Violent Dem: "Obama should bash Republicans with Baseball Bat"

[teapartysamurai]

I don't think Obama could swing a baseball bat.
You ever see that pansy-ass bowl?

have you ever seen him THROW a baseball?

Don't forget he wears mom jeans while throwing a baseball!

 

[teapartysamurai]

What's the point of this thread?

Hey are you that Carbineer idiot from Hannity a long time ago?

God, that guy was an irritating fuck - always whining to the Moderators that he was being picked on.

That's him all right!

 

[teapartysamurai]

but that would be a lie...

oh yeah... nevermind.

Funny how it show exactly that Jillian but I guess you missed that part right? ya

no. i got exactly that you're a hack. so it's all good.

You guys ever notice that liberals condemn in others what they refuse to see in themselves?

 

[teapartysamurai]

Funny how it show exactly that Jillian but I guess you missed that part right? ya

no. i got exactly that you're a hack. so it's all good.

Dontcha know that one person and one quote = the majority of violent rhetoric?

Wake up!

Which is liberal for: IT DOESN'T COUNT WHEN A LIBERAL GETS CAUGHT DOING IT! ONLY WHEN A CONSERVATIVE GETS CAUGHT!

(and we have to make UP the vioent rhetoric from liberals)

 

[teapartysamurai]

Funny how it show exactly that Jillian but I guess you missed that part right? ya

no. i got exactly that you're a hack. so it's all good.

Gee I'm sorry if pointing the truth is offensive to you because it unveils a lie...I'm not really sure what to say to you.

So doesn't that make you a Hack? the OP post was truthful but we're supposed to ignore it because it makes you uncomfortable and someone who simply points out the obvious in the post seems to truly upset you. If you weren't a Hack then you would denounce what was said .....did I miss that post?

Every time I exposed liberals as frauds, Jillian neg reps me, and leaves some childish post in the threat. This is just normal Jillian!

 

[NYcarbineer]

What's the point of this thread?

TPS wants to ban baseball bats. The Dem strategist wants them included in the 2nd amendment.

I've seen her picture. Banning ugly sticks should be her raison d'etre.

 

[NYcarbineer]

What's the point of this thread?

to demonstrate what assholes democrats are. I'm so glad you were curious.

Shouldn't you be off somewhere, moving a bowel or something?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

What's the point of this thread?

To point out the naked hypocrisy and the hate-filled nature of the left. That's all.

 

[NYcarbineer]

What's the point of this thread?

That the Violent rhetoric comes predominantly from from the same people that exclaim that violent comes from others. That would be my take on it.

So this guy also claims the violent rhetoric comes from others?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

What's the point of this thread?

to demonstrate what assholes democrats are. I'm so glad you were curious.

Shouldn't you be off somewhere, moving a bowel or something?

Don't look now, but you just bolstered his position. Good job!

 

[NYcarbineer]

What's the point of this thread?

Ooooo let me see. MONTHS AND MONTHS of liberals claiming that the Tea Party yelled racial epitaphs (yet we still don't have the video evidence).

Claims that the Tea Party was racist and "violent."

Preaching from liberals against "violent rhetroic" from republicans, conservatives, tea party, blah blah blah.

BUT, ANOTHER DEMOCRAT gets caught spewing violent rhetoric, and SUDDENLY liberals don't see the point of talking about "violent rhetoric."



Completely typical, completely phony. Completely hilarious!

So your defense of the violent racist tea partiers is to find someone else who does it too?

lol, not much of a defense.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

What's the point of this thread?

Ooooo let me see. MONTHS AND MONTHS of liberals claiming that the Tea Party yelled racial epitaphs (yet we still don't have the video evidence).

Claims that the Tea Party was racist and "violent."

Preaching from liberals against "violent rhetroic" from republicans, conservatives, tea party, blah blah blah.

BUT, ANOTHER DEMOCRAT gets caught spewing violent rhetoric, and SUDDENLY liberals don't see the point of talking about "violent rhetoric."



Completely typical, completely phony. Completely hilarious!

So your defense of the violent racist tea partiers is to find someone else who does it too?

lol, not much of a defense.

Got an example of, how you say... "violent racist tea partiers "?

Anyway, try to focus.. the point was for you to defend the violent remarks of t he leftist in question.

Here comes a Palin post no doubt...

 

[NYcarbineer]

Ooooo let me see. MONTHS AND MONTHS of liberals claiming that the Tea Party yelled racial epitaphs (yet we still don't have the video evidence).

Claims that the Tea Party was racist and "violent."

Preaching from liberals against "violent rhetroic" from republicans, conservatives, tea party, blah blah blah.

BUT, ANOTHER DEMOCRAT gets caught spewing violent rhetoric, and SUDDENLY liberals don't see the point of talking about "violent rhetoric."



Completely typical, completely phony. Completely hilarious!

So your defense of the violent racist tea partiers is to find someone else who does it too?

lol, not much of a defense.

Got an example of, how you say... "violent racist tea partiers "?

Anyway, try to focus.. the point was for you to defend the violent remarks of t he leftist in question.

Here comes a Palin post no doubt...

Since I'm not defending it, you lose.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

So your defense of the violent racist tea partiers is to find someone else who does it too?

lol, not much of a defense.

Got an example of, how you say... "violent racist tea partiers "?

Anyway, try to focus.. the point was for you to defend the violent remarks of t he leftist in question.

Here comes a Palin post no doubt...

Since I'm not defending it, you lose.

Since you have no evidence of your wildly asinine claim... you lose and simultaneously look like an idiot.

Again.. WELL DONE!

 

[Valerie]

no. i got exactly that you're a hack. so it's all good.

Gee I'm sorry if pointing the truth is offensive to you because it unveils a lie...I'm not really sure what to say to you.

So doesn't that make you a Hack? the OP post was truthful but we're supposed to ignore it because it makes you uncomfortable and someone who simply points out the obvious in the post seems to truly upset you. If you weren't a Hack then you would denounce what was said .....did I miss that post?

Every time I exposed liberals as frauds, Jillian neg reps me, and leaves some childish post in the threat. This is just normal Jillian!

^^^^^^
Your little yellow laughers aren't fooling anyone...



You should really stop crying about other posters and try to make a valid point once in a while.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Gee I'm sorry if pointing the truth is offensive to you because it unveils a lie...I'm not really sure what to say to you.

So doesn't that make you a Hack? the OP post was truthful but we're supposed to ignore it because it makes you uncomfortable and someone who simply points out the obvious in the post seems to truly upset you. If you weren't a Hack then you would denounce what was said .....did I miss that post?

Every time I exposed liberals as frauds, Jillian neg reps me, and leaves some childish post in the threat. This is just normal Jillian!

^^^^^^
Your little yellow laughers aren't fooling anyone...



You should really stop crying about other posters and try to make a valid point once in a while.

I don't believe they were intended to. Odd you would see it that way... care to elaborate?

 

[Valerie]

Every time I exposed liberals as frauds, Jillian neg reps me, and leaves some childish post in the threat. This is just normal Jillian!

^^^^^^
Your little yellow laughers aren't fooling anyone...



You should really stop crying about other posters and try to make a valid point once in a while.

I don't believe they were intended to. Odd you would see it that way... care to elaborate?

No I don't. Odd you would reply for tps though...

 

[teapartysamurai]

What's the point of this thread?

TPS wants to ban baseball bats. The Dem strategist wants them included in the 2nd amendment.

I've seen her picture. Banning ugly sticks should be her raison d'etre.

Once again Carbiner lies. But that isn't a surprise to anyone!

 

[teapartysamurai]

What's the point of this thread?

to demonstrate what assholes democrats are. I'm so glad you were curious.

Shouldn't you be off somewhere, moving a bowel or something?

Shouldn't you be off, somewhere in someone's rent a mob in Wisconsin?

 

[teapartysamurai]

What's the point of this thread?

That the Violent rhetoric comes predominantly from from the same people that exclaim that violent comes from others. That would be my take on it.

So this guy also claims the violent rhetoric comes from others?

You are denying the left has claimed the Tea Party is violent?

Watch your nose grow Pinnochio!