What's the Difference between Right wing protests and Leftwing Protests?

[PubliusInfinitum]

The press portrays flag burning, rock throwing, anti american, communists as peaceful protesters; and then turn around and portray conservative protesters that pledge allegiance and pray as violent thugs.

It's a matter of spin.

Pretty much... It's DIS-information.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

ROFL>.... Oh That's just WRONG...

But it does prove that what would otherwise be a blessing, can turn on ya, if sound principle is ignored...

Yes it is... and they're liberals. You won't find anything even remotely resembling those morons that are conservative. One, conservatives rarely if ever protest. They have jobs, commitments, lives, and don't have the time to be marching down the street carrying signs. Two, I don't know any conservative that's STUPID enough to pull a stunt like code pink, or PETA.

One, conservatives rarely if ever protest.

True...
Conformists....CONFORM...

Conformists... ROFL...

Conservatives believe in the Constituion, the Flag and the Republic for which it stands... And as is noted above, we have LIVES... Sadly, we have allowed you idiots and your various protest de jours to undermine ALL OF THAT and frankly, we're tired of it.

We've allowed the children to run the school and we've reaped a terrible price for our misplaced tolerance. The Party's over kids... The Adults will soon be shutting down the national kegger.

 

[xotoxi]

The Party's over kids... The Adults will shutting down the national kegger.

Not for at least another 2 years, pops!

 

[Bfgrn]

Yes it is... and they're liberals. You won't find anything even remotely resembling those morons that are conservative. One, conservatives rarely if ever protest. They have jobs, commitments, lives, and don't have the time to be marching down the street carrying signs. Two, I don't know any conservative that's STUPID enough to pull a stunt like code pink, or PETA.

One, conservatives rarely if ever protest.

True...
Conformists....CONFORM...

Conformists... ROFL...

Conservatives believe in the Constituion, the Flag and the Republic for which it stands...

------------------------------------------
Of course you conformists do...

The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892 by Francis Bellamy (1855-1931), a Baptist minister, a Christian socialist, and the cousin of socialist utopian novelist Edward Bellamy (1850-1898). Bellamy's original "Pledge of Allegiance" was published in the September 8th issue of the popular children's magazine The Youth's Companion as part of the National Public-School Celebration of Columbus Day, a celebration of the 400th anniversary of Christopher Columbus's discovery of America, conceived by James B. Upham.


Bellamy's original Pledge read:

"I Pledge Allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all."

Reciting of the pledge is accompanied by a salute. An early version of the salute, adopted in 1892, was known as the Bellamy salute. It ended with the arm outstretched and the palm upwards. Because of the similarity between the Bellamy salute and the Nazi salute, President Franklin D. Roosevelt instituted the hand-over-the-heart gesture as the salute to be rendered by civilians during the Pledge of Allegiance and the national anthem in the United States, instead of the Bellamy salute. This was done when Congress officially adopted the Flag Code on June 22, 1942.


Under God Added

The Knights of Columbus, the world's largest Catholic fraternal service organization, in New York City felt that the pledge was incomplete without any reference to a deity. Appealing to the authority of Abraham Lincoln, the Knights felt that the words "under God" which were from Lincolns Gettysburg Address were most appropriate to add to the Pledge.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Originally Posted by PubliusInfinitum
The reasoning sets aside the fluidity wherein by the time those individuals DIE OFF... you will have managed to GAIN PERSPECTIVE assuming nature didn't cash you in before you gather sufficient PERSPECTIVE... which is to say the EXPERIENCE to KNOW BETTER.

-----

YOUR perspective's irrelevant if it isn't shared by a majority of voters...

ROFLMNAO... yet another ad populum farce... and it is this very reason why Democraqcies fail and it is THAT reason why the Founders of the US REJECTED DEMOCRACY...

there is ABSOLUTELY NO CORRELATION BETWEEN THE VALIDITY OF A POSITION AND THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ADHERE TO IT; and there is only ONE issue which determines RELEVANCE, where the context is RIGHT AND WRONG and that is VALIDITY; meaning the position rests upon a valid logical construct and within sound reasoning...

This imbecile believes that what is important is what THE MAJORITY WANTS... which is patently absurd. What is important is that the representtives adhere to the US CONSTITUTION and that they use virtuous prudence in their judgment, and implement policy which reflects such.

There is no discernable sign of virtue or prudence in the full scope of the ideologcal left and the Hussein administration is no exception.

Excuse me ma'am, am I going too fast for you... here's a suggestion, reply with something relevant to the TOPIC...

We are discussing ELECTIONS not governance...
Try to keep up...

smile..

ROFLMNAO... Oh GOD... Now that's just PRECIOUS!

You can't make this crap up kids... and FTR: Congrats sis... this one made the sig...

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

The Party's over kids... The Adults will shutting down the national kegger.

Not for at least another 2 years, pops!

Golly... 2 WHOLE YEARS Sis?

ROFLMNAO... Kids...

 

[Bfgrn]

ROFLMNAO... yet another ad populum farce... and it is this very reason why Democraqcies fail and it is THAT reason why the Founders of the US REJECTED DEMOCRACY...

there is ABSOLUTELY NO CORRELATION BETWEEN THE VALIDITY OF A POSITION AND THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ADHERE TO IT; and there is only ONE issue which determines RELEVANCE, where the context is RIGHT AND WRONG and that is VALIDITY; meaning the position rests upon a valid logical construct and within sound reasoning...

This imbecile believes that what is important is what THE MAJORITY WANTS... which is patently absurd. What is important is that the representtives adhere to the US CONSTITUTION and that they use virtuous prudence in their judgment, and implement policy which reflects such.

There is no discernable sign of virtue or prudence in the full scope of the ideologcal left and the Hussein administration is no exception.

Excuse me ma'am, am I going too fast for you... here's a suggestion, reply with something relevant to the TOPIC...

We are discussing ELECTIONS not governance...
Try to keep up...

smile..

ROFLMNAO... Oh GOD... Now that's just PRECIOUS!

You can't make this crap up kids... and FTR: Congrats sis... this one made the sig...

Do you right wing pea brains have a reading disorder or a comprehension problem?

Originally Posted by PubliusInfinitum
The reasoning sets aside the fluidity wherein by the time those individuals DIE OFF... you will have managed to GAIN PERSPECTIVE assuming nature didn't cash you in before you gather sufficient PERSPECTIVE... which is to say the EXPERIENCE to KNOW BETTER.

-----

My reply:
YOUR perspective's irrelevant if it isn't shared by a majority of voters...

See if your mommy can help you pick out the key word..

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Excuse me ma'am, am I going too fast for you... here's a suggestion, reply with something relevant to the TOPIC...

We are discussing ELECTIONS not governance...
Try to keep up...

smile..

ROFLMNAO... Oh GOD... Now that's just PRECIOUS!

You can't make this crap up kids... and FTR: Congrats sis... this one made the sig...

Do you right wing pea brains have a reading disorder or a comprehension problem?

Originally Posted by PubliusInfinitum
The reasoning sets aside the fluidity wherein by the time those individuals DIE OFF... you will have managed to GAIN PERSPECTIVE assuming nature didn't cash you in before you gather sufficient PERSPECTIVE... which is to say the EXPERIENCE to KNOW BETTER.

-----

My reply:
YOUR perspective's irrelevant if it isn't shared by a majority of voters...

See if your mommy can help you pick out the key word..

Look sis... WHAT IS YOUR POINT? Is someone contesting that The Lord of the Idiots garnered more VOTES? Anyone?... ANYONE AT ALL?

THIS IS THE US of A sis... It's a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC... It's NOT FRANCE, where we reform the Republic everytime someone wins an ELECTION; THE CONSTITUTION GUIDES POLICY; NOT PERSONALITY, NOT PERSONAL PREFERENCE, NOT POPULAR OPINION, NOT POPULAR MAJORITIES...

You don't get to 'DO WHAT YOU WANT' just because ya won the election, UNLESS WHAT YA WANT IS IN KEEPING AND ALIGNMENT WITH THE PRINCIPLES AND THE FRAMING SCOPE OF THAT CONSTITUTION.

LOL... So now that you've been educated, you're expected to behave accordingly... and knock off the 'Social Democractic' absurdities wherein you project your ERRONEOUS 'feelings,' that the left can govern as leftists 'BECAUSE YOU WON THE ELECTION...'

 

[Bfgrn]

ROFLMNAO... Oh GOD... Now that's just PRECIOUS!

You can't make this crap up kids... and FTR: Congrats sis... this one made the sig...

Do you right wing pea brains have a reading disorder or a comprehension problem?

Originally Posted by PubliusInfinitum
The reasoning sets aside the fluidity wherein by the time those individuals DIE OFF... you will have managed to GAIN PERSPECTIVE assuming nature didn't cash you in before you gather sufficient PERSPECTIVE... which is to say the EXPERIENCE to KNOW BETTER.

-----

My reply:
YOUR perspective's irrelevant if it isn't shared by a majority of voters...

See if your mommy can help you pick out the key word..

Look sis... WHAT IS YOUR POINT? Is someone contesting that The Lord of the Idiots garnered more VOTES? Anyone?... ANYONE AT ALL?

THIS IS THE US of A sis... It's a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC... It's NOT FRANCE, where we reform the Republic everytime someone wins an ELECTION; THE CONSTITUTION GUIDES POLICY; NOT PERSONALITY, NOT PERSONAL PREFERENCE, NOT POPULAR OPINION, NOT POPULAR MAJORITIES...

You don't get to 'DO WHAT YOU WANT' just because ya won the election, UNLESS WHAT YA WANT IS IN KEEPING AND ALIGNMENT WITH THE PRINCIPLES AND THE FRAMING SCOPE OF THAT CONSTITUTION.

LOL... So now that you've been educated, you're expected to behave accordingly... and knock off the 'Social Democractic' absurdities wherein you project your ERRONEOUS 'feelings,' that the left can govern as leftists 'BECAUSE YOU WON THE ELECTION...'

MY point is you are a pea brain...

I pointed out that PERSPECTIVE, which you did an Archie Bunkerism filled rant on is irrelevant if it isn't shared by a majority of voters.

THEN, you went off on a diatribe about America being a republic, not a democracy and that my reply signified I was somehow unaware of that fact.

BUT, I was talking about ELECTIONS... here's the tip off...VOTERS

SO...your reply was irrelevant.

Now to your current pea brain reply...Obama and the Democrats in Congress have NOT proposed any Constitutional Amendments...SO you are off on another pea brain rant...

Amendments to the Constitution is the ONLY way it can be changed.

 

[bthoma91]

Please don't lower OUR taxes President Obama... give it to the elite and the corporations that sponsored this... so they can invest it in jobs for workers overseas...

WE ARE NOT WORTHY!!!

its called capitalism jackass. woul you like this?... "Raise the rich's taxes Obama so that we can redistribute the wealth of the working man to government dependents so that you can remain in power as long as you can. oh and dont forget your government funding"

 

[Bfgrn]

Please don't lower OUR taxes President Obama... give it to the elite and the corporations that sponsored this... so they can invest it in jobs for workers overseas...

WE ARE NOT WORTHY!!!

its called capitalism jackass. woul you like this?... "Raise the rich's taxes Obama so that we can redistribute the wealth of the working man to government dependents so that you can remain in power as long as you can. oh and dont forget your government funding"

Please try to talk in coherent sentences...

 

[bthoma91]

The difference is too complex and too layered for two pictures. Your right wing example are people who watch Fox and listen to Rush and can't accept the democratic outcome of the last election. Your left example are young people who see the destruction caused by global corporate rape and pollution. But the reality that one is left and one is right is in your mind only. It helps you (and many others) categorize who is good and who is bad and prevents genuine thinking about the issues.

Where was the second picture taken?

It doesnt matter where it was taken, Left wing ideology is left wing ideolgy where ever it is.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Do you right wing pea brains have a reading disorder or a comprehension problem?

Originally Posted by PubliusInfinitum
The reasoning sets aside the fluidity wherein by the time those individuals DIE OFF... you will have managed to GAIN PERSPECTIVE assuming nature didn't cash you in before you gather sufficient PERSPECTIVE... which is to say the EXPERIENCE to KNOW BETTER.

-----

My reply:
YOUR perspective's irrelevant if it isn't shared by a majority of voters...

See if your mommy can help you pick out the key word..

Look sis... WHAT IS YOUR POINT? Is someone contesting that The Lord of the Idiots garnered more VOTES? Anyone?... ANYONE AT ALL?

THIS IS THE US of A sis... It's a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC... It's NOT FRANCE, where we reform the Republic everytime someone wins an ELECTION; THE CONSTITUTION GUIDES POLICY; NOT PERSONALITY, NOT PERSONAL PREFERENCE, NOT POPULAR OPINION, NOT POPULAR MAJORITIES...

You don't get to 'DO WHAT YOU WANT' just because ya won the election, UNLESS WHAT YA WANT IS IN KEEPING AND ALIGNMENT WITH THE PRINCIPLES AND THE FRAMING SCOPE OF THAT CONSTITUTION.

LOL... So now that you've been educated, you're expected to behave accordingly... and knock off the 'Social Democractic' absurdities wherein you project your ERRONEOUS 'feelings,' that the left can govern as leftists 'BECAUSE YOU WON THE ELECTION...'

MY point is you are a pea brain...

I pointed out that PERSPECTIVE, which you did an Archie Bunkerism filled rant on is irrelevant if it isn't shared by a majority of voters.

AGAIN... you're entire thesis is POPULARISM... What the MAJORITY OF VOTERS WANT IS IRRELEVANT... THE US IS NOT A SOCIAL DEMOCRACY

If I was the ONLY ONE to hold this position, that STARK MINORITY STATUS WOULD NEITHER THE SOUND REASONING, NOR THE VALID LOGICAL CONSTRUCT OF THAT POSITION... that you feel that your position is more popular than mine, stands ABSENT VALIDITY... IT IS MEANINGLESS... The US is a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC and that means that the POLICY advanced by ANY GOVERNMENT which is ELECTED, MUST BE CONSTRAINED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE LIMITATIONS SET FORTH BY THAT CONSTITUTION... And sis... the Hussein Regime is NOT operating within CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINT... and THAT is the basis of the Tea Partys and THAT is the only point of relevance at issue.

Now to your current pea brain reply...Obama and the Democrats in Congress have NOT proposed any Constitutional Amendments...SO you are off on another pea brain rant...

ROFL... So ya feel that the only way that the Hussein Regime could work outside the Constitution is to advance an amendment to the USC?

Well kids, there ya have it... the purest essence of ignorance set directly before you.

Where an individual who implies that they are a US Citizen, demands that the unconstitutional policy implemented by the Leftist majority Legislature and the Sychophant leftist Executive CANNOT be unconstitutional, except where they advance an amendment to the USC...

The bad news here is that these idiots have the means to vote...

Amendments to the Constitution is the ONLY way it can be changed.

ROFLMNAO... Oh GOD that's precious...

 

[Bfgrn]

Look sis... WHAT IS YOUR POINT? Is someone contesting that The Lord of the Idiots garnered more VOTES? Anyone?... ANYONE AT ALL?

THIS IS THE US of A sis... It's a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC... It's NOT FRANCE, where we reform the Republic everytime someone wins an ELECTION; THE CONSTITUTION GUIDES POLICY; NOT PERSONALITY, NOT PERSONAL PREFERENCE, NOT POPULAR OPINION, NOT POPULAR MAJORITIES...

You don't get to 'DO WHAT YOU WANT' just because ya won the election, UNLESS WHAT YA WANT IS IN KEEPING AND ALIGNMENT WITH THE PRINCIPLES AND THE FRAMING SCOPE OF THAT CONSTITUTION.

LOL... So now that you've been educated, you're expected to behave accordingly... and knock off the 'Social Democractic' absurdities wherein you project your ERRONEOUS 'feelings,' that the left can govern as leftists 'BECAUSE YOU WON THE ELECTION...'

MY point is you are a pea brain...

I pointed out that PERSPECTIVE, which you did an Archie Bunkerism filled rant on is irrelevant if it isn't shared by a majority of voters.

AGAIN... you're entire thesis is POPULARISM... What the MAJORITY OF VOTERS WANT IS IRRELEVANT... THE US IS NOT A SOCIAL DEMOCRACY

If I was the ONLY ONE to hold this position, that STARK MINORITY STATUS WOULD NEITHER THE SOUND REASONING, NOR THE VALID LOGICAL CONSTRUCT OF THAT POSITION... that you feel that your position is more popular than mine, stands ABSENT VALIDITY... IT IS MEANINGLESS... The US is a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC and that means that the POLICY advanced by ANY GOVERNMENT which is ELECTED, MUST BE CONSTRAINED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE LIMITATIONS SET FORTH BY THAT CONSTITUTION... And sis... the Hussein Regime is NOT operating within CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINT... and THAT is the basis of the Tea Partys and THAT is the only point of relevance at issue.

Now to your current pea brain reply...Obama and the Democrats in Congress have NOT proposed any Constitutional Amendments...SO you are off on another pea brain rant...

ROFL... So ya feel that the only way that the Hussein Regime could work outside the Constitution is to advance an amendment to the USC?

Well kids, there ya have it... the purest essence of ignorance set directly before you.

Where an individual who implies that they are a US Citizen, demands that the unconstitutional policy implemented by the Leftist majority Legislature and the Sychophant leftist Executive CANNOT be unconstitutional, except where they advance an amendment to the USC...

The bad news here is that these idiots have the means to vote...

Amendments to the Constitution is the ONLY way it can be changed.

ROFLMNAO... Oh GOD that's precious...

BLUSTER is not an argument, it's a diversion away from your extreme insecurity...

POPULARISM... What the MAJORITY OF VOTERS WANT IS IRRELEVANT...

NOT when we are talking about WHO is elected...is THIS point too big for your tiny pea?

NOTHING Obama or the Democrats in Congress has done is unconstitutional...it just FEELS that way to you right wing pea brains...

 

[Gurdari]

Leftwingers are young, and chickenshit and rightwingers are old as dirt?

and bravely have the balls to show their faces

hahaha... the balls to agree with the existing power structure.

LW has a different motivation than the RW on many issues...
tending towards more democracy, less pollution, more human rights, etc.

RW seems more inclined to tell you to shut up and just obey your leaders, don't question authority, etc.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

MY point is you are a pea brain...

I pointed out that PERSPECTIVE, which you did an Archie Bunkerism filled rant on is irrelevant if it isn't shared by a majority of voters.

AGAIN... you're entire thesis is POPULARISM... What the MAJORITY OF VOTERS WANT IS IRRELEVANT... THE US IS NOT A SOCIAL DEMOCRACY

If I was the ONLY ONE to hold this position, that STARK MINORITY STATUS WOULD NEITHER THE SOUND REASONING, NOR THE VALID LOGICAL CONSTRUCT OF THAT POSITION... that you feel that your position is more popular than mine, stands ABSENT VALIDITY... IT IS MEANINGLESS... The US is a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC and that means that the POLICY advanced by ANY GOVERNMENT which is ELECTED, MUST BE CONSTRAINED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE LIMITATIONS SET FORTH BY THAT CONSTITUTION... And sis... the Hussein Regime is NOT operating within CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINT... and THAT is the basis of the Tea Partys and THAT is the only point of relevance at issue.



ROFL... So ya feel that the only way that the Hussein Regime could work outside the Constitution is to advance an amendment to the USC?

Well kids, there ya have it... the purest essence of ignorance set directly before you.

Where an individual who implies that they are a US Citizen, demands that the unconstitutional policy implemented by the Leftist majority Legislature and the Sychophant leftist Executive CANNOT be unconstitutional, except where they advance an amendment to the USC...

The bad news here is that these idiots have the means to vote...

Amendments to the Constitution is the ONLY way it can be changed.

ROFLMNAO... Oh GOD that's precious...

BLUSTER is not an argument, it's a diversion away from your extreme insecurity...

POPULARISM... What the MAJORITY OF VOTERS WANT IS IRRELEVANT...

NOT when we are talking about WHO is elected...is THIS point too big for your tiny pea?

NOTHING Obama or the Democrats in Congress has done is unconstitutional...it just FEELS that way to you right wing pea brains...

ROFLMNAO...

No one...
.
.
.
Not me...
.
.
.
None of those who are ideologically aligned with me...
.
.
.
.
NO ONE has contested that The Lord of the Idiots was duly elected... PERIOD.

For you to try and project that SOMEONE has contested THE ELECTION OF President Hussein only establishes you as an obtuse FOOL.

What Americans contest is the ANTI-AMERICAN, UNCONSTITUTIONAL POLICY BEING IMPLEMENTED BY THAT MARXIST and the sychophant, re-tread Clinton syndicate he's appointed to help him subvert the US, her Constitution and the bed-rock, immutable principles on which she rests.

Your argument thus stands as an EPIC FAIL

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Leftwingers are young, and chickenshit and rightwingers are old as dirt?

and bravely have the balls to show their faces

hahaha... the balls to agree with the existing power structure.

LW has a different motivation than the RW on many issues...
tending towards more democracy, less pollution, more human rights, etc.

RW seems more inclined to tell you to shut up and just obey your leaders, don't question authority, etc.

ROFL...

What color is the sky in your world?

 

[Bfgrn]

AGAIN... you're entire thesis is POPULARISM... What the MAJORITY OF VOTERS WANT IS IRRELEVANT... THE US IS NOT A SOCIAL DEMOCRACY

If I was the ONLY ONE to hold this position, that STARK MINORITY STATUS WOULD NEITHER THE SOUND REASONING, NOR THE VALID LOGICAL CONSTRUCT OF THAT POSITION... that you feel that your position is more popular than mine, stands ABSENT VALIDITY... IT IS MEANINGLESS... The US is a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC and that means that the POLICY advanced by ANY GOVERNMENT which is ELECTED, MUST BE CONSTRAINED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE LIMITATIONS SET FORTH BY THAT CONSTITUTION... And sis... the Hussein Regime is NOT operating within CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINT... and THAT is the basis of the Tea Partys and THAT is the only point of relevance at issue.



ROFL... So ya feel that the only way that the Hussein Regime could work outside the Constitution is to advance an amendment to the USC?

Well kids, there ya have it... the purest essence of ignorance set directly before you.

Where an individual who implies that they are a US Citizen, demands that the unconstitutional policy implemented by the Leftist majority Legislature and the Sychophant leftist Executive CANNOT be unconstitutional, except where they advance an amendment to the USC...

The bad news here is that these idiots have the means to vote...


ROFLMNAO... Oh GOD that's precious...

BLUSTER is not an argument, it's a diversion away from your extreme insecurity...

POPULARISM... What the MAJORITY OF VOTERS WANT IS IRRELEVANT...

NOT when we are talking about WHO is elected...is THIS point too big for your tiny pea?

NOTHING Obama or the Democrats in Congress has done is unconstitutional...it just FEELS that way to you right wing pea brains...

ROFLMNAO...

No one...
.
.
.
Not me...
.
.
.
None of those who are ideologically aligned with me...
.
.
.
.
NO ONE has contested that The Lord of the Idiots was duly elected... PERIOD.

For you to try and project that SOMEONE has contested THE ELECTION OF President Hussein only establishes you as an obtuse FOOL.

What Americans contest is the ANTI-AMERICAN, UNCONSTITUTIONAL POLICY BEING IMPLEMENTED BY THAT MARXIST and the sychophant, re-tread Clinton syndicate he's appointed to help him subvert the US, her Constitution and the bed-rock, immutable principles on which she rests.

Your argument thus stands as an EPIC FAIL

------------------------

WOW, you are obtuse...

NO WHERE do I claim anyone is contesting the election, so your line of ranting is irrelevant AGAIN...

Why don't you go back and have adult read the posts to you...

We were talking about the election and the change in demographics in America...

Smile...

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

BLUSTER is not an argument, it's a diversion away from your extreme insecurity...

POPULARISM... What the MAJORITY OF VOTERS WANT IS IRRELEVANT...

NOT when we are talking about WHO is elected...is THIS point too big for your tiny pea?

NOTHING Obama or the Democrats in Congress has done is unconstitutional...it just FEELS that way to you right wing pea brains...

ROFLMNAO...

No one...
.
.
.
Not me...
.
.
.
None of those who are ideologically aligned with me...
.
.
.
.
NO ONE has contested that The Lord of the Idiots was duly elected... PERIOD.

For you to try and project that SOMEONE has contested THE ELECTION OF President Hussein only establishes you as an obtuse FOOL.

What Americans contest is the ANTI-AMERICAN, UNCONSTITUTIONAL POLICY BEING IMPLEMENTED BY THAT MARXIST and the sychophant, re-tread Clinton syndicate he's appointed to help him subvert the US, her Constitution and the bed-rock, immutable principles on which she rests.

Your argument thus stands as an EPIC FAIL

------------------------

WOW, you are obtuse...

NO WHERE do I claim anyone is contesting the election, so your line of ranting is irrelevant AGAIN...

Why don't you go back and have adult read the posts to you...

We were talking about the election and the change in demographics in America...

Smile...

Sis you don't have a clue WHAT it is you're saying... the good news is that you've no means to EVEN MAKE a point... as you've now denied that you've spoken to every conceivable facet of this issue...

But by all means... PUHLEASE TRY!

 

[Bfgrn]

ROFLMNAO...

No one...
.
.
.
Not me...
.
.
.
None of those who are ideologically aligned with me...
.
.
.
.
NO ONE has contested that The Lord of the Idiots was duly elected... PERIOD.

For you to try and project that SOMEONE has contested THE ELECTION OF President Hussein only establishes you as an obtuse FOOL.

What Americans contest is the ANTI-AMERICAN, UNCONSTITUTIONAL POLICY BEING IMPLEMENTED BY THAT MARXIST and the sychophant, re-tread Clinton syndicate he's appointed to help him subvert the US, her Constitution and the bed-rock, immutable principles on which she rests.

Your argument thus stands as an EPIC FAIL

------------------------

WOW, you are obtuse...

NO WHERE do I claim anyone is contesting the election, so your line of ranting is irrelevant AGAIN...

Why don't you go back and have adult read the posts to you...

We were talking about the election and the change in demographics in America...

Smile...

Sis you don't have a clue WHAT it is you're saying... the good news is that you've no means to EVEN MAKE a point... as you've now denied that you've spoken to every conceivable facet of this issue...

But by all means... PUHLEASE TRY!

I will try to make it as simple as possible for you...

America is a republic, with elected representation, it is not a pure democracy or majority rule... I am fully aware that our founders set up that framework for GOVERNANCE.

BUT when and ELECTION is held to choose that representation, it IS majority rule.

Is THAT too difficult for your tiny little pea brain to comprehend???