What is immoral about eugenics?

JBeukema

Rookie
Apr 23, 2009
25,613
1,747
0
everywhere and nowhere
It is a “given” in discussions of genetic engineering that no sensible person can be in favour of eugenics. The main reason for this presumption is that so much horror, misery, and mayhem have been carried out in the name of eugenics in the 20th century that no person with any moral sense could think otherwise.1–3 In fact, the abysmal history of murder and sterilisation undertaken in the name of race hygiene and the “improvement” of the human species again and again in this century is so overpowering that the risk of reoccurrence, sliding down what has proved time and time again to be an extremely slick, slippery slope, does seem enough to bring all ethical argument in favour of eugenics to an end.
However, before dismissing any favourable stance towards eugenics it is important to distinguish what has happened in the past under the banner of eugenics and what might happen in the future. It is important to distinguish between genetic changes undertaken with respect to improving a group or population and genetic change that takes a single individual as its focus.
Summary points

The horrible abuses committed in the name of eugenics through coercive policies imposed by governments have obscured the fact that eugenic goals can be the subject of choice as well as coercion
In the rush to map the human genome and reap the benefits of new genetic knowledge it has become commonplace to argue that eugenic goals will play no part in how new genetic knowledge is used
The moral case against voluntary choices to advance eugenic goals by individuals or couples has not been persuasively made
Given the power and authority granted to parents to seek to improve or better their children by environmental interventions, at least some forms of genetic selection or alteration seem equally ethically defensible if they are undertaken freely and do not disempower or disadvantage children





http://www.bmj.com/content/319/7220/1284.full#otherarticles
 
They forgot to mention it in the bible.

Oh, really? What about God's ordering genocidal campaigns of extermination to make way for the Chosen People?

Read the Book. He ordered the campaigns to fullfill his promises to those people that sinned against Him and people. He sent a "weak" army against hardened warriors to demonstrate that with his help even the most inferior army could "end them".

Also: OT, the sins of the father were passed to the children. If the Lord promised to "end them", He did it in His time. When Joshua was His general, there were angels that walked beside Joshua in battle. The angels were not happy to "kill" the others, but that was there assignment, and they did it well.

The Canaanites were cursed by the Lord for "stealing" land (they had been given part of Africa as Canaan was Ham's son), they stayed near "Palestine". In the NT, Yeshua blesses a Canaanite for her faith, demonstrating, the Lord is willing to forgive, based on faith and repentance.

The problem with genetic manipulation: there is no way to control it. Once it is "okay" to do little things to improve health and life, the wackos want to come, and mix species and worse. You can say it will help all you want, but historically, these things end, badly. It gives the "scientist" authority to manipulate "humans" at which point they become "experiments" that can be destoyed (start over). Once "humans" become "experiments" there is no way to assure they will be treated "humanely. Abuses will follow.
 
Progressives throughout history, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, etc. have been practitioners of Eugenics
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
I think it is the whole business of murdering innocents that might make people think that eugenics might have a doubtful ethical base. YMMV.
 
I think it is the whole business of murdering innocents that might make people think that eugenics might have a doubtful ethical base. YMMV.

:eusa_eh:

WTF are you babbling about?

the science which deals with all influences that improve the inborn qualities of a race; also with those that develop them to the utmost advantage.

See: preimplantation diagnosis, gene therapy, recombinant DNA, prenatal care...
 
There's a book out there titled In the Name of Eugenics. In it is told the story of eugenics, including the corruption of its science racist elements and the struggle by people like myself and those who continue the cause in the medical community to this day to preserve the true goal of the most humane of sciences and work towards its end. The decrease in the West in the prevalence of many genetic diseases is a result of of these efforts. Together with the post- and trans-humans, who persue the same ends through their own means and also those who work primarily in the political arena to achieve the necessary social evolution, such as the social democrats (whatever party the must align themselves with to achieve a better world at a given time), we constitute an unseen vanguard of the new era, driving a reluctant and ill society towards a brighter future.

We are the builders of Man's new form, the disciples of true humanity spreading the gospel of the new ideology which shall work to free man from his minimalistic nature and the bondage of archaic theologies and socio-political paradigms.
 
There's a book out there titled In the Name of Eugenics. In it is told the story of eugenics, including the corruption of its science racist elements and the struggle by people like myself and those who continue the cause in the medical community to this day to preserve the true goal of the most humane of sciences and work towards its end. The decrease in the West in the prevalence of many genetic diseases is a result of of these efforts. Together with the post- and trans-humans, who persue the same ends through their own means and also those who work primarily in the political arena to achieve the necessary social evolution, such as the social democrats (whatever party the must align themselves with to achieve a better world at a given time), we constitute an unseen vanguard of the new era, driving a reluctant and ill society towards a brighter future.

We are the builders of Man's new form, the disciples of true humanity spreading the gospel of the new ideology which shall work to free man from his minimalistic nature and the bondage of archaic theologies and socio-political paradigms.

In the Name of Eugenics is one of the most biased, and yet one of the best, books I have ever come across about eugenics. Maybe if you spent a little more time digging through all his references and reading the material he did not include in his book you would have a better grasp of what eugenics is all about, and understand why knowledgeable people shun it.

I also enjoy the way you tried to make yourself sound qualified to discuss this subject by claiming you are working to promote eugenics. Until you can point to a college that teaches it as a science, which you cannot, you are doing nothing more than pissing into the wind. All that does is get you covered with piss, and teaches non fools to avoid the activity. Please continue to piss as much as you want, I will be watching from upwind.
 
Last edited:
Why did you have your name changed from proletarian or what ever the hell it was nazi?
You found it a burden to be a racist now what ?
 

Forum List

Back
Top