Where Do Grand Old Partiers Go When Disgrace Dogs Them

[Procrustes Stretched]

Woof! They go onto a Web Platform called Cameo:



Could Speaker Johnson be next? Enjoy the satire. Or is it live like Memorex?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

https://web.archive.org/web/20240219164817/https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/2024/02/18/santos-kimmel-cameo-lawsuit/

and in other news...

 

[The Duke]

Kimmel is an unfunny cuck bitch.

 

[sealybobo]

Woof! They go onto a Web Platform called Cameo:



Could Speaker Johnson be next? Enjoy the satire. Or is it live like Memorex?

Or they go into lobbying. I don't think George Santos would get hired as a lobbyist but then again Republicans clearly don't vet their candidates.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Or they go into lobbying. I don't think George Santos would get hired as a lobbyist but then again Republicans clearly don't vet their candidates.

I believe you may be onto something here.

 

[MarathonMike]

Woof! They go onto a Web Platform called Cameo:



Could Speaker Johnson be next? Enjoy the satire. Or is it live like Memorex?

Santos is suing Kimmel for lying about who he was and using the video to mock Santos on national TV. I'd say 10 million would be a fair settlement given the recent awards.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Santos is suing Kimmel for lying about who he was and using the video to mock Santos on national TV. I'd say 10 million would be a fair settlement given the recent awards.

Santos is a clown. He will get laughed out of court.

 

[The Duke]

Trump put a stop to going into lobbying as soon as you leave the government. He imposed a 5-year cooloff period.

Ofc Biden reversed that on Day 1.

 

[sealybobo]

Santos is suing Kimmel for lying about who he was and using the video to mock Santos on national TV. I'd say 10 million would be a fair settlement given the recent awards.

Of course you root for George. He's a darling in the GOP.

 

[sealybobo]

Trump put a stop to going into lobbying as soon as you leave the government. He imposed a 5-year cooloff period.

Ofc Biden reversed that on Day 1.

Why did Biden do that?

The creation of Schedule F was controversial, as it is estimated that tens or hundreds of thousands of career employees could lose their civil service protections,[3] and that it would increase the number of political appointments by a factor of ten.[28] Conversely, there was concern that political appointees of Trump, whose appointments are supposed to expire at the end of his term, could "burrow in" by being converted to Schedule F appointments that are harder to fire.[29]

Eleanor Mueller, a writer for Politico, wrote that the executive order "stripped job protections for many federal workers" by requiring federal agencies to classify "any worker responsible for the handling of policy" into a new category that would be exempt from hiring and firing protections and ineligible for representation as part of a union bargaining unit, and "would make it easier to remove civil servants who do not agree with the administration's policies" while easing the potential transition of current political appointees into permanent civil service jobs.[30] Rebecca Beitsch, writing for The Hill, wrote that unions were criticizing Trump's executive order as "the biggest change to federal workforce protections in a century, converting many federal workers to 'at will' employment".[31] Eric Yoder, a Washington Post journalist, said the order "could affect tens of thousands or more career positions involved in making or carrying out policy".[32]

An official statement from Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) further stated that the executive order was "alarming".[31] The six authors, all infectious disease specialists, and epidemiologists, wrote:

We rely on the judgment of civil service experts to lead responses against the pandemic, inform the public, drive research, update guidance and review data supporting the use and distribution of vaccines and treatments to address the impacts of COVID-19. Replacing our scientists and public health experts with politically motivated staff will reduce our ability to respond, and reduce public confidence in our response, to COVID-19 and other public health crises.[33]

The executive order received support from conservatives. Rachel Greszler, a fellow at The Heritage Foundation, said: "I really think that the order is unlikely to affect many of those workers because the overwhelming majority of federal employees are upstanding individuals, they're providing valuable knowledge and experience that the managers in the agency heads don't want to lose. It's only those bad apples who are derelict in their duties, or they're outright trying to thwart their agency’s actions that would need to worry about their job security".[4]

 

[Arlette]

Kimmel is an unfunny cuck bitch.

Trump is selling shoes

 

[The Duke]

Why did Biden do that?

The creation of Schedule F was controversial, as it is estimated that tens or hundreds of thousands of career employees could lose their civil service protections,[3] and that it would increase the number of political appointments by a factor of ten.[28] Conversely, there was concern that political appointees of Trump, whose appointments are supposed to expire at the end of his term, could "burrow in" by being converted to Schedule F appointments that are harder to fire.[29]

Eleanor Mueller, a writer for Politico, wrote that the executive order "stripped job protections for many federal workers" by requiring federal agencies to classify "any worker responsible for the handling of policy" into a new category that would be exempt from hiring and firing protections and ineligible for representation as part of a union bargaining unit, and "would make it easier to remove civil servants who do not agree with the administration's policies" while easing the potential transition of current political appointees into permanent civil service jobs.[30] Rebecca Beitsch, writing for The Hill, wrote that unions were criticizing Trump's executive order as "the biggest change to federal workforce protections in a century, converting many federal workers to 'at will' employment".[31] Eric Yoder, a Washington Post journalist, said the order "could affect tens of thousands or more career positions involved in making or carrying out policy".[32]

An official statement from Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) further stated that the executive order was "alarming".[31] The six authors, all infectious disease specialists, and epidemiologists, wrote:


The executive order received support from conservatives. Rachel Greszler, a fellow at The Heritage Foundation, said: "I really think that the order is unlikely to affect many of those workers because the overwhelming majority of federal employees are upstanding individuals, they're providing valuable knowledge and experience that the managers in the agency heads don't want to lose. It's only those bad apples who are derelict in their duties, or they're outright trying to thwart their agency’s actions that would need to worry about their job security".[4]

Do you even know what lobbying is, you fuckin' retard?!

President Trump Signs 5-Year Lobbying Ban for Administration Officials

The lobbying ban was a central component of Trump's campaign pledge to "drain the swamp"

news.yahoo.com

Federal Register :: Request Access

Lobbying ought to be outlawed altogether. It's bribery!

And Fuck You and all that irrelevant stupid shit you just posted, Silly Boo Boo.

 

[sealybobo]

Do you even know what lobbying is, you fuckin' retard?!

President Trump Signs 5-Year Lobbying Ban for Administration Officials

The lobbying ban was a central component of Trump's campaign pledge to "drain the swamp"

news.yahoo.com

Federal Register :: Request Access

Lobbying ought to be outlawed altogether. It's bribery!

And Fuck You and all that irrelevant stupid shit you just posted, Silly Boo Boo.

Oh I agree with you. But you're an idiot if you think Trump is going to take the corruption out of government. Is that what you think he's about? LOL. FUCKING TRUMPTARD!

 

[MarathonMike]

Oh I agree with you. But you're an idiot if you think Trump is going to take the corruption out of government. Is that what you think he's about? LOL. FUCKING TRUMPTARD!

So you're going to vote for a Party dedicated to China, Iran, and illegal immigration because you personally hate Trump?

 

[sealybobo]

So you're going to vote for a Party dedicated to China, Iran, and illegal immigration because you personally hate Trump?

China isn't as bad as Russia. Not right now. Iran we do not want to go to war with them.

We're trying to fix immigration. Republicans were working with Biden till Trump told them stop. He should be charged for that too.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

China isn't as bad as Russia. Not right now. Iran we do not want to go to war with them.

We're trying to fix immigration. Republicans were working with Biden till Trump told them stop. He should be charged for that too.

thank you