When Hillary Clinton has the moral high ground you know you've nominated the wrong candidate

SwimExpert

Gold Member
Nov 26, 2013
16,247
1,679
280
I just saw Clinton's campaign ad reminding us that "our children are watching" when Donald Trump goes one his ridiculous tirades. The irony is so thick it's painful. When her husband was President and it was revealed that he had been doing dirties with Monica Lewinsky, there were many on the right who complained that Clinton should step down because his infidelity had set a bad example for the children. The Democrats pushed back, saying it wasn't the President's job to be a role model for the children of the country, that was the work of parents. And now here we are, with Hillary Clinton herself charging that Trump is not an adequate role model for our children to be President.

But what is even worse is the fact that she's right. As much weak of a stake Clinton has to a moral high ground argument over a President being a good role model for the nation's children, she has a better claim than Trump. And this is why nominating Trump was such a stupid mistake to make. When trumping Clinton in ethics means that you come out behind, you probably would have been better to drumpf your candidate.

 
I just saw Clinton's campaign ad reminding us that "our children are watching" when Donald Trump goes one his ridiculous tirades. The irony is so thick it's painful. When her husband was President and it was revealed that he had been doing dirties with Monica Lewinsky, there were many on the right who complained that Clinton should step down because his infidelity had set a bad example for the children. The Democrats pushed back, saying it wasn't the President's job to be a role model for the children of the country, that was the work of parents. And now here we are, with Hillary Clinton herself charging that Trump is not an adequate role model for our children to be President.

But what is even worse is the fact that she's right. As much weak of a stake Clinton has to a moral high ground argument over a President being a good role model for the nation's children, she has a better claim than Trump. And this is why nominating Trump was such a stupid mistake to make. When trumping Clinton in ethics means that you come out behind, you probably would have been better to drumpf your candidate.


Yep.

The Dems do the GOP the favor of running a terribly vulnerable candidate, and the GOP responds by running Trump, of all people.

You can't make this up.
.
 
The Dems are going to discover that hiLIARy is the YAHOO! of candidates. She's been around forever, and still can't figure out who she is. Like YAHOO! turning down Microsoft's offer for $40B+ a few years ago, the Dems ignored the development of better candidates and stuck themselves with hiLIARy's declining popularity (valuation).
 
Who proclaimed the high road for Hillary? Her campaign.

Don't be a dumbass.
 
I just saw Clinton's campaign ad reminding us that "our children are watching" when Donald Trump goes one his ridiculous tirades. The irony is so thick it's painful. When her husband was President and it was revealed that he had been doing dirties with Monica Lewinsky, there were many on the right who complained that Clinton should step down because his infidelity had set a bad example for the children. The Democrats pushed back, saying it wasn't the President's job to be a role model for the children of the country, that was the work of parents. And now here we are, with Hillary Clinton herself charging that Trump is not an adequate role model for our children to be President.

But what is even worse is the fact that she's right. As much weak of a stake Clinton has to a moral high ground argument over a President being a good role model for the nation's children, she has a better claim than Trump. And this is why nominating Trump was such a stupid mistake to make. When trumping Clinton in ethics means that you come out behind, you probably would have been better to drumpf your candidate.



Hillary has the "moral high ground?"

:wtf:

You and I have completely different definitions of morality. Mine is in the dictionary. Yours is off a DNC teleprompter.
 

Forum List

Back
Top