When will the archaic Baconian natural sciences be extinct?

[Questioner]

The Baconian natural sciences and their inductive method have been around since the 15-16th century; nearly as old and outdated as the Renaissance itself.

I'm predicting that with the birth of the information age, the outdated natural sciences and their archaic inductive method will go the way of alchemy and other fields of knowledge and learning considered old, obsolete, and dinosaurish.

Just as much if not most of the low-IQ information popularily available to less intelligent and more superstitious people in regards to those sciences in mass media or lower level K12 and college education, is just outdated information from the 19th century, written and marketed to the 100 IQ demographic or 6th grade reading level to begin with; the type of neanderthall who doesn't even know the difference between a "scientific" theory and a "conspiracy" theory, or have any knowledge or education beyond the archaic and simplistic methods of rote learning and memorization to begin with, let alone anything approaching actual reading comprehension or depth of learning - something which thankfully is an obsolete medium of information, now that intelligent people pursuing superior education and mediums of learning can read the latest and most contemporary scientific information and scientific publishers, such as Pinker, Capra, and others in that archaic field who are actually worth people's time.

And that computational and informational sciences and mathematics will become the new default for discovery and innovation; even the birth of the computer and video game industry, for example, is quite a revolution in regards to entertainment; many old fossils still haven't adapted or caught up to it yet, but as far as "esports", or competitive mathematical games go, it seems promising - such as in the case of simulation games like "Project Cars" or "Gran Turismo", in which players have the option to compete online against real life race car drivers, with some having won contests and gone on to become professional race car drivers as a result of the skills they learned via simulation.

(Not that it matters, since most people spend most of their time just playing simplistic "kiddy" or "childish" games anyway, much as I'm sure they still will even when innovation hands them a new frontier of opportunity altogether).

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I hope bacon science never goes extinct.

 

[Hollie]

The Baconian natural sciences and their inductive method have been around since the 15-16th century; nearly as old and outdated as the Renaissance itself.

I'm predicting that with the birth of the information age, the outdated natural sciences and their archaic inductive method will go the way of alchemy and other fields of knowledge and learning considered old, obsolete, and dinosaurish.

Just as much if not most of the low-IQ information popularily available to less intelligent and more superstitious people in regards to those sciences in mass media or lower level K12 and college education, is just outdated information from the 19th century, written and marketed to the 100 IQ demographic or 6th grade reading level to begin with; the type of neanderthall who doesn't even know the difference between a "scientific" theory and a "conspiracy" theory, or have any knowledge or education beyond the archaic and simplistic methods of rote learning and memorization to begin with, let alone anything approaching actual reading comprehension or depth of learning - something which thankfully is an obsolete medium of information, now that intelligent people pursuing superior education and mediums of learning can read the latest and most contemporary scientific information and scientific publishers, such as Pinker, Capra, and others in that archaic field who are actually worth people's time.

And that computational and informational sciences and mathematics will become the new default for discovery and innovation; even the birth of the computer and video game industry, for example, is quite a revolution in regards to entertainment; many old fossils still haven't adapted or caught up to it yet, but as far as "esports", or competitive mathematical games go, it seems promising - such as in the case of simulation games like "Project Cars" or "Gran Turismo", in which players have the option to compete online against real life race car drivers, with some having won contests and gone on to become professional race car drivers as a result of the skills they learned via simulation.

(Not that it matters, since most people spend most of their time just playing simplistic "kiddy" or "childish" games anyway, much as I'm sure they still will even when innovation hands them a new frontier of opportunity altogether).

“Just as much if not most of the low-IQ information popularily available to less intelligent and more superstitious people in regards to those sciences in mass media or lower level K12 and college education....”

The above bit of reflection on your part is valuable as you assess your lot in life.