US Soldiers NOT Allowed To Defend US Borders From Foreign Enemies

[AzogtheDefiler]

I’m fascinated at how you Lefties are able to pretend that Americans have something to gain by allowing desperate, illiterate, uneducated, criminal minded thirdworlders who can’t speak our language into our nation.

I am even more fascinated how right wingers can prefer Tax Cut economics while waging global alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror and creating more refugees; only to complain about the problems y'all created in the first place.

We did not turn your nations into third world shit holes, you did that to yourselves.

Only bigots on the right wing are hypocritical enough to eschew free market Capitalism for their Big Government nanny-State policies that may be indistinguishable from socialism on an international basis.

Right wingers are trying to turn my nation into a third world shithole by not upgrading infrastructure, both social and physical.

BLah, blah, blah, bigot, blah, blah blah, free market.


Go back to Mexico.

I am a natural born citizen, not a Traitor to our Republic, like You; rebel without a Cause.

Bullshit. YOur loyalty is obviously to Mexico.

Just because a forked-tongue Hypocrite like You says so? You have no "gospel Truth"; are you a paler shade of white?

No, that time you sided with the illegal Mexican child rapist instead of his white child victim, that is why your loyalty is obviously for Mexico.

Just you making up stories, like usual. Only habitual false witness bearers do that. Why don't You go back to the Old World? The new world is inhabited by persons of color. Why not go back and declaim you couldn't handle being in the new world due to all of the non-pale white people there.

How much of my hard earned money is someone else entitled to? Illegals take my hard earned money.

Abolish your worthless and alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror if you don't want your, hard earned money being entitled to it.

They aren’t my wars. Now answer my question.

Ask the right wing. They are the ones alleging to be for free market Capitalism whenever they are in socialism threads.

You are welcome to ask why they created an illegal problem and an illegal underclass when we have no Immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

I am not on the right or the left. Why do you keep ignoring my question and deflecting? No manners.

We have a federal form of Government as defined by our Constitution. Right wingers sometimes have a majority in representation to Government. Why not complain to them about using Your hard earned tax money, wastefully and extra-Constitutionally.

And, I am not deflecting. There is no express Immigration clause to be legal to in our federal Constitution. Ask right wingers why they prefer to be Traitors to our supreme law of the land but whine about less fortunate, alleged "illegals".

I do question RWs over it. And you are deflecting. Just answer the question.

 

[OldLady]

Are the folks in the caravan carrying?

You opposed using the military to guard our borders. Do you also oppose using the military to guard D.C.?

I like the way Richard put it, so I'll just quote him:

We are not being invaded. Illegal immigrants are not our enemies.
Just try to take your head out of your ass for a change!

The two situations are in no way similar, and I'm getting sick of you insurrection lovers. It might be smarter for you to join everyone who is trying to protect our country and our government from terrorists.

I’m fascinated at how you Lefties are able to pretend that Americans have something to gain by allowing desperate, illiterate, uneducated, criminal minded thirdworlders who can’t speak our language into our nation.
Do you believe it is a responsibility Americans must bare...are we obligated to make life easier for the people of other nations?
How do you and Richard-H come up with the bullshit that illegal aliens aren’t enemies of Americans?
Who rapes, maimes and murders more U.S. citizens than does those from Mexico, Central and South America?
Who causes more degradation in communities/cities, who ruins our education and healthcare systems..is it the “RUSSIANS” who do or is it brown people from our south?

I didn't say we should let them in, i said we can't treat them like an invadinng army and shoot them. I'm not in the mood for immigration bitching today. I got called down here for something stupid, I answered it, and i'm outta here.

 

[danielpalos]

I do question RWs over it. And you are deflecting. Just answer the question.

What was their response?

I am not deflecting at all. There is no Immigration clause in our federal Constitution for us to waste Your hard earned tax dollars on. That is all on the right wing and their preference for Big Government nanny-State socialism instead of the free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I do question RWs over it. And you are deflecting. Just answer the question.

What was their response?

I am not deflecting at all. There is no Immigration clause in our federal Constitution for us to waste Your hard earned tax dollars on. That is all on the right wing and their preference for Big Government nanny-State socialism instead of the free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads.

Response is it is needed to upgrade the military and it’s a short term issue. Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

 

[danielpalos]

Response is it is needed to upgrade the military and it’s a short term issue.

Afghanistan is a short term issue? You need to get better answers from the right wing.

 

[danielpalos]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Response is it is needed to upgrade the military and it’s a short term issue.

Afghanistan is a short term issue? You need to get better answers from the right wing.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

 

[Turtlesoup]

'Does the United States military exist only to defend the borders of foreign countries in the Middle East or is it allowed to defend the borders of the U.S. against terrorist cartels, espionage, infiltrations, and smuggling?'

Sound like a stupid question? Here's one that's going to sound even MORE stupid:

Do US military troops have the right to DEFED THEMSELVES in their own country, on their own die of the border, when approached by foreign troops who order them to surrender their weapons?

According to a NorthCom spokesman, the military troops are there NOT in a Law Enforcement capacity.
-- Well, NO SHIT! The US military is used for the defense of the United States...and since there is an illegal invasion going on right now, why can't they be accepted as being there to protect this nation during this 'invasion'?


Military's mission doesn't include enforcement, so smugglers cross Rio Grande right in front of them

The sauds want assad gone from syria---that war will be back once biden/ho and whoever they really want as president is put in.

 

[danielpalos]

Response is it is needed to upgrade the military and it’s a short term issue.

Afghanistan is a short term issue? You need to get better answers from the right wing.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

If upgrading the military is Good, why does the right wing have a problem upgrading infrastructure which must be even better for our economy?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Response is it is needed to upgrade the military and it’s a short term issue.

Afghanistan is a short term issue? You need to get better answers from the right wing.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

If upgrading the military is Good, why does the right wing have a problem upgrading infrastructure which must be even better for our economy?

They don’t. You’re moving the goal posts again. You are a very rude person.

 

[danielpalos]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

 

[danielpalos]

Response is it is needed to upgrade the military and it’s a short term issue.

Afghanistan is a short term issue? You need to get better answers from the right wing.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

If upgrading the military is Good, why does the right wing have a problem upgrading infrastructure which must be even better for our economy?

They don’t. You’re moving the goal posts again. You are a very rude person.

You are being more rude. The republicans had nothing but repeal for all of those shovel ready jobs that were supposed to come online and help the previous administration look better economically instead of as weak as right wingers alleged.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Response is it is needed to upgrade the military and it’s a short term issue.

Afghanistan is a short term issue? You need to get better answers from the right wing.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

If upgrading the military is Good, why does the right wing have a problem upgrading infrastructure which must be even better for our economy?

They don’t. You’re moving the goal posts again. You are a very rude person.

You are being more rude. The republicans had nothing but repeal for all of those shovel ready jobs that were supposed to come online and help the previous administration look better economically instead of as weak as right wingers alleged.

Keep deflecting. You were raised poorly. You are an awful human being.

 

[danielpalos]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

Endless wars are not right wing theories in practice with Your hard earned tax monies?

What is necessary and proper for the common defense? We have no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. I can't give you real numbers only imaginary numbers without going over our entire "defense" establishment.

Here is one number I can give you:

• Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that’s more than $3.3 billion annually.19

Ending the War on Drugs: By the Numbers - Center for American Progress

Researchers and policymakers alike agree that the war on drugs is a failure. Policymakers must replace the war on drugs with a fairer, more effective model that treats substance misuse as a public health issue—not a criminal justice issue.

www.americanprogress.org

.

 

[danielpalos]

Response is it is needed to upgrade the military and it’s a short term issue.

Afghanistan is a short term issue? You need to get better answers from the right wing.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

If upgrading the military is Good, why does the right wing have a problem upgrading infrastructure which must be even better for our economy?

They don’t. You’re moving the goal posts again. You are a very rude person.

You are being more rude. The republicans had nothing but repeal for all of those shovel ready jobs that were supposed to come online and help the previous administration look better economically instead of as weak as right wingers alleged.

Keep deflecting. You were raised poorly. You are an awful human being.

You simply need to ask better questions. Projection is what right wingers do best.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

Endless wars are not right wing theories in practice with Your hard earned tax monies?

What is necessary and proper for the common defense? We have no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. I can't give you real numbers only imaginary numbers without going over our entire "defense" establishment.

Here is one number I can give you:

• Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that’s more than $3.3 billion annually.19--https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/criminal-justice/reports/2018/06/27/452819/ending-war-drugs-numbers/#:~:text=Economic%20impact,more%20than%20%243.3%20billion%20annually.

And. You’re not supposed to give more than six thumbs down per user per day. You don’t follow rules. You were raised poorly and you deflect. You’re an awful person.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Response is it is needed to upgrade the military and it’s a short term issue.

Afghanistan is a short term issue? You need to get better answers from the right wing.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

Endless wars are awful. It was upgrading the military to be more precise. I never said I agreed with it.

If upgrading the military is Good, why does the right wing have a problem upgrading infrastructure which must be even better for our economy?

They don’t. You’re moving the goal posts again. You are a very rude person.

You are being more rude. The republicans had nothing but repeal for all of those shovel ready jobs that were supposed to come online and help the previous administration look better economically instead of as weak as right wingers alleged.

Keep deflecting. You were raised poorly. You are an awful human being.

You simply need to ask better questions. Projection is what right wingers do best.

I ask You direct questions. I am An Independent. I have Told you this 100x. You don’t listen. You were raised very poorly. You are a very rude and ignorant person.

 

[danielpalos]

Again, how much of my hard earned money is someone else aka you entitled to? Spending on the military at least helps the private sector and helps defend the country. Giving money to illegals does nothing.

You merely appeal to ignorance of the law and economics. There is no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. And, military spending does not produce as much of a multiplier effect as more free market capitalism does in general. Why do right wingers only have socialism on a national basis solutions that only have the effect of wasting Your hard earned tax money instead of the fine and wonderful, free market Capitalism solutions they allege to be for in socialism threads?

Bullshit. How many jobs in the private sector depend on military spends? 100s of thousands. Also helps with innovation and such and you’re still deflecting. You were not raised well. I have Directly answered your questions. Shame on you.

You only have right wing propaganda. We are not supposed to be wasting Your hard earned tax monies on a standing army at all. What part of, there is no general warfare clause or common offense clause do you not understand? And, military spending for innovation is worse than spending on Solyndra. I am not deflecting. We have a welfare clause in general and a commerce clause in particular and even a central bank. I advocate for merely using Capitalism for All of its capital worth in modern economic times. We should not be losing money for the people but making money for the people.

You’re talking in theories. What should we spend on the military? Give me a number.

Endless wars are not right wing theories in practice with Your hard earned tax monies?

What is necessary and proper for the common defense? We have no general warfare clause nor any common offense clause. I can't give you real numbers only imaginary numbers without going over our entire "defense" establishment.

Here is one number I can give you:

• Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that’s more than $3.3 billion annually.19--https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/criminal-justice/reports/2018/06/27/452819/ending-war-drugs-numbers/#:~:text=Economic%20impact,more%20than%20%243.3%20billion%20annually.

And. You’re not supposed to give more than six thumbs down per user per day. You don’t follow rules. You were raised poorly and you deflect. You’re an awful person.

Who said that? I merely use them literally. I disagree. I also use them for place markers to help with the flow of the thread.