He always reminded me of a robot. A politician robot. He's SO clean-looking, you know? Something is just not right with Mitt.
Well, he is a Mormon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He always reminded me of a robot. A politician robot. He's SO clean-looking, you know? Something is just not right with Mitt.
Don't tell me just because we won a fairly substantial amount of Rep's and Senators that will amount to a hill of beans in 2 years! TRADITIONALLY the incumbent president loses in the mid years, this just happened to be better than expected!
AND who will be our standard bearer in 2016?... Another Fakey MODERATE like McLame, or McRomney, the acknowledged PROGRESSIVE from 2002?
You have a LIMP BRAIN, as well as a stupidity that only can be cured with age and experience...you sonny boy, have neither!
I explained to you EXACTLY why Obama just handed the 2016 elections to the GOP if they will take it.
He just surrendered the latino vote.
The GOP FINALLY made the smart decision and didn't overplay their hand.
I hope they are smart enough to do the same in regards to the stupid calls for impeachment.
Listen sonny, Latinos have ONE reason to vote Democrat. They want their friends/cousins/brothers whatever to be US citizens.
They will now have this, so when they go to the polls in 2016, they won't care who gave it to them. Oh sure the Dems hope they are that stupid, but they aren't. They will look around and say "Oh, well I got what I want" then they will vote AGAINST gay rights, they will vote AGAINST blacks They will vote AGAINST abortion, they will vote for CONSERVATIVES which means .........
TA DAH the GOP
However, if the GOP turns it into a 2 year fight , THAT the Latinos likely WILL remember and they will vote against the GOP which means obviously the Dems.
Because we strongly disagree doesn't mean that whoever the Republicans put up, will NOT be voted for by either sides, it does depend if you scum, put up a murderer, a ideological misfit, or a declared Socialist...Oh, and an almost 80 year old, senile Vice President!Don't tell me just because we won a fairly substantial amount of Rep's and Senators that will amount to a hill of beans in 2 years! TRADITIONALLY the incumbent president loses in the mid years, this just happened to be better than expected!
AND who will be our standard bearer in 2016?... Another Fakey MODERATE like McLame, or McRomney, the acknowledged PROGRESSIVE from 2002?
You have a LIMP BRAIN, as well as a stupidity that only can be cured with age and experience...you sonny boy, have neither!
I love it. Not even three weeks,a nd they are fighting amongst themselves.
Well played, President Obama. Well Played.
OK, at least I have you guys seeing the situation clearly now.
It is not as you like, because the far right is not only not in charge, it's not even in the decision making room and out of policy decisions.
We will see, then, what will happen.
My work is done here.
What happened to putting the President in JAIL for his immigration policy?
Oh, right, that was last week. lol
What happened to putting the President in JAIL for his immigration policy?
Oh, right, that was last week. lol
Hard to do that when the Attorney General of the United States has a lip lock on the Manchurian muslims dick, and more or less states what the POTUS can't...
Congress voted to unseat a federal judge during bushes term in office.Sure, I would like it if the feds stuck to what their job was originally intended to be, which was VERY limited. That would be great. They have WAY overstepped their bounds, IMO.
Oh, that's not an opinion. That's a fact.
But the left wing morons like Schillian hide behind "case law" to say it does not matter.
And in the end...they are right. What we need is to put judges in place that will take case law in our direction.
Might as well be honest about it....the courts are now as political as congress.
Oh I totally agree. It seems to me that the justices are just as partisan in either direction as any of our politicians. I'd certainly like to see more moderate and nonpartisan justices, but that seems like a pipe dream.
Oh? And when has this happened?
Mainly because the GOP is looking dumber and dumber for critisizing Obama for doing something that at least two GOP Presidents did. They are showing their ignorance and racism.
Just exactly how ill-informed can you get? You must practice ignoring reality. Instead of listening MSNBC talking points, study the facts. It's really refreshing ... and enlightening.
The "two GOP Presidents" you speak of wrote EOs that defined how they were going to implement laws dutifully passed by the Congress. Defining implementation methodology IS within the scope of executive authority.
Obama's EO cancels portions of the current immigration law (deportation), AND creates new law by awarding green cards and work permits, in contravention of current law, to people not authorized to receive them.
THAT is the difference ...
Only in your witless, brain.
Check the OP. Read Sessions. Listen to Boehner and McConnell.
Because they are not, and will not, listen to you guys.
You are finished.
You are wrong on this. Not fighting Obama on this effectively made it a win for the GOP
No, they are wrong and you go along with them... didn't you see the posts I had on the 1986 Immigration law he's breaking?... Apparently some of you will just allow the Obola to keep stepping on the law, and the Constitution, and just say the hell with it...Your Party over the law isn't something I would have guessed you were for!
http://192.168.1.1:8181/http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-100/pdf/STATUTE-100-Pg3445.pdf
I'm a TRUE conservative sir.
This is a fight the GOP couldn't win. There is precedent. So, why bother trying? Why waste the government's time and resources?
Why not say "hey you know what? Hispanics are actually fairly conservative people " and cut Obama off at the fucking knees.
He still needs funding for his little adventure, it's pretty easy to tie funding to shutting down the border so no more can come in.
In the meantime you just picked up 3M ( or so) potential voters who hate blacks/hate gays/ and are pretty damned conservative. THe ONLY reason they have to support the Dem Party is immigration policy.
Use your head, the GOP just outsmarted Obama.
What happened to putting the President in JAIL for his immigration policy?
Oh, right, that was last week. lol
Hard to do that when the Attorney General of the United States has a lip lock on the Manchurian muslims dick, and more or less states what the POTUS can't...
OK, at least I have you guys seeing the situation clearly now.
It is not as you like, because the far right is not only not in charge, it's not even in the decision making room and out of policy decisions.
We will see, then, what will happen.
My work is done here.
Mainly because the GOP is looking dumber and dumber for critisizing Obama for doing something that at least two GOP Presidents did. They are showing their ignorance and racism.
Just exactly how ill-informed can you get? You must practice ignoring reality. Instead of listening MSNBC talking points, study the facts. It's really refreshing ... and enlightening.
The "two GOP Presidents" you speak of wrote EOs that defined how they were going to implement laws dutifully passed by the Congress. Defining implementation methodology IS within the scope of executive authority.
Obama's EO cancels portions of the current immigration law (deportation), AND creates new law by awarding green cards and work permits, in contravention of current law, to people not authorized to receive them.
THAT is the difference ...
Another GOP lie:
Obama Goes It Alone Shielding Up To 5 Million Immigrants From Deportation The Two-Way NPR
— Neither of those two groups will be given a green card. Both of them will be able to get a Social Security card, but they will not be eligible for Social Security benefits.
YesCongress voted to unseat a federal judge during bushes term in office.Oh, that's not an opinion. That's a fact.
But the left wing morons like Schillian hide behind "case law" to say it does not matter.
And in the end...they are right. What we need is to put judges in place that will take case law in our direction.
Might as well be honest about it....the courts are now as political as congress.
Oh I totally agree. It seems to me that the justices are just as partisan in either direction as any of our politicians. I'd certainly like to see more moderate and nonpartisan justices, but that seems like a pipe dream.
Oh? And when has this happened?
And did that happen?
What happened to putting the President in JAIL for his immigration policy?
Oh, right, that was last week. lol
Hard to do that when the Attorney General of the United States has a lip lock on the Manchurian muslims dick, and more or less states what the POTUS can't...
Take out that tin foil hat and wear it with pride... Hey the president is coming to get you with his Commie friends...
They know where you live and the commie muslims are coming to get you... We are here to infect you with the Gay...
You should be so scared... Is that them outside now...
Because we strongly disagree doesn't mean that whoever the Republicans put up, will NOT be voted for by either sides, it does depend if you scum, put up a murderer, a ideological misfit, or a declared Socialist...Oh, and an almost 80 year old, senile Vice President!
Because we strongly disagree doesn't mean that whoever the Republicans put up, will NOT be voted for by either sides, it does depend if you scum, put up a murderer, a ideological misfit, or a declared Socialist...Oh, and an almost 80 year old, senile Vice President!
Oh, Vagisil, you're so funny when I out your nuttiness.