wirebender
Senior Member
repeating a few talking points may make you feel smatah, but believe me, it only makes you look ignorant.
And yet, you remain completely unable to answer even one of them. What a laugh.
Observable data? NASA is NOT using computer models without hard evidence. Predictions?
Of course they were and that is why they, and all other agencies who are trusted to maintain the temperature record have taken to altering the data. The output of the models did not match the observations so they had to start altering the observations to match the computer output and subsequent predictions.
You harp on about predictions. Global warming is NOT based on predictions. Maybe you are confused about things? It happens when people rely on talking points they do not fully understand. it's like you're a monkey reproducing what you see your handlers doing.
Of course it is based on predictions. If you aren't aware of that, then you are even more ignorant on the topic than I first thought. Here, have a gander at the predictions made by the models and the abysmal failure that they represent.
http://www.warwickhughes.com/hoyt/scorecard.htm
Tell me dante, can you name even one factor in the present climate that is even beginning to approach the boundries of natural variability? Of course you can't and yet, you cling to your faith. You are blinded by your political leanings to the point that you have fallen for the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on humanity. Congratulations.