When A 'Conspiracy Theory;....Isn't

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,898
60,273
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
When the facts speak for themselves.

And the facts are that the attempt to unseat a duly elected President began in the viper's nest of Obama's Oval Office.

1. "Obamagate Is Not A Conspiracy Theory
...no reason to ignore the mounting evidence that suggests the Obama administration engaged in serious corruption.

Democrats and their allies, who like to pretend that President Obama’s only scandalous act was wearing a tan suit, are going spend the next few months gaslighting the public by focusing on the most feverish accusations against Obama. But the fact is that we already have more compelling evidence that the Obama administration engaged in misconduct than we ever did for opening the Russian-collusion investigation.


2. ...note that the investigation into Trump was predicated on an opposition-research document filled with fabulism and, most likely, Russian disinformation. We know the DOJ withheld contradictory evidence when it began spying on those in Trump’s orbit. We have proof that many of the relevant FISA-warrant applications — almost every one of them, actually — were based on “fabricated” evidence or riddled with errors.

3. ...members of the Obama administration, who had no genuine role in counterintelligence operations, repeatedly unmasked Trump’s allies. And we now know that, despite a dearth of evidence, the FBI railroaded Michael Flynn into a guilty plea so it could keep the investigation going.



4. ...the larger context only makes all of these facts more damning. By 2016, the Obama administration’s intelligence community had normalized domestic spying. Obama’s director of national intelligence, James Clapper, famously lied about snooping on American citizens to Congress. His CIA director, John Brennan, oversaw an agency that felt comfortable spying on the Senate, with at least five of his underlings breaking into congressional computer files.

5. [Obama's] attorney general, Eric Holder, invoked the Espionage Act to spy on a Fox News journalist, shopping his case to three judges until he found one who let him name the reporter as a co-conspirator. The Obama administration also spied on Associated Press reporters, which the news organization called a “massive and unprecedented intrusion.” And though it’s been long forgotten, Obama officials were caught monitoring the conversations of members of Congress who opposed the Iran nuclear deal."

1589745219731.png
 
Zero Hedge


Has this Media Source failed a fact check?LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:
ZeroHedge - Conspiracy - Fake News - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Not CredibleZeroHedge - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.
Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check

:scared1:
 
Zero Hedge


Has this Media Source failed a fact check?LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:
ZeroHedge - Conspiracy - Fake News - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Not CredibleZeroHedge - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.
Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check

:scared1:




This is the sort of post one expects from apologists who have ....excuse the allusion.....been caught with their pants down.....


On point, there is not a single thing you Obamunists can find in error in that post.
 
Zero Hedge


Has this Media Source failed a fact check?LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:
ZeroHedge - Conspiracy - Fake News - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Not CredibleZeroHedge - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.
Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check

:scared1:




This is the sort of post one expects from apologists who have ....excuse the allusion.....been caught with their pants down.....


On point, there is not a single thing you Obamunists can find in error in that post.

you posted something from a fake news sight; therefore & henceforth & the logical deduction is that it's pure bullshit, not worthy of any response.


sooooooooooooo............ that means you are dismissed.
 
Let the Dems continue to believe it's a "Vast Right-wing conspiracy". Because, Hillary has been saying it all along..



But when it came to her email server being "hacked"...




So, when Hillary is right, it must be... :auiqs.jpg:

The Democrats have nothing but a "vast right-wing conspiracy" when it comes to them (not facing the truth!)
 
Zero Hedge


Has this Media Source failed a fact check?LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:
ZeroHedge - Conspiracy - Fake News - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Not CredibleZeroHedge - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.
Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check

:scared1:




This is the sort of post one expects from apologists who have ....excuse the allusion.....been caught with their pants down.....


On point, there is not a single thing you Obamunists can find in error in that post.

you posted something from a fake news sight; therefore & henceforth & the logical deduction is that it's pure bullshit, not worthy of any response.


sooooooooooooo............ that means you are dismissed.


As usual, the least adept pretend that only their sources are accurate.....

This juvenile attempt to ignore the truth aside......can you point out any errors you can document?

No?

Excellent.

So we agree......you've verified that you can find not a single thing in the post that is not 100% true, accurate and correct.



And I have more coming......better get the antacids.
 
Zero Hedge


Has this Media Source failed a fact check?LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:
ZeroHedge - Conspiracy - Fake News - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Not CredibleZeroHedge - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.
Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check

:scared1:




This is the sort of post one expects from apologists who have ....excuse the allusion.....been caught with their pants down.....


On point, there is not a single thing you Obamunists can find in error in that post.

you posted something from a fake news sight; therefore & henceforth & the logical deduction is that it's pure bullshit, not worthy of any response.


sooooooooooooo............ that means you are dismissed.


As usual, the least adept pretend that only their sources are accurate.....

This juvenile attempt to ignore the truth aside......can you point out any errors you can document?

No?

Excellent.

So we agree......you've verified that you can find not a single thing in the post that is not 100% true, accurate and correct.



And I have more coming......better get the antacids.

lol ... when obama is handcuffed - then i'll consider believing it.

oh & hillary too.
 
Let the Dems continue to believe it's a "Vast Right-wing conspiracy". Because, Hillary has been saying it all along..



But when it came to her email server being "hacked"...




So, when Hillary is right, it must be... :auiqs.jpg:

The Democrats have nothing but a "vast right-wing conspiracy" when it comes to them (not facing the truth!)




In actuality, they don't believe that......they know the truth and feel the avalanche coming........


That moron above is a perfect example: palpable fear.
 
Let the Dems continue to believe it's a "Vast Right-wing conspiracy". Because, Hillary has been saying it all along..



But when it came to her email server being "hacked"...




So, when Hillary is right, it must be... :auiqs.jpg:

The Democrats have nothing but a "vast right-wing conspiracy" when it comes to them (not facing the truth!)




In actuality, they don't believe that......they know the truth and feel the avalanche coming........


That moron above is a perfect example: palpable fear.


i can't wait 'till they nail the clintons for vince foster's murder!
 
Zero Hedge


Has this Media Source failed a fact check?LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:
ZeroHedge - Conspiracy - Fake News - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Not CredibleZeroHedge - Pseudoscience - Fake News - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Not Credible
Factual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.
Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check

:scared1:




This is the sort of post one expects from apologists who have ....excuse the allusion.....been caught with their pants down.....


On point, there is not a single thing you Obamunists can find in error in that post.

you posted something from a fake news sight; therefore & henceforth & the logical deduction is that it's pure bullshit, not worthy of any response.


sooooooooooooo............ that means you are dismissed.


As usual, the least adept pretend that only their sources are accurate.....

This juvenile attempt to ignore the truth aside......can you point out any errors you can document?

No?

Excellent.

So we agree......you've verified that you can find not a single thing in the post that is not 100% true, accurate and correct.



And I have more coming......better get the antacids.

lol ... when obama is handcuffed - then i'll consider believing it.

oh & hillary too.



I said he is guilty.....which he is.....I never said he would get justice.
 
When the facts speak for themselves.

And the facts are that the attempt to unseat a duly elected President began in the viper's nest of Obama's Oval Office.

1. "Obamagate Is Not A Conspiracy Theory
...no reason to ignore the mounting evidence that suggests the Obama administration engaged in serious corruption.

Democrats and their allies, who like to pretend that President Obama’s only scandalous act was wearing a tan suit, are going spend the next few months gaslighting the public by focusing on the most feverish accusations against Obama. But the fact is that we already have more compelling evidence that the Obama administration engaged in misconduct than we ever did for opening the Russian-collusion investigation.


2. ...note that the investigation into Trump was predicated on an opposition-research document filled with fabulism and, most likely, Russian disinformation. We know the DOJ withheld contradictory evidence when it began spying on those in Trump’s orbit. We have proof that many of the relevant FISA-warrant applications — almost every one of them, actually — were based on “fabricated” evidence or riddled with errors.

3. ...members of the Obama administration, who had no genuine role in counterintelligence operations, repeatedly unmasked Trump’s allies. And we now know that, despite a dearth of evidence, the FBI railroaded Michael Flynn into a guilty plea so it could keep the investigation going.



4. ...the larger context only makes all of these facts more damning. By 2016, the Obama administration’s intelligence community had normalized domestic spying. Obama’s director of national intelligence, James Clapper, famously lied about snooping on American citizens to Congress. His CIA director, John Brennan, oversaw an agency that felt comfortable spying on the Senate, with at least five of his underlings breaking into congressional computer files.

5. [Obama's] attorney general, Eric Holder, invoked the Espionage Act to spy on a Fox News journalist, shopping his case to three judges until he found one who let him name the reporter as a co-conspirator. The Obama administration also spied on Associated Press reporters, which the news organization called a “massive and unprecedented intrusion.” And though it’s been long forgotten, Obama officials were caught monitoring the conversations of members of Congress who opposed the Iran nuclear deal."

View attachment 337469

Keep it up, PC. "Unmasked." LOL
No reason to investigate. LOL Ask Rod Rosenstein, appointed by Trump, why he ordered the Mueller Investigation after Comey was fired.

Your typical trash.
1589746337156.png
 
Let the Dems continue to believe it's a "Vast Right-wing conspiracy". Because, Hillary has been saying it all along..



But when it came to her email server being "hacked"...




So, when Hillary is right, it must be... :auiqs.jpg:

The Democrats have nothing but a "vast right-wing conspiracy" when it comes to them (not facing the truth!)




In actuality, they don't believe that......they know the truth and feel the avalanche coming........


That moron above is a perfect example: palpable fear.


i can't wait 'till they nail the clintons for vince foster's murder!



Second attempt to change the subject.


Just as I said.....palpable fear.
 
Last edited:
Let the Dems continue to believe it's a "Vast Right-wing conspiracy". Because, Hillary has been saying it all along..



But when it came to her email server being "hacked"...




So, when Hillary is right, it must be... :auiqs.jpg:

The Democrats have nothing but a "vast right-wing conspiracy" when it comes to them (not facing the truth!)




In actuality, they don't believe that......they know the truth and feel the avalanche coming........


That moron above is a perfect example: palpable fear.


i can't wait 'till they nail the clintons for vince foster's murder!



Second attempt to change the sublect.


Just as I said.....palpable fear.


sooooooooooo.......... hillary WASN'T brought into this by another poster?
 
When the facts speak for themselves.

And the facts are that the attempt to unseat a duly elected President began in the viper's nest of Obama's Oval Office.

1. "Obamagate Is Not A Conspiracy Theory
...no reason to ignore the mounting evidence that suggests the Obama administration engaged in serious corruption.

Democrats and their allies, who like to pretend that President Obama’s only scandalous act was wearing a tan suit, are going spend the next few months gaslighting the public by focusing on the most feverish accusations against Obama. But the fact is that we already have more compelling evidence that the Obama administration engaged in misconduct than we ever did for opening the Russian-collusion investigation.


2. ...note that the investigation into Trump was predicated on an opposition-research document filled with fabulism and, most likely, Russian disinformation. We know the DOJ withheld contradictory evidence when it began spying on those in Trump’s orbit. We have proof that many of the relevant FISA-warrant applications — almost every one of them, actually — were based on “fabricated” evidence or riddled with errors.

3. ...members of the Obama administration, who had no genuine role in counterintelligence operations, repeatedly unmasked Trump’s allies. And we now know that, despite a dearth of evidence, the FBI railroaded Michael Flynn into a guilty plea so it could keep the investigation going.



4. ...the larger context only makes all of these facts more damning. By 2016, the Obama administration’s intelligence community had normalized domestic spying. Obama’s director of national intelligence, James Clapper, famously lied about snooping on American citizens to Congress. His CIA director, John Brennan, oversaw an agency that felt comfortable spying on the Senate, with at least five of his underlings breaking into congressional computer files.

5. [Obama's] attorney general, Eric Holder, invoked the Espionage Act to spy on a Fox News journalist, shopping his case to three judges until he found one who let him name the reporter as a co-conspirator. The Obama administration also spied on Associated Press reporters, which the news organization called a “massive and unprecedented intrusion.” And though it’s been long forgotten, Obama officials were caught monitoring the conversations of members of Congress who opposed the Iran nuclear deal."

View attachment 337469

Keep it up, PC. "Unmasked." LOL
No reason to investigate. LOL Ask Rod Rosenstein, appointed by Trump, why he ordered the Mueller Investigation after Comey was fired.

Your typical trash.
View attachment 337474



Another dolt exhibiting that fear of the truth!


Excellent.


Was there a reason for an investigation?


Nope......it was Hillary beginning the coup.

And that brings us to who began the Russia Hoax. Hillary did….through the State department, and Alexander Downer, to the Obama FBI.







What did the plotters use as the predicate for beginning the ambush?



MR. GOWDY: When did the investigation begin? And if it were not the dossier, what prompted it? MR. MCCABE: The investigation began -- it was officially initiated [an individual] had met - with George Papadopoulos And this related that in a meeting they had … that Mr. Papadopoulos had made comments to them along the lines that he was quite confident that - that then-candidate Trump would win the election. He was confident because, as he stated, the Clintons had a lot of baggage and that the Trump campaign had a fair amount of information about the Clintons…”








The information came from the State Department…Hillary’s State Department….to the Bureau.



And the man who supposedly told Hillary’s State Department was … “Alexander Downer, an Australian diplomat, as having remembered a bar conversation with George Papadopoulos, a foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign.


But how did the FBI know they should talk to him?


That’s left out of their narrative. Downer’s signature appears on a $25 million contribution to the Clinton Foundation. You don’t need much imagination to figure that he was close with Clinton Foundation operatives who relayed information to the State Department, which then called the FBI to complete the loop. This wasn’t intelligence. It was likely opposition research from the start.”



NEXT!
 
Let the Dems continue to believe it's a "Vast Right-wing conspiracy". Because, Hillary has been saying it all along..



But when it came to her email server being "hacked"...




So, when Hillary is right, it must be... :auiqs.jpg:

The Democrats have nothing but a "vast right-wing conspiracy" when it comes to them (not facing the truth!)




In actuality, they don't believe that......they know the truth and feel the avalanche coming........


That moron above is a perfect example: palpable fear.


i can't wait 'till they nail the clintons for vince foster's murder!



Second attempt to change the subject.


Just as I said.....palpable fear.
 
Let the Dems continue to believe it's a "Vast Right-wing conspiracy". Because, Hillary has been saying it all along..



But when it came to her email server being "hacked"...




So, when Hillary is right, it must be... :auiqs.jpg:

The Democrats have nothing but a "vast right-wing conspiracy" when it comes to them (not facing the truth!)




In actuality, they don't believe that......they know the truth and feel the avalanche coming........


That moron above is a perfect example: palpable fear.


i can't wait 'till they nail the clintons for vince foster's murder!



Second attempt to change the sublect.


Just as I said.....palpable fear.


sooooooooooo.......... hillary WASN'T brought into this by another poster?




Hillary???


Did you say Hillary????



And that brings us to who began the Russia Hoax. Hillary did….through the State department, and Alexander Downer, to the Obama FBI.



What did the plotters use as the predicate for beginning the ambush?



MR. GOWDY: When did the investigation begin? And if it were not the dossier, what prompted it? MR. MCCABE: The investigation began -- it was officially initiated [an individual] had met - with George Papadopoulos And this related that in a meeting they had … that Mr. Papadopoulos had made comments to them along the lines that he was quite confident that - that then-candidate Trump would win the election. He was confident because, as he stated, the Clintons had a lot of baggage and that the Trump campaign had a fair amount of information about the Clintons…”






The information came from the State Department…Hillary’s State Department….to the Bureau.



And the man who supposedly told Hillary’s State Department was … “Alexander Downer, an Australian diplomat, as having remembered a bar conversation with George Papadopoulos, a foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign.


But how did the FBI know they should talk to him?



That’s left out of their narrative. Downer’s signature appears on a $25 million contribution to the Clinton Foundation. You don’t need much imagination to figure that he was close with Clinton Foundation operatives who relayed information to the State Department, which then called the FBI to complete the loop. This wasn’t intelligence. It was likely opposition research from the start.”

 
sooooooooooo.......... hillary WASN'T brought into this by another poster?
I was under some impression, this was a "Conspiracy Theory" thread by the OP. And since we were discussing about the Democrats...her name was brought up. :rolleyes: :disbelief:



Actually.....NOT a conspiracy theory: a recitation of the facts.
 
6. “…on top of everything else, we know that Barack Obama was keenly interested in the Russian-collusion investigation’s progress.

In her very last hour in office, national-security adviser Susan Rice wrote a self-preserving email to herself, noting that she’d attended a meeting with the president, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, FBI director James Comey, and Vice President Joe Biden in which Obama stressed that everything in the investigation should proceed “by the book.”



Did high-ranking Obama-administration officials not always conduct such investigations “by the book”? It is curious that they would need to be specifically instructed to do so. It is also curious that the outgoing national-security adviser, 15 minutes after Trump had been sworn in as president, would need to mention this meeting.

In a healthy media environment, though, the mounting evidence of wrongdoing would spark an outpouring of journalistic curiosity.”


But.....worth pursuing based on the fear it appears to generate in the hearts of the Obamunists.
 

Forum List

Back
Top