We don't need the wall. México vows to stop flow of immigrants

[Centrista]

An unintended consequence of the agreement between Mexico and Donald Trump to deploy National Guard Mexicans on the border with Central America, is that there is no argument from for the wall now.

Unless of course, Mexico played Trump like Kim Jong Un did.
If you are a conservative who still wants the wall, then you are admitting that Mexican forces cannot stop the flow of immigrants.

 

[kyzr]

Trump gave Mexico 90 days to stem the flow of migrants. So this is a reprieve not a victory. The wall is still needed and is still being built.

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump gave Mexico 90 days to stem the flow of migrants. So this is a reprieve not a victory. The wall is still needed and is still being built.

So is Trump's agreement with Mexico something or not? If it is the great success he claims, and Mexico will stop all those refugees from coming here, there isn't much need for a wall.

 

[DBA]

Trump gave Mexico 90 days to stem the flow of migrants. So this is a reprieve not a victory. The wall is still needed and is still being built.

So is Trump's agreement with Mexico something or not? If it is the great success he claims, and Mexico will stop all those refugees from coming here, there isn't much need for a wall.

Of course there is a need. When a Democrat gets in power they will neither enforce the agreement nor stop the flow of illegal immigrants. A wall will at least force an open border liberal to be honest with the American people as to their real agenda. They would have to either tear down the wall, which they won't or to literally open the doors. This is the REAL reason Democrats don't want a wall in the first place. It severely hampers their open borders policy.

 

[Hellbilly]

Trump gave Mexico 90 days to stem the flow of migrants. So this is a reprieve not a victory. The wall is still needed and is still being built.

So is Trump's agreement with Mexico something or not? If it is the great success he claims, and Mexico will stop all those refugees from coming here, there isn't much need for a wall.

Of course there is a need. When a Democrat gets in power they will neither enforce the agreement nor stop the flow of illegal immigrants. A wall will at least force an open border liberal to be honest with the American people as to their real agenda. They would have to either tear down the wall, which they won't or to literally open the doors. This is the REAL reason Democrats don't want a wall in the first place. It severely hampers their open borders policy.

When a Democrat gets in office perhaps they will “tear down this wall”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Sunni Man]

We need both the Wall and Mexico's cooperation to help stop the tidal wave of illegals flooding across our border. ...

 

[Third Party]

An unintended consequence of the agreement between Mexico and Donald Trump to deploy National Guard Mexicans on the border with Central America, is that there is no argument from for the wall now.

Unless of course, Mexico played Trump like Kim Jong Un did.
If you are a conservative who still wants the wall, then you are admitting that Mexican forces cannot stop the flow of immigrants.

No, it is one part-fixing asylum laws is another-if The Democrats were willing we could do it quickly and not need the wall. Fixing the immigration system is the last part.

 

[Maxdeath]

An unintended consequence of the agreement between Mexico and Donald Trump to deploy National Guard Mexicans on the border with Central America, is that there is no argument from for the wall now.

Unless of course, Mexico played Trump like Kim Jong Un did.
If you are a conservative who still wants the wall, then you are admitting that Mexican forces cannot stop the flow of immigrants.

You seem to be always missing the point. So close a handgrende could do damage but never on target.

There is still the drugs in Mexico that make their way here. There is still human trafficking from Mexico. There are still those that think that Dems will give them free things in Mexico. Mexico only said they would stop caravans coming north. They never said anything about those that were already in Mexico nor did they promise to stop small groups that snuck into Mexico.

But why worry? Dems will always make sure you have enough illegals to exploit. In fact your Gardner and maid are probably here already being paid far less then minimum wage. The drugs you crave are never going to be stopped. The gangs you hope for will still be here selling the children you have an appetite for. If they are not foreign children does it really matter?

 

[DBA]

Trump gave Mexico 90 days to stem the flow of migrants. So this is a reprieve not a victory. The wall is still needed and is still being built.

So is Trump's agreement with Mexico something or not? If it is the great success he claims, and Mexico will stop all those refugees from coming here, there isn't much need for a wall.

Of course there is a need. When a Democrat gets in power they will neither enforce the agreement nor stop the flow of illegal immigrants. A wall will at least force an open border liberal to be honest with the American people as to their real agenda. They would have to either tear down the wall, which they won't or to literally open the doors. This is the REAL reason Democrats don't want a wall in the first place. It severely hampers their open borders policy.

When a Democrat gets in office perhaps they will “tear down this wall”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Like I said, either way they would not be able to hide their true agenda any longer. There is a segment of Democrats who still don't believe that open borders is what their party really wants. I don't think a Democrat would risk losing those mis-informed folks by taking such a drastic measure to ensure that people are able to enter our country illegally.

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump gave Mexico 90 days to stem the flow of migrants. So this is a reprieve not a victory. The wall is still needed and is still being built.

So is Trump's agreement with Mexico something or not? If it is the great success he claims, and Mexico will stop all those refugees from coming here, there isn't much need for a wall.

Of course there is a need. When a Democrat gets in power they will neither enforce the agreement nor stop the flow of illegal immigrants. A wall will at least force an open border liberal to be honest with the American people as to their real agenda. They would have to either tear down the wall, which they won't or to literally open the doors. This is the REAL reason Democrats don't want a wall in the first place. It severely hampers their open borders policy.

Yep. That's nuts.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

An unintended consequence of the agreement between Mexico and Donald Trump to deploy National Guard Mexicans on the border with Central America, is that there is no argument from for the wall now.

Unless of course, Mexico played Trump like Kim Jong Un did.
If you are a conservative who still wants the wall, then you are admitting that Mexican forces cannot stop the flow of immigrants.

Wait

Yesterday you all told us the "agreement" was just another Trump lie.

So now the pivot when you realize you looked foolish?

 

[Centrista]

An unintended consequence of the agreement between Mexico and Donald Trump to deploy National Guard Mexicans on the border with Central America, is that there is no argument from for the wall now.

Unless of course, Mexico played Trump like Kim Jong Un did.
If you are a conservative who still wants the wall, then you are admitting that Mexican forces cannot stop the flow of immigrants.

Wait

Yesterday you all told us the "agreement" was just another Trump lie.

So now the pivot when you realize you looked foolish?

I didn't say it was a lie. I said the agreement was made in March. Now kindly apologize for not reading or purposely changing what others say.
And don't think you're off the hook because you have to tell me your opinion on the wall. Do we need it?

 

[candycorn]

An unintended consequence of the agreement between Mexico and Donald Trump to deploy National Guard Mexicans on the border with Central America, is that there is no argument from for the wall now.

Unless of course, Mexico played Trump like Kim Jong Un did.
If you are a conservative who still wants the wall, then you are admitting that Mexican forces cannot stop the flow of immigrants.

Wait

Yesterday you all told us the "agreement" was just another Trump lie.

So now the pivot when you realize you looked foolish?

No, the OP has sat up a paradox between Republican/Conservative statements and their actions.

Like how you guys keep passing laws to make it harder and harder for people to vote and then turn around and still claim there is voter fraud (only when you lose of course).

You’re stating that Trump and the Mexicans have inked a deal to stop illegal immigration…but still want the wall that will now, according to you, stop something that will no longer exist.

The OP meant for you to look stupid. He succeeded.

 

[DBA]

Trump gave Mexico 90 days to stem the flow of migrants. So this is a reprieve not a victory. The wall is still needed and is still being built.

So is Trump's agreement with Mexico something or not? If it is the great success he claims, and Mexico will stop all those refugees from coming here, there isn't much need for a wall.

Of course there is a need. When a Democrat gets in power they will neither enforce the agreement nor stop the flow of illegal immigrants. A wall will at least force an open border liberal to be honest with the American people as to their real agenda. They would have to either tear down the wall, which they won't or to literally open the doors. This is the REAL reason Democrats don't want a wall in the first place. It severely hampers their open borders policy.

Yep. That's nuts.

It's "nuts" that Democrats want open borders? Walls work, proven fact. Democrats can change any law or turn off any survellience, but a wall is much more difficult to render useless. They know this, thus why they fight so hard against it.

 

[DBA]

An unintended consequence of the agreement between Mexico and Donald Trump to deploy National Guard Mexicans on the border with Central America, is that there is no argument from for the wall now.

Unless of course, Mexico played Trump like Kim Jong Un did.
If you are a conservative who still wants the wall, then you are admitting that Mexican forces cannot stop the flow of immigrants.

Wait

Yesterday you all told us the "agreement" was just another Trump lie.

So now the pivot when you realize you looked foolish?

No, the OP has sat up a paradox between Republican/Conservative statements and their actions.

Like how you guys keep passing laws to make it harder and harder for people to vote and then turn around and still claim there is voter fraud (only when you lose of course).

You’re stating that Trump and the Mexicans have inked a deal to stop illegal immigration…but still want the wall that will now, according to you, stop something that will no longer exist.

The OP meant for you to look stupid. He succeeded.

Agreements can be ignored at any time...walls can't.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

An unintended consequence of the agreement between Mexico and Donald Trump to deploy National Guard Mexicans on the border with Central America, is that there is no argument from for the wall now.

Unless of course, Mexico played Trump like Kim Jong Un did.
If you are a conservative who still wants the wall, then you are admitting that Mexican forces cannot stop the flow of immigrants.

Wait

Yesterday you all told us the "agreement" was just another Trump lie.

So now the pivot when you realize you looked foolish?

No, the OP has sat up a paradox between Republican/Conservative statements and their actions.

Like how you guys keep passing laws to make it harder and harder for people to vote and then turn around and still claim there is voter fraud (only when you lose of course).

You’re stating that Trump and the Mexicans have inked a deal to stop illegal immigration…but still want the wall that will now, according to you, stop something that will no longer exist.

The OP meant for you to look stupid. He succeeded.

Agreements can be ignored at any time...walls can't.

Yup, see the Iran agreement as a perfect example

 

[Centrista]

An unintended consequence of the agreement between Mexico and Donald Trump to deploy National Guard Mexicans on the border with Central America, is that there is no argument from for the wall now.

Unless of course, Mexico played Trump like Kim Jong Un did.
If you are a conservative who still wants the wall, then you are admitting that Mexican forces cannot stop the flow of immigrants.

Wait

Yesterday you all told us the "agreement" was just another Trump lie.

So now the pivot when you realize you looked foolish?

No, the OP has sat up a paradox between Republican/Conservative statements and their actions.

Like how you guys keep passing laws to make it harder and harder for people to vote and then turn around and still claim there is voter fraud (only when you lose of course).

You’re stating that Trump and the Mexicans have inked a deal to stop illegal immigration…but still want the wall that will now, according to you, stop something that will no longer exist.

The OP meant for you to look stupid. He succeeded.

Agreements can be ignored at any time...walls can't.

I got you where I wanted you. Poo-pooing the deal.

 

[DBA]

An unintended consequence of the agreement between Mexico and Donald Trump to deploy National Guard Mexicans on the border with Central America, is that there is no argument from for the wall now.

Unless of course, Mexico played Trump like Kim Jong Un did.
If you are a conservative who still wants the wall, then you are admitting that Mexican forces cannot stop the flow of immigrants.

Wait

Yesterday you all told us the "agreement" was just another Trump lie.

So now the pivot when you realize you looked foolish?

No, the OP has sat up a paradox between Republican/Conservative statements and their actions.

Like how you guys keep passing laws to make it harder and harder for people to vote and then turn around and still claim there is voter fraud (only when you lose of course).

You’re stating that Trump and the Mexicans have inked a deal to stop illegal immigration…but still want the wall that will now, according to you, stop something that will no longer exist.

The OP meant for you to look stupid. He succeeded.

Agreements can be ignored at any time...walls can't.

I got you where I wanted you. Poo-pooing the deal.

No you didn't. Mexico will abide by the agreement as long as a strong border control President is in power and a wall can't be built overnight, so we must do something in the short term. A nut job leftist will inevitably be elected at some point. We need to protect against that now, otherwise, back to square one.

 

[RealDave]

Trump gave Mexico 90 days to stem the flow of migrants. So this is a reprieve not a victory. The wall is still needed and is still being built.

It bis not Mexico's job to do Trump's job. Trump can fix the border. He made it worse & now demands Mexico fixes it.

It is rather funny because Trump refused to help with the Syrian refugees. He backed off from Obama's efforts.

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump gave Mexico 90 days to stem the flow of migrants. So this is a reprieve not a victory. The wall is still needed and is still being built.

So is Trump's agreement with Mexico something or not? If it is the great success he claims, and Mexico will stop all those refugees from coming here, there isn't much need for a wall.

Of course there is a need. When a Democrat gets in power they will neither enforce the agreement nor stop the flow of illegal immigrants. A wall will at least force an open border liberal to be honest with the American people as to their real agenda. They would have to either tear down the wall, which they won't or to literally open the doors. This is the REAL reason Democrats don't want a wall in the first place. It severely hampers their open borders policy.

Yep. That's nuts.

It's "nuts" that Democrats want open borders? Walls work, proven fact. Democrats can change any law or turn off any survellience, but a wall is much more difficult to render useless. They know this, thus why they fight so hard against it.

Well, no. A wall covering that distance will never work.