Most Corporations Avoid Paying Taxes

Truthseeker420

Gold Member
Mar 30, 2011
10,374
1,015
140
Home of the 2013 BCS National Champion
Most firms pay no income taxes - Congress
Study finds that the majority of domestic and foreign corporations in the United States avoid paying federal income taxes.



NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Nearly two-thirds of U.S. companies and 68% of foreign corporations do not pay federal income taxes, according to a congressional report released Tuesday.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) examined samples of corporate tax returns filed between 1998 and 2005. In that time period, an annual average of 1.3 million U.S. companies and 39,000 foreign companies doing business in the United States paid no income taxes - despite having a combined $2.5 trillion in revenue.

The study showed that 28% of foreign companies and 25% of U.S. corporations with more than $250 million in assets or $50 million in sales paid no federal income taxes in 2005. Those companies totaled a combined $372 billion in sales for the largest foreign companies and $1.1 trillion in revenue for the biggest U.S. companies.

The GAO report, which did not name any specific companies, said that some corporations reported zero income before deducting expenses while others said they had zero net income after deducting expenses. Either way, those companies reported no tax liability, the GAO said.

But many of the companies the report found had paid no tax were likely small businesses that pay other taxes. Generally, many small firms, because they do not have shareholders, are able to shift corporate income to individual income.

"Small businesses that are going to be liable for a lot of income tax are likely to use other tax forms so they only pay individual income taxes," said Eric Toder, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.

The study was requested by Sens. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D, and Carl Levin, D-Mich., in an attempt to determine if corporations are abusing so-called transfer prices.

Transfer prices are charges on transactions between subsidiary companies within a larger corporate group. Companies may try to lessen their U.S. tax hit by improperly transferring income to foreign subsidiaries in countries with lower rates.

The GAO study did not attempt to determine if companies were abusing transfer prices, but it said that potential abuse of transfers could reduce the amount of taxes companies pay in the United States.

"The tax system that allows this wholesale tax avoidance is an embarrassment and unfair to hardworking Americans who pay their fair share of taxes," Dorgan said in a statement.

U.S. politicians disagree about how much income tax the government should levy on corporations. Currently the rate is 35%, but most foreign governments have set their rates below the U.S. level.

"The U.S. corporate tax rate stayed the same while foreign countries have drifted down, which increases the incentive for companies to report income in other countries," said Toder. "If the U.S. drops the rate to 30% but closes other tax loopholes, that may ultimately generate more tax revenue for the government."

Majority of corporations avoid federal income taxes - study - Aug. 12, 2008
 
Most firms pay no income taxes - Congress
Study finds that the majority of domestic and foreign corporations in the United States avoid paying federal income taxes.



NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Nearly two-thirds of U.S. companies and 68% of foreign corporations do not pay federal income taxes, according to a congressional report released Tuesday.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) examined samples of corporate tax returns filed between 1998 and 2005. In that time period, an annual average of 1.3 million U.S. companies and 39,000 foreign companies doing business in the United States paid no income taxes - despite having a combined $2.5 trillion in revenue.

The study showed that 28% of foreign companies and 25% of U.S. corporations with more than $250 million in assets or $50 million in sales paid no federal income taxes in 2005. Those companies totaled a combined $372 billion in sales for the largest foreign companies and $1.1 trillion in revenue for the biggest U.S. companies.

The GAO report, which did not name any specific companies, said that some corporations reported zero income before deducting expenses while others said they had zero net income after deducting expenses. Either way, those companies reported no tax liability, the GAO said.

But many of the companies the report found had paid no tax were likely small businesses that pay other taxes. Generally, many small firms, because they do not have shareholders, are able to shift corporate income to individual income.

"Small businesses that are going to be liable for a lot of income tax are likely to use other tax forms so they only pay individual income taxes," said Eric Toder, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.

The study was requested by Sens. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D, and Carl Levin, D-Mich., in an attempt to determine if corporations are abusing so-called transfer prices.

Transfer prices are charges on transactions between subsidiary companies within a larger corporate group. Companies may try to lessen their U.S. tax hit by improperly transferring income to foreign subsidiaries in countries with lower rates.

The GAO study did not attempt to determine if companies were abusing transfer prices, but it said that potential abuse of transfers could reduce the amount of taxes companies pay in the United States.

"The tax system that allows this wholesale tax avoidance is an embarrassment and unfair to hardworking Americans who pay their fair share of taxes," Dorgan said in a statement.

U.S. politicians disagree about how much income tax the government should levy on corporations. Currently the rate is 35%, but most foreign governments have set their rates below the U.S. level.

"The U.S. corporate tax rate stayed the same while foreign countries have drifted down, which increases the incentive for companies to report income in other countries," said Toder. "If the U.S. drops the rate to 30% but closes other tax loopholes, that may ultimately generate more tax revenue for the government."

Majority of corporations avoid federal income taxes - study - Aug. 12, 2008

Sure go ahead and remove deductions for hiring new employee's lets see whats happens to unemployment. Let's remove deductions for your healthcare LOL think it cost a bunch now you haven't seen anything yet. Lets remove deductions for increasing or upgrading facility's remember that past unemployment number.

What's funny is how the left who have very little understanding of creating or maintaining a business cry about deductions that allow them to have a job. But at the same time say NOTHING about an out of control federal government.
 
Corporations pay taxes?
I thought people did.

didn't you read the article Corporations are not paying taxes. yes people pay taxes...well the middle class anyways.

Psssssst....

The wealthiest 1 percent of the population earn 19 per*cent of the income but pay 37 percent of the income tax. The top 10 percent pay 68 percent of the tab. Meanwhile, the bottom 50 percent—those below the median income level—now earn 13 percent of the income but pay just 3 percent of the taxes.

Better now, dumb fuck?
 
Most firms pay no income taxes - Congress
Study finds that the majority of domestic and foreign corporations in the United States avoid paying federal income taxes.



NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Nearly two-thirds of U.S. companies and 68% of foreign corporations do not pay federal income taxes, according to a congressional report released Tuesday.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) examined samples of corporate tax returns filed between 1998 and 2005. In that time period, an annual average of 1.3 million U.S. companies and 39,000 foreign companies doing business in the United States paid no income taxes - despite having a combined $2.5 trillion in revenue.

The study showed that 28% of foreign companies and 25% of U.S. corporations with more than $250 million in assets or $50 million in sales paid no federal income taxes in 2005. Those companies totaled a combined $372 billion in sales for the largest foreign companies and $1.1 trillion in revenue for the biggest U.S. companies.

The GAO report, which did not name any specific companies, said that some corporations reported zero income before deducting expenses while others said they had zero net income after deducting expenses. Either way, those companies reported no tax liability, the GAO said.

But many of the companies the report found had paid no tax were likely small businesses that pay other taxes. Generally, many small firms, because they do not have shareholders, are able to shift corporate income to individual income.

"Small businesses that are going to be liable for a lot of income tax are likely to use other tax forms so they only pay individual income taxes," said Eric Toder, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.

The study was requested by Sens. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D, and Carl Levin, D-Mich., in an attempt to determine if corporations are abusing so-called transfer prices.

Transfer prices are charges on transactions between subsidiary companies within a larger corporate group. Companies may try to lessen their U.S. tax hit by improperly transferring income to foreign subsidiaries in countries with lower rates.

The GAO study did not attempt to determine if companies were abusing transfer prices, but it said that potential abuse of transfers could reduce the amount of taxes companies pay in the United States.

"The tax system that allows this wholesale tax avoidance is an embarrassment and unfair to hardworking Americans who pay their fair share of taxes," Dorgan said in a statement.

U.S. politicians disagree about how much income tax the government should levy on corporations. Currently the rate is 35%, but most foreign governments have set their rates below the U.S. level.

"The U.S. corporate tax rate stayed the same while foreign countries have drifted down, which increases the incentive for companies to report income in other countries," said Toder. "If the U.S. drops the rate to 30% but closes other tax loopholes, that may ultimately generate more tax revenue for the government."

Majority of corporations avoid federal income taxes - study - Aug. 12, 2008

Sure go ahead and remove deductions for hiring new employee's lets see whats happens to unemployment. Let's remove deductions for your healthcare LOL think it cost a bunch now you haven't seen anything yet. Lets remove deductions for increasing or upgrading facility's remember that past unemployment number.

What's funny is how the left who have very little understanding of creating or maintaining a business cry about deductions that allow them to have a job. But at the same time say NOTHING about an out of control federal government.

lol you think corporations hire people based on tax codes. They hire on production needs. If it takes a 100 workers to make a 1000 widgets thats how many workers they will have.
 
Most firms pay no income taxes - Congress
Study finds that the majority of domestic and foreign corporations in the United States avoid paying federal income taxes.



NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Nearly two-thirds of U.S. companies and 68% of foreign corporations do not pay federal income taxes, according to a congressional report released Tuesday.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) examined samples of corporate tax returns filed between 1998 and 2005. In that time period, an annual average of 1.3 million U.S. companies and 39,000 foreign companies doing business in the United States paid no income taxes - despite having a combined $2.5 trillion in revenue.

The study showed that 28% of foreign companies and 25% of U.S. corporations with more than $250 million in assets or $50 million in sales paid no federal income taxes in 2005. Those companies totaled a combined $372 billion in sales for the largest foreign companies and $1.1 trillion in revenue for the biggest U.S. companies.

The GAO report, which did not name any specific companies, said that some corporations reported zero income before deducting expenses while others said they had zero net income after deducting expenses. Either way, those companies reported no tax liability, the GAO said.

But many of the companies the report found had paid no tax were likely small businesses that pay other taxes. Generally, many small firms, because they do not have shareholders, are able to shift corporate income to individual income.

"Small businesses that are going to be liable for a lot of income tax are likely to use other tax forms so they only pay individual income taxes," said Eric Toder, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.

The study was requested by Sens. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D, and Carl Levin, D-Mich., in an attempt to determine if corporations are abusing so-called transfer prices.

Transfer prices are charges on transactions between subsidiary companies within a larger corporate group. Companies may try to lessen their U.S. tax hit by improperly transferring income to foreign subsidiaries in countries with lower rates.

The GAO study did not attempt to determine if companies were abusing transfer prices, but it said that potential abuse of transfers could reduce the amount of taxes companies pay in the United States.

"The tax system that allows this wholesale tax avoidance is an embarrassment and unfair to hardworking Americans who pay their fair share of taxes," Dorgan said in a statement.

U.S. politicians disagree about how much income tax the government should levy on corporations. Currently the rate is 35%, but most foreign governments have set their rates below the U.S. level.

"The U.S. corporate tax rate stayed the same while foreign countries have drifted down, which increases the incentive for companies to report income in other countries," said Toder. "If the U.S. drops the rate to 30% but closes other tax loopholes, that may ultimately generate more tax revenue for the government."

Majority of corporations avoid federal income taxes - study - Aug. 12, 2008

Sure go ahead and remove deductions for hiring new employee's lets see whats happens to unemployment. Let's remove deductions for your healthcare LOL think it cost a bunch now you haven't seen anything yet. Lets remove deductions for increasing or upgrading facility's remember that past unemployment number.

What's funny is how the left who have very little understanding of creating or maintaining a business cry about deductions that allow them to have a job. But at the same time say NOTHING about an out of control federal government.

lol you think corporations hire people based on tax codes. They hire on production needs. If it takes a 100 workers to make a 1000 widgets thats how many workers they will have.

:clap2: LOL You are absolutely clueless on how Business work those same 1000 widgets can also be made by 70 workers instead of 100 and with no incentive to hire more the business will save money in the process.
 
Sure go ahead and remove deductions for hiring new employee's lets see whats happens to unemployment. Let's remove deductions for your healthcare LOL think it cost a bunch now you haven't seen anything yet. Lets remove deductions for increasing or upgrading facility's remember that past unemployment number.

What's funny is how the left who have very little understanding of creating or maintaining a business cry about deductions that allow them to have a job. But at the same time say NOTHING about an out of control federal government.

lol you think corporations hire people based on tax codes. They hire on production needs. If it takes a 100 workers to make a 1000 widgets thats how many workers they will have.

:clap2: LOL You are absolutely clueless on how Business work those same 1000 widgets can also be made by 70 workers instead of 100 and with no incentive to hire more the business will save money in the process.

Why do Fox News watchers always start out with insults like it makes their argument any more plausible? or do they think it intimidates someone?

Corporations will always try and keep production staff to a minimum and the only way they hire is if there is demand. That is economics 101.
 
lol you think corporations hire people based on tax codes. They hire on production needs. If it takes a 100 workers to make a 1000 widgets thats how many workers they will have.

:clap2: LOL You are absolutely clueless on how Business work those same 1000 widgets can also be made by 70 workers instead of 100 and with no incentive to hire more the business will save money in the process.

Why do Fox News watchers always start out with insults like it makes their argument any more plausible? or do they think it intimidates someone?

Corporations will always try and keep production staff to a minimum and the only way they hire is if there is demand. That is economics 101.

You are one raging fucking idiot.

Seriously...
 
lol you think corporations hire people based on tax codes. They hire on production needs. If it takes a 100 workers to make a 1000 widgets thats how many workers they will have.

:clap2: LOL You are absolutely clueless on how Business work those same 1000 widgets can also be made by 70 workers instead of 100 and with no incentive to hire more the business will save money in the process.

Why do Fox News watchers always start out with insults like it makes their argument any more plausible? or do they think it intimidates someone?

Corporations will always try and keep production staff to a minimum and the only way they hire is if there is demand. That is economics 101.

For a person that claims the title of "truthseeker' you're pretty closed minded when it comes to understanding. I understand you like the rhetoric of class warfare but still it doesn't lessen the 'truth' One of which is your understanding of how Business or Corporations make decisions about tax liabilities and how to minimize its impact on the bottom line.
 
So what of corp pays no income taxes?

The people it employs pay taxes. The people who buy and sell its stock pay taxes. The people who get paid dividends on stock pay taxes. The companies they buy stuff from pay people who pay taxes.

The money generated by a corp. gets taxed because you want to tax it before it gets handed out and taxed again does not magically produce more government revenue all it does is make everyone pay a little less for the same net result.
 
:clap2: LOL You are absolutely clueless on how Business work those same 1000 widgets can also be made by 70 workers instead of 100 and with no incentive to hire more the business will save money in the process.

Why do Fox News watchers always start out with insults like it makes their argument any more plausible? or do they think it intimidates someone?

Corporations will always try and keep production staff to a minimum and the only way they hire is if there is demand. That is economics 101.

For a person that claims the title of "truthseeker' you're pretty closed minded when it comes to understanding. I understand you like the rhetoric of class warfare but still it doesn't lessen the 'truth' One of which is your understanding of how Business or Corporations make decisions about tax liabilities and how to minimize its impact on the bottom line.


so just more insults is all you got?
 
So what of corp pays no income taxes?

The people it employs pay taxes. The people who buy and sell its stock pay taxes. The people who get paid dividends on stock pay taxes. The companies they buy stuff from pay people who pay taxes.

The money generated by a corp. gets taxed because you want to tax it before it gets handed out and taxed again does not magically produce more government revenue all it does is make everyone pay a little less for the same net result.

Corporate tax is on net profits.
 
So what of corp pays no income taxes?

The people it employs pay taxes. The people who buy and sell its stock pay taxes. The people who get paid dividends on stock pay taxes. The companies they buy stuff from pay people who pay taxes.

The money generated by a corp. gets taxed because you want to tax it before it gets handed out and taxed again does not magically produce more government revenue all it does is make everyone pay a little less for the same net result.

Corpoprate tax is on net profits.

YAwn.

Sooner or later those profits get handed out or spent and then they are taxed.

If you tax them before they are handed out or spent then there is less to hand out or spend and therefore the tax revenue on those profits does not increase.

There is no upside to a corporation keeping large sums of it's profit locked up.
 
For a person that claims the title of "truthseeker' you're pretty closed minded when it comes to understanding. I understand you like the rhetoric of class warfare but still it doesn't lessen the 'truth' One of which is your understanding of how Business or Corporations make decisions about tax liabilities and how to minimize its impact on the bottom line.

You forgot that liberalism means truth. You can disprove any liberal argument to a liberal as long as you don't violate the inherent truth of liberalism in doing it. Now that you understand the rules, try again...
 
:clap2: LOL You are absolutely clueless on how Business work those same 1000 widgets can also be made by 70 workers instead of 100 and with no incentive to hire more the business will save money in the process.
i'm sorry, this may be the dumbest post i've ever, ever, ever read.

unless the tax incentive is equal to or greater than the cost of hiring that employee - including all wages, training, and benefits - there is no company in the world that will hire without first having a need for increased capacity.

honestly you have some nerve calling others clueless on how businesses work.
 
It's ok corporations are allowed to do anything they want. We should be grateful to eat the scraps that fall from their tables.
 
So what of corp pays no income taxes?

The people it employs pay taxes. The people who buy and sell its stock pay taxes. The people who get paid dividends on stock pay taxes. The companies they buy stuff from pay people who pay taxes.

The money generated by a corp. gets taxed because you want to tax it before it gets handed out and taxed again does not magically produce more government revenue all it does is make everyone pay a little less for the same net result.

Corpoprate tax is on net profits.

YAwn.

Sooner or later those profits get handed out or spent and then they are taxed.

If you tax them before they are handed out or spent then there is less to hand out or spend and therefore the tax revenue on those profits does not increase.

There is no upside to a corporation keeping large sums of it's profit locked up.

I don't know what you mean to "hand out" workers earn their wages and are not a hand out. If your assersions is more corporate profits mean higher pay for workers that is just not the case. But our government shouldn't be trying to control profits but should have a fair tax system that makes corporations pay their fair share for the roads,police,fire,security ,water and other common resources corporations use.
 
It's ok corporations are allowed to do anything they want. We should be grateful to eat the scraps that fall from their tables.

Right, our only choices are the polar choices of being grateful and eating the scraps that fall from their tables or bitch slapping and pillaging them. Oh, and why can Republicans only think in black and white, what's wrong with them?
 

Forum List

Back
Top