Dick Tuck
Board Troll
- Aug 29, 2009
- 8,511
- 505
- 48
- Thread starter
- #61
it would be yet another distinction without a difference.
having the (allegedly) smallest govt per capita in 45 years means nothing.
zero. zip. the donut.
i'd be interested (but not interested enough to do the research) to see how many of the alleged lay offs were due to attrition and how many were part time temporary workers (census) that obama used to try to inflate employment numbers.
The charts include both the hiring and lay offs of census workers. There would have been 3 other hiring and layoffs during the 45 year period. Since this wasn't accomplished by any of the Republican presidents in the last 45 years, I'd say it's a pretty important fact.
How well did Reagan, Bush the First, or Dubya do on this indicator.
who cares?
you wanna play silly reindeer games with numbers, knock yourself out.
just don't expect rational people to be taken in by them.
Sounds more like don't expect rational discussion from closed mined people who already made up their minds without facts.