Oddball
Unobtanium Member
I'll take that to mean that you ain't got jack schitt....Like we didn't already know.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Name one significant bureaucracy/law/rule/regulation/EO/signing statement of Chimpola that Bioking has trashed completely.Are capable of disputing the facts in the article?
None of the right wing shitheads can. Fox tells them Obama has given us the biggest government in history from his marxist/communist/socialist policies. They don't care about the truth, only about what they want to hear.
just one.
C'mon....Dazzle us with your professed love for smaller gubmint...Bring it.
The report is from The Hamilton Project, do you know who they are? Did you do ANY research on them?This is quite an interesting fact. Lowest rate in 45 years, and the right is still claiming that Obama is growing government.
Of course you didn't.
Oddball hasn't found the proper talking points to respond to this fact. Give him some time.
You're using very select "facts" to prove your point.Name one significant bureaucracy/law/rule/regulation/EO/signing statement of Chimpola that Bioking has trashed completely.None of the right wing shitheads can. Fox tells them Obama has given us the biggest government in history from his marxist/communist/socialist policies. They don't care about the truth, only about what they want to hear.
just one.
C'mon....Dazzle us with your professed love for smaller gubmint...Bring it.
Total irrelevant to the fact presented in the OP article. I'd have thought that a conservative would be happy with this fact.
Name one significant bureaucracy/law/rule/regulation/EO/signing statement of Chimpola that Bioking has trashed completely.None of the right wing shitheads can. Fox tells them Obama has given us the biggest government in history from his marxist/communist/socialist policies. They don't care about the truth, only about what they want to hear.
just one.
C'mon....Dazzle us with your professed love for smaller gubmint...Bring it.
Total irrelevant to the fact presented in the OP article. I'd have thought that a conservative would be happy with this fact.
You're using very select "facts" to prove your point.Name one significant bureaucracy/law/rule/regulation/EO/signing statement of Chimpola that Bioking has trashed completely.
just one.
C'mon....Dazzle us with your professed love for smaller gubmint...Bring it.
Total irrelevant to the fact presented in the OP article. I'd have thought that a conservative would be happy with this fact.
Name the significant cut to any federal program, bureaucracy, etcetera....Just one.
We Now Have Our Smallest Government in 45 Years
So how badly has this actually hurt the job market? The Hamilton folks estimate that, if the share of government workers was back to 2007 levels, we'd have about 1.7 million more jobs than we do today. Now, did we have the balance right before the recession? That's for a much longer conversation. But it's certainly food for thought.
This is quite an interesting fact. Lowest rate in 45 years, and the right is still claiming that Obama is growing government.
We Now Have Our Smallest Government in 45 Years
So how badly has this actually hurt the job market? The Hamilton folks estimate that, if the share of government workers was back to 2007 levels, we'd have about 1.7 million more jobs than we do today. Now, did we have the balance right before the recession? That's for a much longer conversation. But it's certainly food for thought.
This is quite an interesting fact. Lowest rate in 45 years, and the right is still claiming that Obama is growing government.
Ok, so you're telling me you like small government? Is that what I'm hearing?
do they have a graph showing govt workers/ blue eyed people?
because that would be almost as meaningful
In what way?
it would be yet another distinction without a difference.
having the (allegedly) smallest govt per capita in 45 years means nothing.
zero. zip. the donut.
i'd be interested (but not interested enough to do the research) to see how many of the alleged lay offs were due to attrition and how many were part time temporary workers (census) that obama used to try to inflate employment numbers.
We Now Have Our Smallest Government in 45 Years
So how badly has this actually hurt the job market? The Hamilton folks estimate that, if the share of government workers was back to 2007 levels, we'd have about 1.7 million more jobs than we do today. Now, did we have the balance right before the recession? That's for a much longer conversation. But it's certainly food for thought.
This is quite an interesting fact. Lowest rate in 45 years, and the right is still claiming that Obama is growing government.
And now we have a chart from FRED that says so--
While the private-sector is drowning under a perpetual recessionary storm, U.S. regulatory agencies are flourishing. "If the federal government’s regulatory operation were a business, it would be one of the 50 biggest in the country in terms of revenues, and the third largest in terms of employees, with more people working for it than McDonald’s, Ford, Disney and Boeing combined," writes John Merline of Investors.com.
Indeed, the federal regulatory business is thriving, and if there is one "victory" President Obama can declare, this is it, because government regulation has grown rapidly under his watch.
Regulatory agencies have seen their combined budgets grow a healthy 16% since 2008, topping $54 billion, according to the annual "Regulator's Budget," compiled by George Washington University and Washington University in St. Louis.
That's at a time when the overall economy grew a paltry 5%.
Since Obama took office, 75 new major regulations have been enacted, costing $38 billion annually, according to a study by the Heritage Foundation. "No other president has imposed as high a number or cost in a comparable time period," wrote James Gattuso, the study’s author.
The Heritage study predicts that this flood of new red tape will only intensify, as hundreds of new regulations will flow from the tentacles of ObamaCare, the Dodd-Frank financial regulation law, and the EPA’s war on global warming.
"When you don't have a record to run on, you paint your opponent as someone people need to run from"--Barack Obama
We Now Have Our Smallest Government in 45 Years
So how badly has this actually hurt the job market? The Hamilton folks estimate that, if the share of government workers was back to 2007 levels, we'd have about 1.7 million more jobs than we do today. Now, did we have the balance right before the recession? That's for a much longer conversation. But it's certainly food for thought.
This is quite an interesting fact. Lowest rate in 45 years, and the right is still claiming that Obama is growing government.
We Now Have Our Smallest Government in 45 Years
So how badly has this actually hurt the job market? The Hamilton folks estimate that, if the share of government workers was back to 2007 levels, we'd have about 1.7 million more jobs than we do today. Now, did we have the balance right before the recession? That's for a much longer conversation. But it's certainly food for thought.
This is quite an interesting fact. Lowest rate in 45 years, and the right is still claiming that Obama is growing government.
Then why are we spending so f**king much money? Such a small government should need a lot less money, right? Unless maybe something is wrong with the chart.
In what way?
it would be yet another distinction without a difference.
having the (allegedly) smallest govt per capita in 45 years means nothing.
zero. zip. the donut.
i'd be interested (but not interested enough to do the research) to see how many of the alleged lay offs were due to attrition and how many were part time temporary workers (census) that obama used to try to inflate employment numbers.
The charts include both the hiring and lay offs of census workers. There would have been 3 other hiring and layoffs during the 45 year period. Since this wasn't accomplished by any of the Republican presidents in the last 45 years, I'd say it's a pretty important fact.
How well did Reagan, Bush the First, or Dubya do on this indicator.
We Now Have Our Smallest Government in 45 Years
So how badly has this actually hurt the job market? The Hamilton folks estimate that, if the share of government workers was back to 2007 levels, we'd have about 1.7 million more jobs than we do today. Now, did we have the balance right before the recession? That's for a much longer conversation. But it's certainly food for thought.
This is quite an interesting fact. Lowest rate in 45 years, and the right is still claiming that Obama is growing government.
We Now Have Our Smallest Government in 45 Years
So how badly has this actually hurt the job market? The Hamilton folks estimate that, if the share of government workers was back to 2007 levels, we'd have about 1.7 million more jobs than we do today. Now, did we have the balance right before the recession? That's for a much longer conversation. But it's certainly food for thought.
This is quite an interesting fact. Lowest rate in 45 years, and the right is still claiming that Obama is growing government.
We Now Have Our Smallest Government in 45 Years
This is quite an interesting fact. Lowest rate in 45 years, and the right is still claiming that Obama is growing government.
Then why are we spending so f**king much money? Such a small government should need a lot less money, right? Unless maybe something is wrong with the chart.
Or the chart is correct and something is wrong with our government even if it is smaller.