We Could Have Saved Two Years Worth Of Posts!

[ViewFromAbove]

The Democrat's playbook is now keep this going until the 2020 Re-election. It makes great coffee table talk. And it drives both sides batty. They enjoy when both sides collide in the huge political arena.

C'mon.....the Democrats have far more important items on their agenda:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

You appear very partisan AND extreme in your conclusions, if you're not flippant.
I think BOTH parties and others prefer to give respect to DECENT people regardless of race, pay taxes only if they contribute effectively to the common social good, value ALL speech that's not harmful, etc.
You can spin, and you can spin, and it shows your partisan colors.

Welcome to the board.

Let me suggest a point that will make your time here smoother.

Focus like a laser: point out that with which you disagree, and prove you are right.

Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct.




Which part(s) of this statement are you prepared to deny?
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



I can prove every bit of it.


Oh....and BTW.....try not to be a fool, as it will cost you.

"The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech"

YOUR above statement is very general, extreme, and demonstrates your partisan spinning.
Ok, let's go with YOUR recommendation:
"Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct".

Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.

Did you just use "us" when you mean "me"???

Why????

Are you too cowardly to stand on your own....of do you have a tapeworm?


I told you not to be a fool.

Yes, I used “us”. You have to ask why?
Show “us” as in “us readers”. Duh.
Trying to be a wit? You are revealing yourself as a DIMwit.

 

[ViewFromAbove]

The Democrat's playbook is now keep this going until the 2020 Re-election. It makes great coffee table talk. And it drives both sides batty. They enjoy when both sides collide in the huge political arena.

C'mon.....the Democrats have far more important items on their agenda:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

You appear very partisan AND extreme in your conclusions, if you're not flippant.
I think BOTH parties and others prefer to give respect to DECENT people regardless of race, pay taxes only if they contribute effectively to the common social good, value ALL speech that's not harmful, etc.
You can spin, and you can spin, and it shows your partisan colors.

Welcome to the board.

Let me suggest a point that will make your time here smoother.

Focus like a laser: point out that with which you disagree, and prove you are right.

Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct.




Which part(s) of this statement are you prepared to deny?
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



I can prove every bit of it.


Oh....and BTW.....try not to be a fool, as it will cost you.

"The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech"

YOUR above statement is very general, extreme, and demonstrates your partisan spinning.
Ok, let's go with YOUR recommendation:
"Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct".

Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.

It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics


"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White


“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”


In your face, booooyyyyyeeeeeeee!!!!

Your sources do NOT prove the DNC is racist against whites.
Show me/us the detail that shows that.
OPINION pieces from other partisans? OMG. P-L-E-A-S-E don’t be a DIMwit!!!

 

[ViewFromAbove]

The Democrat's playbook is now keep this going until the 2020 Re-election. It makes great coffee table talk. And it drives both sides batty. They enjoy when both sides collide in the huge political arena.

C'mon.....the Democrats have far more important items on their agenda:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

You appear very partisan AND extreme in your conclusions, if you're not flippant.
I think BOTH parties and others prefer to give respect to DECENT people regardless of race, pay taxes only if they contribute effectively to the common social good, value ALL speech that's not harmful, etc.
You can spin, and you can spin, and it shows your partisan colors.

Welcome to the board.

Let me suggest a point that will make your time here smoother.

Focus like a laser: point out that with which you disagree, and prove you are right.

Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct.




Which part(s) of this statement are you prepared to deny?
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



I can prove every bit of it.


Oh....and BTW.....try not to be a fool, as it will cost you.

"The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech"

YOUR above statement is very general, extreme, and demonstrates your partisan spinning.
Ok, let's go with YOUR recommendation:
"Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct".

Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.

2. Obama named Peter Singer, champion of infanticide, as his 'science adviser.'

3. The Democrat administration in Virginia offered a law for...in favor of....infanticide....stopped by Republicans.

4. The Democrat governor of Virginia agreed with the bill for infanticide.

5. "New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"


6. "Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"



How easy to prove you as dumb as asphalt, huh?

A common definition of “infanticide” is:
“the crime of killing a child within a year of birth”.
Show me/us where the DNC supports families in killing their BORN infants OTHER than special circumstances where the family wanted an abortion.

 

[ViewFromAbove]

The Democrat's playbook is now keep this going until the 2020 Re-election. It makes great coffee table talk. And it drives both sides batty. They enjoy when both sides collide in the huge political arena.

C'mon.....the Democrats have far more important items on their agenda:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

You appear very partisan AND extreme in your conclusions, if you're not flippant.
I think BOTH parties and others prefer to give respect to DECENT people regardless of race, pay taxes only if they contribute effectively to the common social good, value ALL speech that's not harmful, etc.
You can spin, and you can spin, and it shows your partisan colors.

Welcome to the board.

Let me suggest a point that will make your time here smoother.

Focus like a laser: point out that with which you disagree, and prove you are right.

Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct.




Which part(s) of this statement are you prepared to deny?
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



I can prove every bit of it.


Oh....and BTW.....try not to be a fool, as it will cost you.

"The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech"

YOUR above statement is very general, extreme, and demonstrates your partisan spinning.
Ok, let's go with YOUR recommendation:
"Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct".

Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.

What could be less American than Democrats endorsing censorship of individual’s freedom of speech?

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, [Democrat Elena] Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."

In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."

Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."
If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".



Kagan’s fantastical notion of “black-robed rulers overriding citizens’ choices” by “weaponizing the First Amendment” is puzzling. Citizens in non-right-to-work states are completely free to join a union if they so wish, and in doing so, commit to paying union dues. The only change here is that unions can no longer extort dues from non-members in any state.

Citizens’ choices have not been overridden; indeed, citizen choice is expanded under this ruling. They can join a union or not join a union, those who do not join cannot be compelled to pay union dues, but they are also not barred from doing so if they wish.

Her point about “weaponizing the First Amendment” is equally confounding. The Founders intendedthe First Amendment to be a weapon . . . against government tyranny and oppression. They were insistent that freedom of speech was required to check government and to maintain a free and independent citizenry.”



BTW, this Democrat star Kagan has been guilty of lying, and fraud as well as opposing free speech.


…the Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism.




So, tool, how do you feel having proven that I am never wrong?

You are putting up all kinds of stuff about Kagan regarding the 1st Amendment.
How about a position paper by the DNC that supposedly is “opposed to free speech” that does not harm people directly?
Please don’t be a DIMwit again.

 

[Justin Richardson]

Show me/us where the DNC supports families in killing their BORN infants OTHER than special circumstances where the family wanted an abortion.

The Wisconsin Democratic governor Tony Evers planned on vetoing the bill. According to his statement:

"I think those protections already exist," Evers said in an interview Monday. "We have all sorts of issues to deal with in the state of Wisconsin and to pass a bill that is redundant seems to be not a productive use of time. And clearly, I ran on the belief — and I still believe — that women should be able to make choices about their health care. But this deals with a specific issue that's already been resolved."

So, basically...That Evers would not sign the bill is no surprise given the fact that he compared killing babies in abortions to a legitimate medical procedure.

How nice.

 

[PoliticalChic]

C'mon.....the Democrats have far more important items on their agenda:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

You appear very partisan AND extreme in your conclusions, if you're not flippant.
I think BOTH parties and others prefer to give respect to DECENT people regardless of race, pay taxes only if they contribute effectively to the common social good, value ALL speech that's not harmful, etc.
You can spin, and you can spin, and it shows your partisan colors.

Welcome to the board.

Let me suggest a point that will make your time here smoother.

Focus like a laser: point out that with which you disagree, and prove you are right.

Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct.




Which part(s) of this statement are you prepared to deny?
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



I can prove every bit of it.


Oh....and BTW.....try not to be a fool, as it will cost you.

"The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech"

YOUR above statement is very general, extreme, and demonstrates your partisan spinning.
Ok, let's go with YOUR recommendation:
"Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct".

Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.

Did you just use "us" when you mean "me"???

Why????

Are you too cowardly to stand on your own....of do you have a tapeworm?


I told you not to be a fool.

Yes, I used “us”. You have to ask why?
Show “us” as in “us readers”. Duh.
Trying to be a wit? You are revealing yourself as a DIMwit.

What???

You need another lesson????




1. While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

2. The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob.
Coulter

 

[PoliticalChic]

C'mon.....the Democrats have far more important items on their agenda:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

You appear very partisan AND extreme in your conclusions, if you're not flippant.
I think BOTH parties and others prefer to give respect to DECENT people regardless of race, pay taxes only if they contribute effectively to the common social good, value ALL speech that's not harmful, etc.
You can spin, and you can spin, and it shows your partisan colors.

Welcome to the board.

Let me suggest a point that will make your time here smoother.

Focus like a laser: point out that with which you disagree, and prove you are right.

Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct.




Which part(s) of this statement are you prepared to deny?
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



I can prove every bit of it.


Oh....and BTW.....try not to be a fool, as it will cost you.

"The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech"

YOUR above statement is very general, extreme, and demonstrates your partisan spinning.
Ok, let's go with YOUR recommendation:
"Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct".

Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.

It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics


"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White


“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”


In your face, booooyyyyyeeeeeeee!!!!

Your sources do NOT prove the DNC is racist against whites.



Stop lying.

 

[PoliticalChic]

C'mon.....the Democrats have far more important items on their agenda:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

You appear very partisan AND extreme in your conclusions, if you're not flippant.
I think BOTH parties and others prefer to give respect to DECENT people regardless of race, pay taxes only if they contribute effectively to the common social good, value ALL speech that's not harmful, etc.
You can spin, and you can spin, and it shows your partisan colors.

Welcome to the board.

Let me suggest a point that will make your time here smoother.

Focus like a laser: point out that with which you disagree, and prove you are right.

Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct.




Which part(s) of this statement are you prepared to deny?
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



I can prove every bit of it.


Oh....and BTW.....try not to be a fool, as it will cost you.

"The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech"

YOUR above statement is very general, extreme, and demonstrates your partisan spinning.
Ok, let's go with YOUR recommendation:
"Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct".

Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.

1. Hussein Obama supported infanticide.

2. Obama named Peter Singer, champion of infanticide, as his 'science adviser.'

3. The Democrat administration in Virginia offered a law for...in favor of....infanticide....stopped by Republicans.

4. The Democrat governor of Virginia agreed with the bill for infanticide.

5. "New York abortion law changes allow infanticide"


6. "Anti-infanticide bill blocked by Senate Democrats"



How easy to prove you as dumb as asphalt, huh?

A common definition of “infanticide” is:
“the crime of killing a child within a year of birth”.
Show me/us where the DNC supports families in killing their BORN infants OTHER than special circumstances where the family wanted an abortion.

I just did.


Every state that allows abortion up to birth allows infanticide:

a. It would allow the slaughter as the child is partially out of the birth canal

b."The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother."
Virginia governor faces backlash over comments supporting late-term abortion bill - CNNPolitics
...allowed to quietly die: infanticide.




Obama supported the same thing.




It appears that guillotining you would make only an aesthetic difference.

 

[PoliticalChic]

C'mon.....the Democrats have far more important items on their agenda:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

You appear very partisan AND extreme in your conclusions, if you're not flippant.
I think BOTH parties and others prefer to give respect to DECENT people regardless of race, pay taxes only if they contribute effectively to the common social good, value ALL speech that's not harmful, etc.
You can spin, and you can spin, and it shows your partisan colors.

Welcome to the board.

Let me suggest a point that will make your time here smoother.

Focus like a laser: point out that with which you disagree, and prove you are right.

Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct.




Which part(s) of this statement are you prepared to deny?
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



I can prove every bit of it.


Oh....and BTW.....try not to be a fool, as it will cost you.

"The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech"

YOUR above statement is very general, extreme, and demonstrates your partisan spinning.
Ok, let's go with YOUR recommendation:
"Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct".

Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.

What could be less American than Democrats endorsing censorship of individual’s freedom of speech?

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, [Democrat Elena] Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."

In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."

Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."
If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".



Kagan’s fantastical notion of “black-robed rulers overriding citizens’ choices” by “weaponizing the First Amendment” is puzzling. Citizens in non-right-to-work states are completely free to join a union if they so wish, and in doing so, commit to paying union dues. The only change here is that unions can no longer extort dues from non-members in any state.

Citizens’ choices have not been overridden; indeed, citizen choice is expanded under this ruling. They can join a union or not join a union, those who do not join cannot be compelled to pay union dues, but they are also not barred from doing so if they wish.

Her point about “weaponizing the First Amendment” is equally confounding. The Founders intendedthe First Amendment to be a weapon . . . against government tyranny and oppression. They were insistent that freedom of speech was required to check government and to maintain a free and independent citizenry.”



BTW, this Democrat star Kagan has been guilty of lying, and fraud as well as opposing free speech.


…the Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism.




So, tool, how do you feel having proven that I am never wrong?

You are putting up all kinds of stuff about Kagan regarding the 1st Amendment.
How about a position paper by the DNC that supposedly is “opposed to free speech” that does not harm people directly?
Please don’t be a DIMwit again.

Who and which party put an anti-free speech proponent on the Supreme Court?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Show me/us where the DNC supports families in killing their BORN infants OTHER than special circumstances where the family wanted an abortion.

The Wisconsin Democratic governor Tony Evers planned on vetoing the bill. According to his statement:

"I think those protections already exist," Evers said in an interview Monday. "We have all sorts of issues to deal with in the state of Wisconsin and to pass a bill that is redundant seems to be not a productive use of time. And clearly, I ran on the belief — and I still believe — that women should be able to make choices about their health care. But this deals with a specific issue that's already been resolved."

So, basically...That Evers would not sign the bill is no surprise given the fact that he compared killing babies in abortions to a legitimate medical procedure.

How nice.

Democrats: the knuckle-dragging atavistic pagan party.

 

[ViewFromAbove]

You appear very partisan AND extreme in your conclusions, if you're not flippant.
I think BOTH parties and others prefer to give respect to DECENT people regardless of race, pay taxes only if they contribute effectively to the common social good, value ALL speech that's not harmful, etc.
You can spin, and you can spin, and it shows your partisan colors.

Welcome to the board.

Let me suggest a point that will make your time here smoother.

Focus like a laser: point out that with which you disagree, and prove you are right.

Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct.




Which part(s) of this statement are you prepared to deny?
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



I can prove every bit of it.


Oh....and BTW.....try not to be a fool, as it will cost you.

"The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech"

YOUR above statement is very general, extreme, and demonstrates your partisan spinning.
Ok, let's go with YOUR recommendation:
"Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct".

Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.

Did you just use "us" when you mean "me"???

Why????

Are you too cowardly to stand on your own....of do you have a tapeworm?


I told you not to be a fool.

Yes, I used “us”. You have to ask why?
Show “us” as in “us readers”. Duh.
Trying to be a wit? You are revealing yourself as a DIMwit.

What???

You need another lesson????




1. While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

2. The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob.
Coulter

You FAILED. I asked you:
.. Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.
Did you see the large print? Or, can you only select some statements from democrats or liberals and SPIN them with stupid OPINIONS from partisans?

Coulter is an IDIOT and so is Trump. Many Democrats are also idiots. I am not partisan.
Are you also an idiot, or only a spinning PARTISAN dimwit?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Welcome to the board.

Let me suggest a point that will make your time here smoother.

Focus like a laser: point out that with which you disagree, and prove you are right.

Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct.




Which part(s) of this statement are you prepared to deny?
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…



I can prove every bit of it.


Oh....and BTW.....try not to be a fool, as it will cost you.

"The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech"

YOUR above statement is very general, extreme, and demonstrates your partisan spinning.
Ok, let's go with YOUR recommendation:
"Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct".

Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.

Did you just use "us" when you mean "me"???

Why????

Are you too cowardly to stand on your own....of do you have a tapeworm?


I told you not to be a fool.

Yes, I used “us”. You have to ask why?
Show “us” as in “us readers”. Duh.
Trying to be a wit? You are revealing yourself as a DIMwit.

What???

You need another lesson????




1. While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

2. The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob.
Coulter

You FAILED. I asked you:
.. Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.
Did you see the large print? Or, can you only select some statements from democrats or liberals and SPIN them with stupid OPINIONS from partisans?

Coulter is an IDIOT and so is Trump. Many Democrats are also idiots. I am not partisan.
Are you also an idiot, or only a spinning PARTISAN dimwit?

I never 'fail.'

You just lie.

I believe you have just proven.....
You Can’t Wake a Person Who Is Pretending to Be Asleep – Navajo Proverb



As I have shown, and everyone knows,
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

In your case, perhaps a birth defect, or poor upbringing, but you will lie to support the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
I told you not to be a fool, but it appears you can't help it.


Sooo.....you're a government school grad, huh?

 

[ViewFromAbove]

"The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech"

YOUR above statement is very general, extreme, and demonstrates your partisan spinning.
Ok, let's go with YOUR recommendation:
"Use quotes, links and source your material....show where your views are correct".

Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.

Did you just use "us" when you mean "me"???

Why????

Are you too cowardly to stand on your own....of do you have a tapeworm?


I told you not to be a fool.

Yes, I used “us”. You have to ask why?
Show “us” as in “us readers”. Duh.
Trying to be a wit? You are revealing yourself as a DIMwit.

What???

You need another lesson????




1. While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.

2. The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob.
Coulter

You FAILED. I asked you:
.. Show us where the DEMOCRATIC PARTY is racist against white people, are for infanticide, and/or are opposed to free speech.
Did you see the large print? Or, can you only select some statements from democrats or liberals and SPIN them with stupid OPINIONS from partisans?

Coulter is an IDIOT and so is Trump. Many Democrats are also idiots. I am not partisan.
Are you also an idiot, or only a spinning PARTISAN dimwit?

I never 'fail.'

You just lie.

I believe you have just proven.....
You Can’t Wake a Person Who Is Pretending to Be Asleep – Navajo Proverb



As I have shown, and everyone knows,
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

In your case, perhaps a birth defect, or poor upbringing, but you will lie to support the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
I told you not to be a fool, but it appears you can't help it.


Sooo.....you're a government school grad, huh?

You don’t know what “PROOF” means. Stupid OPINIONS don’t count.
All you have shown is what a PARTISAN IDIOT you are. Worse than a dimwit.