3.5 for pointless melodrama.No one here is killing men, women, or children. No one that I know of is profiting from any type of abortion. Did you have some point you were trying to make?
Don't you kill millions of unborn children each year?
Don't you make huge amounts of money doing it? Aren't you basically a professional killer?
so since you disbelieve everything we've presented.....is there a picture of a 12 week old fetus out there that you DO believe is realistic?.......
maybe something like this?....
so since you disbelieve everything we've presented.....is there a picture of a 12 week old fetus out there that you DO believe is realistic?.......
maybe something like this?....
