CDZ Was America Great When?

[Tommy Tainant]

they didn't have the wheel/iron plows/horses/farm animals for advanced farming like the whites
what are you talking about??
they didn't have the transportation/roads/etc for effective farming as the whites

"Like the WHITES" LoL Bla La - Kindly study Native American HiSTORY

Individuals who use wheeled transportation as a benchmark for measuring civilization fail to take the natural environment into account. Suitable draft animals did not exist in the pre-contact Americas. [1] The two largest animals -- bison and llamas -- aren't readily domesticated to pull carts or chariots.

Terrain was another factor that discouraged the development of wheeled transportation in the Americas. European new to North America often found their wheeled wagons inappropriate for the land they were trying to cross. Frequently they traded this clumsy transport for American Indian forms of transportation – the canoe, snowshoes and toboggans. Indigenous people throughout the Americas used runners to deliver communications. The Inca built a road system that included suspension bridges for their runners.

Failing to consider the environmental context in which American Indian science arose is not only superficial scholarship -- it is racist scholarship.

Note:

1. Horses, though extant in parts of North America, may well not have been abundant and widespread enough for native human populations to widely opt to domesticate them.
   
   The genus Equus, which includes modern horses, zebras, and asses, is the only surviving genus in a once diverse family of horses that included 27 genera. The precise date of origin for the genus Equus is unknown, but evidence documents the dispersal of Equus from North America to Eurasia approximately 2–3 million years ago and a possible origin at about 3.4–3.9 million years ago.
   
   Following this original emigration, several extinctions occurred in North America, with additional migrations to Asia (presumably across the Bering Land Bridge), and return migrations back to North America, over time. The last North American extinction probably occurred between 13,000 and 11,000 years ago (Fazio 1995), although more recent extinctions for horses have been suggested. Dr. Ross MacPhee, Curator of Mammalogy at the American Museum of Natural History, and colleagues, have dated the existence of woolly mammoths and horses in North America to as recent as 7,600 years ago. Had it not been for previous westward migration, over the 2 Bering Land Bridge, into northwestern Russia (Siberia) and Asia, the horse would have faced complete extinction. However, Equus survived and spread to all continents of the globe, except Australia and Antarctica. (Source)
   
   There is also the matter that Native American culture and religion may not have condoned domestication. To the extent that the cultural/religious mores played a role, they must be considered independently of individual or ethnic intellect. To wit, observers some five-hundred years from now may very well look at our and preceding eras and construe that the actions we have undertaken due to our theistically driven cultural mores distinguish us as less intelligent than are other coexistent cultures that have no such theological foundings and constraints on the nature and extent of activity they undertake or don't undertake.

the whites were making big gun ships/high tech wagons/high tech trains/etc
the NAs were living in the stone age

Life is so much better now that the white man is here.
No corruption, crime, drug abuse, murder, rape, wars, hatred.
Oh wait. We have all of that.
Hope your happy.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

When you steal a country and decimate the local population you need something to justify that. So the locals were stupid, violent or both.
In reality the locals lived their lives by their own customs and not by western european customs. Its the same in Africa and Australia.

 

[toobfreak]

Was America great when America was 100% Native American?

It wasn’t America then.

What was it?

It was a land of warring tribes.

It's STILL a land of warring tribes. Today we have the NBA, NHL, MLB, NFL and the phony tribes of the DNC and the RNC..

The ol' Chief says it best:

 

[harmonica]

they didn't have the wheel/iron plows/horses/farm animals for advanced farming like the whites
what are you talking about??
they didn't have the transportation/roads/etc for effective farming as the whites

"Like the WHITES" LoL Bla La - Kindly study Native American HiSTORY

Individuals who use wheeled transportation as a benchmark for measuring civilization fail to take the natural environment into account. Suitable draft animals did not exist in the pre-contact Americas. [1] The two largest animals -- bison and llamas -- aren't readily domesticated to pull carts or chariots.

Terrain was another factor that discouraged the development of wheeled transportation in the Americas. European new to North America often found their wheeled wagons inappropriate for the land they were trying to cross. Frequently they traded this clumsy transport for American Indian forms of transportation – the canoe, snowshoes and toboggans. Indigenous people throughout the Americas used runners to deliver communications. The Inca built a road system that included suspension bridges for their runners.

Failing to consider the environmental context in which American Indian science arose is not only superficial scholarship -- it is racist scholarship.

Note:

1. Horses, though extant in parts of North America, may well not have been abundant and widespread enough for native human populations to widely opt to domesticate them.
   
   The genus Equus, which includes modern horses, zebras, and asses, is the only surviving genus in a once diverse family of horses that included 27 genera. The precise date of origin for the genus Equus is unknown, but evidence documents the dispersal of Equus from North America to Eurasia approximately 2–3 million years ago and a possible origin at about 3.4–3.9 million years ago.
   
   Following this original emigration, several extinctions occurred in North America, with additional migrations to Asia (presumably across the Bering Land Bridge), and return migrations back to North America, over time. The last North American extinction probably occurred between 13,000 and 11,000 years ago (Fazio 1995), although more recent extinctions for horses have been suggested. Dr. Ross MacPhee, Curator of Mammalogy at the American Museum of Natural History, and colleagues, have dated the existence of woolly mammoths and horses in North America to as recent as 7,600 years ago. Had it not been for previous westward migration, over the 2 Bering Land Bridge, into northwestern Russia (Siberia) and Asia, the horse would have faced complete extinction. However, Equus survived and spread to all continents of the globe, except Australia and Antarctica. (Source)
   
   There is also the matter that Native American culture and religion may not have condoned domestication. To the extent that the cultural/religious mores played a role, they must be considered independently of individual or ethnic intellect. To wit, observers some five-hundred years from now may very well look at our and preceding eras and construe that the actions we have undertaken due to our theistically driven cultural mores distinguish us as less intelligent than are other coexistent cultures that have no such theological foundings and constraints on the nature and extent of activity they undertake or don't undertake.

the whites were making big gun ships/high tech wagons/high tech trains/etc
the NAs were living in the stone age

Life is so much better now that the white man is here.
No corruption, crime, drug abuse, murder, rape, wars, hatred.
Oh wait. We have all of that.
Hope your happy.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

When you steal a country and decimate the local population you need something to justify that. So the locals were stupid, violent or both.
In reality the locals lived their lives by their own customs and not by western european customs. Its the same in Africa and Australia.

blacks in Africa murdered/warred on/raped/slaughtered/etc just like the NAs and whites did
the NAs decimated other tribes as did the blacks in Africa

but, that's ok. because they are all on the same continent !! how BRILLIANT
genocide/murder/rape--ok if you are on the same continent !!

 

[harmonica]

they didn't have the wheel/iron plows/horses/farm animals for advanced farming like the whites
what are you talking about??
they didn't have the transportation/roads/etc for effective farming as the whites

"Like the WHITES" LoL Bla La - Kindly study Native American HiSTORY

Individuals who use wheeled transportation as a benchmark for measuring civilization fail to take the natural environment into account. Suitable draft animals did not exist in the pre-contact Americas. [1] The two largest animals -- bison and llamas -- aren't readily domesticated to pull carts or chariots.

Terrain was another factor that discouraged the development of wheeled transportation in the Americas. European new to North America often found their wheeled wagons inappropriate for the land they were trying to cross. Frequently they traded this clumsy transport for American Indian forms of transportation – the canoe, snowshoes and toboggans. Indigenous people throughout the Americas used runners to deliver communications. The Inca built a road system that included suspension bridges for their runners.

Failing to consider the environmental context in which American Indian science arose is not only superficial scholarship -- it is racist scholarship.

Note:

1. Horses, though extant in parts of North America, may well not have been abundant and widespread enough for native human populations to widely opt to domesticate them.
   
   The genus Equus, which includes modern horses, zebras, and asses, is the only surviving genus in a once diverse family of horses that included 27 genera. The precise date of origin for the genus Equus is unknown, but evidence documents the dispersal of Equus from North America to Eurasia approximately 2–3 million years ago and a possible origin at about 3.4–3.9 million years ago.
   
   Following this original emigration, several extinctions occurred in North America, with additional migrations to Asia (presumably across the Bering Land Bridge), and return migrations back to North America, over time. The last North American extinction probably occurred between 13,000 and 11,000 years ago (Fazio 1995), although more recent extinctions for horses have been suggested. Dr. Ross MacPhee, Curator of Mammalogy at the American Museum of Natural History, and colleagues, have dated the existence of woolly mammoths and horses in North America to as recent as 7,600 years ago. Had it not been for previous westward migration, over the 2 Bering Land Bridge, into northwestern Russia (Siberia) and Asia, the horse would have faced complete extinction. However, Equus survived and spread to all continents of the globe, except Australia and Antarctica. (Source)
   
   There is also the matter that Native American culture and religion may not have condoned domestication. To the extent that the cultural/religious mores played a role, they must be considered independently of individual or ethnic intellect. To wit, observers some five-hundred years from now may very well look at our and preceding eras and construe that the actions we have undertaken due to our theistically driven cultural mores distinguish us as less intelligent than are other coexistent cultures that have no such theological foundings and constraints on the nature and extent of activity they undertake or don't undertake.

the whites were making big gun ships/high tech wagons/high tech trains/etc
the NAs were living in the stone age

Life is so much better now that the white man is here.
No corruption, crime, drug abuse, murder, rape, wars, hatred.
Oh wait. We have all of that.
Hope your happy.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

When you steal a country and decimate the local population you need something to justify that. So the locals were stupid, violent or both.
In reality the locals lived their lives by their own customs and not by western european customs. Its the same in Africa and Australia.

as a matter of fact I'm reading at this very moment of Shaka Zulu [ not the first time though ]
perhaps you might want to learn a little African history

Not losing any time in testing his military knowledge in real life, Shaka went after conquering the first and then more of his neighboring tribes.

However, things got out of control as soon as his mother, Nandi, passed away in 1827. Initially, he became angry after judging that some people had not expressed sufficient grief at her mourning ceremonies. Shaka rage veered into madness, and he killed hundreds of Zulu. Supposedly, he also ordered all women carrying babies as well as their spouses be put to death.

etc etc etc

babies also!! because-------------------------they didn't cry at his mom's funeral !!!???!!!!!!!!!
yes--the Africans are so much better than those evil whites

 

[harmonica]

they didn't have the wheel/iron plows/horses/farm animals for advanced farming like the whites
what are you talking about??
they didn't have the transportation/roads/etc for effective farming as the whites

"Like the WHITES" LoL Bla La - Kindly study Native American HiSTORY

Individuals who use wheeled transportation as a benchmark for measuring civilization fail to take the natural environment into account. Suitable draft animals did not exist in the pre-contact Americas. [1] The two largest animals -- bison and llamas -- aren't readily domesticated to pull carts or chariots.

Terrain was another factor that discouraged the development of wheeled transportation in the Americas. European new to North America often found their wheeled wagons inappropriate for the land they were trying to cross. Frequently they traded this clumsy transport for American Indian forms of transportation – the canoe, snowshoes and toboggans. Indigenous people throughout the Americas used runners to deliver communications. The Inca built a road system that included suspension bridges for their runners.

Failing to consider the environmental context in which American Indian science arose is not only superficial scholarship -- it is racist scholarship.

Note:

1. Horses, though extant in parts of North America, may well not have been abundant and widespread enough for native human populations to widely opt to domesticate them.
   
   The genus Equus, which includes modern horses, zebras, and asses, is the only surviving genus in a once diverse family of horses that included 27 genera. The precise date of origin for the genus Equus is unknown, but evidence documents the dispersal of Equus from North America to Eurasia approximately 2–3 million years ago and a possible origin at about 3.4–3.9 million years ago.
   
   Following this original emigration, several extinctions occurred in North America, with additional migrations to Asia (presumably across the Bering Land Bridge), and return migrations back to North America, over time. The last North American extinction probably occurred between 13,000 and 11,000 years ago (Fazio 1995), although more recent extinctions for horses have been suggested. Dr. Ross MacPhee, Curator of Mammalogy at the American Museum of Natural History, and colleagues, have dated the existence of woolly mammoths and horses in North America to as recent as 7,600 years ago. Had it not been for previous westward migration, over the 2 Bering Land Bridge, into northwestern Russia (Siberia) and Asia, the horse would have faced complete extinction. However, Equus survived and spread to all continents of the globe, except Australia and Antarctica. (Source)
   
   There is also the matter that Native American culture and religion may not have condoned domestication. To the extent that the cultural/religious mores played a role, they must be considered independently of individual or ethnic intellect. To wit, observers some five-hundred years from now may very well look at our and preceding eras and construe that the actions we have undertaken due to our theistically driven cultural mores distinguish us as less intelligent than are other coexistent cultures that have no such theological foundings and constraints on the nature and extent of activity they undertake or don't undertake.

the whites were making big gun ships/high tech wagons/high tech trains/etc
the NAs were living in the stone age

Life is so much better now that the white man is here.
No corruption, crime, drug abuse, murder, rape, wars, hatred.
Oh wait. We have all of that.
Hope your happy.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

When you steal a country and decimate the local population you need something to justify that. So the locals were stupid, violent or both.
In reality the locals lived their lives by their own customs and not by western european customs. Its the same in Africa and Australia.

Military History magazine Jan 2018:
the African chief Mtetwa '''was willing to let rival tribes submit peacefully'' [ still they are subjugating them ],, Shaka Zula wanted to crush the enemy--so there would be no '' option but subservience''' !!!!!!

how nice of the Africans----o--but that's ok--they are on the same continent !! that makes it ok !!

 

[Tommy Tainant]

"Like the WHITES" LoL Bla La - Kindly study Native American HiSTORY

Individuals who use wheeled transportation as a benchmark for measuring civilization fail to take the natural environment into account. Suitable draft animals did not exist in the pre-contact Americas. [1] The two largest animals -- bison and llamas -- aren't readily domesticated to pull carts or chariots.

Terrain was another factor that discouraged the development of wheeled transportation in the Americas. European new to North America often found their wheeled wagons inappropriate for the land they were trying to cross. Frequently they traded this clumsy transport for American Indian forms of transportation – the canoe, snowshoes and toboggans. Indigenous people throughout the Americas used runners to deliver communications. The Inca built a road system that included suspension bridges for their runners.

Failing to consider the environmental context in which American Indian science arose is not only superficial scholarship -- it is racist scholarship.

Note:

1. Horses, though extant in parts of North America, may well not have been abundant and widespread enough for native human populations to widely opt to domesticate them.
   
   The genus Equus, which includes modern horses, zebras, and asses, is the only surviving genus in a once diverse family of horses that included 27 genera. The precise date of origin for the genus Equus is unknown, but evidence documents the dispersal of Equus from North America to Eurasia approximately 2–3 million years ago and a possible origin at about 3.4–3.9 million years ago.
   
   Following this original emigration, several extinctions occurred in North America, with additional migrations to Asia (presumably across the Bering Land Bridge), and return migrations back to North America, over time. The last North American extinction probably occurred between 13,000 and 11,000 years ago (Fazio 1995), although more recent extinctions for horses have been suggested. Dr. Ross MacPhee, Curator of Mammalogy at the American Museum of Natural History, and colleagues, have dated the existence of woolly mammoths and horses in North America to as recent as 7,600 years ago. Had it not been for previous westward migration, over the 2 Bering Land Bridge, into northwestern Russia (Siberia) and Asia, the horse would have faced complete extinction. However, Equus survived and spread to all continents of the globe, except Australia and Antarctica. (Source)
   
   There is also the matter that Native American culture and religion may not have condoned domestication. To the extent that the cultural/religious mores played a role, they must be considered independently of individual or ethnic intellect. To wit, observers some five-hundred years from now may very well look at our and preceding eras and construe that the actions we have undertaken due to our theistically driven cultural mores distinguish us as less intelligent than are other coexistent cultures that have no such theological foundings and constraints on the nature and extent of activity they undertake or don't undertake.

the whites were making big gun ships/high tech wagons/high tech trains/etc
the NAs were living in the stone age

Life is so much better now that the white man is here.
No corruption, crime, drug abuse, murder, rape, wars, hatred.
Oh wait. We have all of that.
Hope your happy.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

When you steal a country and decimate the local population you need something to justify that. So the locals were stupid, violent or both.
In reality the locals lived their lives by their own customs and not by western european customs. Its the same in Africa and Australia.

blacks in Africa murdered/warred on/raped/slaughtered/etc just like the NAs and whites did
the NAs decimated other tribes as did the blacks in Africa

but, that's ok. because they are all on the same continent !! how BRILLIANT
genocide/murder/rape--ok if you are on the same continent !!

So you take pride that the white people were more effective at killing ?

 

[harmonica]

Individuals who use wheeled transportation as a benchmark for measuring civilization fail to take the natural environment into account. Suitable draft animals did not exist in the pre-contact Americas. [1] The two largest animals -- bison and llamas -- aren't readily domesticated to pull carts or chariots.

Terrain was another factor that discouraged the development of wheeled transportation in the Americas. European new to North America often found their wheeled wagons inappropriate for the land they were trying to cross. Frequently they traded this clumsy transport for American Indian forms of transportation – the canoe, snowshoes and toboggans. Indigenous people throughout the Americas used runners to deliver communications. The Inca built a road system that included suspension bridges for their runners.

Failing to consider the environmental context in which American Indian science arose is not only superficial scholarship -- it is racist scholarship.

Note:

1. Horses, though extant in parts of North America, may well not have been abundant and widespread enough for native human populations to widely opt to domesticate them.
   
   The genus Equus, which includes modern horses, zebras, and asses, is the only surviving genus in a once diverse family of horses that included 27 genera. The precise date of origin for the genus Equus is unknown, but evidence documents the dispersal of Equus from North America to Eurasia approximately 2–3 million years ago and a possible origin at about 3.4–3.9 million years ago.
   
   Following this original emigration, several extinctions occurred in North America, with additional migrations to Asia (presumably across the Bering Land Bridge), and return migrations back to North America, over time. The last North American extinction probably occurred between 13,000 and 11,000 years ago (Fazio 1995), although more recent extinctions for horses have been suggested. Dr. Ross MacPhee, Curator of Mammalogy at the American Museum of Natural History, and colleagues, have dated the existence of woolly mammoths and horses in North America to as recent as 7,600 years ago. Had it not been for previous westward migration, over the 2 Bering Land Bridge, into northwestern Russia (Siberia) and Asia, the horse would have faced complete extinction. However, Equus survived and spread to all continents of the globe, except Australia and Antarctica. (Source)
   
   There is also the matter that Native American culture and religion may not have condoned domestication. To the extent that the cultural/religious mores played a role, they must be considered independently of individual or ethnic intellect. To wit, observers some five-hundred years from now may very well look at our and preceding eras and construe that the actions we have undertaken due to our theistically driven cultural mores distinguish us as less intelligent than are other coexistent cultures that have no such theological foundings and constraints on the nature and extent of activity they undertake or don't undertake.

the whites were making big gun ships/high tech wagons/high tech trains/etc
the NAs were living in the stone age

Life is so much better now that the white man is here.
No corruption, crime, drug abuse, murder, rape, wars, hatred.
Oh wait. We have all of that.
Hope your happy.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

When you steal a country and decimate the local population you need something to justify that. So the locals were stupid, violent or both.
In reality the locals lived their lives by their own customs and not by western european customs. Its the same in Africa and Australia.

blacks in Africa murdered/warred on/raped/slaughtered/etc just like the NAs and whites did
the NAs decimated other tribes as did the blacks in Africa

but, that's ok. because they are all on the same continent !! how BRILLIANT
genocide/murder/rape--ok if you are on the same continent !!

So you take pride that the white people were more effective at killing ?

if you want to talk about effective killing
sure, the Germans were more effective/''better'' at killing the Jews/etc
...but, because Hutus were not--more Hutus--with medieval weapons had to directly participate in the Rwandan genocide than Germans did in the Holocaust
Holocaust about 6 million 1939-1945
Rwanda minimum 500,000 in 3 months
--do the math
in Rwanda more were killed per time --with medieval weapons !!!!

whites had superior technology---you bring some ''pride'' crap up--why?? when it was not even in the thread?
your pre-conceived-obsession with whites being the only EVlL race -isn't it??
..

 

[Tommy Tainant]

the whites were making big gun ships/high tech wagons/high tech trains/etc
the NAs were living in the stone age

Life is so much better now that the white man is here.
No corruption, crime, drug abuse, murder, rape, wars, hatred.
Oh wait. We have all of that.
Hope your happy.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

When you steal a country and decimate the local population you need something to justify that. So the locals were stupid, violent or both.
In reality the locals lived their lives by their own customs and not by western european customs. Its the same in Africa and Australia.

blacks in Africa murdered/warred on/raped/slaughtered/etc just like the NAs and whites did
the NAs decimated other tribes as did the blacks in Africa

but, that's ok. because they are all on the same continent !! how BRILLIANT
genocide/murder/rape--ok if you are on the same continent !!

So you take pride that the white people were more effective at killing ?

if you want to talk about effective killing
sure, the Germans were more effective/''better'' at killing the Jews/etc
...but, because Hutus were not--more Hutus--with medieval weapons had to directly participate in the Rwandan genocide than Germans did in the Holocaust
Holocaust about 6 million 1939-1945
Rwanda minimum 500,000 in 3 months
--do the math
in Rwanda more were killed per time --with medieval weapons !!!!

whites had superior technology---you bring some ''pride'' crap up--why?? when it was not even in the thread?
your pre-conceived-obsession with whites being the only EVlL race -isn't it??
..

Well you seem to take pride in denigrating a way of life that had survived for centuries. Why is that ?

 

[harmonica]

Life is so much better now that the white man is here.
No corruption, crime, drug abuse, murder, rape, wars, hatred.
Oh wait. We have all of that.
Hope your happy.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

When you steal a country and decimate the local population you need something to justify that. So the locals were stupid, violent or both.
In reality the locals lived their lives by their own customs and not by western european customs. Its the same in Africa and Australia.

blacks in Africa murdered/warred on/raped/slaughtered/etc just like the NAs and whites did
the NAs decimated other tribes as did the blacks in Africa

but, that's ok. because they are all on the same continent !! how BRILLIANT
genocide/murder/rape--ok if you are on the same continent !!

So you take pride that the white people were more effective at killing ?

if you want to talk about effective killing
sure, the Germans were more effective/''better'' at killing the Jews/etc
...but, because Hutus were not--more Hutus--with medieval weapons had to directly participate in the Rwandan genocide than Germans did in the Holocaust
Holocaust about 6 million 1939-1945
Rwanda minimum 500,000 in 3 months
--do the math
in Rwanda more were killed per time --with medieval weapons !!!!

whites had superior technology---you bring some ''pride'' crap up--why?? when it was not even in the thread?
your pre-conceived-obsession with whites being the only EVlL race -isn't it??
..

Well you seem to take pride in denigrating a way of life that had survived for centuries. Why is that ?

Billy Boom, and all the white haters---
well--according to you, and others, the nazis are not that bad after all--since they ONLY murdered people on the same continent--
the nazis mostly murdered other whites--same race --so--according to your reasoning-- that's not as bad as what the whites did to the NAs !!!!
BRILLIANT !!!!!!!!!!!!
this should have it's own thread

same with the Hutus BUTCHERING to death 500, 000!!!!
I'm sure they are relieved to know what they did was not as bad as what the whites did to the NAs--according to your reasoning !!!!
they only murdered 500,000 in 3 months--some HACKED to death---but since they are the same race--AND-it wasn't 5 billion dead---it was ok.....that's not as bad as what the whites did

those whites sure are evil

 

[harmonica]

the whites were making big gun ships/high tech wagons/high tech trains/etc
the NAs were living in the stone age

Life is so much better now that the white man is here.
No corruption, crime, drug abuse, murder, rape, wars, hatred.
Oh wait. We have all of that.
Hope your happy.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

are you saying the NAs were inhuman--they never did any of that??

Of all the North American Indian tribes, the seventeenth-century Iroquois are the most renowned for their cruelty towards other human beings. Scholars know that they ruthlessly tortured war prisoners and that they were cannibals;

the Iroquois were not alone in these practices

David Scheimann

.....the NAs raped/murdered/hated/etc .......
what are trying to say??
the whites had the superior technology/etc ..fact...fact ...

Do you honestly believe that when we got here and screwed over the natives we were technologically more advanced? What - just because we had guns?
Believe it was some timely sarcasm directed at those who believe the white man is somehow more civilized.
We ain't, and prove it on a daily basis

we were not more advanced??
big gun ships/more advanced metal-iron applications/horses/firearms/etc
it's undeniable--obvious....you must be trolling

timely sarcasm?? that just means he thinks I MUST be racist/hater/etc
it was a reply to my post
I never said anything about the whites being more civilized---I said advanced technology

just like the blacks --EVERY white is a RACIST

no--YOU/etc have it wrong !! as I've stated before---most people/MSM/modern Hollywood/etc make out the WHITES as being the ONLY ''uncivilized''/racist race
it is the WHITES who are labeled and castigated as the ONLY evil race
this is more than obvious in the MSM

Yep.View attachment 173532

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

blacks are more violent per capita than the whites
the numbers prove this--do I really need to post the statistics --for the hundredth time on USMB?

 

[Hellbilly]

Life is so much better now that the white man is here.
No corruption, crime, drug abuse, murder, rape, wars, hatred.
Oh wait. We have all of that.
Hope your happy.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

are you saying the NAs were inhuman--they never did any of that??

Of all the North American Indian tribes, the seventeenth-century Iroquois are the most renowned for their cruelty towards other human beings. Scholars know that they ruthlessly tortured war prisoners and that they were cannibals;

the Iroquois were not alone in these practices

David Scheimann

.....the NAs raped/murdered/hated/etc .......
what are trying to say??
the whites had the superior technology/etc ..fact...fact ...

Do you honestly believe that when we got here and screwed over the natives we were technologically more advanced? What - just because we had guns?
Believe it was some timely sarcasm directed at those who believe the white man is somehow more civilized.
We ain't, and prove it on a daily basis

we were not more advanced??
big gun ships/more advanced metal-iron applications/horses/firearms/etc
it's undeniable--obvious....you must be trolling

timely sarcasm?? that just means he thinks I MUST be racist/hater/etc
it was a reply to my post
I never said anything about the whites being more civilized---I said advanced technology

just like the blacks --EVERY white is a RACIST

no--YOU/etc have it wrong !! as I've stated before---most people/MSM/modern Hollywood/etc make out the WHITES as being the ONLY ''uncivilized''/racist race
it is the WHITES who are labeled and castigated as the ONLY evil race
this is more than obvious in the MSM

Yep.View attachment 173532

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

blacks are more violent per capita than the whites
the numbers prove this--do I really need to post the statistics --for the hundredth time on USMB?

Why not? Post em. You post the same stuff over and over anyway.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

 

[HenryBHough]

That horse has left the barn. But I rather think native Americans would show more resolve were they to get a do-over just now.

 

[harmonica]

are you saying the NAs were inhuman--they never did any of that??
David Scheimann

.....the NAs raped/murdered/hated/etc .......
what are trying to say??
the whites had the superior technology/etc ..fact...fact ...

Do you honestly believe that when we got here and screwed over the natives we were technologically more advanced? What - just because we had guns?
Believe it was some timely sarcasm directed at those who believe the white man is somehow more civilized.
We ain't, and prove it on a daily basis

we were not more advanced??
big gun ships/more advanced metal-iron applications/horses/firearms/etc
it's undeniable--obvious....you must be trolling

timely sarcasm?? that just means he thinks I MUST be racist/hater/etc
it was a reply to my post
I never said anything about the whites being more civilized---I said advanced technology

just like the blacks --EVERY white is a RACIST

no--YOU/etc have it wrong !! as I've stated before---most people/MSM/modern Hollywood/etc make out the WHITES as being the ONLY ''uncivilized''/racist race
it is the WHITES who are labeled and castigated as the ONLY evil race
this is more than obvious in the MSM

Yep.View attachment 173532

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

blacks are more violent per capita than the whites
the numbers prove this--do I really need to post the statistics --for the hundredth time on USMB?

Why not? Post em. You post the same stuff over and over anyway.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

so you agree that the blacks are more violent??

 

[monkrules]

are you blind?
the NAs invaded/attacked/decimated/displaced/eliminated/other tribes
they didn't have the technology/etc to travel/etc across the globe

they did the SAME evil as whites--just not on the greater scale--because they did not have the technology/superiority

These fucking idiots are always trying to say Africans or NAs were little angels who never would do anything vicious. Delusional fucking liars.

In America (what is now America), the tribes seem always to have been at war with one another.

In Africa the animals butcher each other with machetes whenever they get a hair up their stinking asses. Before that they were fucking eating each other.

So all these people are angels. Give me a fucking break. Imbeciles.

 

[Hellbilly]

Do you honestly believe that when we got here and screwed over the natives we were technologically more advanced? What - just because we had guns?
Believe it was some timely sarcasm directed at those who believe the white man is somehow more civilized.
We ain't, and prove it on a daily basis

we were not more advanced??
big gun ships/more advanced metal-iron applications/horses/firearms/etc
it's undeniable--obvious....you must be trolling

timely sarcasm?? that just means he thinks I MUST be racist/hater/etc
it was a reply to my post
I never said anything about the whites being more civilized---I said advanced technology

just like the blacks --EVERY white is a RACIST

no--YOU/etc have it wrong !! as I've stated before---most people/MSM/modern Hollywood/etc make out the WHITES as being the ONLY ''uncivilized''/racist race
it is the WHITES who are labeled and castigated as the ONLY evil race
this is more than obvious in the MSM

Yep.View attachment 173532

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

blacks are more violent per capita than the whites
the numbers prove this--do I really need to post the statistics --for the hundredth time on USMB?

Why not? Post em. You post the same stuff over and over anyway.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

so you agree that the blacks are more violent??

I would agree that you make the same posts. Over and over and over.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

 

[harmonica]

we were not more advanced??
big gun ships/more advanced metal-iron applications/horses/firearms/etc
it's undeniable--obvious....you must be trolling

timely sarcasm?? that just means he thinks I MUST be racist/hater/etc
it was a reply to my post
I never said anything about the whites being more civilized---I said advanced technology

just like the blacks --EVERY white is a RACIST

no--YOU/etc have it wrong !! as I've stated before---most people/MSM/modern Hollywood/etc make out the WHITES as being the ONLY ''uncivilized''/racist race
it is the WHITES who are labeled and castigated as the ONLY evil race
this is more than obvious in the MSM

Yep.View attachment 173532

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

blacks are more violent per capita than the whites
the numbers prove this--do I really need to post the statistics --for the hundredth time on USMB?

Why not? Post em. You post the same stuff over and over anyway.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

so you agree that the blacks are more violent??

I would agree that you make the same posts. Over and over and over.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

and you abhor statistical facts and whites

 

[harmonica]

are you blind?
the NAs invaded/attacked/decimated/displaced/eliminated/other tribes
they didn't have the technology/etc to travel/etc across the globe

they did the SAME evil as whites--just not on the greater scale--because they did not have the technology/superiority

These fucking idiots are always trying to say Africans or NAs were little angels who never would do anything vicious. Delusional fucking liars.

In America, the tribes seem always to have been at war with one another.

In Africa the animals butcher each other with machetes whenever they get a hair up their stinking asses. Before that they were fucking eating each other.

So all these people are angels. Give me a fucking break. Imbeciles.

yes, it is a known fact that one of the reasons the whites beat their ass is because they were fighting among themselves

but when you say the whites conquered the NAs--that's RACIST --not factual

 

[PredFan]

"Like the WHITES" LoL Bla La - Kindly study Native American HiSTORY

Individuals who use wheeled transportation as a benchmark for measuring civilization fail to take the natural environment into account. Suitable draft animals did not exist in the pre-contact Americas. [1] The two largest animals -- bison and llamas -- aren't readily domesticated to pull carts or chariots.

Terrain was another factor that discouraged the development of wheeled transportation in the Americas. European new to North America often found their wheeled wagons inappropriate for the land they were trying to cross. Frequently they traded this clumsy transport for American Indian forms of transportation – the canoe, snowshoes and toboggans. Indigenous people throughout the Americas used runners to deliver communications. The Inca built a road system that included suspension bridges for their runners.

Failing to consider the environmental context in which American Indian science arose is not only superficial scholarship -- it is racist scholarship.

Note:

1. Horses, though extant in parts of North America, may well not have been abundant and widespread enough for native human populations to widely opt to domesticate them.
   
   The genus Equus, which includes modern horses, zebras, and asses, is the only surviving genus in a once diverse family of horses that included 27 genera. The precise date of origin for the genus Equus is unknown, but evidence documents the dispersal of Equus from North America to Eurasia approximately 2–3 million years ago and a possible origin at about 3.4–3.9 million years ago.
   
   Following this original emigration, several extinctions occurred in North America, with additional migrations to Asia (presumably across the Bering Land Bridge), and return migrations back to North America, over time. The last North American extinction probably occurred between 13,000 and 11,000 years ago (Fazio 1995), although more recent extinctions for horses have been suggested. Dr. Ross MacPhee, Curator of Mammalogy at the American Museum of Natural History, and colleagues, have dated the existence of woolly mammoths and horses in North America to as recent as 7,600 years ago. Had it not been for previous westward migration, over the 2 Bering Land Bridge, into northwestern Russia (Siberia) and Asia, the horse would have faced complete extinction. However, Equus survived and spread to all continents of the globe, except Australia and Antarctica. (Source)
   
   There is also the matter that Native American culture and religion may not have condoned domestication. To the extent that the cultural/religious mores played a role, they must be considered independently of individual or ethnic intellect. To wit, observers some five-hundred years from now may very well look at our and preceding eras and construe that the actions we have undertaken due to our theistically driven cultural mores distinguish us as less intelligent than are other coexistent cultures that have no such theological foundings and constraints on the nature and extent of activity they undertake or don't undertake.

the whites were making big gun ships/high tech wagons/high tech trains/etc
the NAs were living in the stone age

Life is so much better now that the white man is here.
No corruption, crime, drug abuse, murder, rape, wars, hatred.
Oh wait. We have all of that.
Hope your happy.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

When you steal a country and decimate the local population you need something to justify that. So the locals were stupid, violent or both.
In reality the locals lived their lives by their own customs and not by western european customs. Its the same in Africa and Australia.

blacks in Africa murdered/warred on/raped/slaughtered/etc just like the NAs and whites did
the NAs decimated other tribes as did the blacks in Africa

but, that's ok. because they are all on the same continent !! how BRILLIANT
genocide/murder/rape--ok if you are on the same continent !!

You are correct. The problem today is that history isn't taught. And what little IS taught, is run through the filter of political correctness. It's sad really.

 

[flacaltenn]

Was America great when America was 100% Native American?

It wasn’t America then.

What was it?

It was a land of warring tribes.

It's STILL a land of warring tribes. Today we have the NBA, NHL, MLB, NFL and the phony tribes of the DNC and the RNC..

The ol' Chief says it best:

View attachment 173712

Pretty brilliant observation. Only problem Two Eagles would have today making that argument is that tribal life on the plains was not TRULY "sustainable" by modern leftist definition. They wasted a lot of land and resources to survive. So their "perfect system" would be slowed by demands to recycle and lose the meat part of their diet. And "making whoopie every night" would be encouraging population expansion and the free Medicine Man would have to serve some segments of the tribe for next to nothing in return..

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Life is so much better now that the white man is here.
No corruption, crime, drug abuse, murder, rape, wars, hatred.
Oh wait. We have all of that.
Hope your happy.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

are you saying the NAs were inhuman--they never did any of that??

Of all the North American Indian tribes, the seventeenth-century Iroquois are the most renowned for their cruelty towards other human beings. Scholars know that they ruthlessly tortured war prisoners and that they were cannibals;

the Iroquois were not alone in these practices

David Scheimann

.....the NAs raped/murdered/hated/etc .......
what are trying to say??
the whites had the superior technology/etc ..fact...fact ...

Do you honestly believe that when we got here and screwed over the natives we were technologically more advanced? What - just because we had guns?
Believe it was some timely sarcasm directed at those who believe the white man is somehow more civilized.
We ain't, and prove it on a daily basis

we were not more advanced??
big gun ships/more advanced metal-iron applications/horses/firearms/etc
it's undeniable--obvious....you must be trolling

timely sarcasm?? that just means he thinks I MUST be racist/hater/etc
it was a reply to my post
I never said anything about the whites being more civilized---I said advanced technology

just like the blacks --EVERY white is a RACIST

no--YOU/etc have it wrong !! as I've stated before---most people/MSM/modern Hollywood/etc make out the WHITES as being the ONLY ''uncivilized''/racist race
it is the WHITES who are labeled and castigated as the ONLY evil race
this is more than obvious in the MSM

Yep.View attachment 173532

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

blacks are more violent per capita than the whites
the numbers prove this--do I really need to post the statistics --for the hundredth time on USMB?

You are an idiot.White people have traditionally been most violent.Probably because of their technology.
The Chinese invented gunpowder and made fireworks. Whitey made bombs.