VA Landowner Sues Game Warden For Stealing Trail Camera

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2021
41,507
58,443
3,488
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
There’s been a number of stories lately of over-zealous game wardens crossing the line for the sake of protecting fish and game. It wasn’t too long ago that we reported on one hunter that had his buck mounts stolen by game wardens over some far-fetched, false accusations that ultimately didn’t go in the offending officers favor.

However, the latest news of officers overstepping their bounds comes out of Virginia where a landowner recently sued a game warden for stealing a trail camera off his own property.

There’s been a lot of controversy in recent years over whether or not state game wardens should have the right to trespass on a private landowner without first presenting a warrant. Regardless, that’s only one of the issues Virginia resident, Josh Highlander, took up with a local game warden. Not only did the warden come on to his property, but the officer stole a trail camera from Highlander’s food plot, located a short distance from his home.

Highlander is now teamed up with the Institute for Justice to sue the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources for invading and taking his property.

While most Americans would think law enforcement needs a warrant to conduct surveillance on private land, the U.S. Supreme Court held nearly a century ago that the Fourth Amendment does not apply to “open fields.” But whether law enforcement can take a camera or other property without a warrant while searching an open field is legally questionable.


In virtually every state in America, and every jurisdiction within the old British Empire before, law enforcement officials are allowed to ignore your private property signs.

It is called the "open fields" doctrine. The short of it, is that they can basically access your property with the exception of your curtilage at anytime.

The "bunny police" have particular powers in that regard here in Virginia.

The part that surprised me was they had three wardens involved.....In my AO they are so thin on the ground that two wardens cover three counties and mostly they troll the boat landings looking for the low hanging fruit of fishing violations.
 
we had a rancher run a game warden off with a gun in our county. LOL
2 elk were fighting and locked horns on his private property, and the GW asked for permission to come on his property to help separate them.
He told em to buzz off, b/c of previous problems; and the 2 elk fought to the death on the ranch property.
The ksl news came up from SLC and made a big deal out of it, calling the rancher the sinner; when not knowing the full circumstances of the fewd.
Used to go fishing in the creek there until the Utah fish and game put otters in the utah side and they migrated into the idaho side killing all the fish in the stream
 
There’s been a number of stories lately of over-zealous game wardens crossing the line for the sake of protecting fish and game. It wasn’t too long ago that we reported on one hunter that had his buck mounts stolen by game wardens over some far-fetched, false accusations that ultimately didn’t go in the offending officers favor.

However, the latest news of officers overstepping their bounds comes out of Virginia where a landowner recently sued a game warden for stealing a trail camera off his own property.

There’s been a lot of controversy in recent years over whether or not state game wardens should have the right to trespass on a private landowner without first presenting a warrant. Regardless, that’s only one of the issues Virginia resident, Josh Highlander, took up with a local game warden. Not only did the warden come on to his property, but the officer stole a trail camera from Highlander’s food plot, located a short distance from his home.

Highlander is now teamed up with the Institute for Justice to sue the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources for invading and taking his property.

While most Americans would think law enforcement needs a warrant to conduct surveillance on private land, the U.S. Supreme Court held nearly a century ago that the Fourth Amendment does not apply to “open fields.” But whether law enforcement can take a camera or other property without a warrant while searching an open field is legally questionable.


In virtually every state in America, and every jurisdiction within the old British Empire before, law enforcement officials are allowed to ignore your private property signs.

It is called the "open fields" doctrine. The short of it, is that they can basically access your property with the exception of your curtilage at anytime.

The "bunny police" have particular powers in that regard here in Virginia.

The part that surprised me was they had three wardens involved.....In my AO they are so thin on the ground that two wardens cover three counties and mostly they troll the boat landings looking for the low hanging fruit of fishing violations.
The Open fields doctrine will continue, but removing private property is a nogo, game wardens can and should expect to lose. Stealing stuff on the wrong property could get somebody shot, and bring the issue to a head, possibly a headshot.
 
"Bunny laws" have even morphed into laws to prohibit folks that don't even hunt their rights.....The dems during the brief time they held total sway pushed this one through....Before it was a hunting regulation.


§ 15.2-915.2. Regulation of transportation of a loaded rifle or shotgun.​

The governing body of any county or city may by ordinance make it unlawful for any person to transport, possess or carry a loaded shotgun or loaded rifle in any vehicle on any public street, road, or highway within such locality. Any violation of such ordinance shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $100. Conservation police officers, sheriffs and all other law-enforcement officers shall enforce the provisions of this section. No ordinance adopted pursuant to this section shall be enforceable unless the governing body adopting such ordinance so notifies the Director of the Department of Wildlife Resources by registered mail prior to May 1 of the year in which such ordinance is to take effect.

The provisions of this section shall not apply to duly authorized law-enforcement officers or military personnel in the performance of their lawful duties, nor to any person who reasonably believes that a loaded rifle or shotgun is necessary for his personal safety in the course of his employment or business.
 
The Open fields doctrine will continue, but removing private property is a nogo, game wardens can and should expect to lose. Stealing stuff on the wrong property could get somebody shot, and bring the issue to a head, possibly a headshot.
Sadly...not this time.
 

Forum List

Back
Top