We can create babies without men, claim scientists

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Brave new world...

We can create babies without men, claim scientists | Daily Mail Online

"Fertility specialists have found a way for women to have babies without men.
It involves a cocktail of chemicals acting as an 'artificial sperm' to trick a human egg into forming an embryo.
The stunning discovery has alarmed medical ethics campaigners, who described it as turning nature on its head. Researchers say the groundbreaking technology could be used to help women whose husbands are infertile but who do not want to use donor sperm.
Any babies born from the process would be female and genetically identical to their mother.
Taken to its extreme, it could lead to the science fiction nightmare of a female-dominated society where men have little or no role.
The news also creates a legal minefield for UK authorities which govern fertility treatments, because British laws do not cover the creation of an embryo without sperm.
The discovery was made by researchers from the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics in Los Angeles."

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The problem is they all become Lena Dunham.

 

[Pop23]

Am I reading this right?

October 2001?

Brave Old World?

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Am I reading this right?

October 2001?

Brave Old World?

Huh...link was given to me...i see today's date on top....where is older date?..if so...my bad!

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

OK...MY bad...currently they have produced live mouse babies using this method...no humans.

 

[Pop23]

Am I reading this right?

October 2001?

Brave Old World?

Huh...link was given to me...i see today's date on top....where is older date?..if so...my bad!

Not sure why there's a difference

On laptop. that date that shows up is today's date, but I think that's up with the weather, the same on all articles that you bring up. On my mobile, it shows October 22, 2001

 

[konradv]

Sensationalized fake scientific news. Here's the real original article from 2002.

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2002/01/look-mom-no-sperm

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Brave new world...

We can create babies without men, claim scientists | Daily Mail Online

"Fertility specialists have found a way for women to have babies without men.
It involves a cocktail of chemicals acting as an 'artificial sperm' to trick a human egg into forming an embryo.
The stunning discovery has alarmed medical ethics campaigners, who described it as turning nature on its head. Researchers say the groundbreaking technology could be used to help women whose husbands are infertile but who do not want to use donor sperm.
Any babies born from the process would be female and genetically identical to their mother.
Taken to its extreme, it could lead to the science fiction nightmare of a female-dominated society where men have little or no role.
The news also creates a legal minefield for UK authorities which govern fertility treatments, because British laws do not cover the creation of an embryo without sperm.
The discovery was made by researchers from the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics in Los Angeles."

We can create babies without men, claim scientists

I love men and children need fathers, so I tell scientists to

 

[Pop23]

Brave new world...

We can create babies without men, claim scientists | Daily Mail Online

"Fertility specialists have found a way for women to have babies without men.
It involves a cocktail of chemicals acting as an 'artificial sperm' to trick a human egg into forming an embryo.
The stunning discovery has alarmed medical ethics campaigners, who described it as turning nature on its head. Researchers say the groundbreaking technology could be used to help women whose husbands are infertile but who do not want to use donor sperm.
Any babies born from the process would be female and genetically identical to their mother.
Taken to its extreme, it could lead to the science fiction nightmare of a female-dominated society where men have little or no role.
The news also creates a legal minefield for UK authorities which govern fertility treatments, because British laws do not cover the creation of an embryo without sperm.
The discovery was made by researchers from the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics in Los Angeles."

We can create babies without men, claim scientists

I love men and children need fathers, so I tell scientists to

I was in a discussion about this several years ago.

a Couple of issues? Who would want to be the person that takes men no longer a requirement to procreation.

Dude would have a target the size of a dump truck on his back. Enjoy your research, your time on this planet would be short.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Brave new world...

We can create babies without men, claim scientists | Daily Mail Online

"Fertility specialists have found a way for women to have babies without men.
It involves a cocktail of chemicals acting as an 'artificial sperm' to trick a human egg into forming an embryo.
The stunning discovery has alarmed medical ethics campaigners, who described it as turning nature on its head. Researchers say the groundbreaking technology could be used to help women whose husbands are infertile but who do not want to use donor sperm.
Any babies born from the process would be female and genetically identical to their mother.
Taken to its extreme, it could lead to the science fiction nightmare of a female-dominated society where men have little or no role.
The news also creates a legal minefield for UK authorities which govern fertility treatments, because British laws do not cover the creation of an embryo without sperm.
The discovery was made by researchers from the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics in Los Angeles."

We can create babies without men, claim scientists

I love men and children need fathers, so I tell scientists to

I was in a discussion about this several years ago.

a Couple of issues? Who would want to be the person that takes men no longer a requirement to procreation.

Dude would have a target the size of a dump truck on his back. Enjoy your research, your time on this planet would be short.

"Who would want to be the person that takes men no longer a requirement to procreation."

Well it's not just that, it's this also:

"Any babies born from the process would be female and genetically identical to their mother.
Taken to its extreme, it could lead to the science fiction nightmare of a female-dominated society where men have little or no role."

^^^^ This is what the Radical Militant Feminists would like, they hate men the ugly, hairy arm-pitted, angry Men-Hating Radical Militant Feminists if they could would like to just eradicate men completely from the planet.

 

[Pop23]

Brave new world...

We can create babies without men, claim scientists | Daily Mail Online

"Fertility specialists have found a way for women to have babies without men.
It involves a cocktail of chemicals acting as an 'artificial sperm' to trick a human egg into forming an embryo.
The stunning discovery has alarmed medical ethics campaigners, who described it as turning nature on its head. Researchers say the groundbreaking technology could be used to help women whose husbands are infertile but who do not want to use donor sperm.
Any babies born from the process would be female and genetically identical to their mother.
Taken to its extreme, it could lead to the science fiction nightmare of a female-dominated society where men have little or no role.
The news also creates a legal minefield for UK authorities which govern fertility treatments, because British laws do not cover the creation of an embryo without sperm.
The discovery was made by researchers from the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics in Los Angeles."

We can create babies without men, claim scientists

I love men and children need fathers, so I tell scientists to

I was in a discussion about this several years ago.

a Couple of issues? Who would want to be the person that takes men no longer a requirement to procreation.

Dude would have a target the size of a dump truck on his back. Enjoy your research, your time on this planet would be short.

"Who would want to be the person that takes men no longer a requirement to procreation."

Well it's not just that, it's this also:

"Any babies born from the process would be female and genetically identical to their mother.
Taken to its extreme, it could lead to the science fiction nightmare of a female-dominated society where men have little or no role."

^^^^ This is what the Radical Militant Feminists would like, they hate men the ugly, hairy arm-pitted, angry Men-Hating Radical Militant Feminists if they could would like to just eradicate men completely from the planet.

The “child” would have to be monitored it’s entire life. It would be, by any standard, a new life form.

And what happens if it breeds with a normal human?

No insurance company in the world would take that risk. And without that, no lab in the world would touch it.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Brave new world...

We can create babies without men, claim scientists | Daily Mail Online

"Fertility specialists have found a way for women to have babies without men.
It involves a cocktail of chemicals acting as an 'artificial sperm' to trick a human egg into forming an embryo.
The stunning discovery has alarmed medical ethics campaigners, who described it as turning nature on its head. Researchers say the groundbreaking technology could be used to help women whose husbands are infertile but who do not want to use donor sperm.
Any babies born from the process would be female and genetically identical to their mother.
Taken to its extreme, it could lead to the science fiction nightmare of a female-dominated society where men have little or no role.
The news also creates a legal minefield for UK authorities which govern fertility treatments, because British laws do not cover the creation of an embryo without sperm.
The discovery was made by researchers from the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics in Los Angeles."

We can create babies without men, claim scientists

I love men and children need fathers, so I tell scientists to

I was in a discussion about this several years ago.

a Couple of issues? Who would want to be the person that takes men no longer a requirement to procreation.

Dude would have a target the size of a dump truck on his back. Enjoy your research, your time on this planet would be short.

"Who would want to be the person that takes men no longer a requirement to procreation."

Well it's not just that, it's this also:

"Any babies born from the process would be female and genetically identical to their mother.
Taken to its extreme, it could lead to the science fiction nightmare of a female-dominated society where men have little or no role."

^^^^ This is what the Radical Militant Feminists would like, they hate men the ugly, hairy arm-pitted, angry Men-Hating Radical Militant Feminists if they could would like to just eradicate men completely from the planet.

The “child” would have to be monitored it’s entire life. It would be, by any standard, a new life form.

And what happens if it breeds with a normal human?

No insurance company in the world would take that risk. And without that, no lab in the world would touch it.

"And what happens if it breeds with a normal human?"

Well if taken to the ultimate extreme and there were only females around it wouldn't be able to breed. These scientists are to be considered dangerous to life on this planet, these scientists and also the ones involved with the Sex Robot things, they seem determined to end life on this planet in some way eg. humans can only breed with humans, humans cannot breed with Sex Robots so that would eventually end life on this planet because there would be no new humans being bred.

 

[Silhouette]

Can't create fathers without men though. So why bother? So some lesbians can have science relieve them completely of finding men relevant...as they use dildos to stimulate each other?

 

[Pop23]

Can't create fathers without men though. So why bother? So some lesbians can have science relieve them completely of finding men relevant...as they use dildos to stimulate each other?

Yes, let’s make a completely new life form so lesbians, who reject how life is made in the first place, can have a sparkly new cuddle toy.

 

[Silhouette]

Can't create fathers without men though. So why bother? So some lesbians can have science relieve them completely of finding men relevant...as they use dildos to stimulate each other?

Yes, let’s make a completely new life form so lesbians, who reject how life is made in the first place, can have a sparkly new cuddle toy.

Yep. But my point is that lesbians are closet heteros. And gays are closet heteros too, using each others' end holes as artificial vaginas. One seeks a pole still, the other seeks a hole still.

So all this is really just about mental illness and how far a society will go to pretend it is otherwise...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The “child” would have to be monitored it’s entire life. It would be, by any standard, a new life form.

And what happens if it breeds with a normal human?

huh? It would not be a new life form. It would be no different than the mother's identical twin. And it wouldn't breed any differently than any other human. Where do you get this nonsense....

 

[Pop23]

The “child” would have to be monitored it’s entire life. It would be, by any standard, a new life form.

And what happens if it breeds with a normal human?

huh? It would not be a new life form. It would be no different than the mother's identical twin. And it wouldn't breed any differently than any other human. Where do you get this nonsense....

Created in a completely different way then all other children ever created. There is simply no way to know what this life form would handle what comes upon them. Viruses and such.

Anyone advocating this is gambling the child would be fine, as would the offspring. Creepy when you consider the agony if things don’t go perfectly.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Created in a completely different way then all other children ever created. There is simply no way to know what this life form would handle what comes upon them.

That is ridiculous. They would simply be their mothers' identical twins. You have absolutely no basis for any of that.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Created in a completely different way then all other children ever created. There is simply no way to know what this life form would handle what comes upon them.

That is ridiculous. They would simply be their mothers' identical twins. You have absolutely no basis for any of that.

It would be another iteration of the GMO argument--it ain't natural..so it must be bad--the religious types would be in an uproar..woman..not born of man.

 

[Pop23]

Created in a completely different way then all other children ever created. There is simply no way to know what this life form would handle what comes upon them.

That is ridiculous. They would simply be their mothers' identical twins. You have absolutely no basis for any of that.

It would be another iteration of the GMO argument--it ain't natural..so it must be bad--the religious types would be in an uproar..woman..not born of man.

Gonna risk horrible effects cuz lesbians want it?

Ok, been 16 years since reported, and nada.

Oops