'We Will Not Engage': Michele Bachmann Reveals GOP Plans to Ignore Executive Amnesty

Don't tell me just because we won a fairly substantial amount of Rep's and Senators that will amount to a hill of beans in 2 years! TRADITIONALLY the incumbent president loses in the mid years, this just happened to be better than expected!

AND who will be our standard bearer in 2016?... Another Fakey MODERATE like McLame, or McRomney, the acknowledged PROGRESSIVE from 2002?

You have a LIMP BRAIN, as well as a stupidity that only can be cured with age and experience...you sonny boy, have neither!

I love it. Not even three weeks,a nd they are fighting amongst themselves.

Well played, President Obama. Well Played.
 
I explained to you EXACTLY why Obama just handed the 2016 elections to the GOP if they will take it.

He just surrendered the latino vote.

The GOP FINALLY made the smart decision and didn't overplay their hand.

I hope they are smart enough to do the same in regards to the stupid calls for impeachment.

What was that you were saying about not smoking crack?
 
Listen sonny, Latinos have ONE reason to vote Democrat. They want their friends/cousins/brothers whatever to be US citizens.

They will now have this, so when they go to the polls in 2016, they won't care who gave it to them. Oh sure the Dems hope they are that stupid, but they aren't. They will look around and say "Oh, well I got what I want" then they will vote AGAINST gay rights, they will vote AGAINST blacks They will vote AGAINST abortion, they will vote for CONSERVATIVES which means .........

TA DAH the GOP

However, if the GOP turns it into a 2 year fight , THAT the Latinos likely WILL remember and they will vote against the GOP which means obviously the Dems.

Again, what have you been smoking?

For the above scenario to happen, Hispanics will have to

1) Forget it a decade of Latino Bashing by the GOP, including clowns like Tancredo calling them terrorists, calling for a huge fence to keep them out, supporting laws like Jan Brewer's "Driving While Brown" laws, and so on.

2) Neglect to notice the ONLY reason why they acted in their behalf at all was because Obama told them to shit or get off the pot.

3) Become numb to the fact that the GOP is supported by the people who were exploiting them in those "wet" labor jobs to start with.


But you are right, in the LONG run, it would probably be best to drop the hateful rhertoric, because it will only make you look silly in 20 years.

It won't do them any good in 2016, though.
 
OK, at least I have you guys seeing the situation clearly now.

It is not as you like, because the far right is not only not in charge, it's not even in the decision making room and out of policy decisions.

We will see, then, what will happen.

My work is done here.
 
Don't tell me just because we won a fairly substantial amount of Rep's and Senators that will amount to a hill of beans in 2 years! TRADITIONALLY the incumbent president loses in the mid years, this just happened to be better than expected!

AND who will be our standard bearer in 2016?... Another Fakey MODERATE like McLame, or McRomney, the acknowledged PROGRESSIVE from 2002?

You have a LIMP BRAIN, as well as a stupidity that only can be cured with age and experience...you sonny boy, have neither!

I love it. Not even three weeks,a nd they are fighting amongst themselves.

Well played, President Obama. Well Played.
Because we strongly disagree doesn't mean that whoever the Republicans put up, will NOT be voted for by either sides, it does depend if you scum, put up a murderer, a ideological misfit, or a declared Socialist...Oh, and an almost 80 year old, senile Vice President!
 
OK, at least I have you guys seeing the situation clearly now.

It is not as you like, because the far right is not only not in charge, it's not even in the decision making room and out of policy decisions.

We will see, then, what will happen.

My work is done here.

Your WORK is now well documented, you are the Manchurian Republican, not a moderate, but someone MORE interested in defaming the BASE of the Republican party, to advance the subversive agenda.... BUT I will continue to remind the folks here, with everyone of your tortured posts.... You are HISTORY, and you aren't the man Mr./ Chamberlain was.... he, at least, was HONEST, but completely wrong!
 
What happened to putting the President in JAIL for his immigration policy?

Oh, right, that was last week. lol

Hard to do that when the Attorney General of the United States has a lip lock on the Manchurian muslims dick, and more or less states what the POTUS can't...

aa-Eric-Holder-invoking-black-jesus-300x250.jpg
 
What happened to putting the President in JAIL for his immigration policy?

Oh, right, that was last week. lol

Hard to do that when the Attorney General of the United States has a lip lock on the Manchurian muslims dick, and more or less states what the POTUS can't...

aa-Eric-Holder-invoking-black-jesus-300x250.jpg

There's a guy (Holder) who should have been terminated from his position, IMO. He is obviously a racist.
 
Sure, I would like it if the feds stuck to what their job was originally intended to be, which was VERY limited. :) That would be great. They have WAY overstepped their bounds, IMO.

Oh, that's not an opinion. That's a fact.

But the left wing morons like Schillian hide behind "case law" to say it does not matter.

And in the end...they are right. What we need is to put judges in place that will take case law in our direction.

Might as well be honest about it....the courts are now as political as congress.

Oh I totally agree. It seems to me that the justices are just as partisan in either direction as any of our politicians. I'd certainly like to see more moderate and nonpartisan justices, but that seems like a pipe dream. :lol:

Oh? And when has this happened?
Congress voted to unseat a federal judge during bushes term in office.

And did that happen?
 
Mainly because the GOP is looking dumber and dumber for critisizing Obama for doing something that at least two GOP Presidents did. They are showing their ignorance and racism.

Just exactly how ill-informed can you get? You must practice ignoring reality. Instead of listening MSNBC talking points, study the facts. It's really refreshing ... and enlightening.

The "two GOP Presidents" you speak of wrote EOs that defined how they were going to implement laws dutifully passed by the Congress. Defining implementation methodology IS within the scope of executive authority.

Obama's EO cancels portions of the current immigration law (deportation), AND creates new law by awarding green cards and work permits, in contravention of current law, to people not authorized to receive them.

THAT is the difference ...

Another GOP lie:

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way...nnounce-relief-for-up-to-5-million-immigrants

— Neither of those two groups will be given a green card. Both of them will be able to get a Social Security card, but they will not be eligible for Social Security benefits.
 
Only in your witless, brain.

Check the OP. Read Sessions. Listen to Boehner and McConnell.

Because they are not, and will not, listen to you guys.

You are finished.
dzytfk.jpg

You are wrong on this. Not fighting Obama on this effectively made it a win for the GOP

No, they are wrong and you go along with them... didn't you see the posts I had on the 1986 Immigration law he's breaking?... Apparently some of you will just allow the Obola to keep stepping on the law, and the Constitution, and just say the hell with it...Your Party over the law isn't something I would have guessed you were for!

http://192.168.1.1:8181/http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-100/pdf/STATUTE-100-Pg3445.pdf


I'm a TRUE conservative sir.

This is a fight the GOP couldn't win. There is precedent. So, why bother trying? Why waste the government's time and resources?

Why not say "hey you know what? Hispanics are actually fairly conservative people " and cut Obama off at the fucking knees.

He still needs funding for his little adventure, it's pretty easy to tie funding to shutting down the border so no more can come in.

In the meantime you just picked up 3M ( or so) potential voters who hate blacks/hate gays/ and are pretty damned conservative. THe ONLY reason they have to support the Dem Party is immigration policy.

Use your head, the GOP just outsmarted Obama.

In Irish households for years there picture of Jesus Christ, the pope and JFK... Hispanics will have Obama instead of JFK... And the Bachmanns of this world will make sure that is ingrained in their mind... Hispanics are more liberal than Regular voter (check the polls)....
While Catholic, they are Catholic like the Irish culture rather social issues.

Big Democrat win and it is just getting better the more an idiot like this complains...
 
What happened to putting the President in JAIL for his immigration policy?

Oh, right, that was last week. lol

Hard to do that when the Attorney General of the United States has a lip lock on the Manchurian muslims dick, and more or less states what the POTUS can't...

aa-Eric-Holder-invoking-black-jesus-300x250.jpg

Take out that tin foil hat and wear it with pride... Hey the president is coming to get you with his Commie friends...

They know where you live and the commie muslims are coming to get you... We are here to infect you with the Gay...

You should be so scared... Is that them outside now...
 
OK, at least I have you guys seeing the situation clearly now.

It is not as you like, because the far right is not only not in charge, it's not even in the decision making room and out of policy decisions.

We will see, then, what will happen.

My work is done here.

What work ?

You've probably never done a day's work in your entire life. Expect in your imagination.
 
Mainly because the GOP is looking dumber and dumber for critisizing Obama for doing something that at least two GOP Presidents did. They are showing their ignorance and racism.

Just exactly how ill-informed can you get? You must practice ignoring reality. Instead of listening MSNBC talking points, study the facts. It's really refreshing ... and enlightening.

The "two GOP Presidents" you speak of wrote EOs that defined how they were going to implement laws dutifully passed by the Congress. Defining implementation methodology IS within the scope of executive authority.

Obama's EO cancels portions of the current immigration law (deportation), AND creates new law by awarding green cards and work permits, in contravention of current law, to people not authorized to receive them.

THAT is the difference ...

Another GOP lie:

Obama Goes It Alone Shielding Up To 5 Million Immigrants From Deportation The Two-Way NPR

— Neither of those two groups will be given a green card. Both of them will be able to get a Social Security card, but they will not be eligible for Social Security benefits.

From your own reference: "In a prime-time speech to the country on Thursday, Obama said he would defer the deportation of the parents of children who are either U.S. citizens or legal residents, and that he also would expand that protection to more "DREAMers," or children who entered the country illegally with their parents. Those two groups also will be allowed to work in the United States legally, after passing a background check and paying a fee."

There is no law that allows an illegal immigrant to work in the US legally ... period. To implement this program, Obama is creating a new immigration law ... something he is not authorized to do. (That's what the work permit comment is all about.)

Patently illegal, and he will lose in court - if i were an illegal, I would be careful. Get on a government registry, and then find out that the supposed authority to stay in the country is actually illegal???? Damn bus would be showing up Monday morning to give me a ride to the border!
 
Oh, that's not an opinion. That's a fact.

But the left wing morons like Schillian hide behind "case law" to say it does not matter.

And in the end...they are right. What we need is to put judges in place that will take case law in our direction.

Might as well be honest about it....the courts are now as political as congress.

Oh I totally agree. It seems to me that the justices are just as partisan in either direction as any of our politicians. I'd certainly like to see more moderate and nonpartisan justices, but that seems like a pipe dream. :lol:

Oh? And when has this happened?
Congress voted to unseat a federal judge during bushes term in office.

And did that happen?
Yes
 
What happened to putting the President in JAIL for his immigration policy?

Oh, right, that was last week. lol

Hard to do that when the Attorney General of the United States has a lip lock on the Manchurian muslims dick, and more or less states what the POTUS can't...

aa-Eric-Holder-invoking-black-jesus-300x250.jpg

Take out that tin foil hat and wear it with pride... Hey the president is coming to get you with his Commie friends...

They know where you live and the commie muslims are coming to get you... We are here to infect you with the Gay...

You should be so scared... Is that them outside now...

YOU ARE a strange little man!

Which one were you again?

brokeback+mountain.jpg
 
Because we strongly disagree doesn't mean that whoever the Republicans put up, will NOT be voted for by either sides, it does depend if you scum, put up a murderer, a ideological misfit, or a declared Socialist...Oh, and an almost 80 year old, senile Vice President!

Oh, Vagisil, you're so funny when I out your nuttiness.

Now...that's funny!!! Especially from the nutter that posted it!!!:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:
 

Forum List

Back
Top