EriktheRed
Eh...
Or, did misogyny play a part in your Palin rants?
Misogyny??? When Cons try to pin "misogynist" or "racist" labels on liberals, you know they're grabbing at straws.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Or, did misogyny play a part in your Palin rants?
The number of Republicans I know who give a tinkers damn what your skin color is happens to be is infinitessimally small. the number of Democrats on the other hand seems rather large...
The resignations are comparable, in the words, phrases and reasons used. Both were blame-shifting. I've made that quite clear.Not making any such claim.You're proclaiming that Jones and Palin are two sides of the same coin? Comparable (albeit from different ends of the spectrum) figures in behaviour, beliefs, character, and actions?
Let's wait and see how much conservative endorsement of that you get...
But, you knew that.
And seriously, I have never cared what Pugs or Cons think. Why should I?
So the two situations AREN"T comparable? Then why would anyone be hypocritical for viewing them differently?
You might almost have a point there, were I a Con. And in your partisan idiocy, you seemed unable to understand I never accused liberals of anything.Or, did misogyny play a part in your Palin rants?
Misogyny??? When Cons try to pin "misogynist" or "racist" labels on liberals, you know they're grabbing at straws.
Weak. He still ostensibly had a choice, right? Quit or be fired. He chose to be a quitter.It's fairly clear that Van Jones was forced out
Well, I'm sure they'll take your stance into consideration when the Van Jones for President committee is preparing their drafts...Weak. He still ostensibly had a choice, right? Quit or be fired. He chose to be a quitter.It's fairly clear that Van Jones was forced out
Where are all the wails and cries of "quitter!" when it comes to Van Jones?
Van Jones plays the Palin, "They smeared me" card and isn't called on it or called a "quitter" by the far-left? Hypocrisy.
He uses the same basic language Palin did when she resigned -- that the job is bigger than one person, too much focus on me, enemies smearing me, blah blah blah -- and gets a pass?
How so? Quitterbirds, please elucidate. Isn't a crybaby, blame-shifting quitter still a quitter, no matter the gender?
Or, did misogyny play a part in your Palin rants?
A quitter is a quitter whether man, woman, no matter skin color, no matter political stripe. Right? Right.Where are all the wails and cries of "quitter!" when it comes to Van Jones?
Van Jones plays the Palin, "They smeared me" card and isn't called on it or called a "quitter" by the far-left? Hypocrisy.
He uses the same basic language Palin did when she resigned -- that the job is bigger than one person, too much focus on me, enemies smearing me, blah blah blah -- and gets a pass?
How so? Quitterbirds, please elucidate. Isn't a crybaby, blame-shifting quitter still a quitter, no matter the gender?
Or, did misogyny play a part in your Palin rants?
You just don't get it, MM. Van Jones did the "honorable thing" by resigning because he is a Democrap. If he had of been a Republican, then he would just be a low-life "quitter" and we would not have heard the end of the ridicule. Besides, the White House staff is busy at work trying to get this swept under the rug. Must be a big lump in that rug with all the sweeping going on around there!
Is it MY stance? Or just the truth?Well, I'm sure they'll take your stance into consideration when the Van Jones for President committee is preparing their drafts...Weak. He still ostensibly had a choice, right? Quit or be fired. He chose to be a quitter.It's fairly clear that Van Jones was forced out
;D
You know MM, I think it's pretty shitty to pull the misogyny card....
Still waiting for the Quitterbirds to come on in here and call Jones a quitter, like they spent weeks and many threads calling Palin one. I want to see if they have the courage to do so.
Of course, they don't because they are misogynistic cowards. And they know who they are.
Who are they?Of course, they don't because they are misogynistic cowards. And they know who they are.
heh, I made my post before I read this one.You know MM, I think it's pretty shitty to pull the misogyny card....
Still waiting for the Quitterbirds to come on in here and call Jones a quitter, like they spent weeks and many threads calling Palin one. I want to see if they have the courage to do so.
Of course, they don't because they are misogynistic cowards. And they know who they are.
That makes you no better than the dildos who pull out the race card when they legitimately criticize Obama.
Shame on you.
You might almost have a point there, were I a Con. And in your partisan idiocy, you seemed unable to understand I never accused liberals of anything.Or, did misogyny play a part in your Palin rants?
Misogyny??? When Cons try to pin "misogynist" or "racist" labels on liberals, you know they're grabbing at straws.
Or, did misogyny play a part in your Palin rants?
iiRACIST!!Where are all the wails and cries of "quitter!" when it comes to Van Jones?
Van Jones plays the Palin, "They smeared me" card and isn't called on it or called a "quitter" by the far-left? Hypocrisy.
He uses the same basic language Palin did when she resigned -- that the job is bigger than one person, too much focus on me, enemies smearing me, blah blah blah -- and gets a pass?
How so? Quitterbirds, please elucidate. Isn't a crybaby, blame-shifting quitter still a quitter, no matter the gender?
Or, did misogyny play a part in your Palin rants?
Of course, they don't because they are misogynistic cowards. And they know who they are.
Where are all the wails and cries of "quitter!" when it comes to Van Jones?
Van Jones plays the Palin, "They smeared me" card and isn't called on it or called a "quitter" by the far-left? Hypocrisy.
He uses the same basic language Palin did when she resigned -- that the job is bigger than one person, too much focus on me, enemies smearing me, blah blah blah -- and gets a pass?
How so? Quitterbirds, please elucidate. Isn't a crybaby, blame-shifting quitter still a quitter, no matter the gender?
Or, did misogyny play a part in your Palin rants?
You just don't get it, MM. Van Jones did the "honorable thing" by resigning because he is a Democrap. If he had of been a Republican, then he would just be a low-life "quitter" and we would not have heard the end of the ridicule. Besides, the White House staff is busy at work trying to get this swept under the rug. Must be a big lump in that rug with all the sweeping going on around there!
A quitter is a quitter whether man, woman, no matter skin color, no matter political stripe. Right? Right.Where are all the wails and cries of "quitter!" when it comes to Van Jones?
Van Jones plays the Palin, "They smeared me" card and isn't called on it or called a "quitter" by the far-left? Hypocrisy.
He uses the same basic language Palin did when she resigned -- that the job is bigger than one person, too much focus on me, enemies smearing me, blah blah blah -- and gets a pass?
How so? Quitterbirds, please elucidate. Isn't a crybaby, blame-shifting quitter still a quitter, no matter the gender?
Or, did misogyny play a part in your Palin rants?
You just don't get it, MM. Van Jones did the "honorable thing" by resigning because he is a Democrap. If he had of been a Republican, then he would just be a low-life "quitter" and we would not have heard the end of the ridicule. Besides, the White House staff is busy at work trying to get this swept under the rug. Must be a big lump in that rug with all the sweeping going on around there!
Still waiting for the Quitterbirds to come on in here and call Jones a quitter, like they spent weeks and many threads calling Palin one. I want to see if they have the courage to do so.
Of course, they don't because they are misogynistic cowards. And they know who they are.
Of course, they don't because they are misogynistic cowards. And they know who they are.
Oh, and here you are now making the very accusation you denied making earlier.