Okay, I just showed our resident cop the Youtube footage of the Berkeley incident. His analysis:
1. There is no footage of what happened prior to the event. No footage of the police giving verbal orders to disperse or any threats that may have been leveled at the police. The odds are excellent that the expanded footage would have painted a different picture than the Youtube clip. Note there is a police photographer there filming the whole thing. The police would not have been there at all if the University officials were not concerned and had not called them.
2. Due to the protesters being right in the face of the police there was no room to use pepper spray or tear gas. This was almost certainly deliberate. Unless the police are equipped with gas masks, etc. distance is required to use that stuff without incapacitating and putting the police officers at risk.
3. It is imperative that a 'reactionary gap' be maintained between the police and a mob. This gives the police a chance to react when violence occurs and also keeps the mob from easily attacking the police officers and perhaps taking their weapons. Each police officer has on his person a taser, handcuffs, a baton, and a firearm. The batons in this case were used to re-establish the reactionary gap when the crowd surged forward. If you look carefully, there is likely a gap in the Youtube tape in which that surge occurred. You will note that the police are severely outnumbered. There is a reason they call it the 'thin blue line.'
4. The poking with the batons to move the crowd back is the least violent and least injurious method of crowd control. You will note that nobody was taken down, nobody was bleeding, no cracked heads, no broken bones. The police officers were demonstrating excellent training with that maneuver.
So there you have it.
1. There is no footage of what happened prior to the event. No footage of the police giving verbal orders to disperse or any threats that may have been leveled at the police. The odds are excellent that the expanded footage would have painted a different picture than the Youtube clip. Note there is a police photographer there filming the whole thing. The police would not have been there at all if the University officials were not concerned and had not called them.
2. Due to the protesters being right in the face of the police there was no room to use pepper spray or tear gas. This was almost certainly deliberate. Unless the police are equipped with gas masks, etc. distance is required to use that stuff without incapacitating and putting the police officers at risk.
3. It is imperative that a 'reactionary gap' be maintained between the police and a mob. This gives the police a chance to react when violence occurs and also keeps the mob from easily attacking the police officers and perhaps taking their weapons. Each police officer has on his person a taser, handcuffs, a baton, and a firearm. The batons in this case were used to re-establish the reactionary gap when the crowd surged forward. If you look carefully, there is likely a gap in the Youtube tape in which that surge occurred. You will note that the police are severely outnumbered. There is a reason they call it the 'thin blue line.'
4. The poking with the batons to move the crowd back is the least violent and least injurious method of crowd control. You will note that nobody was taken down, nobody was bleeding, no cracked heads, no broken bones. The police officers were demonstrating excellent training with that maneuver.
So there you have it.
Last edited: