nitroz
INDEPENDENTly ruthless
does it matter?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I mean the Jews wrote the new testament, a fullfilment to all their ancient prophesies and now they don't even believe it. Why would they do that
jews didn't "write" the new testament
damn...
jews didn't "write" the new testament
damn...
Now Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Thomas et al weren't Jews. LMAO!!!!
some were, some weren't...
but the gospels, or what was cherrypicked to be the new testament by constantine, wasn't a jewish writing.
idiot.
Evidence or Link to back up your statement that Revelations was written by a Hellenic monk?Revelations is an example of one of those books that made the NT cut that was written by a Hellenic monk a century or more after Christ was dead.
jews didn't "write" the new testament
damn...
Now Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Thomas et al weren't Jews. LMAO!!!!
some were, some weren't...
but the gospels, or what was cherrypicked to be the new testament by constantine, wasn't a jewish writing.
idiot.
Give it up. Your stupidity is already well known.I mean the Jews wrote the new testament, a fullfilment to all their ancient prophesies and now they don't even believe it. Why would they do that
Only when purchasing a used car.does it matter?
Evidence or Link to back up your statement that Revelations was written by a Hellenic monk?Revelations is an example of one of those books that made the NT cut that was written by a Hellenic monk a century or more after Christ was dead.
Thanks
Early views
Justin Martyr (c. 100–165 AD) who was acquainted with Polycarp, who had been mentored by John, makes a possible allusion to this book, and credits John as the source.[5] Irenaeus (c. 115–202) assumes it as a conceded point. At the end of the 2nd century, it is accepted at Antioch by Theophilus (died c. 183), and in Africa by Tertullian (c. 160–220). At the beginning of the 3rd century, it is adopted by Clement of Alexandria and by Origen of Alexandria, later by Methodius, Cyprian, Lactantius,[citation needed] Dionysius of Alexandria,[6] and in the 5th century by Quodvultdeus.[7] Eusebius (c. 263–339) was inclined to class the Apocalypse with the accepted books but also listed it in the Antilegomena, with his own reservation for identification of John of Patmos with John the Apostle, pointing out there were large difference in Greek skill and styles between the Gospel of John, which he doubtlessly attributed to John the Apostle, and the Revelation.[8] Jerome (347–420) relegated it to second class.[9] Most canons included it, but some in the Eastern Church rejected it, see Development of the New Testament canon for details. It is not included in the Peshitta (an early New Testament in Aramaic).[10]
I mean the Jews wrote the new testament, a fullfilment to all their ancient prophesies and now they don't even believe it. Why would they do that
#1) All of the known NT books were written in Greek. (no earlier copies in any other language have been found)
#2) Although writing styles are different. No one can definitely prove either way if John of the Gospels is the same person as John of the Revelations.
#3) There is zero evidence that John the Revelator was a Monk.
#4) Just because the earliest known copies of the N.T. are in Greek. Does not mean that the writers were Hellenistic Greeks. (with the possible exception of Paul who writes that he is a Roman citizen of Greek descent)
Even Jesus in the N.T. says that he was sent for the Jews and not the Gentile.#1) All of the known NT books were written in Greek. (no earlier copies in any other language have been found)
#2) Although writing styles are different. No one can definitely prove either way if John of the Gospels is the same person as John of the Revelations.
#3) There is zero evidence that John the Revelator was a Monk.
#4) Just because the earliest known copies of the N.T. are in Greek. Does not mean that the writers were Hellenistic Greeks. (with the possible exception of Paul who writes that he is a Roman citizen of Greek descent)
But Sunni Man,
The implication that Jews wrote the NT is that The Jews, that believed in the Christ, are still JEWS(MSPedit).
But belief in the Jesus as the Messiah is one of the theological dividing lines between Judaism and Christianity. If the authors of the NT believed that Jesus was the Messiah, then they were Christians. It is possible that they were Jews Or Hellenic or whatever before hand, but once they came to accept Jesus as their Messiah, they are then to be considered Christians.
Even Jesus in the N.T. says that he was sent for the Jews and not the Gentile.#1) All of the known NT books were written in Greek. (no earlier copies in any other language have been found)
#2) Although writing styles are different. No one can definitely prove either way if John of the Gospels is the same person as John of the Revelations.
#3) There is zero evidence that John the Revelator was a Monk.
#4) Just because the earliest known copies of the N.T. are in Greek. Does not mean that the writers were Hellenistic Greeks. (with the possible exception of Paul who writes that he is a Roman citizen of Greek descent)
But Sunni Man,
The implication that Jews wrote the NT is that The Jews, that believed in the Christ, are still JEWS(MSPedit).
But belief in the Jesus as the Messiah is one of the theological dividing lines between Judaism and Christianity. If the authors of the NT believed that Jesus was the Messiah, then they were Christians. It is possible that they were Jews Or Hellenic or whatever before hand, but once they came to accept Jesus as their Messiah, they are then to be considered Christians.
The original followers of Jesus were all Jewish and still continued to to celebrate all of the feasts and sat in the Temple even when he was gone.
So for the first almost 100 years what we now refer to as Christianity was just another Jewish sect that still practiced Judiasm.
The term Christian wasn't even used until well after Jesus's death. Basically, after Paul changed the religion into what we now call Christianity.
And that is when the division between Judiasm and Christianity took place.
Evidence or Link to back up your statement that Revelations was written by a Hellenic monk?Revelations is an example of one of those books that made the NT cut that was written by a Hellenic monk a century or more after Christ was dead.
Thanks
What is major is your stupidity, as always.Evidence or Link to back up your statement that Revelations was written by a Hellenic monk?Revelations is an example of one of those books that made the NT cut that was written by a Hellenic monk a century or more after Christ was dead.
Thanks
Revelations was written by an exiled John who was sick and delirious. Anybody with one eye and half sense will quickly recogni e the delirium. Multi headed, horned monsters and the like aren't ordinarily placed in the soup du jour category. Talk about major bullschit!!
Paul didn't create Christianity or the Church. The Church was established by Jesus. He told peter in Matthew 16:18 "And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hades will not overcome it." Peter means rock. Jesus was telling Peter that his faith is what the Church will be built on.You are off base on that one Jillian.Jesus was a Jew.
and? the idiot o/p said "the jews" wrote the new testament. they weren't jews if they believed the messiah had come.
There were many Jewish sects during that time.
Jews who followed the Rabbi Yeshua (Jesus) were still Jewish.
And initially followed all of the Torah Laws, kept the feasts, and went to the Temple to worship.
Even the New Testament affirms this as being true.
It wasn't until after the death of Jesus that Paul came along and created a separate religion called Christianity.