ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 52,555
- 52,726
- 3,615
We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.
How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.
How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.
How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.
How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
Easy to tell.
Was there a court order?
If yes- legal.
If not- not legal.
Was there a court order?
All tainted evidence would be thrown out.We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.
How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
It's not that simple. If the order was obtained under fraudulent terms (such as lying to the judge for political advantage), then said order can be vacated and any and all resultant evidence obtained deemed inadmissible.If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.
How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
Easy to tell.
Was there a court order?
If yes- legal.
If not- not legal.
Was there a court order?
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.
How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
Easy to tell.
Was there a court order?
If yes- legal.
If not- not legal.
Was there a court order?
a court order doesnt make it legal.
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.
How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
Easy to tell.
Was there a court order?
If yes- legal.
If not- not legal.
Was there a court order?
a court order doesnt make it legal.
The court order makes it legal.
Walmart law degree dropout, that one.If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.
How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
Easy to tell.
Was there a court order?
If yes- legal.
If not- not legal.
Was there a court order?
a court order doesnt make it legal.
The court order makes it legal.
No, it doesn't, counselor.
We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.
How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
The left and GOP establishment are prosecuting president Trump in the media, this will never see the inside of a courtroom where Trump would prevail.
The left and GOP establishment are prosecuting president Trump in the media, this will never see the inside of a courtroom where Trump would prevail.
The left and GOP establishment are prosecuting president Trump in the media, this will never see the inside of a courtroom where Trump would prevail.
If illegal, then all resultant evidence is inadmissible. It would be considered "fruit of the tainted tree". In addition, any evidence obtained consequently from discovery based upon tainted evidence is also inadmissible.
And you think everything has been conducted above board.problem with your statement is Flynn was NEVER wire tapped....
The Russian Ambassador Kislyak was legally being monitored/tapped.
Flynn happened to call him... but Kislyak has been monitored for years if not decades and Flynn would have been aware of that as a former DIA director....unless he simply was stupefied by some act of God or simply suffered from a brain fart???
Or, maybe arrogant enough to think president Trump would protect him somehow, from his lawlessness, because he was covering up something harmful to Trump or family by lying to the FBI???
Pushing the ''illegal to tape Flynn angle''
WOULD MOST CERTAINLY have been used by Flynn's lawyers to get everything thrown out, IF they Could have used it legally....
Political espionage.We are weaponizing our intelligence apparatus to attack political enemies.
How adorable...sounds very HITLER to me.
It's not illegal to wiretap the Russians, retard.What happens if Flynn wiretap was illegal?