#WalkAway Movement Gains Momentum as People Leave the Democrat Party in Droves

[NotfooledbyW]

protectiprotectionist, post: 20479882onist

time, the convoys were out on open desert roads, for years totally vulnerable, and Obama didn't attack them.

What years and what locations? Your conspiracy theory requires that ISIS’s heavily armored convoys attacked the first major cities in Iraq on open desert roads. You are saying Fallujah and Mosul were attacked from without and from Syria vulnerable to air strikes.

None of that is true.

 

[protectionist]

What years and what locations? Your conspiracy theory requires that ISIS’s heavily armored convoys attacked the first major cities in Iraq on open desert roads. You are saying Fallujah and Mosul were attacked from without and from Syria vulnerable to air strikes.

None of that is true.

IGNORE!!! I'm not reading another single word from you. I've got legitimate posters and genuine threads to attend to. Go talk to yourself.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

protectionist, post: 20480445

'm not reading another single word from y

Truth hurts doesn’t it? Be gone but don’t spread your conspiracy theory wherever you are running to.

 

[ptbw forever]

Now the #Walkaway YouTube fan site is growing exponentially.

I remember when it had 400 subscribers not long ago.



Hilarious how idiot Democrats think this is fake when one of the members literally created the walkaway theme song for everyone to see in his testimonial, and it is playing in the background of this video.

 

[Markle]

SIS has not not established a Caliphate in Iraq or anywhere else. Are you having trouble keeping up.

ISIS most certainly did establish a Caliphate in Iraq after failed former President Barack Hussein Obama mistakenly pulled all our troops out of Iraq creating a vacuum. A vacuum quickly filled by ISIS and Russia.

ISIS ANNIVERSARY
What is an Islamic caliphate, why did ISIS create one and where is it? Third anniversary of Islamic State declaration – all you need to know

Islamist militants declared a 'caliphate' spanning Iraq and Syria back in 2014

By Maryse Godden
29th June 2017, 10:11 am
Updated: 29th June 2017, 10:11 am

ISIS burst onto the international stage when they declared a caliphate bearing the infamous black jihadist flag after they seized control of Mosul in 2014.

As this year marks the terror group's third anniversary of the declaration - we explain what it's all about.

What is a caliphate, why did ISIS create one and where is it? Third anniversary of Islamic State declaration - all you need to know

 

[Markle]

PS - in a recent USA Today/Suffolk University survey of 20 political issues, Russia came in dead last in importance to voters.

I could not find a link for this allegation. Would you please post that for our edification.

 

[Markle]

No they did not. Not one military adviser advised Obama to keep troops in Iraq if the Iraqis could not continue the immunity from Iraqi courts that they had until the final date of withdrawal.

As you know, that is a lie. Why did you ignore what was happening or did you intentionally chose sources you knew would protect you from the truth?

Obama vs. the generals


By Marc A. Thiessen Columnist September 15, 2014

Pity poor Gen. Lloyd Austin, top commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East.

Rarely has a U.S. general given his commander in chief better military advice, only to see it repeatedly rejected.

In 2010, Gen. Austin advised President Obama against withdrawing all U.S. forces from Iraq, recommending that the president instead leave 24,000 U.S. troops (down from 45,000) to secure the military gains made in the surge and prevent a terrorist resurgence. Had Obama listened to Austin’s counsel, the rise of the Islamic State could have been stopped.

But Obama rejected Austin’s advice and enthusiastically withdrew all U.S. all forces from the country, boasting that he was finally bringing an end to “the long war in Iraq.”

Now the “long war in Iraq” is back. And because Obama has not learned from his past mistakes, it is likely to get even longer.

Last week, Obama announced a strategy to re-defeat the terrorists in Iraq. But instead of listening to his commanders this time around, Obama once again rejected the advice of . . . you guessed it . . . Gen. Lloyd Austin.

The Post reports that, when asked for his recommendation for the best way to defeat the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, Austin told the president that “his best military advice was to send a modest contingent of American troops, principally Special Operations forces, to advise and assist Iraqi army units in fighting the militants.” Obama was having none of it. Austin’s recommendation, The Post reports, “was cast aside in favor of options that did not involve U.S. ground forces in a front-line role.”

Obama vs. the generals

 

[Mike473]

The Democrats had an 11.5 percent lead in the Generic ballot in late fall of 2006. They picked up 30 seats.

In 2010, the Republicans had a 9% lead in the Generic ballot. The Republicans picked up 60 seats. Twice the number the Dems picked up despite The Dems having a greater lead in the Generic ballot.

On November 9, 2006. George W Bush dropped to under 35% approval on the Real Clear Politics average. Today, Trump has a 43.3% approval on RCP.

I think that many people have walked away from the Democrats, at least for the moment. The election is still 3 months away. I don't see a blue wave here. This is going to be a battle. I think this is going to be one of the more interesting elections in our lifetime.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Markle, post: 20485148

As you know, that is a lie.

You cannot call me a liar unless you find a military adviser on record that recommends Obama leave US troops in Iraq without A Status of Forces Agreement that grants those troops immunity from Iraqi courts.

Perhaps you are unable to understand the critical issue of immunity, but you must research it before calling someone a liar because of that ignorance.

So where is your link providing an adviser that wants US troops stationed in Iraq without immunity?

Iraq could not politically grant immunity in 2012. That is why no one who cares about our troops advised Obama to keep them there anyway and in violation of the Bush / Maliki SOFA that set the date for US TROOPS IMMUNITY to end.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Markle, post: 20485148

The Post reports that, when asked for his recommendation for the best way to defeat the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, Austin told the president that “his best military advice was to send a modest contingent of American troops, principally Special Operations forces, to advise and assist Iraqi army units in fighting the militants.” Obama was having none of it. Austin’s recommendation, The Post reports, “was cast aside in favor of options that did not involve U.S. ground forces in a front-line role.”

Did you volunteer to go fight for Iraqis against ISIS? If not why are you promoting that insane General Austin who wanted Americans to start dying again in Iraq after 30,000 Iraqi Troops fled Mosul when they heard a few hundred terrorists along with Sunni Mosul resident sympathizers were coming at them in fricken pickup trucks?

Thank god Obama didn’t listen to a General so fricken eager to see Americans die again in Bush’s quagmire that was started based on lies according to Trumpo.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Markle, post: 20484914,

ISIS most certainly did establish a Caliphate in Iraq after failed former President Barack Hussein Obama mistakenly pulled all our troops out of Iraq creating a vacuum. A vacuum quickly filled by ISIS and Russia.

Have you been in a coma the past two years and have not caught up on current event?

ISIS has not established a Caliphate in Iraq or anywhere else.

They tried, they failed. They never were going to succeed as you rightwing Obama haters hoped.

Btw, Russia has bever filled a vacuum in Iraq - so that is just another ignorance based Obama hater lie.

 

[Markle]

You cannot call me a liar unless you find a military adviser on record that recommends Obama leave US troops in Iraq without A Status of Forces Agreement that grants those troops immunity from Iraqi courts.

Your desperation is duly noted. That's not what you said originally. Now you're bobbing and weaving from your original stance.

IF failed former President Barack Hussein Obama had any stones, he could have and should have negotiated a Status of Forces Agreement. President Obama did not want to, as he said, he preferred leading from behind.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Markle, post: 20485989

That's not what you said originally. Now you're bobbing and weaving from your original stance.

Are you blind? Can’t you read? Here is exactly what I wrote and to which you responded:

Markle, post: 20485148

No they did not. Not one military adviser advised Obama to keep troops in Iraq if the Iraqis could not continue the immunity from Iraqi courts that they had until the final date of withdrawal.

As you know, that is a lie. Why did you ignore what was happening or did you intentionally chose sources you knew would protect you from the truth?

....

Obama vs. the generals

Why do you think that you can lie about what is in writing and get away with it?

Now do you get the point about immunity or not?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Markle, post: 20485989

IF failed former President Barack Hussein Obama had any stones, he could have and should have negotiated a Status of Forces Agreement. President Obama did not want to, as he said, he preferred leading from behind.

Stones have nothing to do with it
.
Iraq’s Parliament had to vote on any SOFA that Obama could have negotiated. It’s on record, there were nowhere’s near enough Iraqi politicians that would vote for a SOFA that would continue granting immunity to US troops staying in Iraq beyond the Bush deadline.

How in the hell does a US President negotiate a deal for immunity with Iraq’s Parliament when the vast majority of members oppose it?

If you are eager to be uninformed on this matter, perhaps you should take your blatant Obama hatred elsewhere.

Proof you are a know-nothing is in your last few posts.