Was George W. Bush For Real.....Or Just A Frigment

[Euroconservativ]

Bush passed those hideous tax cuts that only benefited the rich... 10 years later liberals warn of catastrophe if most of the tax cuts are not renewed.

Love it


Who Really Benefited From the Bush Tax Cuts?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/30/u...rden-than-in-the-80s.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Alan Hicks divides long days between the insurance business he started in the late 1970s and the barbecue restaurant he opened with his sons three years ago. He earned more than $250,000 last year and said taxes took more than 40 percent. What’s worse, in his view, is that others — the wealthy, hiding in loopholes; the poor, living on government benefits — are not paying their fair share.

“It feels like the harder we work, the more they take from us,” said Mr. Hicks, 55, as he waited for a meat truck one recent afternoon. “And it seems like there’s an awful lot of people in the United States who don’t pay any taxes.”

 

[Stephanie]

Bush passed those hideous tax cuts that only benefited the rich... 10 years later liberals warn of catastrophe if most of the tax cuts are not renewed.

Love it


Who Really Benefited From the Bush Tax Cuts?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/30/u...rden-than-in-the-80s.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Alan Hicks divides long days between the insurance business he started in the late 1970s and the barbecue restaurant he opened with his sons three years ago. He earned more than $250,000 last year and said taxes took more than 40 percent. What’s worse, in his view, is that others — the wealthy, hiding in loopholes; the poor, living on government benefits — are not paying their fair share.

“It feels like the harder we work, the more they take from us,” said Mr. Hicks, 55, as he waited for a meat truck one recent afternoon. “And it seems like there’s an awful lot of people in the United States who don’t pay any taxes.”

Hey, they are nothing if not two faced HYPROCITES..
But it was sort of sweet revenge for Bush and a burn on the Democrats and their sheep

 

[Cammmpbell]

Bush passed those hideous tax cuts that only benefited the rich... 10 years later liberals warn of catastrophe if most of the tax cuts are not renewed.

Love it


Who Really Benefited From the Bush Tax Cuts?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/30/u...rden-than-in-the-80s.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Alan Hicks divides long days between the insurance business he started in the late 1970s and the barbecue restaurant he opened with his sons three years ago. He earned more than $250,000 last year and said taxes took more than 40 percent. What’s worse, in his view, is that others — the wealthy, hiding in loopholes; the poor, living on government benefits — are not paying their fair share.

“It feels like the harder we work, the more they take from us,” said Mr. Hicks, 55, as he waited for a meat truck one recent afternoon. “And it seems like there’s an awful lot of people in the United States who don’t pay any taxes.”

Hey, they are nothing if not two faced HYPROCITES..
But it was sort of sweet revenge for Bush and a burn on the Democrats and their sheep

I've gottcher hypocrite a schwanging. Anybody who can't see what the Republicans did to the middle class of America beginning in 1982 with Reagan has their head up their ass so far they will never see daylight again....especially if they keep watching Faux and listening to Lush Rambo.

 

[Dreamy]

Without family influence Bush's inept ass would have more than likely got killed in Vietnam. Without his brother and Jeb's concubine he would have never been president. Gore got half a million more votes than he did and the fracus in Florida and the U S supreme court absolutely GAVE him the election. He assumed a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to the outyears and immediately cut taxes....twice. He started two wars 10,000 miles from home, one totally by choice and unnecessary....then he doubled the national debt.

After he left Yale the university of Texas refused his admission to law school. The reason....his grades:

And what do the doctors give as your prognosis for your long lingering BDS? Wishing you a year full of "stop living in the past" and "move along darling".

Let me help.

Give us your opinions on the CURRENT President's job performance.

 

[Harry Dresden]

I voted for Dubya in 2000 and 2004. Not because he was an awesome candidate, but because he was the lesser of two great evils. We keep choosing between lesser evils and that just gets us more and more evil choices, see.
.

cut the cord.....go 3rd Party....this "lessor" of 2 evils is a crock of shit......Evil is Evil.....and if you know both are "Evil" .....why the hell would anyone vote for them?....

Shit...the only reason the Republicans ever win is that most of the Democrats can't get time off from their Republican jobs to go vote. If the playing field is ever really leveled the Republicans will immediately become an antique in this country....and you know how they are about their money......they'll opt to save it and starve to death.

then the Democrats should create their own jobs....

and you know how they are about their money......

yea they are no different than Democrats are about theirs......and speaking of Antiques....

 

[Harry Dresden]

I'm a 78 year old male with about twice as much knowledge in my memory banks as the smartest Republican asshole I've ever met on a discussion board. 'Course I've only posted on 20-25 different ones in the last 18-20 years.

and you are an asshole.....you got on me for not using an Apostrophe but yet look how you misspelled Figment. .....just act like it never happened.... you are no different then all those other so called "Spell Nazis" we have here.....

You dumb prick! I used "frigment" on purpose. Frig You with a hinnie mule's dick!

sure you did......

 

[Harry Dresden]

I was born on a west TN dirt farm. You think animals breeding is nasty? I first remember seeing it when I was 3 or 4 years old. It's called life....it's called procreation.

whoopee
I was raised on a farm too but i don't feel the need to post pictures of animals fucking

It just seemed like the thing to do at the time. What the juveniles at this board want or expect from me rates right up there with fly shit and ashes.

thats because when we see Fly Shit and Ashes.....we see ....you.....only its more like Fly Shit and Assholes.......so now you know why....

 

[Harry Dresden]

Bush passed those hideous tax cuts that only benefited the rich... 10 years later liberals warn of catastrophe if most of the tax cuts are not renewed.

Love it


Who Really Benefited From the Bush Tax Cuts?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/30/u...rden-than-in-the-80s.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Alan Hicks divides long days between the insurance business he started in the late 1970s and the barbecue restaurant he opened with his sons three years ago. He earned more than $250,000 last year and said taxes took more than 40 percent. What’s worse, in his view, is that others — the wealthy, hiding in loopholes; the poor, living on government benefits — are not paying their fair share.

“It feels like the harder we work, the more they take from us,” said Mr. Hicks, 55, as he waited for a meat truck one recent afternoon. “And it seems like there’s an awful lot of people in the United States who don’t pay any taxes.”

Hey, they are nothing if not two faced HYPROCITES..
But it was sort of sweet revenge for Bush and a burn on the Democrats and their sheep

I've gottcher hypocrite a schwanging. Anybody who can't see what the Republicans did to the middle class of America beginning in 1982 with Reagan has their head up their ass so far they will never see daylight again....especially if they keep watching Faux and listening to Lush Rambo.

old man.....you do realize you have your head up your Ass too....right?......your post at LEAST prove it is up the Democrats Asses.....

 

[Cammmpbell]

Bush passed those hideous tax cuts that only benefited the rich... 10 years later liberals warn of catastrophe if most of the tax cuts are not renewed.

Love it


Who Really Benefited From the Bush Tax Cuts?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/30/u...rden-than-in-the-80s.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Alan Hicks divides long days between the insurance business he started in the late 1970s and the barbecue restaurant he opened with his sons three years ago. He earned more than $250,000 last year and said taxes took more than 40 percent. What’s worse, in his view, is that others — the wealthy, hiding in loopholes; the poor, living on government benefits — are not paying their fair share.

“It feels like the harder we work, the more they take from us,” said Mr. Hicks, 55, as he waited for a meat truck one recent afternoon. “And it seems like there’s an awful lot of people in the United States who don’t pay any taxes.”

You must have some kind of learning disability. have you possibly noticed the total disaster Bush left the economy in?

Bush, Bernanke and Paulson handed the banks nearly a trillion dollars. What you really need to be looking at is the fact that Bush assumed a balanced budget, surpluses projected all the way to the outyears and an unemployment rate of about 4%. Kinda different from the stock market being off 4000 points, jobs being bled at a rate of 800,000 a month, and a national debt that had doubled since Bush took over. 'Course I wouldn't want you right winger bible thumping corporation loving pricks who start wars and never serve in one to really get upset about it.

As far as how the breaks were divvied up.....When Reagan cut rates to the bone in 1982 I remember exactly what the effect was. A millionaire made enough each year to buy a new Mercedes and an ordinary stiff made enough to buy a muffler for the thing. Not only that we had to borrow money to get along back then and his new law stopped allowing interest deductions for auto loans, signature loans, etc. Just about everything except home mortgage interest and church contributions. TRICKLE DOWN didn't work. Bush41 even called it VooDoo Economics. That bull shit was never more than a way for corporations and the rich to shove it to the working man. The hell of it is they have succeeded. When somebody purposefully gives tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans while at the same time they are doubling and/or quadrupling the national debt they should be pillaried in the public square.

Here's one thing you can go ahead and get upset about. The Republican party will have to be able to carry somebody except people over 65 and White men to ever win another election. Take it to the bank.

 

[Cammmpbell]

Without family influence Bush's inept ass would have more than likely got killed in Vietnam. Without his brother and Jeb's concubine he would have never been president. Gore got half a million more votes than he did and the fracus in Florida and the U S supreme court absolutely GAVE him the election. He assumed a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to the outyears and immediately cut taxes....twice. He started two wars 10,000 miles from home, one totally by choice and unnecessary....then he doubled the national debt.

After he left Yale the university of Texas refused his admission to law school. The reason....his grades:

And what do the doctors give as your prognosis for your long lingering BDS? Wishing you a year full of "stop living in the past" and "move along darling".

Let me help.

Give us your opinions on the CURRENT President's job performance.

LMAO! Living in the past? Reagan, George Bush41 and George W. Bush should be hung by the balls for borrowing trillions of dollars from foreign banks to fund tax cuts for the wealthy. I guess you would like for people to forget it..........FORGET IT!!

 

[earlycuyler]

Without family influence Bush's inept ass would have more than likely got killed in Vietnam. Without his brother and Jeb's concubine he would have never been president. Gore got half a million more votes than he did and the fracus in Florida and the U S supreme court absolutely GAVE him the election. He assumed a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to the outyears and immediately cut taxes....twice. He started two wars 10,000 miles from home, one totally by choice and unnecessary....then he doubled the national debt.

After he left Yale the university of Texas refused his admission to law school. The reason....his grades:

^wants yet another recount of the recount. Hey joe. How was festivus this year ?

 

[AmericanFirst]

Without family influence Bush's inept ass would have more than likely got killed in Vietnam. Without his brother and Jeb's concubine he would have never been president. Gore got half a million more votes than he did and the fracus in Florida and the U S supreme court absolutely GAVE him the election. He assumed a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to the outyears and immediately cut taxes....twice. He started two wars 10,000 miles from home, one totally by choice and unnecessary....then he doubled the national debt.

After he left Yale the university of Texas refused his admission to law school. The reason....his grades:

Without commies like ayers and soros your whore obamaturd wouldn't have a chance. Idiot!!!

 

[Cammmpbell]

Without family influence Bush's inept ass would have more than likely got killed in Vietnam. Without his brother and Jeb's concubine he would have never been president. Gore got half a million more votes than he did and the fracus in Florida and the U S supreme court absolutely GAVE him the election. He assumed a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to the outyears and immediately cut taxes....twice. He started two wars 10,000 miles from home, one totally by choice and unnecessary....then he doubled the national debt.

After he left Yale the university of Texas refused his admission to law school. The reason....his grades:

Without commies like ayers and soros your whore obamaturd wouldn't have a chance. Idiot!!!

Without somebody to help your cause except White men and folks over 65 your political life is over. The church and NRA ain't gonna hack it.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Without family influence Bush's inept ass would have more than likely got killed in Vietnam. Without his brother and Jeb's concubine he would have never been president. Gore got half a million more votes than he did and the fracus in Florida and the U S supreme court absolutely GAVE him the election. He assumed a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to the outyears and immediately cut taxes....twice. He started two wars 10,000 miles from home, one totally by choice and unnecessary....then he doubled the national debt.

After he left Yale the university of Texas refused his admission to law school. The reason....his grades:

Without commies like ayers and soros your whore obamaturd wouldn't have a chance. Idiot!!!

Without somebody to help your cause except White men and folks over 65 your political life is over. The church and NRA ain't gonna hack it.

Only because socialist idiots like you want socialism in this country. Move to europe please and spare us the stink.

 

[Cammmpbell]

Without commies like ayers and soros your whore obamaturd wouldn't have a chance. Idiot!!!

Without somebody to help your cause except White men and folks over 65 your political life is over. The church and NRA ain't gonna hack it.

Only because socialist idiots like you want socialism in this country. Move to europe please and spare us the stink.

Contrary to what you gerrymandering right wing ass holes think this country doesn't belong to you. So far all you've managed to get from us is your bills paid and somebody to do your share of the fighting in some unnecessary oil war 10,000 miles from home.

 

[Euroconservativ]

Bush passed those hideous tax cuts that only benefited the rich... 10 years later liberals warn of catastrophe if most of the tax cuts are not renewed.

Love it


Who Really Benefited From the Bush Tax Cuts?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/30/u...rden-than-in-the-80s.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Alan Hicks divides long days between the insurance business he started in the late 1970s and the barbecue restaurant he opened with his sons three years ago. He earned more than $250,000 last year and said taxes took more than 40 percent. What’s worse, in his view, is that others — the wealthy, hiding in loopholes; the poor, living on government benefits — are not paying their fair share.

“It feels like the harder we work, the more they take from us,” said Mr. Hicks, 55, as he waited for a meat truck one recent afternoon. “And it seems like there’s an awful lot of people in the United States who don’t pay any taxes.”

You must have some kind of learning disability. have you possibly noticed the total disaster Bush left the economy in?

Bush, Bernanke and Paulson handed the banks nearly a trillion dollars. What you really need to be looking at is the fact that Bush assumed a balanced budget, surpluses projected all the way to the outyears and an unemployment rate of about 4%. Kinda different from the stock market being off 4000 points, jobs being bled at a rate of 800,000 a month, and a national debt that had doubled since Bush took over. 'Course I wouldn't want you right winger bible thumping corporation loving pricks who start wars and never serve in one to really get upset about it.

As far as how the breaks were divvied up.....When Reagan cut rates to the bone in 1982 I remember exactly what the effect was. A millionaire made enough each year to buy a new Mercedes and an ordinary stiff made enough to buy a muffler for the thing. Not only that we had to borrow money to get along back then and his new law stopped allowing interest deductions for auto loans, signature loans, etc. Just about everything except home mortgage interest and church contributions. TRICKLE DOWN didn't work. Bush41 even called it VooDoo Economics. That bull shit was never more than a way for corporations and the rich to shove it to the working man. The hell of it is they have succeeded. When somebody purposefully gives tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans while at the same time they are doubling and/or quadrupling the national debt they should be pillaried in the public square.

Here's one thing you can go ahead and get upset about. The Republican party will have to be able to carry somebody except people over 65 and White men to ever win another election. Take it to the bank.

Clinton's surpluses were due to the dotcom bubble economy. Bush and Bernanke created another bubble to ge out of the recession and made things worse.

Low tax rates are not the problem. Loopholes are. Reagan called for an end of "crazy" tax loopholes for the millionaire. Today's republicans support it too. Democrats say no, first let's raise taxes on families and small businesses owners (read Alan Hicks words in the NYT article again) that make $250K.

Obama: Wealthy must see higher taxes; Boehner says close tax loopholes | news10.net

Alan Hicks pays 40-50% while GE, Google and many others pay effective tax rates near zero percent. And they are proud of it:

Google's tax avoidance is called 'capitalism', says chairman Eric Schmidt - Telegraph


"Here's one thing you can go ahead and get upset about. The Republican party will have to be able to carry somebody except people over 65 and White men to ever win another election. "

According to the National Exit Poll, Romney had the best result among white women and white young people since Reagan in 1984.

 

[Euroconservativ]

Without somebody to help your cause except White men and folks over 65 your political life is over. The church and NRA ain't gonna hack it.

Who needs what?

*Age:
18-29: Obama +23
30-44: Obama +7
45-64: Romney +4
65 or over: Romney +12

white 18-29: Romney +7
white 30-44: Romney +21
white 45-64: Romney +23
white 65 or over: Romney +22

black 18-29: Obama +83
black 30-44: Obama +89
black 45-64: Obama +86
black 65 or over: Obama +87


* Family income:
Under $30,000: Obama +28
$30,000-49,999: Obama +15
$50,000-100,000: Romney +6
$100,000-200,000: Romney +10
$200,000-250,000: Romney +5
$250,000 or more: Romney +13

Latinos over $50,000: 40% voted for Romney (versus 27% nationwide)

 

[Cammmpbell]

Bush passed those hideous tax cuts that only benefited the rich... 10 years later liberals warn of catastrophe if most of the tax cuts are not renewed.

Love it


Who Really Benefited From the Bush Tax Cuts?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/30/u...rden-than-in-the-80s.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Alan Hicks divides long days between the insurance business he started in the late 1970s and the barbecue restaurant he opened with his sons three years ago. He earned more than $250,000 last year and said taxes took more than 40 percent. What’s worse, in his view, is that others — the wealthy, hiding in loopholes; the poor, living on government benefits — are not paying their fair share.

“It feels like the harder we work, the more they take from us,” said Mr. Hicks, 55, as he waited for a meat truck one recent afternoon. “And it seems like there’s an awful lot of people in the United States who don’t pay any taxes.”

You must have some kind of learning disability. have you possibly noticed the total disaster Bush left the economy in?

Bush, Bernanke and Paulson handed the banks nearly a trillion dollars. What you really need to be looking at is the fact that Bush assumed a balanced budget, surpluses projected all the way to the outyears and an unemployment rate of about 4%. Kinda different from the stock market being off 4000 points, jobs being bled at a rate of 800,000 a month, and a national debt that had doubled since Bush took over. 'Course I wouldn't want you right winger bible thumping corporation loving pricks who start wars and never serve in one to really get upset about it.

As far as how the breaks were divvied up.....When Reagan cut rates to the bone in 1982 I remember exactly what the effect was. A millionaire made enough each year to buy a new Mercedes and an ordinary stiff made enough to buy a muffler for the thing. Not only that we had to borrow money to get along back then and his new law stopped allowing interest deductions for auto loans, signature loans, etc. Just about everything except home mortgage interest and church contributions. TRICKLE DOWN didn't work. Bush41 even called it VooDoo Economics. That bull shit was never more than a way for corporations and the rich to shove it to the working man. The hell of it is they have succeeded. When somebody purposefully gives tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans while at the same time they are doubling and/or quadrupling the national debt they should be pillaried in the public square.

Here's one thing you can go ahead and get upset about. The Republican party will have to be able to carry somebody except people over 65 and White men to ever win another election. Take it to the bank.

Clinton's surpluses were due to the dotcom bubble economy. Bush and Bernanke created another bubble to ge out of the recession and made things worse.

Low tax rates are not the problem. Loopholes are. Reagan called for an end of "crazy" tax loopholes for the millionaire. Today's republicans support it too. Democrats say no, first let's raise taxes on families and small businesses owners (read Alan Hicks words in the NYT article again) that make $250K.

Obama: Wealthy must see higher taxes; Boehner says close tax loopholes | news10.net

Alan Hicks pays 40-50% while GE, Google and many others pay effective tax rates near zero percent. And they are proud of it:

Google's tax avoidance is called 'capitalism', says chairman Eric Schmidt - Telegraph


"Here's one thing you can go ahead and get upset about. The Republican party will have to be able to carry somebody except people over 65 and White men to ever win another election. "

According to the National Exit Poll, Romney had the best result among white women and white young people since Reagan in 1984.

You're quite frankly full of shit. Neither party has ever cut spending a dime but under Democrats they adjusted the rates high enough to pay the bills. Before Reagan there was no such problem. You need to stop and smell the roses. If you'll take a few minutes here's your answers...and anybody else who only gets their shit from Lush Rambo and Faux News. You should talk to your congress...they're the reason the rates are as low as they are right now. When Reagan did his big tax cutting the rates went down to a rate just barely higher than what they were just before Hoover and the banks ruined the economy:

Total U S Debt


09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accomodate Tens of Trillions)

09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32

09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32

09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38(Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)

09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

 

[Cammmpbell]

Without somebody to help your cause except White men and folks over 65 your political life is over. The church and NRA ain't gonna hack it.

Who needs what?

*Age:
18-29: Obama +23
30-44: Obama +7
45-64: Romney +4
65 or over: Romney +12

white 18-29: Romney +7
white 30-44: Romney +21
white 45-64: Romney +23
white 65 or over: Romney +22

black 18-29: Obama +83
black 30-44: Obama +89
black 45-64: Obama +86
black 65 or over: Obama +87


* Family income:
Under $30,000: Obama +28
$30,000-49,999: Obama +15
$50,000-100,000: Romney +6
$100,000-200,000: Romney +10
$200,000-250,000: Romney +5
$250,000 or more: Romney +13

Latinos over $50,000: 40% voted for Romney (versus 27% nationwide)

A bunch of gooble-de-gook

Over 90% of Blacks voted for Obama
Over 70% of Latinos voted for Obama
Over half of women voted for Obama
Nearly all Gays and Lesbians voted for Obama
Over half of young people voted for Obama

The only two major demographics Romulus won was folks over 65 and White men

I don't stutter

 

[Harry Dresden]

Without somebody to help your cause except White men and folks over 65 your political life is over. The church and NRA ain't gonna hack it.

Who needs what?

*Age:
18-29: Obama +23
30-44: Obama +7
45-64: Romney +4
65 or over: Romney +12

white 18-29: Romney +7
white 30-44: Romney +21
white 45-64: Romney +23
white 65 or over: Romney +22

black 18-29: Obama +83
black 30-44: Obama +89
black 45-64: Obama +86
black 65 or over: Obama +87


* Family income:
Under $30,000: Obama +28
$30,000-49,999: Obama +15
$50,000-100,000: Romney +6
$100,000-200,000: Romney +10
$200,000-250,000: Romney +5
$250,000 or more: Romney +13

Latinos over $50,000: 40% voted for Romney (versus 27% nationwide)

A bunch of gooble-de-gook

Over 90% of Blacks voted for Obama
Over 70% of Latinos voted for Obama
Over half of women voted for Obama
Nearly all Gays and Lesbians voted for Obama
Over half of young people voted for Obama

The only two major demographics Romulus won was folks over 65 and White men

I don't stutter

all that and he only won by a few million votes......wow.....