Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Trump b'lieves Biden got away with a crime. He solicited the president of Zelensky to find the evidence he needs to prove it. Given both Trump and Biden are running for the same office, that world be dirt Trump thinks he can use to knock Biden out of the race.Melodramatic outrage about the President committing an entirely proper act. How idiotic. Like there is something improper about suggesting that an American government official possibly coercing an official of a foreign government for private gain be investigated.
Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
In what delusional world does suggesting an investigation equal "digging up dirt"? Maybe someone who speaks English could explain it to you.
Great, finally... someone with proof that Ukraine interfered with our election in 2016!Melodramatic outrage about the President committing an entirely proper act. How idiotic. Like there is something improper about suggesting that an American government official possibly coercing an official of a foreign government for private gain be investigated.
Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
You sad little booby. You loons hyperventilated for years about Russian Collusion in the 2016 election. As it turns out, Ukraine tried to interfere in our election, and it is perfectly appropriate for Trump to want to get to the bottom of it.
What's really going on here is that the Lefties are bathing in flop sweat over the imminent criminal indictments coming their way from the Barr-Durham investigations. This fouxtrage aimed at Trump is just a diversionary tactic - quite transparent and pathetic, and doomed to failure.
Trump b'lieves Biden got away with a crime. He solicited the president of Zelensky to find the evidence he needs to prove it. Given both Trump and Biden are running for the same office, that world be dirt Trump thinks he can use to knock Biden out of the race.Melodramatic outrage about the President committing an entirely proper act. How idiotic. Like there is something improper about suggesting that an American government official possibly coercing an official of a foreign government for private gain be investigated.
Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
In what delusional world does suggesting an investigation equal "digging up dirt"? Maybe someone who speaks English could explain it to you.
They're both running for president, ya moron.Trump b'lieves Biden got away with a crime. He solicited the president of Zelensky to find the evidence he needs to prove it. Given both Trump and Biden are running for the same office, that world be dirt Trump thinks he can use to knock Biden out of the race.Melodramatic outrage about the President committing an entirely proper act. How idiotic. Like there is something improper about suggesting that an American government official possibly coercing an official of a foreign government for private gain be investigated.
Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
In what delusional world does suggesting an investigation equal "digging up dirt"? Maybe someone who speaks English could explain it to you.
No, Trump and Biden (neither one) are running for the same office. There is a slim possibility that they might be next year but that is entirely beside the point. Crime is illegal; "dirt" is not. And whatever the reason for doing so suggesting an investigation is neither illegal nor improper.
Trump b'lieves Biden got away with a crime. He solicited the president of Zelensky to find the evidence he needs to prove it. Given both Trump and Biden are running for the same office, that world be dirt Trump thinks he can use to knock Biden out of the race.Melodramatic outrage about the President committing an entirely proper act. How idiotic. Like there is something improper about suggesting that an American government official possibly coercing an official of a foreign government for private gain be investigated.
Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
In what delusional world does suggesting an investigation equal "digging up dirt"? Maybe someone who speaks English could explain it to you.
No, Trump and Biden (neither one) are running for the same office. There is a slim possibility that they might be next year but that is entirely beside the point. Crime is illegal; "dirt" is not. And whatever the reason for doing so suggesting an investigation is neither illegal nor improper.
They're both running for president, ya moron.Trump b'lieves Biden got away with a crime. He solicited the president of Zelensky to find the evidence he needs to prove it. Given both Trump and Biden are running for the same office, that world be dirt Trump thinks he can use to knock Biden out of the race.Melodramatic outrage about the President committing an entirely proper act. How idiotic. Like there is something improper about suggesting that an American government official possibly coercing an official of a foreign government for private gain be investigated.
Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
In what delusional world does suggesting an investigation equal "digging up dirt"? Maybe someone who speaks English could explain it to you.
No, Trump and Biden (neither one) are running for the same office. There is a slim possibility that they might be next year but that is entirely beside the point. Crime is illegal; "dirt" is not. And whatever the reason for doing so suggesting an investigation is neither illegal nor improper.
And since there's no evidence Biden did anything wrong, coupled with several Ukranians stating as much, it's dirt Trump is looking for.
Melodramatic outrage about the President committing an entirely proper act. How idiotic. Like there is something improper about suggesting that an American government official possibly coercing an official of a foreign government for private gain be investigated.
Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
You sad little booby. You loons hyperventilated for years about Russian Collusion in the 2016 election. As it turns out, Ukraine tried to interfere in our election, and it is perfectly appropriate for Trump to want to get to the bottom of it..
Melodramatic outrage about the President committing an entirely proper act. How idiotic. Like there is something improper about suggesting that an American government official possibly coercing an official of a foreign government for private gain be investigated.
Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
In what delusional world does suggesting an investigation equal "digging up dirt"? Maybe someone who speaks English could explain it to you.
What U.S. policy is that?Was Biden obligated to demand for the removalTrump claimed that he was obligated by the Constitution to talk to Ukraine about the Biden's and their supposed corruption.
"If you look and you read our Constitution and many other things, I have an obligation to look at corruption."
Is that true?
Where in the Constitution does it say that the President of the United States must 'look at corruption' in a foreign country?
of another country's AG, else no money
Shit, why then, huh.
We had already been giving them
hundreds of millions of dollars,
why the problem with corruption suddenly.
As a matter of fact, why did financial aid for Ukraine
more than double In 2015 to $350 million dollars
from the $148 million dollars in 2014?
And then more than double again in 2016
to $667 million dollars...$300 million more than 2015
the last 2 years Biden and Kerry were in office?
2015 & 2016 were the ONLY times
Ukraine received MORE THAN $200 million from us
Hmmmm
Further still, were the 3 senators obligated
to help Mueller with his investigation?
Biden wasn't obligated to demand the removal of the Ukrainian prosecutor- but he did so as part of U.S. policy, backed by both Republicans and Democrats in Congress, along with our European allies.
This was done in the interest the U.S. had in actually fighting the actual corruption in Ukraine.
Notice how Biden didn't just demand that Ukraine investigate Trump's campaign chair- but was taking action on all corruption.
Ok, well, they fired Shokin and put in LutsenkoObligated? No, Biden wasn't obligated. It was merely a bluff to get Poroshenko to finally pull the trigger on kicking out Shokin after saying he would fire some time as part of Ukraine's effort to clean up corruption; as supported by several nations and international bodies.Was Biden obligated to demand for the removalTrump claimed that he was obligated by the Constitution to talk to Ukraine about the Biden's and their supposed corruption.
"If you look and you read our Constitution and many other things, I have an obligation to look at corruption."
Is that true?
Where in the Constitution does it say that the President of the United States must 'look at corruption' in a foreign country?
of another country's AG, else no money
Shit, why then, huh.
We had already been giving them
hundreds of millions of dollars,
why the problem with corruption suddenly.
As a matter of fact, why did financial aid for Ukraine
more than double In 2015 to $350 million dollars
from the $148 million dollars in 2014?
And then more than double again in 2016
to $667 million dollars...$300 million more than 2015
the last 2 years Biden and Kerry were in office?
2015 & 2016 were the ONLY times
Ukraine received MORE THAN $200 million from us
Hmmmm
Further still, were the 3 senators obligated
to help Mueller with his investigation?
Oh, but he wasLiar. Shokin was not investigating Burisma when he was kicked to the curb...Obligated? No, Biden wasn't obligated. It was merely a bluff to get Poroshenko to finally pull the trigger on kicking out Shokin after saying he would fire some time as part of Ukraine's effort to clean up corruption; as supported by several nations and international bodies.Was Biden obligated to demand for the removalTrump claimed that he was obligated by the Constitution to talk to Ukraine about the Biden's and their supposed corruption.
"If you look and you read our Constitution and many other things, I have an obligation to look at corruption."
Is that true?
Where in the Constitution does it say that the President of the United States must 'look at corruption' in a foreign country?
of another country's AG, else no money
Shit, why then, huh.
We had already been giving them
hundreds of millions of dollars,
why the problem with corruption suddenly.
As a matter of fact, why did financial aid for Ukraine
more than double In 2015 to $350 million dollars
from the $148 million dollars in 2014?
And then more than double again in 2016
to $667 million dollars...$300 million more than 2015
the last 2 years Biden and Kerry were in office?
2015 & 2016 were the ONLY times
Ukraine received MORE THAN $200 million from us
Hmmmm
Further still, were the 3 senators obligated
to help Mueller with his investigation?
I swear to Allah you all couldn't be anymore stupid than you are.
Shokin was the man cleaning up the corruption,
That's why the full court press against him
Sort of resembling the attempted coup against President Trump.
The story behind Biden's son, Ukraine and Trump's claims
Ukraine’s current prosecutor, Yuriy Lutsenko, was quoted by Bloomberg News in May as saying he had no evidence of wrongdoing by Biden or his son. Bloomberg also reported that the investigation into Burisma was dormant at the time Biden pressed for Shokhin’s ouster.
You left out that Lutsenko appealed and won on appeal.Ok, well, they fired Shokin and put in LutsenkoObligated? No, Biden wasn't obligated. It was merely a bluff to get Poroshenko to finally pull the trigger on kicking out Shokin after saying he would fire some time as part of Ukraine's effort to clean up corruption; as supported by several nations and international bodies.Was Biden obligated to demand for the removalTrump claimed that he was obligated by the Constitution to talk to Ukraine about the Biden's and their supposed corruption.
"If you look and you read our Constitution and many other things, I have an obligation to look at corruption."
Is that true?
Where in the Constitution does it say that the President of the United States must 'look at corruption' in a foreign country?
of another country's AG, else no money
Shit, why then, huh.
We had already been giving them
hundreds of millions of dollars,
why the problem with corruption suddenly.
As a matter of fact, why did financial aid for Ukraine
more than double In 2015 to $350 million dollars
from the $148 million dollars in 2014?
And then more than double again in 2016
to $667 million dollars...$300 million more than 2015
the last 2 years Biden and Kerry were in office?
2015 & 2016 were the ONLY times
Ukraine received MORE THAN $200 million from us
Hmmmm
Further still, were the 3 senators obligated
to help Mueller with his investigation?
who was sent to prison for fraud and embezzlement in 2010
Huh, Yanukovych pardoned him and he was releasedYou left out that Lutsenko appealed and won on appeal.
Put down the crack pipe.Oh, but he wasLiar. Shokin was not investigating Burisma when he was kicked to the curb...Obligated? No, Biden wasn't obligated. It was merely a bluff to get Poroshenko to finally pull the trigger on kicking out Shokin after saying he would fire some time as part of Ukraine's effort to clean up corruption; as supported by several nations and international bodies.Was Biden obligated to demand for the removalTrump claimed that he was obligated by the Constitution to talk to Ukraine about the Biden's and their supposed corruption.
"If you look and you read our Constitution and many other things, I have an obligation to look at corruption."
Is that true?
Where in the Constitution does it say that the President of the United States must 'look at corruption' in a foreign country?
of another country's AG, else no money
Shit, why then, huh.
We had already been giving them
hundreds of millions of dollars,
why the problem with corruption suddenly.
As a matter of fact, why did financial aid for Ukraine
more than double In 2015 to $350 million dollars
from the $148 million dollars in 2014?
And then more than double again in 2016
to $667 million dollars...$300 million more than 2015
the last 2 years Biden and Kerry were in office?
2015 & 2016 were the ONLY times
Ukraine received MORE THAN $200 million from us
Hmmmm
Further still, were the 3 senators obligated
to help Mueller with his investigation?
I swear to Allah you all couldn't be anymore stupid than you are.
Shokin was the man cleaning up the corruption,
That's why the full court press against him
Sort of resembling the attempted coup against President Trump.
The story behind Biden's son, Ukraine and Trump's claims
Ukraine’s current prosecutor, Yuriy Lutsenko, was quoted by Bloomberg News in May as saying he had no evidence of wrongdoing by Biden or his son. Bloomberg also reported that the investigation into Burisma was dormant at the time Biden pressed for Shokhin’s ouster.
Internal report
They're both running for president, ya moron.Trump b'lieves Biden got away with a crime. He solicited the president of Zelensky to find the evidence he needs to prove it. Given both Trump and Biden are running for the same office, that world be dirt Trump thinks he can use to knock Biden out of the race.Melodramatic outrage about the President committing an entirely proper act. How idiotic. Like there is something improper about suggesting that an American government official possibly coercing an official of a foreign government for private gain be investigated.
Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
In what delusional world does suggesting an investigation equal "digging up dirt"? Maybe someone who speaks English could explain it to you.
No, Trump and Biden (neither one) are running for the same office. There is a slim possibility that they might be next year but that is entirely beside the point. Crime is illegal; "dirt" is not. And whatever the reason for doing so suggesting an investigation is neither illegal nor improper.
And since there's no evidence Biden did anything wrong, coupled with several Ukranians stating as much, it's dirt Trump is looking for.
Trump b'lieves Biden got away with a crime. He solicited the president of Zelensky to find the evidence he needs to prove it. Given both Trump and Biden are running for the same office, that world be dirt Trump thinks he can use to knock Biden out of the race.Melodramatic outrage about the President committing an entirely proper act. How idiotic. Like there is something improper about suggesting that an American government official possibly coercing an official of a foreign government for private gain be investigated.
Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
In what delusional world does suggesting an investigation equal "digging up dirt"? Maybe someone who speaks English could explain it to you.
No, Trump and Biden (neither one) are running for the same office. There is a slim possibility that they might be next year but that is entirely beside the point. Crime is illegal; "dirt" is not. And whatever the reason for doing so suggesting an investigation is neither illegal nor improper.
Wow- so you think that if President Trump called up Russia and asked them to dig investigate any possible crimes by Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and the rest of the Democratic slate- that no matter what his 'motivation' it wouldn't be illegal or improper?
They're both running for president, ya moron.Trump b'lieves Biden got away with a crime. He solicited the president of Zelensky to find the evidence he needs to prove it. Given both Trump and Biden are running for the same office, that world be dirt Trump thinks he can use to knock Biden out of the race.Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
In what delusional world does suggesting an investigation equal "digging up dirt"? Maybe someone who speaks English could explain it to you.
No, Trump and Biden (neither one) are running for the same office. There is a slim possibility that they might be next year but that is entirely beside the point. Crime is illegal; "dirt" is not. And whatever the reason for doing so suggesting an investigation is neither illegal nor improper.
And since there's no evidence Biden did anything wrong, coupled with several Ukranians stating as much, it's dirt Trump is looking for.
And given that:
A) Trump is only asking for countries to investigate 'corruption' or 'crimes' when he can also say Biden at the same time and
B) Trump didn't provide any evidence of any potential crimes to Ukraine to investigate and most damning:
C) Trump insisted that Ukraine publicly announce the investigation into Biden.
Why would Trump insist that Ukraine publicly announce it was investigating the Biden's?
Hell Obama didn't even do that when the FBI was actually investigating Trump for possibly conspiring with Russia.
Biden is running for president. Biden can run for president even if Democrats nominate someone else.They're both running for president, ya moron.Trump b'lieves Biden got away with a crime. He solicited the president of Zelensky to find the evidence he needs to prove it. Given both Trump and Biden are running for the same office, that world be dirt Trump thinks he can use to knock Biden out of the race.Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
In what delusional world does suggesting an investigation equal "digging up dirt"? Maybe someone who speaks English could explain it to you.
No, Trump and Biden (neither one) are running for the same office. There is a slim possibility that they might be next year but that is entirely beside the point. Crime is illegal; "dirt" is not. And whatever the reason for doing so suggesting an investigation is neither illegal nor improper.
And since there's no evidence Biden did anything wrong, coupled with several Ukranians stating as much, it's dirt Trump is looking for.
Looking for evidence is the intended purpose of investigations. No evidence; no charges. What part of that are you having a problem understanding? And Biden is running to be his parties nominee for President. In the unlikely event that happens THEN he will be running for President. D. Trump is already President maybe next year he will run again. If so, THEN he will be running for reelection. People should become exempt from investigation of their crimes because they happen to be out of work politicians? I don't think so. Dims are constantly launching investigations without evidence. Surely they don't consider that a problem.
Melodramatic outrage about the President committing an entirely proper act. How idiotic. Like there is something improper about suggesting that an American government official possibly coercing an official of a foreign government for private gain be investigated.
Like there is something improper for Congress to investigating a President's attempt to coerce an official of a foreign government for his own personal gain?
Face it- the only 'corruption' that Donald Trump has asked any foreign government to investigate is 'corruption' that can include 'Biden' in the same sentence.
And yes- asking two foreign governments including the Commies in China- to dig up dirt on a political rival is not a proper act.
In what delusional world does suggesting an investigation equal "digging up dirt"? Maybe someone who speaks English could explain it to you.
Well lets review what our Nervous Nancy President asked Ukraine and the Commies to do- shall we?
“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, what Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that, so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great,” Trump said to Zelensky in the call.
Trump then said, “Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution, so if you can look into it, it sounds horrible to me.”
And we know from the diplomats involved that Trump demanded that Ukraine publicly announce such an 'investigation'
Demanding a public announcement of investigation on his political rival- yeah sure sounds like a demand that Ukraine look for dirt on Biden.
And then of course his call on China to do so
“They should investigate the Bidens,” Trump said. “Likewise, China should start an investigation into the Bidens, because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine.”
So what evidence did Trump provide to China to inspire them to investigate his political opponent and his son? Nothing. Nada.
Trump couldn't even name what China should be investigating- just that they should investigate his political rival.
And no one else.
Yeah- that is calling on foreign countries to find dirt on your political rival.
