What happens if Flynn wiretap was illegal?

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2015
52,336
52,327
3,615
We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.

How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
 
We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.

How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.
 
We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.

How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.

Easy to tell.

Was there a court order?

If yes- legal.

If not- not legal.

Was there a court order?
 
We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.

How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.

Easy to tell.

Was there a court order?

If yes- legal.

If not- not legal.

Was there a court order?

A court order doesn't make it legal.

What if the court order was issued based on lies?
 
Last edited:
We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.

How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.

Easy to tell.

Was there a court order?

If yes- legal.

If not- not legal.

Was there a court order?
It's not that simple. If the order was obtained under fraudulent terms (such as lying to the judge for political advantage), then said order can be vacated and any and all resultant evidence obtained deemed inadmissible.
 
We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.

How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.

Easy to tell.

Was there a court order?

If yes- legal.

If not- not legal.

Was there a court order?

a court order doesnt make it legal.

The court order makes it legal.
 
We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.

How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.

Easy to tell.

Was there a court order?

If yes- legal.

If not- not legal.

Was there a court order?

a court order doesnt make it legal.

The court order makes it legal.

No, it doesn't, counselor.
 
We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.

How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.

Easy to tell.

Was there a court order?

If yes- legal.

If not- not legal.

Was there a court order?

a court order doesnt make it legal.

The court order makes it legal.

No, it doesn't, counselor.
Walmart law degree dropout, that one.
 
problem with your statement is Flynn was NEVER wire tapped....

The Russian Ambassador Kislyak was legally being monitored/tapped.

Flynn happened to call him... but Kislyak has been monitored for years if not decades and Flynn would have been aware of that as a former DIA director....unless he simply was stupefied by some act of God or simply suffered from a brain fart???

Or, maybe arrogant enough to think president Trump would protect him somehow, from his lawlessness, because he was covering up something harmful to Trump or family by lying to the FBI??? :dunno:

Pushing the ''illegal to tape Flynn angle''

WOULD MOST CERTAINLY have been used by Flynn's lawyers to get everything thrown out, IF they Could have used it legally....
 
The left and GOP establishment are prosecuting president Trump in the media, this will never see the inside of a courtroom where Trump would prevail.
 
The left and GOP establishment are prosecuting president Trump in the media, this will never see the inside of a courtroom where Trump would prevail.

Exactly.

If there were any bombshells, the HILLARY CLINTON SYMPATHETIC FBI AGENTS INVESTIGATING TRUMP would have leaked them.

There isn't shit.

Donald J Trump will not be removed from office for colluding with PUTIN to rig the 2016 POTUS election. PERIOD.
 
The left and GOP establishment are prosecuting president Trump in the media, this will never see the inside of a courtroom where Trump would prevail.

Wouldn't be too sure there...

He has already admitted he knew that Flynn lie to FBI.

He then asked Comey to let Flynn go.

He then fired Comey.

When asked he said it was about the Russia thing...

Sorry but that looks like obstruction of justice. So please goto court.
 
The left and GOP establishment are prosecuting president Trump in the media, this will never see the inside of a courtroom where Trump would prevail.

Yes. How dare they tell a vicious pack of truths about the orange sociopath.

Just because you insane delusional obs-deranged loons spent eight years persecuting the black guy in the whitehouse doesn't mean that's what normal people do.
 
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.

That's fruit of the poison tree, and the problem is Flynn pled guilty, and gave up all appeal rights. So there is no court to overturn the evidence.
 
problem with your statement is Flynn was NEVER wire tapped....

The Russian Ambassador Kislyak was legally being monitored/tapped.

Flynn happened to call him... but Kislyak has been monitored for years if not decades and Flynn would have been aware of that as a former DIA director....unless he simply was stupefied by some act of God or simply suffered from a brain fart???

Or, maybe arrogant enough to think president Trump would protect him somehow, from his lawlessness, because he was covering up something harmful to Trump or family by lying to the FBI??? :dunno:

Pushing the ''illegal to tape Flynn angle''

WOULD MOST CERTAINLY have been used by Flynn's lawyers to get everything thrown out, IF they Could have used it legally....
And you think everything has been conducted above board.
The bit about spying on political opponents is espionage.
They talk about this plea-bargain being just the tip of the iceberg, but this espionage is the real conspiracy.
Nevermind that the same FBI agent that did a terrible job interviewing Hillary was a strong Hillary supporter and was also on the Mueller team investigating Trump, and conveniently a Trump Hater.....an obvious conflict of interest.
 
What happens if Flynn wiretap was illegal?
It's not illegal to wiretap the Russians, retard.

Pro Tip: If you don't want to be caught on a wiretap of the Russians, DON'T CALL THEM!


We done here?
 

Forum List

Back
Top