Onyx
Gold Member
- Dec 17, 2015
- 7,887
- 499
- 155
Christ, you have to be so far out there to get me and Joe to agree on something.
But still, more of an anarchist child, imo.
Insult posts are insulting to your own intelligence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Christ, you have to be so far out there to get me and Joe to agree on something.
But still, more of an anarchist child, imo.
wanting to protect our borders and control who enters our country is neither religion or race baiting, it is common sense.
Correll is merely an Alt Right mirror of TM.I honestly don't know how to respond here. I realize there is nothing I can say. You see absolutes, I don't. You see one candidate as defensible and the other as tearing the nation apart, I don't care for either candidate. This is an asymmetrical conversation. Maybe you should be having this conversation with a left wing partisan ideologue who will respond with their own attacks and absolutes.I see the difference within the context of your point, I just don't agree.Okie dokie!Trump's propaganda is aimed at Hillary, or other players.
Hillary is the one targeting large portions of the American population.
That is a very start contrast.
One is tearing this nation apart.
Trump is talking about America as a whole, serving OUR interests as a WHOLE, not setting people at each other's throats.
HIllary is the bad messenger, with the bad message.
But she has two massive industries dominated by partisans indoctrinated to lie for her.
And it is working.
On you.
.
Do you see the difference between targeting players and targeting the population?
.
How so?
.
How big does the rock you live under have to be to keep you thinking these stupid thoughts?Says someone supporting a rapist defender, habitual liar, grifter for president.
One and Three are lies. Two is some kind of sick joke coming from a Trump Supporter.
Christ, you have to be so far out there to get me and Joe to agree on something.
But still, more of an anarchist child, imo.
Insult posts are insulting to your own intelligence.
Look....you can have your own opinion but not your own factsThey realize that it's far better to have a corrupt politician in the White House than a mentally unbalanced demigod. Corrupt politicians are nothing new. The country will certainly survive a Clinton. Trump is a big gamble. His temper, lack of control, and tenancy to exaggerate can create problems far worst than anything we have seen in the past.
This nation will not survive HIllary.
Her tactics and her issues are tearing this nation apart.
Trump is trying to bring US together.
This nation will not survive Hillary
We heard the same thing about Obama for eight years. Obamacare will destroy the economy, Obama is a Trainwreck, the stock market will crash, rampant inflation is just around the corner
Rinse/Repeat
yes, and those predictions about Obama have come true. he has doubled our debt, put more americans in poverty and on food stamps than ever before, had the longest recession in history, destroyed the best medical system in the world, weakened us internationally, funded our enemies, and divided us like never before. Worst president in history is an understatement.
Some Trainwreck.
The economy added $50 trillion to our national wealth.....More than any President in history
Republicans predicted we would lose millions of jobs because of Obamacare, instead, we added 8 million jobs
neither of those statements are true. Just because the obozo media pumps something into your head, does not make it true.
obamacare cost us millions of full time jobs. it forced employers to cut hours in order to afford to stay in business. it raised the premiums and deductibles for every, ran doctors out of practice and caused insurance companies to force people to pay for coverage that they did not want or need.
National "net worth" ? are you fricken crazy? he doubled the national debt. what would your net worth do if you doubled your debt?
damn, you libs are the dumbest creatures on planet earth.
No charges. No indictment. No point.
Well ain't you a good little brain-dead zombie.....but what you're missing is they'd leave you upside down in a ditch full or alligators if you got in their way.
And yet they still endorse Hilliary...
Oldstyle, post: 15423815He's not a Washington insider.
And you want to make him the ultimate Washington insider with nothing but his and his family's financial interests to be unlimited and gainful. You think this ego-maniac billionaire has his cult like followers interests on the top of his agenda.
About 34 percent of likely voters were born suckers and The Donald knows it.
Clinton voters will save your suckered butts. Thank god.
Oldstyle, post: 15423815That isn't a negative in this election...it's a positive because the electorate is sick of politicians and the status quo.
Putin is an outsider too, and he is a politician. Trump is not 'sick' of the Russian politician.
I'd rather have American politicians running the country than Trump's hidden foreign entanglements and connections being run by and for the Trump progeny as heirs to gramps and daddy's empire.
Then there's this, the Outsider business person ultimate dream:
Donald Trump in 2006: I 'sort of hope' real estate market tanks - CNNPolitics.com
CNN.com › 2016/05/19 › politics › dona...
AMP - May 19, 2016 - (CNN)Two years before the housing market collapsed in 2008 and millions of Americans lost their homes, Donald Trump said he was hoping for a crash. "I sort of hope that happens because then people like me would go in and buy," Trump said in a 2006 audiobook from Trump University ...
The Trump kids will have an orgy of buying depressed real estate when daddy becomes an insider.
What did Trump call it in the debate? Oh yeah - "That's Business"
USA Today's editorial board is unfit for providing news.
USA Today's editorial board is unfit for providing news.
This isn't news. It's an editorial. By the editorial board. In the editorial section of the paper.
Wrong.USA Today's editorial board is unfit for providing news.
This isn't news. It's an editorial. By the editorial board. In the editorial section of the paper.
What the editorial board of a newspaper prints as opinion will pretty much tell you what their bias is going to be with the news as well. Just saying...
USA Today's editorial board is unfit for providing news.
This isn't news. It's an editorial. By the editorial board. In the editorial section of the paper.
Wrong.USA Today's editorial board is unfit for providing news.
This isn't news. It's an editorial. By the editorial board. In the editorial section of the paper.
What the editorial board of a newspaper prints as opinion will pretty much tell you what their bias is going to be with the news as well. Just saying...
Editorial staff function separate and apart from the news and reporting staff, one having nothing to do with the other.
The myth of ‘media bias’ is among the more ridiculous and idiotic of rightwing canards.
That ‘the media’ report facts and the truth you and others on the right don’t like doesn’t constitute ‘bias.’
And that the USA Today editorial board considers Trump unfit to be president is based on Trump’s own statements, Trump’s own actions, and Trump’s wrongheaded position on the issues – Trump has only himself to blame; his bizarre Twitter meltdown this weekend one of many examples as to why Trump has no business being president.
USA Today's editorial board is unfit for providing news.
This isn't news. It's an editorial. By the editorial board. In the editorial section of the paper.
Editorial boards traditionally pick one candidate over the other
But to declare a major candidate for president "unfit for office" is unprecidented
I honestly don't know how to respond here. I realize there is nothing I can say. You see absolutes, I don't. You see one candidate as defensible and the other as tearing the nation apart, I don't care for either candidate. This is an asymmetrical conversation. Maybe you should be having this conversation with a left wing partisan ideologue who will respond with their own attacks and absolutes.I see the difference within the context of your point, I just don't agree.Okie dokie!Trump's propaganda is aimed at Hillary, or other players.
Hillary is the one targeting large portions of the American population.
That is a very start contrast.
One is tearing this nation apart.
Trump is talking about America as a whole, serving OUR interests as a WHOLE, not setting people at each other's throats.
HIllary is the bad messenger, with the bad message.
But she has two massive industries dominated by partisans indoctrinated to lie for her.
And it is working.
On you.
.
Do you see the difference between targeting players and targeting the population?
.
How so?
.
Correll, post: 15426120If HIllary and her supporters really have two thirds of the nation supporting them on the issues, then focusing the discussion on those issues would get those voters realizing that they agree with Hillary.
Because she is nowhere close to 75% in the polls.
Are you really not up to this discussion. Immigration is one issue among hundreds.
Pew and I said around two thirds. The last time I checked that is 67% not 75%. You have Trump's penchant for exaggeration.
If immigration were the single and absolute issue determining the result of this election, Clinton would be up on Trump by 33 points.
Now are you aware that there are many other issues driving the outcome as in every other election held in this country since its founding?
You want to discuss immigration. Do you think PEW's research in invalid? If so why and based on what?
If you accept PEW's research what is there to discuss.
It proves Trump is demagoging an issue to rouse a certain group that carries animosity to people of Latino descent.
I reach that conclusion by watching Trump and those supporters in rallies all year.