JBeukema
Rookie
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #61
[voluntary measures] would constitute euthenics, not eugenics.
see: liberal eugenics
the two approaches lay on either side of the dichotomyevil
Eugenics is a science, not an approach or set of policies, and only with a somewhat liberal usage of the term does it apply to any application of the science.
nazis were eugenicists
They were also germans, largely male, and to a large extent various shades of Christian. Some claim Hitler was also a vegetarian.
so you come into this argument with a bad rap.
Then, too, do all Christians. After all, the people who burned the women in Salem, the guys who run Blackwater, and the Hutaree were all Christians... Except that Christianity is a set of beliefs and eugenics is nothing more than a broad field of study. Now tell me who really enters the conversation covered in filth if we're going to use your criteria?
what do you propose as a eugenic policy which you'd advocate a country like the US should adopt?
see: liberal eugenics. I've gone over this many times.