What you get for Criminal witness retaliation - 10 years in prison. Trump claims Don McGahn lied.

[deanrd]

Fact-checking Trump's claim McGahn was never told to fire Mueller - CNNPolitics

From multiple interviews with McGahn and others, the report states that after news broke saying Trump had ordered McGahn to fire Mueller, "the President ... sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel." McGahn rejected this command and "insisted his memory of the President's direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate," the report states.

-----------------

Trump said he never used the word "fired". McGahn says what Trump said was "Mueller has to go."

Is there a difference between "fire that guy" and "That guy has to go"?

If the end result is the same, then the intention was the same.

And now Trump (the world's biggest liar) is publicly accusing former White House Counsel Don McGahn of lying to Federal Investigators. A criminal offense. I suspect that could be considered "Criminal witness retaliation". After all, Trump, the President of the United States of America, is accusing McGahn of not only lying to federal investigations but committing a felony that could come with a jail sentence. Sounds like retaliation to me. Especially considering Trump is attempting to ruin this man's life. And all because McGahn refused to break the law. Or as we like to call it "Obstruction of Justice".

What do you think about that? Could that be considered a "high crime"?



Can you believe it? Fox News judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano laid many of Trump's crimes out for all to see. That means Fox Viewers watched this video. Even Fox Viewers have been exposed to Trump's crimes.

For Obstruction of Justice you need three things:
Nexus to an ongoing investigation (the Mueller Report)
Obstruction Act (telling people to do any number of things, I could list them)
Evidence of Corrupt Intent (Trump said publicly to make the Mueller investigation go away)

It seems William Barr will testify next Wednesday in front of the Judicial Committee over his conclusions in the Mueller report after saying he won't.

Why the change of heart? It seems Congress can issue subpoenas, which, of course, can be ignored. But ignoring that subpoena means possible arrest and a fine of $25,000.00
Not $25,000.00 total, but per day.

And Trump telling everyone not to go means further obstruction of Justice.

This is in the constitution folks. This is a fight Trump can't win. And you can believe such important cases will be fast tracked by the Supreme Court. If it even gets that far. Once a ruling is made in a lower court, the Supreme Court might not choose to hear it. Instead, it will stand. And the law isn't on Trump's side. The law is on the side of the Constitution.

 

[Oddball]

 

[Kat]

Fact checking from CNN? Yep, that'll do it.

 

[Oddball]

The Most Busted Name in Fake Nooz!

 

[deanrd]

The Most Busted Name in Fake Nooz!

I'm not going to call anyone dumb fuking sh!t or anything like that because I don't see it as productive.

But Fox News judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano doesn't work for CNN.

I'm sure you guys know that.

This doesn't make you guys look terribly bright. Even you guys have to agree with that, right?

 

[impuretrash]

The Most Busted Name in Fake Nooz!

I'm not going to call anyone dumb fuking sh!t or anything like that because I don't see it as productive.

But Fox News judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano doesn't work for CNN.

I'm sure you guys know that.

This doesn't make you guys look terribly bright. Even you guys have to agree with that, right?

Obstruction of justice...

A investigation of a crime that never took place, a false allegation meant revoke an election and impeach a president because some people dislike his personality..

Is that what we're calling justice nowadays?

 

[Kat]

The Most Busted Name in Fake Nooz!

I'm not going to call anyone dumb fuking sh!t or anything like that because I don't see it as productive.

But Fox News judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano doesn't work for CNN.

I'm sure you guys know that.

This doesn't make you guys look terribly bright. Even you guys have to agree with that, right?

Not like we don't know that. But, thanks for playing.

 

[Dale Smith]

The Most Busted Name in Fake Nooz!

I'm not going to call anyone dumb fuking sh!t or anything like that because I don't see it as productive.

But Fox News judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano doesn't work for CNN.

I'm sure you guys know that.

This doesn't make you guys look terribly bright. Even you guys have to agree with that, right?

deantard, the swamp rat Mueller found ZERO, ZILCH....NADA after looking in every nook and cranny HOPING to find ANYTHING that could tie Trump to the ROOSKIES.....even the intentional plants and attempts to infiltrate Russian operatives of the Deep State into the Trump campaign never succeeded. Trump was made aware of those attempts by the "white hats".....


Sucks to be you.........

 

[Muhammed]

Fact-checking Trump's claim McGahn was never told to fire Mueller - CNNPolitics

From multiple interviews with McGahn and others, the report states that after news broke saying Trump had ordered McGahn to fire Mueller, "the President ... sought to have McGahn deny that he had been directed to remove the Special Counsel." McGahn rejected this command and "insisted his memory of the President's direction to remove the Special Counsel was accurate," the report states.

-----------------

Trump said he never used the word "fired". McGahn says what Trump said was "Mueller has to go."

Is there a difference between "fire that guy" and "That guy has to go"?

If the end result is the same, then the intention was the same.

And now Trump (the world's biggest liar) is publicly accusing former White House Counsel Don McGahn of lying to Federal Investigators. A criminal offense. I suspect that could be considered "Criminal witness retaliation". After all, Trump, the President of the United States of America, is accusing McGahn of not only lying to federal investigations but committing a felony that could come with a jail sentence. Sounds like retaliation to me. Especially considering Trump is attempting to ruin this man's life. And all because McGahn refused to break the law. Or as we like to call it "Obstruction of Justice".

What do you think about that? Could that be considered a "high crime"?



Can you believe it? Fox News judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano laid many of Trump's crimes out for all to see. That means Fox Viewers watched this video. Even Fox Viewers have been exposed to Trump's crimes.

For Obstruction of Justice you need three things:
Nexus to an ongoing investigation (the Mueller Report)
Obstruction Act (telling people to do any number of things, I could list them)
Evidence of Corrupt Intent (Trump said publicly to make the Mueller investigation go away)

It seems William Barr will testify next Wednesday in front of the Judicial Committee over his conclusions in the Mueller report after saying he won't.

Why the change of heart? It seems Congress can issue subpoenas, which, of course, can be ignored. But ignoring that subpoena means possible arrest and a fine of $25,000.00
Not $25,000.00 total, but per day.

And Trump telling everyone not to go means further obstruction of Justice.

This is in the constitution folks. This is a fight Trump can't win. And you can believe such important cases will be fast tracked by the Supreme Court. If it even gets that far. Once a ruling is made in a lower court, the Supreme Court might not choose to hear it. Instead, it will stand. And the law isn't on Trump's side. The law is on the side of the Constitution.

McGahn never even had the authority to fire Mueller, dumbass.

 

[Pete7469]

Deanturd...

Seriously...

It's time to give it up. You even have mods trolling your troll threads.

Get a new hobby. Try dodging trucks blindfolded on an interstate. It's the most productive thing you could do with your time.


.

 

[flacaltenn]

For Obstruction of Justice you need three things:
Nexus to an ongoing investigation (the Mueller Report)
Obstruction Act (telling people to do any number of things, I could list them)
Evidence of Corrupt Intent (Trump said publicly to make the Mueller investigation go away)

He asked his aides to do a LOT of things. But those things never happened.. And unless Mueller can CITE HOW his investigation was obstructed by any of these things -- you have no ACT of obstruction..

THINKING or conferring with aides about obstruction of an witchhunt that is producing NOTHING but financial ruin for handfuls of your campaign staff --- is not a crime...

You would certainly think that if Mueller FELT or EXPERIENCED ANY OBSTRUCTION -- it would SURELY be on page 1 of the 2nd volume of his report... Go CHECK !!! Betcha there's no list of whiny excuses from Mueller about how his roll was slowed down even a day from any Presidential "obstruction"..

BTW -- the "fact" about Trump offering a pardon to Cohen is NOT a fact. It's according to Cohen alone. And to boot -- the word pardon was never used.. It was more of a general "hang in there and we'll take care of you" statement from WH lawyers because Trump Foundation was INITIALLY PAYING HIS LEGAL expenses. Until Lanny Davis showed up.. And then I suppose we can all SUPPOSE the Clinton Foundation started to cover his defense..

 

[Penelope]

That is because there was so much obstruction going on, lying and deleting emails.

Obvious obstruction: read and weep:
-----------------------------------------------
​

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

 

[keepitreal]

That is because there was so much obstruction going on, lying and deleting emails.

Obvious obstruction: read and weep:
-----------------------------------------------
​

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

SEE, THATS WHY WE KEEP GOING BACK TO HILLARY

 

[Penelope]

That is because there was so much obstruction going on, lying and deleting emails.

Obvious obstruction: read and weep:
-----------------------------------------------
​

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

SEE, THATS WHY WE KEEP GOING BACK TO HILLARY

This is about Tramp , not Hillary, are you aware she is not the Potus? maybe not.

 

[impuretrash]

That is because there was so much obstruction going on, lying and deleting emails.

Obvious obstruction: read and weep:
-----------------------------------------------
​

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

SEE, THATS WHY WE KEEP GOING BACK TO HILLARY

This is about Tramp , not Hillary, are you aware she is not the Potus? maybe not.

It's not obstruction when a Democrat does it!!!!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

That is because there was so much obstruction going on, lying and deleting emails.

Obvious obstruction: read and weep:
-----------------------------------------------
​

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

That covers Hillary's deletion of 33,000 emails. Obama made the FBI cover for her. You agree that a serious crime, right?

 

[keepitreal]

That is because there was so much obstruction going on, lying and deleting emails.

Obvious obstruction: read and weep:
-----------------------------------------------
​

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

SEE, THATS WHY WE KEEP GOING BACK TO HILLARY

This is about Tramp , not Hillary, are you aware she is not the Potus? maybe not.

Why is it not about Hillary?